Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

CCAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Sonoma St. 1,603.6013 1,619.6918 1,611.6265 53.05 68.77 0.212
2nd Cal St. San B'dino 1,575.1911 1,573.3796 1,574.2851 50.91 67.56 0.191
3rd Humboldt St. 1,553.3088 1,547.9481 1,550.6261 49.84 64.63 0.128
4th Cal St. L.A. 1,546.1511 1,536.0780 1,541.1063 49.16 63.83 0.145
5th Cal Poly Pomona 1,523.9445 1,526.6412 1,525.2923 51.01 61.49 0.112
6th San Fran. St. 1,518.6487 1,523.7560 1,521.2002 47.87 63.53 0.109
7th UC San Diego 1,509.9540 1,509.8575 1,509.9058 46.97 63.63 0.105
8th Chico St. 1,506.0757 1,510.7393 1,508.4057 47.01 63.66 0.087
9th Cal St. Monterey Bay 1,481.8519 1,485.9038 1,483.8765 46.48 60.36 0.084
10th Cal St. East Bay 1,473.4139 1,477.0563 1,475.2340 47.75 59.25 0.070
11th Cal St. Dom. Hills 1,405.2670 1,403.2554 1,404.2608 43.66 55.62 -0.016
12th Stanislaus St. 1,400.6234 1,399.9051 1,400.2642 42.92 55.06 -0.003

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Sonoma St. 0.3135 43.31 11.96 40.21 43.31 5.73 8.18
2nd Cal St. San B'dino 0.3026 41.17 10.91 37.66 45.49 4.71 6.29
3rd Cal St. L.A. 0.2782 41.45 13.62 39.00 45.01 4.82 6.48
4th Chico St. 0.2579 39.12 13.33 36.96 44.06 5.25 6.50
5th San Fran. St. 0.2545 38.78 13.33 36.33 45.74 5.98 5.87
6th Humboldt St. 0.2506 39.45 14.39 37.49 45.47 6.00 6.78
7th Cal St. Monterey Bay 0.2444 37.58 13.14 34.88 49.95 4.35 6.11
8th UC San Diego 0.2391 38.40 14.48 35.68 48.16 5.29 5.15
9th Cal Poly Pomona 0.2304 38.50 15.46 36.39 47.00 5.90 6.99
10th Cal St. East Bay 0.2293 37.68 14.75 35.67 44.93 5.54 6.67
11th Stanislaus St. 0.1900 33.78 14.78 31.10 52.96 5.39 5.82
12th Cal St. Dom. Hills 0.1664 35.80 19.16 33.46 46.75 6.73 6.27

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Sonoma St. 0.1016 26.57 16.41 24.85 59.03 5.09 4.90
2nd Cal St. San B'dino 0.1117 28.77 17.60 26.27 55.59 6.32 5.53
3rd Cal Poly Pomona 0.1183 28.48 16.65 26.03 56.92 6.05 4.58
4th Humboldt St. 0.1226 28.20 15.94 26.46 57.02 4.43 5.32
5th Cal St. L.A. 0.1336 29.78 16.42 27.46 57.25 5.21 5.32
6th UC San Diego 0.1338 29.28 15.90 26.80 56.80 5.56 5.66
7th San Fran. St. 0.1452 29.63 15.11 27.47 57.91 4.08 4.77
8th Cal St. East Bay 0.1588 32.67 16.79 30.83 53.01 3.81 6.57
9th Cal St. Monterey Bay 0.1600 32.50 16.50 29.90 52.74 4.93 5.87
10th Chico St. 0.1711 30.93 13.82 27.80 57.86 3.18 5.27
11th Cal St. Dom. Hills 0.1819 33.61 15.42 30.85 52.93 5.17 6.78
12th Stanislaus St. 0.1933 33.90 14.57 31.29 53.15 2.42 7.48

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,508.8403 1,509.4193 1,514.4559 1,514.9645 1,511.9200
Difference 0.5790 5.6156 6.1242 4.1062

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Sonoma St. 109 2,544 1,194 188 208 46.93 13.5 12.2 2,186 811 113 163 62.90 19.3 13.4
Cal St. San B'dino 108 2,489 1,124 137 212 45.16 18.2 11.7 2,237 847 131 167 62.14 17.1 13.4
Humboldt St. 101 2,195 979 147 168 44.60 14.9 13.1 2,026 808 118 177 60.12 17.2 11.4
Cal St. L.A. 97 2,188 958 131 214 43.78 16.7 10.2 2,100 854 119 201 59.33 17.6 10.4
Cal Poly Pomona 100 2,216 1,002 144 162 45.22 15.4 13.7 2,138 921 105 162 56.92 20.4 13.2
San Fran. St. 105 2,207 948 124 170 42.95 17.8 13.0 2,149 884 117 176 58.87 18.4 12.2
Chico St. 94 2,060 857 123 162 41.60 16.7 12.7 2,043 845 115 166 58.64 17.8 12.3
UC San Diego 102 2,255 933 101 152 41.38 22.3 14.8 2,270 947 137 192 58.28 16.6 11.8
Cal St. East Bay 97 2,084 887 130 117 42.56 16.0 17.8 2,174 982 149 177 54.83 14.6 12.3
Cal St. Monterey Bay 96 1,716 704 117 153 41.03 14.7 11.2 1,812 805 143 165 55.57 12.7 11.0
Cal St. Dom. Hills 93 1,692 643 102 170 38.00 16.6 10.0 2,022 999 157 170 50.59 12.9 11.9
Stanislaus St. 89 1,755 656 90 172 37.38 19.5 10.2 2,122 1,059 165 164 50.09 12.9 12.9
Conference Average 99 2,117 907 128 172 42.55 16.9 12.6 2,107 897 131 173 57.36 16.4 12.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the CCAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

76.09

2014-10-02 San Bernardino, CA
Cal St. San B'dino
Cal Poly Pomona
2
3
20
25
25
14
24
26
28
26
13
15
GAME

75.39

2014-09-19 Rohnert Park, CA
Sonoma St.
Humboldt St.
3
2
25
13
25
27
25
22
23
25
15
9
GAME

75.13

2014-09-20 Rohnert Park, CA
Sonoma St.
Cal St. San B'dino
2
3
25
23
20
25
11
25
25
23
11
15
GAME

74.61

2014-10-02 Arcata, CA
Humboldt St.
UC San Diego
2
3
25
21
25
21
24
26
21
25
16
18
GAME

73.98

2014-09-26 San Francisco, Calif
San Fran. St.
Cal Poly Pomona
3
2
26
24
21
25
17
25
25
19
15
7
GAME

73.72

2014-10-31 La Jolla, CA
UC San Diego
San Fran. St.
2
3
26
28
22
25
25
21
25
23
9
15
GAME

73.62

2014-10-18 Arcata, CA
Humboldt St.
Cal St. Monterey Bay
2
3
25
18
25
22
23
25
25
27
12
15
GAME

73.61

2014-10-23 Arcata, CA
Humboldt St.
San Fran. St.
3
1
25
21
22
25
25
19
25
21
GAME

73.61

2014-09-26 Rohnert Park, CA
Sonoma St.
UC San Diego
3
1
22
25
25
22
25
19
25
23
GAME

73.52

2014-11-11 San Francisco, Calif
San Fran. St.
Sonoma St.
3
2
18
25
15
25
25
22
25
15
15
10

HuskerGeek CCAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 26.0280
2 23.1307
3 23.0430
4 22.3925
5 21.2771
6 20.6347
7 20.2124
8 19.8319
9 19.1322
10 18.5500

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 18.6579
2 13.9846
3 13.9031
4 13.0402
5 12.8543
6 12.7350
7 11.4707
8 11.4691
9 11.3848
10 11.2920

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.8923
2 15.6682
3 14.9750
4 14.7324
5 14.6291
6 14.4158
7 13.6371
8 13.1766
9 12.6871
10 12.1249

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2552
2 0.2446
3 0.2382
4 0.2122
5 0.2114
6 0.2105
7 0.2084
8 0.2052
9 0.1975
10 0.1944

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1712
2 0.1488
3 0.1387
4 0.1363
5 0.1318
6 0.1307
7 0.1275
8 0.1192
9 0.1190
10 0.1179

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1705
2 0.1632
3 0.1556
4 0.1543
5 0.1503
6 0.1442
7 0.1374
8 0.1358
9 0.1319
10 0.1274


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek