Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Big East - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Creighton 1,716.9728 1,683.7552 1,700.2829 53.87 64.84 0.172
2nd Marquette 1,700.2495 1,670.1188 1,685.1168 49.15 68.89 0.157
3rd St. John's (NY) 1,658.8764 1,621.9752 1,640.3221 33.88 25.14 0.077
4th Villanova 1,643.9341 1,611.9474 1,627.8622 47.57 62.93 0.101
5th DePaul 1,583.0702 1,546.4953 1,564.6759 46.92 55.51 0.018
6th Butler 1,575.2469 1,536.1963 1,555.5991 50.46 52.53 0.025
7th Xavier 1,545.2573 1,510.1939 1,527.6250 45.89 57.36 -0.011
8th Georgetown 1,521.4585 1,491.7406 1,506.5263 43.37 56.06 -0.036
9th Providence 1,500.4736 1,464.3296 1,482.2915 44.45 52.66 -0.070
10th Seton Hall 1,479.0717 1,441.6106 1,460.2210 42.94 50.28 -0.096

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Marquette 0.3153 44.50 12.97 41.89 41.28 6.22 7.33
2nd Creighton 0.2867 42.18 13.51 38.85 43.43 4.96 7.80
3rd Villanova 0.2838 39.69 11.31 35.70 46.54 4.49 6.44
4th St. John's (NY) 0.2549 41.73 16.25 39.22 39.53 11.32 15.06
5th DePaul 0.2313 38.19 15.05 34.93 44.64 6.44 5.20
6th Xavier 0.2126 35.43 14.17 32.81 50.65 5.14 4.55
7th Butler 0.2085 34.16 13.31 31.37 53.53 4.66 6.02
8th Georgetown 0.1767 34.21 16.54 32.11 49.57 6.58 6.57
9th Seton Hall 0.1704 31.83 14.79 29.03 52.72 6.18 5.59
10th Providence 0.1583 33.23 17.41 30.59 51.84 5.95 6.13

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Creighton 0.1142 28.64 17.22 26.82 55.39 6.35 5.61
2nd Marquette 0.1584 31.67 15.83 29.79 55.77 5.16 5.22
3rd St. John's (NY) 0.1775 34.07 16.31 31.82 49.05 6.35 3.65
4th Villanova 0.1832 34.12 15.80 31.33 51.11 5.90 6.87
5th Butler 0.1840 33.03 14.63 30.87 50.82 6.00 6.91
6th Georgetown 0.2128 36.70 15.42 34.28 49.16 5.20 5.83
7th DePaul 0.2136 35.74 14.38 32.52 50.89 5.45 8.91
8th Xavier 0.2235 37.00 14.65 34.56 49.62 6.47 7.63
9th Providence 0.2281 37.05 14.24 33.75 49.62 5.56 8.51
10th Seton Hall 0.2668 39.46 12.78 36.57 45.58 3.39 7.92

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,575.0523 1,573.7523 1,570.4351 1,568.9405 1,572.0450
Difference -1.2999 -4.6172 -6.1117 -4.0096

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Creighton 111 2,410 1,380 187 276 57.26 12.9 8.7 1,796 692 115 206 61.47 15.6 8.7
Marquette 118 2,919 1,500 192 256 51.39 15.2 11.4 2,317 827 124 230 64.31 18.7 10.1
Villanova 112 2,690 1,409 167 309 52.38 16.1 8.7 2,172 839 144 235 61.37 15.1 9.2
Xavier 110 2,193 1,147 96 163 52.30 22.8 13.5 1,961 888 165 238 54.72 11.9 8.2
Georgetown 122 2,600 1,276 179 347 49.08 14.5 7.5 2,473 1,099 132 275 55.56 18.7 9.0
DePaul 121 2,691 1,328 142 198 49.35 19.0 13.6 2,483 1,140 217 256 54.09 11.4 9.7
Butler 115 2,370 1,217 142 222 51.35 16.7 10.7 2,292 1,108 166 197 51.66 13.8 11.6
Providence 115 2,436 1,207 155 236 49.55 15.7 10.3 2,352 1,109 189 252 52.85 12.4 9.3
Seton Hall 114 2,097 988 143 181 47.12 14.7 11.6 2,253 1,130 191 250 49.85 11.8 9.0
St. John's (NY) 117 1,015 403 184 194 39.70 5.5 5.2 3,442 3,155 134 257 8.34 25.7 13.4
Conference Average 116 2,342 1,186 159 238 49.95 15.3 10.1 2,354 1,199 158 240 51.42 15.5 9.8
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Big East

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

82.84

2019-10-26 Queens, N.Y.
St. John's (NY)
DePaul
3
1
25
19
27
29
25
15
25
19
GAME

81.78

2019-10-12 Milwaukee, Wis.
Marquette
Creighton
2
3
21
25
23
25
29
27
31
29
8
15
GAME

80.20

2019-10-25 Queens, N.Y.
St. John's (NY)
Marquette
1
3
23
25
26
28
25
23
15
25
GAME

80.19

2019-10-04 Queens, N.Y.
St. John's (NY)
Creighton
0
3
24
26
25
27
19
25
GAME

78.66

2019-10-09 Queens, N.Y.
St. John's (NY)
Villanova
3
0
25
18
25
23
25
18
GAME

78.47

2019-11-10 Queens, N.Y.
St. John's (NY)
Butler
3
0
25
20
25
19
25
22
GAME

76.77

2019-11-15 Queens, N.Y.
St. John's (NY)
Seton Hall
3
0
25
18
25
14
25
17
GAME

76.42

2019-11-16 Milwaukee, Wis.
Marquette
Villanova
3
1
23
25
26
24
25
18
25
19
GAME

74.87

2019-11-24 Omaha, Neb.
Creighton
DePaul
3
1
25
19
25
21
25
27
25
21
GAME

74.43

2019-09-25
DePaul
Xavier
2
3
23
25
25
22
25
20
23
25
14
16

HuskerGeek Big East All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 24.0392
2 23.0289
3 22.8757
4 21.6700
5 20.6478
6 19.5936
7 18.5305
8 18.1234
9 17.8199
10 17.6453

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 21.5130
2 15.1660
3 14.3355
4 12.6943
5 12.3383
6 11.2745
7 9.3190
8 9.2721
9 8.9734
10 8.7016

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.6288
2 16.9695
3 16.8752
4 16.1203
5 15.0837
6 14.4549
7 13.3119
8 12.7264
9 12.4691
10 10.8842

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2109
2 0.2107
3 0.2061
4 0.2005
5 0.1988
6 0.1968
7 0.1894
8 0.1685
9 0.1673
10 0.1622

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1887
2 0.1392
3 0.1365
4 0.1296
5 0.1112
6 0.1053
7 0.1034
8 0.0897
9 0.0896
10 0.0879

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1654
2 0.1606
3 0.1554
4 0.1543
5 0.1414
6 0.1410
7 0.1368
8 0.1257
9 0.1209
10 0.1158


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek