Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,839.6298

Football ohio st 12.7316
Men's Basketball kansas 12.7368
Women's Basketball south carolina 13.4324
Baseball ucla 12.9478
Softball ucla 10.9838
Ice Hockey north dakota 10.7002
Men's Lacrosse syracuse 7.8562
Women's Lacrosse north carolina 10.7252
Men's Soccer georgetown 10.7279
Women's Soccer stanford 13.0262
Men's Volleyball byu 11.1006
Women's Volleyball stanford 11.3000
Field Hockey north carolina 12.2787

Big 12 - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Texas 1,789.7986 1,756.1398 1,772.8893 53.98 71.73 0.280
2nd Baylor 1,779.8704 1,747.1809 1,763.4499 53.46 70.47 0.259
3rd Oklahoma 1,702.1440 1,662.1581 1,682.0322 52.60 62.89 0.137
4th Iowa St. 1,683.8982 1,649.9527 1,666.8391 50.13 62.78 0.140
5th TCU 1,641.7597 1,604.9433 1,623.2471 46.51 60.87 0.072
6th Kansas 1,635.7901 1,599.9218 1,617.7565 46.96 59.64 0.071
7th Texas Tech 1,633.0645 1,597.1729 1,615.0190 47.31 61.56 0.072
8th West Virginia 1,630.4090 1,593.6898 1,611.9448 46.90 59.24 0.065
9th Kansas St. 1,610.1809 1,575.8382 1,592.9170 45.99 59.80 0.077

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Texas 0.3929 47.74 8.45 44.33 41.58 2.84 8.25
2nd Baylor 0.3479 47.29 12.50 43.96 39.03 5.07 6.11
3rd Iowa St. 0.2875 40.86 12.11 37.14 45.24 3.55 7.05
4th Kansas St. 0.2613 37.38 11.25 34.45 49.29 4.53 6.02
5th Oklahoma 0.2591 38.27 12.36 35.09 48.45 5.07 6.71
6th Texas Tech 0.2563 38.91 13.27 35.84 46.83 5.99 6.02
7th Kansas 0.2525 38.39 13.14 34.77 46.57 6.61 5.31
8th West Virginia 0.2476 38.61 13.85 35.78 47.77 4.98 4.81
9th TCU 0.2466 40.23 15.58 37.69 43.93 6.41 6.11

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Baylor 0.0893 28.56 19.63 26.96 55.24 8.11 4.96
2nd Texas 0.1125 31.42 20.17 30.10 50.94 9.00 5.12
3rd Oklahoma 0.1224 29.36 17.12 27.38 54.64 7.13 5.07
4th Iowa St. 0.1476 31.01 16.25 28.79 53.85 6.73 5.53
5th TCU 0.1744 34.68 17.24 32.82 50.10 7.19 5.92
6th Kansas 0.1814 35.32 17.18 33.13 47.02 8.00 6.39
7th West Virginia 0.1824 34.39 16.15 32.46 50.52 6.12 6.09
8th Texas Tech 0.1842 34.58 16.16 32.85 51.14 6.10 5.29
9th Kansas St. 0.1846 33.58 15.13 30.84 50.52 5.90 7.95

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,660.6772 1,654.3270 1,640.9788 1,635.9476 1,647.9826
Difference -6.3503 -19.6984 -24.7297 -16.9261

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Texas 98 1,980 987 150 294 49.85 13.2 6.7 1,554 516 90 211 66.80 17.3 7.4
Baylor 109 2,156 995 119 214 46.15 18.1 10.1 1,825 639 103 255 64.99 17.7 7.2
Oklahoma 108 2,429 1,223 134 226 50.35 18.1 10.7 2,126 876 109 217 58.80 19.5 9.8
Iowa St. 107 2,344 1,038 143 258 44.28 16.4 9.1 2,235 932 123 217 58.30 18.2 10.3
Texas Tech 116 2,327 988 132 205 42.46 17.6 11.4 2,274 940 131 227 58.66 17.4 10.0
West Virginia 108 2,336 982 104 192 42.04 22.5 12.2 2,404 1,054 139 218 56.16 17.3 11.0
Kansas St. 113 2,318 951 121 257 41.03 19.2 9.0 2,430 1,064 196 241 56.21 12.4 10.1
TCU 108 2,261 924 126 279 40.87 17.9 8.1 2,367 1,033 139 272 56.36 17.0 8.7
Kansas 96 2,034 828 89 187 40.71 22.9 10.9 2,179 966 130 233 55.67 16.8 9.4
Conference Average 107 2,243 991 124 235 44.19 18.4 9.8 2,155 891 129 232 59.10 17.1 9.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Big 12

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

80.47

2019-10-30 Norman, Okla.
Oklahoma
Baylor
2
3
24
26
25
15
31
29
15
25
12
15
GAME

79.56

2019-10-26 Lubbock, Texas
Texas Tech
Oklahoma
1
3
25
22
21
25
25
27
24
26
GAME

79.42

2019-10-16 Norman, Okla
Oklahoma
Kansas St.
3
2
20
25
19
25
25
23
25
16
16
14
GAME

77.68

2019-11-16 Morgantown, W.Va.
West Virginia
Texas Tech
2
3
25
16
24
26
19
25
25
23
13
15
GAME

77.67

2019-11-23 Fort Worth, Texas
TCU
Texas Tech
2
3
25
22
20
25
26
24
23
25
11
15
GAME

77.55

2019-11-30 Ames, Iowa
Iowa St.
Texas
1
3
25
23
9
25
19
25
22
25
GAME

77.53

2019-10-09 Ames, Iowa
Iowa St.
Baylor
0
3
24
26
18
25
25
27
GAME

77.42

2019-09-28 Morgantown, W.Va.
West Virginia
Oklahoma
1
3
8
25
23
25
31
29
21
25
GAME

77.39

2019-11-27 Fort Worth, Texas
TCU
Oklahoma
1
3
26
24
23
25
17
25
34
36
GAME

77.31

2019-10-23 Manhattan, Kan.
Kansas St.
Kansas
3
2
31
33
22
25
25
22
25
22
15
9

HuskerGeek Big 12 All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S
S
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S
S
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 27.6429
2 26.0882
3 24.3328
4 22.6516
5 22.5429
6 19.9271
7 19.2883
8 18.3909
9 18.3023
10 17.9672

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 18.3281
2 16.0584
3 15.9597
4 14.1009
5 13.7038
6 12.3306
7 11.7408
8 11.1868
9 11.0211
10 10.6218

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 16.7138
2 14.5701
3 13.8121
4 10.8905
5 10.5478
6 10.1785
7 10.1284
8 10.0833
9 9.7194
10 9.3148

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2710
2 0.2535
3 0.2508
4 0.2346
5 0.2277
6 0.2113
7 0.2097
8 0.2030
9 0.1880
10 0.1858

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1797
2 0.1673
3 0.1535
4 0.1384
5 0.1378
6 0.1362
7 0.1306
8 0.1298
9 0.1165
10 0.1087

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1688
2 0.1415
3 0.1354
4 0.1186
5 0.1099
6 0.1098
7 0.1076
8 0.1047
9 0.1008
10 0.0985


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek