Nerdly Nebraska.
2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Rnk. | Team | Résumé | Recent | ViPR | Adj SP% | Adj SO% | Adj. Hit Mar. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Sonoma St. | 1,603.6013 | 1,619.6918 | 1,611.6265 | 53.05 | 68.77 | 0.212 |
2nd | Cal St. San B'dino | 1,575.1911 | 1,573.3796 | 1,574.2851 | 50.91 | 67.56 | 0.191 |
3rd | Humboldt St. | 1,553.3088 | 1,547.9481 | 1,550.6261 | 49.84 | 64.63 | 0.128 |
4th | Cal St. L.A. | 1,546.1511 | 1,536.0780 | 1,541.1063 | 49.16 | 63.83 | 0.145 |
5th | Cal Poly Pomona | 1,523.9445 | 1,526.6412 | 1,525.2923 | 51.01 | 61.49 | 0.112 |
6th | San Fran. St. | 1,518.6487 | 1,523.7560 | 1,521.2002 | 47.87 | 63.53 | 0.109 |
7th | UC San Diego | 1,509.9540 | 1,509.8575 | 1,509.9058 | 46.97 | 63.63 | 0.105 |
8th | Chico St. | 1,506.0757 | 1,510.7393 | 1,508.4057 | 47.01 | 63.66 | 0.087 |
9th | Cal St. Monterey Bay | 1,481.8519 | 1,485.9038 | 1,483.8765 | 46.48 | 60.36 | 0.084 |
10th | Cal St. East Bay | 1,473.4139 | 1,477.0563 | 1,475.2340 | 47.75 | 59.25 | 0.070 |
11th | Cal St. Dom. Hills | 1,405.2670 | 1,403.2554 | 1,404.2608 | 43.66 | 55.62 | -0.016 |
12th | Stanislaus St. | 1,400.6234 | 1,399.9051 | 1,400.2642 | 42.92 | 55.06 | -0.003 |
ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.
Rnk. | Team | Hit% | Kill% | HE% | AST% | O_DIG% | O_BLK% | ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Sonoma St. | 0.3135 | 43.31 | 11.96 | 40.21 | 43.31 | 5.73 | 8.18 |
2nd | Cal St. San B'dino | 0.3026 | 41.17 | 10.91 | 37.66 | 45.49 | 4.71 | 6.29 |
3rd | Cal St. L.A. | 0.2782 | 41.45 | 13.62 | 39.00 | 45.01 | 4.82 | 6.48 |
4th | Chico St. | 0.2579 | 39.12 | 13.33 | 36.96 | 44.06 | 5.25 | 6.50 |
5th | San Fran. St. | 0.2545 | 38.78 | 13.33 | 36.33 | 45.74 | 5.98 | 5.87 |
6th | Humboldt St. | 0.2506 | 39.45 | 14.39 | 37.49 | 45.47 | 6.00 | 6.78 |
7th | Cal St. Monterey Bay | 0.2444 | 37.58 | 13.14 | 34.88 | 49.95 | 4.35 | 6.11 |
8th | UC San Diego | 0.2391 | 38.40 | 14.48 | 35.68 | 48.16 | 5.29 | 5.15 |
9th | Cal Poly Pomona | 0.2304 | 38.50 | 15.46 | 36.39 | 47.00 | 5.90 | 6.99 |
10th | Cal St. East Bay | 0.2293 | 37.68 | 14.75 | 35.67 | 44.93 | 5.54 | 6.67 |
11th | Stanislaus St. | 0.1900 | 33.78 | 14.78 | 31.10 | 52.96 | 5.39 | 5.82 |
12th | Cal St. Dom. Hills | 0.1664 | 35.80 | 19.16 | 33.46 | 46.75 | 6.73 | 6.27 |
Rnk. | Team | O_Hit% | O_Kill% | O_HE% | O_AST% | DIG% | BLK% | O_ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Sonoma St. | 0.1016 | 26.57 | 16.41 | 24.85 | 59.03 | 5.09 | 4.90 |
2nd | Cal St. San B'dino | 0.1117 | 28.77 | 17.60 | 26.27 | 55.59 | 6.32 | 5.53 |
3rd | Cal Poly Pomona | 0.1183 | 28.48 | 16.65 | 26.03 | 56.92 | 6.05 | 4.58 |
4th | Humboldt St. | 0.1226 | 28.20 | 15.94 | 26.46 | 57.02 | 4.43 | 5.32 |
5th | Cal St. L.A. | 0.1336 | 29.78 | 16.42 | 27.46 | 57.25 | 5.21 | 5.32 |
6th | UC San Diego | 0.1338 | 29.28 | 15.90 | 26.80 | 56.80 | 5.56 | 5.66 |
7th | San Fran. St. | 0.1452 | 29.63 | 15.11 | 27.47 | 57.91 | 4.08 | 4.77 |
8th | Cal St. East Bay | 0.1588 | 32.67 | 16.79 | 30.83 | 53.01 | 3.81 | 6.57 |
9th | Cal St. Monterey Bay | 0.1600 | 32.50 | 16.50 | 29.90 | 52.74 | 4.93 | 5.87 |
10th | Chico St. | 0.1711 | 30.93 | 13.82 | 27.80 | 57.86 | 3.18 | 5.27 |
11th | Cal St. Dom. Hills | 0.1819 | 33.61 | 15.42 | 30.85 | 52.93 | 5.17 | 6.78 |
12th | Stanislaus St. | 0.1933 | 33.90 | 14.57 | 31.29 | 53.15 | 2.42 | 7.48 |
Description | Average | Remove First and Last | Remove Top and Bottom 2 | Remove Top and Bottom 3 | Composite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 1,508.8403 | 1,509.4193 | 1,514.4559 | 1,514.9645 | 1,511.9200 |
Difference | 0.5790 | 5.6156 | 6.1242 | 4.1062 |
Offense | Defense | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team | Sets | S | SP | SA | SE | SP% | S/SA | S/SE | OS | SPA | SAA | SEA | SO% | OS/SAA | OS/SEA |
Sonoma St. | 109 | 2,544 | 1,194 | 188 | 208 | 46.93 | 13.5 | 12.2 | 2,186 | 811 | 113 | 163 | 62.90 | 19.3 | 13.4 |
Cal St. San B'dino | 108 | 2,489 | 1,124 | 137 | 212 | 45.16 | 18.2 | 11.7 | 2,237 | 847 | 131 | 167 | 62.14 | 17.1 | 13.4 |
Humboldt St. | 101 | 2,195 | 979 | 147 | 168 | 44.60 | 14.9 | 13.1 | 2,026 | 808 | 118 | 177 | 60.12 | 17.2 | 11.4 |
Cal St. L.A. | 97 | 2,188 | 958 | 131 | 214 | 43.78 | 16.7 | 10.2 | 2,100 | 854 | 119 | 201 | 59.33 | 17.6 | 10.4 |
Cal Poly Pomona | 100 | 2,216 | 1,002 | 144 | 162 | 45.22 | 15.4 | 13.7 | 2,138 | 921 | 105 | 162 | 56.92 | 20.4 | 13.2 |
San Fran. St. | 105 | 2,207 | 948 | 124 | 170 | 42.95 | 17.8 | 13.0 | 2,149 | 884 | 117 | 176 | 58.87 | 18.4 | 12.2 |
Chico St. | 94 | 2,060 | 857 | 123 | 162 | 41.60 | 16.7 | 12.7 | 2,043 | 845 | 115 | 166 | 58.64 | 17.8 | 12.3 |
UC San Diego | 102 | 2,255 | 933 | 101 | 152 | 41.38 | 22.3 | 14.8 | 2,270 | 947 | 137 | 192 | 58.28 | 16.6 | 11.8 |
Cal St. East Bay | 97 | 2,084 | 887 | 130 | 117 | 42.56 | 16.0 | 17.8 | 2,174 | 982 | 149 | 177 | 54.83 | 14.6 | 12.3 |
Cal St. Monterey Bay | 96 | 1,716 | 704 | 117 | 153 | 41.03 | 14.7 | 11.2 | 1,812 | 805 | 143 | 165 | 55.57 | 12.7 | 11.0 |
Cal St. Dom. Hills | 93 | 1,692 | 643 | 102 | 170 | 38.00 | 16.6 | 10.0 | 2,022 | 999 | 157 | 170 | 50.59 | 12.9 | 11.9 |
Stanislaus St. | 89 | 1,755 | 656 | 90 | 172 | 37.38 | 19.5 | 10.2 | 2,122 | 1,059 | 165 | 164 | 50.09 | 12.9 | 12.9 |
Conference Average | 99 | 2,117 | 907 | 128 | 172 | 42.55 | 16.9 | 12.6 | 2,107 | 897 | 131 | 173 | 57.36 | 16.4 | 12.2 |
|
|
|
Game Link | EPIC | Game Date | Location | Teams | Sets | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Set 4 | Set 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAME |
76.09 |
2014-10-02 | San Bernardino, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
75.39 |
2014-09-19 | Rohnert Park, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
75.13 |
2014-09-20 | Rohnert Park, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
74.61 |
2014-10-02 | Arcata, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
73.98 |
2014-09-26 | San Francisco, Calif |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
73.72 |
2014-10-31 | La Jolla, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
73.62 |
2014-10-18 | Arcata, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
73.61 |
2014-10-23 | Arcata, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
73.61 |
2014-09-26 | Rohnert Park, CA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
73.52 |
2014-11-11 | San Francisco, Calif |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Kelsey Hull | Sonoma St. |
2 | Heidi Sierks | UC San Diego |
3 | Madelyn Densberger | Sonoma St. |
4 | Caylie Seitz | Sonoma St. |
5 | Torey Thompson | Chico St. |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Kelsey Hull | Sonoma St. |
2 | Caylie Seitz | Sonoma St. |
3 | Iona Lofrano | Cal St. L.A. |
4 | Caitlin Brenton | UC San Diego |
5 | Alexandra Torline | Cal St. San B'dino |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Heidi Sierks | UC San Diego |
2 | Torey Thompson | Chico St. |
3 | Ciara Richards | Cal St. San B'dino |
4 | Jacquie Brice | San Fran. St. |
5 | Kelsey Molnar | Cal St. L.A. |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Haley Biles | Humboldt St. |
2 | Arielle McCullough | Cal St. San B'dino |
3 | Kaitlyn Connolly | Sonoma St. |
4 | Zoe Herrera | Cal Poly Pomona |
5 | Emily Duran | Chico St. |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Heidi Sierks | UC San Diego | 26.0280 |
2 | Madelyn Densberger | Sonoma St. | 23.1307 |
3 | Caylie Seitz | Sonoma St. | 23.0430 |
4 | Torey Thompson | Chico St. | 22.3925 |
5 | Kelsey Hull | Sonoma St. | 21.2771 |
6 | Jacquie Brice | San Fran. St. | 20.6347 |
7 | Iona Lofrano | Cal St. L.A. | 20.2124 |
8 | Caitlin Brenton | UC San Diego | 19.8319 |
9 | Jaclyn Clark | San Fran. St. | 19.1322 |
10 | Alexandra Torline | Cal St. San B'dino | 18.5500 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Caylie Seitz | Sonoma St. | 18.6579 |
2 | Lindsay Quigley | Chico St. | 13.9846 |
3 | Heidi Sierks | UC San Diego | 13.9031 |
4 | Torey Thompson | Chico St. | 13.0402 |
5 | Tori May | Cal St. San B'dino | 12.8543 |
6 | Alexandra Torline | Cal St. San B'dino | 12.7350 |
7 | Kelsey Molnar | Cal St. L.A. | 11.4707 |
8 | Kelsey Hull | Sonoma St. | 11.4691 |
9 | Jacquie Brice | San Fran. St. | 11.3848 |
10 | Caitlin Brenton | UC San Diego | 11.2920 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arielle McCullough | Cal St. San B'dino | 15.8923 |
2 | Haley Biles | Humboldt St. | 15.6682 |
3 | Kaitlyn Connolly | Sonoma St. | 14.9750 |
4 | Zoe Herrera | Cal Poly Pomona | 14.7324 |
5 | Emily Duran | Chico St. | 14.6291 |
6 | Jessica Nicerio | San Fran. St. | 14.4158 |
7 | Rachel Cookus | Cal St. Monterey Bay | 13.6371 |
8 | April Reyes | Cal St. L.A. | 13.1766 |
9 | Madelyn Densberger | Sonoma St. | 12.6871 |
10 | Heidi Sierks | UC San Diego | 12.1249 |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Heidi Sierks | UC San Diego | 0.2552 |
2 | Kelsey Hull | Sonoma St. | 0.2446 |
3 | Torey Thompson | Chico St. | 0.2382 |
4 | Madelyn Densberger | Sonoma St. | 0.2122 |
5 | Caylie Seitz | Sonoma St. | 0.2114 |
6 | Iona Lofrano | Cal St. L.A. | 0.2105 |
7 | Jacquie Brice | San Fran. St. | 0.2084 |
8 | Ciara Richards | Cal St. San B'dino | 0.2052 |
9 | Ashia Joseph | Cal St. East Bay | 0.1975 |
10 | Caitlin Brenton | UC San Diego | 0.1944 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Caylie Seitz | Sonoma St. | 0.1712 |
2 | Lindsay Quigley | Chico St. | 0.1488 |
3 | Torey Thompson | Chico St. | 0.1387 |
4 | Heidi Sierks | UC San Diego | 0.1363 |
5 | Kelsey Hull | Sonoma St. | 0.1318 |
6 | Ciara Richards | Cal St. San B'dino | 0.1307 |
7 | Kelsey Molnar | Cal St. L.A. | 0.1275 |
8 | Ashia Joseph | Cal St. East Bay | 0.1192 |
9 | Tori May | Cal St. San B'dino | 0.1190 |
10 | Alexandra Torline | Cal St. San B'dino | 0.1179 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rachel Cookus | Cal St. Monterey Bay | 0.1705 |
2 | Haley Biles | Humboldt St. | 0.1632 |
3 | Emily Duran | Chico St. | 0.1556 |
4 | Arielle McCullough | Cal St. San B'dino | 0.1543 |
5 | Zoe Herrera | Cal Poly Pomona | 0.1503 |
6 | Jessica Nicerio | San Fran. St. | 0.1442 |
7 | Kaitlyn Connolly | Sonoma St. | 0.1374 |
8 | April Reyes | Cal St. L.A. | 0.1358 |
9 | Makensie Bates | UC San Diego | 0.1319 |
10 | Angie Maina | Cal St. East Bay | 0.1274 |
Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts. The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams. This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams. The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores. It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams. The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average. If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating. If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings. It was weighing the average down so to speak. The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.
The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game. EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.
All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them. This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.
Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list. Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric. Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.