Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Big Ten - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Nebraska 1,697.0720 1,660.6697 1,678.7722 54.42 74.03 0.285
2nd Penn St. 1,680.2927 1,655.5912 1,667.8962 54.23 71.77 0.263
3rd Purdue 1,677.3425 1,645.9543 1,661.5743 53.32 71.78 0.257
4th Illinois 1,668.1031 1,633.3511 1,650.6357 51.07 73.16 0.265
5th Minnesota 1,643.0735 1,614.1457 1,628.5454 52.00 70.79 0.225
6th Michigan 1,627.9844 1,595.0365 1,611.4262 51.77 69.46 0.193
7th Michigan St. 1,601.9985 1,575.7402 1,588.8151 49.76 68.78 0.197
8th Ohio St. 1,590.9945 1,577.2493 1,584.1070 50.82 67.04 0.188
9th Northwestern 1,586.5204 1,562.6903 1,574.5603 51.74 65.36 0.158
10th Wisconsin 1,576.4347 1,558.8039 1,567.5945 50.64 65.52 0.174
11th Iowa 1,458.6738 1,442.9601 1,450.7957 45.78 60.16 0.063
12th Indiana 1,448.6633 1,432.7412 1,440.6802 43.84 61.17 0.048

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Penn St. 0.3475 46.09 11.33 42.35 41.50 3.80 8.53
2nd Illinois 0.3463 44.50 9.86 41.53 43.70 3.60 6.12
3rd Nebraska 0.3445 45.35 10.90 42.05 42.66 2.91 4.56
4th Purdue 0.3291 44.29 11.37 40.65 42.75 3.02 5.92
5th Minnesota 0.3262 44.91 12.29 42.12 41.22 5.17 6.56
6th Michigan St. 0.3250 47.38 14.88 43.74 37.89 5.00 5.29
7th Michigan 0.3171 44.72 13.01 41.52 40.19 5.61 7.75
8th Ohio St. 0.3092 44.44 13.52 41.43 41.45 4.44 5.90
9th Wisconsin 0.2902 42.79 13.77 39.61 43.67 4.92 5.62
10th Northwestern 0.2486 38.30 13.44 35.10 47.90 4.79 6.38
11th Indiana 0.2217 40.01 17.84 37.10 44.93 5.49 6.46
12th Iowa 0.2206 36.28 14.22 33.78 50.46 4.87 5.95

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Nebraska 0.0598 26.32 20.33 24.98 57.59 8.22 3.48
2nd Purdue 0.0722 26.83 19.61 24.64 56.49 8.40 3.32
3rd Illinois 0.0813 27.19 19.07 25.74 56.14 8.03 3.69
4th Penn St. 0.0850 27.80 19.30 26.12 55.91 9.10 4.02
5th Northwestern 0.0901 27.39 18.38 25.86 56.96 7.77 3.21
6th Minnesota 0.1016 27.03 16.87 25.25 58.47 6.64 2.95
7th Wisconsin 0.1161 29.47 17.87 27.42 55.46 7.36 5.17
8th Ohio St. 0.1212 29.74 17.62 27.65 55.36 7.65 3.84
9th Michigan 0.1238 29.14 16.77 26.99 56.92 6.51 3.53
10th Michigan St. 0.1279 31.35 18.56 28.73 52.37 8.39 3.72
11th Iowa 0.1578 31.84 16.06 30.39 55.10 5.37 5.03
12th Indiana 0.1738 33.87 16.49 31.29 51.32 6.54 5.10

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,592.1169 1,598.5950 1,608.4073 1,606.3483 1,601.3669
Difference 6.4781 16.2904 14.2314 12.3333

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Nebraska 113 2,575 1,197 91 161 46.49 28.3 16.0 2,129 727 95 195 65.85 22.4 10.9
Purdue 124 2,899 1,349 145 214 46.53 20.0 13.5 2,442 859 102 239 64.82 23.9 10.2
Penn St. 122 2,711 1,261 209 288 46.51 13.0 9.4 2,315 838 113 202 63.80 20.5 11.5
Illinois 143 3,116 1,304 161 306 41.85 19.4 10.2 2,870 1,025 138 246 64.29 20.8 11.7
Michigan St. 122 2,792 1,203 121 210 43.09 23.1 13.3 2,597 986 114 253 62.03 22.8 10.3
Michigan 131 2,988 1,296 194 261 43.37 15.4 11.4 2,775 1,075 115 227 61.26 24.1 12.2
Northwestern 114 2,527 1,133 141 185 44.84 17.9 13.7 2,385 992 93 209 58.41 25.6 11.4
Minnesota 124 2,736 1,149 141 250 42.00 19.4 10.9 2,608 1,014 99 198 61.12 26.3 13.2
Ohio St. 132 3,017 1,311 146 259 43.45 20.7 11.6 2,886 1,168 126 212 59.53 22.9 13.6
Wisconsin 117 2,614 1,147 119 181 43.88 22.0 14.4 2,511 1,045 145 194 58.38 17.3 12.9
Iowa 123 2,478 992 129 236 40.03 19.2 10.5 2,735 1,265 154 235 53.75 17.8 11.6
Indiana 118 2,256 843 132 263 37.37 17.1 8.6 2,579 1,185 152 230 54.05 17.0 11.2
Conference Average 124 2,726 1,182 144 235 43.28 19.6 12.0 2,569 1,015 121 220 60.61 21.8 11.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Big Ten

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

80.13

2011-11-04 Minneapolis, MN
Minnesota
Penn St.
2
3
25
27
17
25
25
23
25
23
12
15
GAME

78.06

2011-10-01 Champaign, Ill.
Illinois
Purdue
3
1
26
24
25
20
23
25
25
23
GAME

77.76

2011-11-02 West Lafayette, Ind.
Purdue
Illinois
3
1
21
25
25
22
26
24
25
21
GAME

77.23

2011-11-18 Ann Arbor, Mich.
Michigan
Northwestern
3
2
25
21
25
27
25
21
23
25
15
11
GAME

76.98

2011-11-06 Madison, Wis.
Wisconsin
Penn St.
3
2
26
24
25
19
32
34
14
25
15
12
GAME

76.97

2011-10-19 Madison, Wis.
Wisconsin
Minnesota
2
3
25
22
23
25
18
25
25
21
10
15
GAME

76.88

2011-10-15 Minneapolis, MN
Minnesota
Nebraska
2
3
30
28
25
19
10
25
12
25
11
15
GAME

76.85

2011-11-11 Evanston, Ill.
Northwestern
Ohio St.
3
2
25
22
21
25
25
22
25
27
15
13
GAME

75.63

2011-11-23 Columbus, Ohio
Ohio St.
Penn St.
1
3
25
23
22
25
23
25
13
25
GAME

75.46

2011-11-26 Evanston, Ill.
Northwestern
Nebraska
3
1
25
20
9
25
25
21
25
23

HuskerGeek Big Ten All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 33.1641
2 31.2051
3 29.1434
4 28.8791
5 28.8093
6 27.2427
7 27.1948
8 26.5888
9 25.8754
10 25.3614

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 18.2962
2 18.0804
3 17.9343
4 17.8304
5 17.7271
6 17.5201
7 17.3485
8 15.9869
9 15.4490
10 15.4422

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.3984
2 17.4627
3 17.3762
4 17.3139
5 17.0962
6 15.8156
7 15.3675
8 15.2993
9 15.2738
10 14.2223

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2457
2 0.2409
3 0.2323
4 0.2311
5 0.2242
6 0.2233
7 0.2225
8 0.2193
9 0.2139
10 0.2138

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1609
2 0.1448
3 0.1446
4 0.1438
5 0.1417
6 0.1355
7 0.1353
8 0.1339
9 0.1321
10 0.1285

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1481
2 0.1461
3 0.1396
4 0.1386
5 0.1342
6 0.1326
7 0.1270
8 0.1252
9 0.1175
10 0.1175


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek