Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

ASUN - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st FGCU 1,603.7633 1,575.5094 1,589.5736 47.95 63.96 0.113
2nd Kennesaw St. 1,574.4697 1,538.3309 1,556.2954 45.42 64.13 0.088
3rd Lipscomb 1,552.7534 1,517.8072 1,535.1808 43.80 62.00 0.051
4th Liberty 1,504.9032 1,472.4670 1,488.5968 41.73 59.44 0.046
5th Stetson 1,463.9033 1,432.6577 1,448.1963 40.61 55.67 -0.033
6th North Florida 1,421.0599 1,394.6664 1,407.8013 38.30 55.46 -0.058
7th Jacksonville 1,370.9052 1,340.3556 1,355.5443 35.40 51.84 -0.137
8th North Ala. 1,356.7932 1,321.8850 1,339.2254 36.34 48.37 -0.157
9th NJIT 1,274.3997 1,250.6803 1,262.4843 32.94 45.00 -0.245

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st FGCU 0.2624 38.36 12.13 36.17 49.04 4.38 4.95
2nd Kennesaw St. 0.2529 40.72 15.43 38.36 43.20 6.34 6.41
3rd Lipscomb 0.2477 40.00 15.23 37.71 45.56 6.30 6.12
4th Liberty 0.2329 39.13 15.84 36.96 45.17 5.92 5.87
5th North Florida 0.1894 35.00 16.06 33.16 50.02 6.35 4.41
6th Stetson 0.1882 31.94 13.12 29.69 55.34 5.41 4.76
7th Jacksonville 0.1424 32.57 18.33 30.48 50.94 6.58 7.30
8th North Ala. 0.1034 26.98 16.64 25.50 58.09 6.21 5.56
9th NJIT 0.0396 25.03 21.07 23.80 57.19 8.25 5.02

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st FGCU 0.1491 31.74 16.84 29.75 54.34 7.56 4.05
2nd Kennesaw St. 0.1653 33.05 16.52 30.81 52.72 7.34 4.67
3rd Liberty 0.1868 35.97 17.29 33.75 47.84 7.03 6.60
4th Lipscomb 0.1971 34.67 14.96 32.37 52.94 5.84 3.59
5th Stetson 0.2217 36.94 14.77 33.52 49.29 5.34 6.17
6th North Florida 0.2470 39.84 15.15 36.78 45.27 5.35 6.36
7th North Ala. 0.2603 39.55 13.51 36.87 47.23 4.59 8.88
8th Jacksonville 0.2798 41.63 13.65 37.85 44.47 4.81 6.55
9th NJIT 0.2850 41.11 12.62 38.45 46.09 3.64 6.88

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,442.5442 1,447.2629 1,447.0639 1,448.1981 1,446.2673
Difference 4.7187 4.5197 5.6539 4.9641

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
FGCU 120 2,763 1,334 138 217 48.28 20.0 12.7 2,311 848 91 217 63.31 25.4 10.6
Kennesaw St. 120 2,751 1,250 175 283 45.44 15.7 9.7 2,410 888 113 241 63.15 21.3 10.0
Lipscomb 108 2,392 1,042 144 262 43.56 16.6 9.1 2,262 899 83 174 60.26 27.3 13.0
Stetson 107 2,329 1,026 119 133 44.05 19.6 17.5 2,283 978 136 221 57.16 16.8 10.3
Liberty 116 2,607 1,105 154 312 42.39 16.9 8.4 2,560 1,055 167 217 58.79 15.3 11.8
North Florida 122 2,590 1,030 115 177 39.77 22.5 14.6 2,782 1,236 170 228 55.57 16.4 12.2
Jacksonville 106 2,093 787 161 305 37.60 13.0 6.9 2,450 1,171 155 215 52.20 15.8 11.4
North Ala. 90 1,751 681 102 145 38.89 17.2 12.1 2,108 1,060 182 210 49.72 11.6 10.0
NJIT 115 2,192 858 135 195 39.14 16.2 11.2 2,669 1,364 176 272 48.90 15.2 9.8
Conference Average 112 2,385 1,013 138 225 42.12 17.5 11.4 2,426 1,055 141 222 56.56 18.3 11.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the ASUN

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.79

2018-11-16 Kennesaw, Ga.
Kennesaw St.
Lipscomb
3
2
23
25
25
23
26
24
21
25
15
13
GAME

75.47

2018-11-04 Kennesaw, Ga.
Kennesaw St.
FGCU
1
3
25
23
22
25
26
28
22
25
GAME

75.11

2018-10-17 Nashville, Tennessee
Lipscomb
Kennesaw St.
2
3
31
29
14
25
25
27
25
22
9
15
GAME

73.58

2018-11-17 Kennesaw, Ga.
FGCU
Kennesaw St.
3
2
25
20
27
25
22
25
17
25
15
12
GAME

72.12

2018-11-06 Kennesaw, Ga.
Kennesaw St.
Lipscomb
3
1
25
22
25
20
22
25
25
23
GAME

71.90

2018-10-05 Fort Myers, Fla.
FGCU
Kennesaw St.
1
3
20
25
25
27
25
16
24
26
GAME

71.75

2018-10-10 Fort Myers, Fla.
FGCU
Stetson
3
0
25
15
29
27
25
21
GAME

70.83

2018-10-12 Lynchburg, Va.
Liberty
FGCU
2
3
25
23
20
25
22
25
25
17
5
15
GAME

70.36

2018-11-02 Nashville, Tenn.
Lipscomb
FGCU
0
3
21
25
22
25
17
25
GAME

70.32

2018-11-06 DeLand, Fla.
Stetson
FGCU
1
3
25
21
23
25
18
25
18
25

HuskerGeek ASUN All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 24.8636
2 24.7147
3 22.2287
4 21.0230
5 21.0011
6 19.1982
7 18.8866
8 18.2986
9 18.0217
10 17.0142

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 19.4884
2 14.9712
3 14.6005
4 12.3055
5 12.1315
6 10.7176
7 10.1016
8 10.0848
9 9.7857
10 9.1680

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.4076
2 16.2666
3 15.6407
4 15.2976
5 13.4602
6 12.3114
7 11.5111
8 10.6479
9 10.5884
10 10.1143

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2072
2 0.2060
3 0.2058
4 0.1794
5 0.1752
6 0.1736
7 0.1575
8 0.1574
9 0.1562
10 0.1512

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1624
2 0.1237
3 0.1217
4 0.1123
5 0.1089
6 0.0992
7 0.0935
8 0.0865
9 0.0840
10 0.0815

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1617
2 0.1520
3 0.1403
4 0.1315
5 0.1303
6 0.1160
7 0.1140
8 0.1066
9 0.0990
10 0.0971


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek