Nerdly Nebraska.

2018-2019 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,750.6919
BPR D1 NCAAWBB Baylor 0.7877

Football clemson 12.6021
Men's Basketball duke 12.9757
Women's Basketball baylor 13.5441
Baseball vanderbilt 10.1606
Softball oklahoma 13.3516
Ice Hockey st cloud st 10.4909
Men's Lacrosse penn st 7.8422
Women's Lacrosse maryland 11.2186
Men's Soccer palm beach atl 10.6001
Women's Soccer usc 12.7949
Men's Volleyball hawaii 9.4513
Women's Volleyball stanford 12.9947
Field Hockey north carolina 12.5324

Big 12 - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Texas 1,714.7246 1,681.0044 1,697.7808 50.78 73.98 0.275
2nd Baylor 1,637.2276 1,602.5923 1,619.8174 50.04 66.77 0.169
3rd Iowa St. 1,622.0796 1,591.6703 1,606.8030 49.21 65.57 0.177
4th Oklahoma 1,607.0497 1,579.7219 1,593.3272 47.91 66.02 0.139
5th TCU 1,599.4183 1,570.7527 1,585.0207 47.63 64.95 0.115
6th Kansas St. 1,590.4014 1,557.4621 1,573.8456 46.48 65.56 0.127
7th Kansas 1,588.3555 1,557.8945 1,573.0513 49.36 62.60 0.135
8th Texas Tech 1,583.2854 1,547.0023 1,565.0387 46.84 64.07 0.113
9th West Virginia 1,530.8169 1,499.7262 1,515.1918 43.69 60.48 0.042

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Texas 0.3861 48.13 9.52 44.67 43.09 3.06 6.35
2nd Iowa St. 0.3052 41.79 11.27 39.05 47.13 3.63 6.13
3rd Kansas St. 0.2952 40.68 11.16 37.84 46.77 4.70 6.81
4th Baylor 0.2950 43.20 13.70 40.52 44.18 5.17 5.95
5th Texas Tech 0.2665 40.22 13.57 37.39 47.07 5.84 5.90
6th Oklahoma 0.2660 39.35 12.75 36.58 46.86 5.14 5.14
7th TCU 0.2639 40.30 13.90 37.96 46.28 5.46 6.94
8th Kansas 0.2633 41.95 15.62 39.26 43.39 4.99 5.06
9th West Virginia 0.2132 36.91 15.59 34.11 48.98 5.06 5.17

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Texas 0.1108 30.74 19.66 29.44 51.45 8.50 4.21
2nd Baylor 0.1263 29.61 16.98 28.04 54.72 6.82 3.77
3rd Oklahoma 0.1267 30.13 17.46 27.93 53.56 7.69 3.75
4th Iowa St. 0.1281 29.76 16.95 27.72 55.05 7.80 4.65
5th Kansas 0.1286 32.03 19.17 30.16 50.65 9.05 5.26
6th TCU 0.1494 31.48 16.55 30.31 53.85 6.42 4.10
7th Texas Tech 0.1530 33.15 17.84 31.46 51.37 7.32 5.19
8th Kansas St. 0.1682 33.47 16.65 31.32 51.54 6.50 4.38
9th West Virginia 0.1710 34.51 17.41 32.81 50.28 7.45 5.28

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,592.2085 1,588.1291 1,586.4096 1,584.0645 1,587.7029
Difference -4.0794 -5.7989 -8.1440 -6.0074

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Texas 101 2,353 1,001 116 258 42.54 20.3 9.1 2,083 704 100 220 66.20 20.8 9.5
Baylor 118 2,645 1,147 126 206 43.37 21.0 12.8 2,496 984 105 227 60.58 23.8 11.0
Iowa St. 123 2,811 1,217 141 271 43.29 19.9 10.4 2,674 1,061 134 197 60.32 20.0 13.6
Oklahoma 108 2,421 1,029 104 227 42.50 23.3 10.7 2,288 896 93 207 60.84 24.6 11.1
TCU 102 2,281 973 137 199 42.66 16.6 11.5 2,186 871 91 211 60.16 24.0 10.4
Texas Tech 110 2,458 1,055 123 223 42.92 20.0 11.0 2,345 941 127 205 59.87 18.5 11.4
Kansas St. 98 2,196 900 126 194 40.98 17.4 11.3 2,169 866 102 183 60.07 21.3 11.9
Kansas 109 2,380 1,024 94 174 43.03 25.3 13.7 2,362 1,001 131 219 57.62 18.0 10.8
West Virginia 112 2,330 925 102 252 39.70 22.8 9.2 2,509 1,109 136 220 55.80 18.4 11.4
Conference Average 109 2,431 1,030 119 223 42.33 20.7 11.1 2,346 937 113 210 60.16 21.0 11.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Big 12

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

78.51

2018-11-03 Norman, Okla.
Oklahoma
Baylor
1
3
20
25
36
34
25
27
21
25
GAME

77.28

2018-09-19 Manhattan, Kan.
Kansas St.
Texas
2
3
26
24
19
25
17
25
25
18
17
19
GAME

76.54

2018-10-03 Fort Worth, Texas
TCU
Texas
2
3
23
25
22
25
25
20
25
18
12
15
GAME

76.20

2018-10-20 Waco, Texas
Baylor
Kansas St.
0
3
23
25
25
27
26
28
GAME

75.68

2018-09-19 Morgantown, W.Va.
West Virginia
Iowa St.
1
3
25
21
33
35
21
25
21
25
GAME

75.62

2018-11-07 Lubbock, Texas
Texas Tech
Oklahoma
2
3
28
30
29
27
26
24
16
25
10
15
GAME

74.91

2018-10-13 Norman, Okla.
Oklahoma
Texas
2
3
23
25
25
20
18
25
25
23
9
15
GAME

74.56

2018-09-26 Norman, Okla.
Oklahoma
Kansas
2
3
25
22
16
25
25
18
20
25
10
15
GAME

74.42

2018-10-26 Ames, Iowa
Iowa St.
Kansas St.
3
1
25
15
21
25
26
24
25
15
GAME

74.27

2018-10-24 Manhattan, Kan.
Kansas St.
Oklahoma
1
3
23
25
17
25
25
23
19
25

HuskerGeek Big 12 All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 30.4990
2 25.8946
3 25.0982
4 22.0484
5 21.4781
6 21.2682
7 20.3195
8 19.9714
9 19.4502
10 19.4429

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 18.0052
2 15.7264
3 15.1648
4 15.0542
5 14.7515
6 13.3376
7 13.0981
8 12.9960
9 12.7127
10 11.9957

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.5620
2 16.0145
3 14.3598
4 13.1446
5 12.8131
6 12.4938
7 12.0393
8 11.3444
9 11.2389
10 11.1400

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2494
2 0.2480
3 0.2398
4 0.2324
5 0.2185
6 0.1977
7 0.1933
8 0.1917
9 0.1903
10 0.1897

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1464
2 0.1456
3 0.1381
4 0.1366
5 0.1337
6 0.1309
7 0.1285
8 0.1270
9 0.1246
10 0.1195

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1626
2 0.1302
3 0.1228
4 0.1217
5 0.1206
6 0.1176
7 0.1113
8 0.1103
9 0.1060
10 0.1023


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek