Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Big Ten - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Penn St. 1,846.7987 1,794.8111 1,820.6193 56.11 78.11 0.330
2nd Wisconsin 1,807.9886 1,757.7417 1,782.6881 55.29 73.10 0.266
3rd Illinois 1,760.6930 1,710.1795 1,735.2524 52.42 71.29 0.235
4th Michigan St. 1,739.1958 1,703.8021 1,721.4080 52.42 68.28 0.189
5th Nebraska 1,742.5707 1,694.1247 1,718.1770 51.34 70.45 0.216
6th Ohio St. 1,709.4016 1,669.4976 1,689.3318 49.26 68.08 0.166
7th Minnesota 1,701.9292 1,660.5768 1,681.1258 49.50 67.65 0.160
8th Purdue 1,703.1562 1,650.5008 1,676.6218 50.94 66.42 0.174
9th Michigan 1,696.2528 1,652.8798 1,674.4259 48.72 67.61 0.148
10th Northwestern 1,666.5499 1,616.1825 1,641.1730 49.12 64.07 0.138
11th Iowa 1,623.7859 1,572.1519 1,597.7603 45.94 61.74 0.081
12th Indiana 1,602.8882 1,548.7393 1,575.5812 43.77 61.68 0.024
13th Maryland 1,570.8388 1,535.2646 1,552.9499 43.01 58.81 0.000
14th Rutgers 1,522.4975 1,481.9009 1,502.0620 40.84 55.94 -0.027

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Penn St. 0.4042 50.99 10.58 46.24 36.68 3.52 8.47
2nd Wisconsin 0.3431 44.37 10.06 41.07 42.93 3.79 6.11
3rd Illinois 0.3281 44.41 11.60 41.48 43.04 4.84 4.88
4th Nebraska 0.3104 43.11 12.07 40.13 43.84 4.13 5.23
5th Purdue 0.3064 44.84 14.19 41.28 40.80 4.94 4.94
6th Michigan 0.2964 43.28 13.64 40.49 41.65 5.80 5.15
7th Minnesota 0.2886 41.52 12.67 38.07 45.19 5.34 5.67
8th Ohio St. 0.2885 44.03 15.18 41.15 41.44 5.42 5.83
9th Michigan St. 0.2855 43.42 14.87 38.98 42.58 4.12 6.40
10th Northwestern 0.2831 41.84 13.53 38.87 43.99 5.37 5.41
11th Iowa 0.2583 41.36 15.53 38.75 43.25 6.75 5.96
12th Indiana 0.2187 40.79 18.92 38.11 42.47 7.22 5.97
13th Maryland 0.1950 36.70 17.20 33.97 49.10 6.16 6.16
14th Rutgers 0.1801 34.42 16.41 31.67 50.47 5.45 5.97

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Penn St. 0.0737 28.10 20.72 26.97 55.28 9.27 2.45
2nd Wisconsin 0.0775 26.02 18.28 25.42 58.40 7.88 3.55
3rd Illinois 0.0930 28.23 18.93 26.81 55.60 8.17 4.29
4th Nebraska 0.0944 29.12 19.68 27.48 54.19 9.01 3.12
5th Michigan St. 0.0960 28.96 19.36 27.80 55.46 8.45 3.81
6th Ohio St. 0.1222 30.16 17.94 28.73 53.66 7.87 4.73
7th Minnesota 0.1283 31.46 18.63 29.96 51.20 8.76 4.41
8th Purdue 0.1323 30.69 17.46 29.24 54.46 7.58 3.93
9th Northwestern 0.1449 30.76 16.28 28.64 53.40 6.78 5.13
10th Michigan 0.1480 31.20 16.40 30.10 54.67 6.17 4.27
11th Iowa 0.1770 35.32 17.62 32.90 47.55 7.03 5.86
12th Maryland 0.1945 37.16 17.70 35.32 46.23 7.98 6.02
13th Indiana 0.1946 35.66 16.20 33.27 48.91 6.48 3.98
14th Rutgers 0.2067 36.70 16.03 34.02 48.03 6.43 6.73

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,669.2269 1,670.5413 1,671.0857 1,675.0029 1,671.4642
Difference 1.3144 1.8588 5.7761 2.9831

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Penn St. 127 3,095 1,546 243 290 49.95 12.7 10.7 2,232 645 61 241 71.10 36.6 9.3
Wisconsin 116 2,756 1,320 147 203 47.90 18.7 13.6 2,260 776 93 231 65.66 24.3 9.8
Illinois 130 3,010 1,334 116 168 44.32 25.9 17.9 2,674 979 129 253 63.39 20.7 10.6
Michigan St. 119 2,747 1,260 155 216 45.87 17.7 12.7 2,442 947 104 203 61.22 23.5 12.0
Purdue 114 2,633 1,209 117 212 45.92 22.5 12.4 2,355 922 104 205 60.85 22.6 11.5
Nebraska 118 2,710 1,177 118 220 43.43 23.0 12.3 2,481 935 93 226 62.31 26.7 11.0
Minnesota 111 2,525 1,105 125 188 43.76 20.2 13.4 2,340 910 118 222 61.11 19.8 10.5
Ohio St. 136 3,016 1,285 153 302 42.61 19.7 10.0 2,859 1,111 150 260 61.14 19.1 11.0
Northwestern 116 2,522 1,092 124 220 43.30 20.3 11.5 2,501 1,061 144 185 57.58 17.4 13.5
Michigan 113 2,480 1,017 103 225 41.01 24.1 11.0 2,446 988 117 224 59.61 20.9 10.9
Indiana 118 2,516 1,004 145 236 39.91 17.4 10.7 2,669 1,165 109 215 56.35 24.5 12.4
Iowa 106 2,234 905 122 193 40.51 18.3 11.6 2,409 1,080 150 206 55.17 16.1 11.7
Maryland 118 2,351 915 134 225 38.92 17.5 10.4 2,647 1,230 169 251 53.53 15.7 10.5
Rutgers 114 2,188 824 125 210 37.66 17.5 10.4 2,630 1,292 185 190 50.88 14.2 13.8
Conference Average 118 2,627 1,142 138 222 43.22 19.7 12.0 2,496 1,003 123 222 59.99 21.6 11.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Big Ten

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

81.98

2014-10-18 Lincoln, Nebraska
Nebraska
Illinois
1
3
23
25
25
21
25
27
21
25
GAME

81.79

2014-11-19 Madison, Wis.
Wisconsin
Illinois
3
1
25
13
24
26
27
25
28
26
GAME

81.30

2014-12-12 Louisville, KY
Wisconsin
Ohio St.
3
2
25
20
21
25
22
25
26
24
15
12
GAME

81.23

2014-10-17 West Lafayette, Ind.
Purdue
Penn St.
2
3
24
26
25
23
25
22
23
25
9
15
GAME

81.09

2014-12-13
Penn St.
Wisconsin
3
1
22
25
25
16
25
22
25
19
GAME

79.98

2014-10-04 Lincoln, Nebraska
Nebraska
Ohio St.
2
3
27
25
25
27
25
23
17
25
14
16
GAME

79.79

2014-10-04 Champaign, Ill.
Illinois
Wisconsin
1
3
17
25
22
25
25
11
23
25
GAME

79.42

2014-09-27 Minneapolis, MN
Minnesota
Penn St.
1
3
29
27
13
25
15
25
22
25
GAME

79.39

2014-11-26 Champaign, Ill.
Illinois
Nebraska
3
2
25
16
22
25
25
18
24
26
15
10
GAME

79.38

2014-11-07 Ann Arbor, Mich.
Michigan
Wisconsin
2
3
20
25
26
24
19
25
25
21
14
16

HuskerGeek Big Ten All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 30.4410
2 28.4268
3 26.6040
4 25.2423
5 24.9061
6 24.1809
7 22.6924
8 21.4553
9 20.5104
10 20.4781

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 19.9527
2 19.0733
3 17.1421
4 16.9052
5 16.3438
6 15.7723
7 14.7931
8 13.8903
9 12.8105
10 12.3222

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.9299
2 17.1552
3 16.9788
4 15.9174
5 14.7605
6 14.2128
7 14.0164
8 13.7857
9 13.2769
10 12.6900

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2647
2 0.2214
3 0.2187
4 0.2111
5 0.2095
6 0.2018
7 0.1991
8 0.1899
9 0.1879
10 0.1793

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1659
2 0.1571
3 0.1483
4 0.1453
5 0.1438
6 0.1309
7 0.1257
8 0.1160
9 0.1134
10 0.1080

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1479
2 0.1464
3 0.1401
4 0.1338
5 0.1220
6 0.1208
7 0.1204
8 0.1131
9 0.1113
10 0.1085


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek