Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,789.9969

Football ohio st 12.8582
Ice Hockey providence 7.9735
Men's Soccer smu 11.4406
Women's Soccer north carolina 12.2707
Women's Volleyball baylor 12.1306
Field Hockey north carolina 12.7413

Big 12 - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Baylor 1,800.6534 1,779.1969 1,789.8930 54.57 73.08 0.297
2nd Texas 1,772.0686 1,752.2102 1,762.1114 50.91 73.10 0.267
3rd Iowa St. 1,693.3959 1,669.4429 1,681.3768 50.72 62.22 0.151
4th Oklahoma 1,674.7443 1,650.7393 1,662.6985 53.30 61.64 0.123
5th Texas Tech 1,627.9479 1,605.0853 1,616.4762 48.14 60.93 0.075
6th TCU 1,622.7792 1,604.3992 1,613.5630 45.68 62.67 0.063
7th West Virginia 1,604.0525 1,584.8655 1,594.4301 46.83 57.35 0.045
8th Kansas 1,600.6968 1,585.3399 1,592.9998 46.27 57.59 0.057
9th Kansas St. 1,597.9253 1,578.0157 1,587.9393 47.31 58.80 0.070

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Texas 0.3992 48.36 8.44 45.32 40.52 2.83 7.13
2nd Baylor 0.3686 49.31 12.45 45.70 37.17 5.28 5.64
3rd Iowa St. 0.3009 41.71 11.62 37.62 43.54 3.37 6.88
4th Kansas St. 0.2636 37.22 10.85 34.17 49.33 4.74 5.57
5th Oklahoma 0.2575 38.34 12.59 35.11 47.85 4.91 6.81
6th Texas Tech 0.2533 38.21 12.87 34.95 47.49 5.59 6.09
7th TCU 0.2474 39.78 15.04 37.44 43.52 5.79 6.19
8th Kansas 0.2445 36.78 12.33 33.49 46.71 6.95 5.76
9th West Virginia 0.2328 37.76 14.49 34.72 48.48 5.53 5.18

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Baylor 0.0720 27.57 20.37 26.43 55.97 8.71 4.07
2nd Texas 0.1319 31.45 18.27 30.60 51.11 7.56 4.84
3rd Oklahoma 0.1350 29.15 15.66 27.28 55.25 6.36 4.45
4th Iowa St. 0.1498 31.74 16.76 29.06 52.58 6.85 5.83
5th Texas Tech 0.1782 34.72 16.90 33.21 50.50 6.48 5.57
6th TCU 0.1841 34.55 16.14 32.36 49.78 6.92 5.85
7th Kansas 0.1877 34.33 15.56 31.68 46.49 7.67 6.01
8th West Virginia 0.1882 34.65 15.83 32.75 50.32 6.36 6.57
9th Kansas St. 0.1941 34.06 14.65 31.56 50.17 5.36 7.66

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,655.7209 1,646.2365 1,633.7089 1,630.9126 1,641.6447
Difference -9.4844 -22.0120 -24.8083 -18.7682

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Texas 44 1,091 540 58 139 49.50 18.8 7.8 860 280 45 118 67.44 19.1 7.3
Baylor 47 1,166 551 50 101 47.26 23.3 11.5 934 298 42 123 68.09 22.2 7.6
Oklahoma 61 1,343 751 71 130 55.92 18.9 10.3 1,101 467 54 111 57.58 20.4 9.9
Texas Tech 73 1,411 639 86 136 45.29 16.4 10.4 1,297 520 85 143 59.91 15.3 9.1
Iowa St. 65 1,467 671 80 142 45.74 18.3 10.3 1,369 579 74 138 57.71 18.5 9.9
West Virginia 63 1,372 615 71 117 44.83 19.3 11.7 1,370 613 84 129 55.26 16.3 10.6
Kansas St. 72 1,475 645 75 156 43.73 19.7 9.5 1,484 651 122 153 56.13 12.2 9.7
TCU 53 1,141 454 61 156 39.79 18.7 7.3 1,195 500 68 162 58.16 17.6 7.4
Kansas 49 1,027 433 46 112 42.16 22.3 9.2 1,120 517 62 110 53.84 18.1 10.2
Conference Average 59 1,277 589 66 132 46.02 19.5 9.8 1,192 492 71 132 59.35 17.7 9.1
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Big 12

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

78.35

2019-10-09 Ames, Iowa
Iowa St.
Baylor
0
3
24
26
18
25
25
27
GAME

76.68

2019-09-28 Morgantown, W.Va.
West Virginia
Oklahoma
1
3
8
25
23
25
31
29
21
25
GAME

75.78

2019-10-12 Fort Worth, Texas
TCU
Baylor
0
3
18
25
20
25
32
34
GAME

75.36

2019-10-09 Manhattan, Kan.
Kansas St.
Texas
0
3
30
32
17
25
18
25
GAME

75.26

2019-09-25 Austin, Texas
Texas
Iowa St.
3
1
25
18
18
25
25
19
25
22
GAME

74.54

2019-10-06 Lubbock, Texas
Texas Tech
TCU
2
3
25
21
21
25
17
25
25
18
14
16
GAME

74.26

2019-10-12 Ames, Iowa
Iowa St.
Texas Tech
1
3
22
25
24
26
25
15
17
25
GAME

73.09

2019-10-02 Manhattan, Kan.
Kansas St.
Texas Tech
0
3
31
33
21
25
20
25
GAME

72.74

2019-10-05 Norman,Okla.
Oklahoma
Kansas
3
1
23
25
25
21
25
16
25
17
GAME

72.38

2019-09-25 Lubbock, Texas
Texas Tech
West Virginia
3
1
25
23
25
20
23
25
25
19

HuskerGeek Big 12 All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 16.9383
2 16.1709
3 14.7006
4 13.2070
5 12.8335
6 12.0278
7 11.7772
8 11.6722
9 9.8345
10 9.4817

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 11.5116
2 9.7251
3 9.4687
4 8.7509
5 8.2941
6 7.7838
7 7.6157
8 7.0741
9 6.1677
10 6.0804

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 9.0108
2 8.3396
3 7.4989
4 7.0781
5 6.6941
6 6.4458
7 6.1201
8 5.9497
9 5.5919
10 5.5014

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2972
2 0.2917
3 0.2810
4 0.2658
5 0.2651
6 0.2194
7 0.2066
8 0.1909
9 0.1906
10 0.1823

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.2152
2 0.2020
3 0.1765
4 0.1594
5 0.1461
6 0.1366
7 0.1306
8 0.1286
9 0.1224
10 0.1209

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1733
2 0.1438
3 0.1358
4 0.1287
5 0.1271
6 0.1249
7 0.1197
8 0.1057
9 0.1045
10 0.1030


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek