Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

ASC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Mary Hardin-Baylor 1,547.9725 1,509.9649 1,528.8506 62.76 58.21 0.236
2nd Texas-Dallas 1,541.0536 1,500.5405 1,520.6621 58.42 60.66 0.222
3rd Concordia (TX) 1,485.0268 1,446.7169 1,465.7467 57.97 54.96 0.156
4th LeTourneau 1,441.6580 1,400.3999 1,420.8792 55.46 54.37 0.094
5th McMurry 1,424.5802 1,386.1596 1,405.2386 53.14 53.75 0.121
6th Hardin-Simmons 1,422.2906 1,384.4208 1,403.2280 57.05 48.51 0.098
7th East Tex. Baptist 1,394.5070 1,360.9648 1,377.6339 53.18 50.05 0.074
8th Sul Ross St. 1,341.9021 1,304.7248 1,323.1828 52.76 48.30 0.056
9th Belhaven 1,253.1330 1,215.7041 1,234.2767 50.54 45.91 -0.043
10th Louisiana Col. 1,214.2072 1,177.1889 1,195.5547 45.38 44.20 -0.083
11th Howard Payne 1,186.7464 1,147.3252 1,166.8693 47.66 40.05 -0.112

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Texas-Dallas 0.3079 42.57 11.78 39.27 42.88 3.19 10.37
2nd Mary Hardin-Baylor 0.3048 38.44 7.96 34.59 50.30 2.13 10.23
3rd Concordia (TX) 0.2505 37.27 12.22 34.31 51.12 2.98 11.92
4th McMurry 0.2264 36.62 13.99 33.72 48.44 3.71 8.29
5th LeTourneau 0.2225 34.97 12.71 31.94 51.33 3.65 9.02
6th East Tex. Baptist 0.2057 33.38 12.81 28.61 50.49 3.49 8.04
7th Hardin-Simmons 0.1947 35.96 16.49 33.36 48.66 4.97 11.63
8th Sul Ross St. 0.1899 31.29 12.31 28.65 54.13 3.14 7.64
9th Belhaven 0.1466 28.34 13.68 25.14 55.94 3.22 9.80
10th Louisiana Col. 0.1177 28.39 16.62 25.67 56.49 4.33 9.84
11th Howard Payne 0.0905 25.04 16.00 22.66 60.10 3.99 9.65

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Mary Hardin-Baylor 0.0684 23.93 17.09 21.78 60.82 5.62 7.51
2nd Texas-Dallas 0.0862 25.50 16.88 24.25 61.16 5.38 5.21
3rd Concordia (TX) 0.0943 26.24 16.81 23.44 60.42 5.00 6.10
4th Hardin-Simmons 0.0967 26.47 16.80 24.73 60.58 4.80 8.30
5th McMurry 0.1051 27.09 16.57 25.34 56.39 5.55 6.61
6th LeTourneau 0.1281 29.02 16.21 27.09 57.85 3.99 5.46
7th East Tex. Baptist 0.1316 27.73 14.56 24.45 56.08 4.30 8.38
8th Sul Ross St. 0.1337 29.97 16.60 27.98 53.63 3.70 8.18
9th Belhaven 0.1897 34.24 15.27 30.21 50.52 3.74 11.58
10th Louisiana Col. 0.2003 33.14 13.10 30.02 51.01 2.53 8.69
11th Howard Payne 0.2028 35.45 15.17 31.45 45.52 3.81 11.13

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,367.4657 1,371.8225 1,375.7408 1,386.0325 1,375.2654
Difference 4.3568 8.2751 18.5668 10.3996

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Mary Hardin-Baylor 110 2,362 1,400 198 140 59.27 11.9 16.9 1,990 975 170 176 51.01 11.7 11.3
Texas-Dallas 92 2,162 1,195 178 188 55.27 12.1 11.5 1,771 819 102 134 53.76 17.4 13.2
Concordia (TX) 97 2,219 1,251 222 189 56.38 10.0 11.7 1,944 982 128 148 49.49 15.2 13.1
LeTourneau 103 2,256 1,222 162 123 54.17 13.9 18.3 2,123 1,082 125 175 49.03 17.0 12.1
McMurry 87 1,814 959 138 160 52.87 13.1 11.3 1,720 895 133 145 47.97 12.9 11.9
Sul Ross St. 80 1,638 889 97 126 54.27 16.9 13.0 1,698 939 156 139 44.70 10.9 12.2
East Tex. Baptist 101 2,057 1,061 127 109 51.58 16.2 18.9 2,069 1,129 190 172 45.43 10.9 12.0
Belhaven 105 2,066 1,133 171 201 54.84 12.1 10.3 2,363 1,369 276 208 42.07 8.6 11.4
Hardin-Simmons 88 1,819 990 169 180 54.43 10.8 10.1 1,899 1,120 165 156 41.02 11.5 12.2
Louisiana Col. 73 1,301 629 115 195 48.35 11.3 6.7 1,709 1,020 155 120 40.32 11.0 14.2
Howard Payne 80 1,296 630 100 129 48.61 13.0 10.0 1,906 1,224 221 142 35.78 8.6 13.4
Conference Average 92 1,908 1,033 152 158 53.64 12.8 12.6 1,927 1,050 166 156 45.51 12.3 12.5
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the ASC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

69.86

2019-10-18 Austin, TX
Mary Hardin-Baylor
Texas-Dallas
3
2
15
25
25
27
25
19
27
25
15
10
GAME

69.18

2019-10-26
Mary Hardin-Baylor
McMurry
3
1
25
19
26
28
27
25
25
16
GAME

68.27

2019-10-25
Mary Hardin-Baylor
Hardin-Simmons
3
1
25
20
25
18
25
27
25
11
GAME

68.25

2019-10-19 Austin, TX
LeTourneau
Mary Hardin-Baylor
0
3
23
25
18
25
14
25
GAME

68.22

2019-10-04
Concordia (TX)
Mary Hardin-Baylor
0
3
20
25
20
25
19
25
GAME

68.00

2019-10-31
Mary Hardin-Baylor
Concordia (TX)
3
0
25
22
25
22
25
16
GAME

67.95

2019-09-27
East Tex. Baptist
Mary Hardin-Baylor
1
3
22
25
14
25
25
21
21
25
GAME

67.57

2019-11-07 Richardson, TX
McMurry
Concordia (TX)
1
3
25
23
21
25
22
25
18
25
GAME

66.55

2019-09-28
LeTourneau
Sul Ross St.
3
2
25
20
26
28
23
25
25
16
15
10
GAME

66.49

2019-10-12
Texas-Dallas
East Tex. Baptist
3
2
22
25
25
19
13
25
25
16
15
10

HuskerGeek ASC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 21.9930
2 21.1136
3 20.8208
4 20.3857
5 19.6884
6 19.0952
7 19.0493
8 19.0210
9 16.6421
10 15.6700

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 12.9630
2 11.3400
3 10.5375
4 10.2263
5 9.9353
6 9.8575
7 9.2726
8 8.8098
9 8.7189
10 8.6307

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.7206
2 12.0959
3 12.0110
4 11.8411
5 11.7667
6 11.3975
7 10.3763
8 9.8482
9 9.7842
10 9.5563

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2289
2 0.2156
3 0.2124
4 0.2070
5 0.2021
6 0.1944
7 0.1903
8 0.1891
9 0.1872
10 0.1847

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1319
2 0.1259
3 0.1182
4 0.1120
5 0.1098
6 0.1014
7 0.1003
8 0.0909
9 0.0891
10 0.0860

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1541
2 0.1493
3 0.1439
4 0.1351
5 0.1291
6 0.1256
7 0.1213
8 0.1166
9 0.1161
10 0.1154


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek