Nerdly Nebraska.

2018-2019 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,750.6919
BPR D1 NCAAWBB Baylor 0.7877

Football clemson 12.6021
Men's Basketball duke 12.9757
Women's Basketball baylor 13.5441
Baseball vanderbilt 10.1854
Softball oklahoma 13.3516
Ice Hockey st cloud st 10.4909
Men's Lacrosse penn st 7.8422
Women's Lacrosse maryland 11.2186
Men's Soccer palm beach atl 10.6001
Women's Soccer usc 12.7949
Men's Volleyball hawaii 9.4513
Women's Volleyball stanford 12.9947
Field Hockey north carolina 12.5324

ACAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Thomas More 1,572.0255 1,578.3717 1,575.1954 59.79 68.87 0.285
2nd Finlandia 1,165.6761 1,201.5475 1,183.4759 41.68 49.28 -0.111
3rd Alfred St. 1,090.5993 1,134.6198 1,112.3918 38.37 43.96 -0.175
4th Mills 1,052.3101 1,082.8200 1,067.4560 36.52 40.11 -0.217
5th Mount Mary 961.7211 998.4973 979.9367 34.97 36.94 -0.287
6th Valley Forge 921.6625 929.9252 925.7846 31.25 33.27 -0.307
7th Pine Manor 599.4875 643.9421 621.3174 17.08 16.24 -0.624

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Thomas More 0.3161 43.56 11.95 40.04 42.29 3.68 10.76
2nd Finlandia 0.0944 27.41 17.97 25.38 56.64 5.73 9.22
3rd Alfred St. 0.0685 27.11 20.25 25.91 57.85 5.54 11.74
4th Mills 0.0403 20.98 16.95 19.51 70.14 2.87 7.93
5th Valley Forge -0.0340 15.80 19.20 14.37 72.34 4.54 2.87
6th Mount Mary -0.0503 14.24 19.27 13.65 75.40 4.26 6.84
7th Pine Manor -0.2428 8.02 32.30 5.64 82.71 4.44 2.32

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Thomas More 0.0307 22.33 19.26 20.45 64.62 6.07 4.30
2nd Finlandia 0.2052 34.92 14.40 31.97 56.24 2.47 8.31
3rd Mount Mary 0.2372 37.10 13.39 35.46 51.87 2.26 10.54
4th Alfred St. 0.2437 38.32 13.95 35.19 49.17 1.69 10.15
5th Mills 0.2568 41.06 15.38 37.38 45.24 2.55 16.16
6th Valley Forge 0.2732 40.03 12.71 36.63 47.72 0.75 20.29
7th Pine Manor 0.3816 52.22 14.06 47.37 34.09 1.22 33.88

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,066.5083 1,053.8090 1,053.2615 1,067.4560 1,060.2587
Difference -12.6992 -13.2467 0.9478 -8.3327

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Thomas More 125 2,514 1,302 234 266 51.79 10.7 9.5 2,050 805 131 173 60.73 15.6 11.8
Alfred St. 66 1,045 508 212 211 48.61 4.9 5.0 1,056 523 158 144 50.47 6.7 7.3
Finlandia 99 1,614 709 176 206 43.93 9.2 7.8 1,869 982 204 180 47.46 9.2 10.4
Mount Mary 23 417 181 33 40 43.41 12.6 10.4 540 311 60 50 42.41 9.0 10.8
Valley Forge 76 1,122 490 89 117 43.67 12.6 9.6 1,519 904 329 169 40.49 4.6 9.0
Mills 46 622 216 44 68 34.73 14.1 9.1 1,037 658 177 110 36.55 5.9 9.4
Pine Manor 36 388 143 45 113 36.86 8.6 3.4 807 575 274 100 28.75 2.9 8.1
Conference Average 67 1,103 507 119 146 43.28 10.4 7.8 1,268 680 190 132 43.84 7.7 9.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the ACAA

HuskerGeek ACAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 17.6304
2 16.9999
3 15.8376
4 15.5167
5 13.0716
6 12.7171
7 11.4128
8 10.4524
9 8.4226
10 7.8832

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 13.1621
2 11.8087
3 9.6362
4 6.9139
5 6.2408
6 5.6931
7 4.7202
8 4.3504
9 2.9420
10 2.7157

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.8939
2 11.8045
3 10.7591
4 7.7058
5 7.5104
6 6.4192
7 6.3227
8 5.9605
9 5.8217
10 5.3996

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1866
2 0.1763
3 0.1719
4 0.1663
5 0.1589
6 0.1532
7 0.1480
8 0.1375
9 0.1257
10 0.1032

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1496
2 0.1114
3 0.0927
4 0.0833
5 0.0583
6 0.0575
7 0.0569
8 0.0554
9 0.0525
10 0.0502

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1485
2 0.1422
3 0.1341
4 0.1216
5 0.1006
6 0.0958
7 0.0794
8 0.0774
9 0.0744
10 0.0734


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek