Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

CCAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Cal St. San B'dino 1,714.3016 1,698.7953 1,706.5308 57.77 71.43 0.266
2nd Cal Poly Pomona 1,667.2582 1,653.4789 1,660.3543 52.92 70.19 0.227
3rd Cal St. L.A. 1,662.4751 1,634.8175 1,648.5883 52.14 67.87 0.205
4th Cal St. East Bay 1,607.8874 1,599.2380 1,603.5569 49.04 66.83 0.165
5th Cal St. San Marcos 1,596.5700 1,587.0076 1,591.7816 52.88 62.45 0.150
6th Cal St. Monterey Bay 1,590.3897 1,577.8672 1,584.1161 51.02 62.13 0.119
7th UC San Diego 1,585.5308 1,578.6888 1,582.1061 50.88 64.05 0.156
8th Stanislaus St. 1,581.9536 1,565.5898 1,573.7504 48.95 63.77 0.129
9th Chico St. 1,579.7119 1,566.8139 1,573.2497 52.18 61.67 0.137
10th San Fran. St. 1,572.5328 1,571.2747 1,571.9036 48.84 62.81 0.151
11th Cal St. Dom. Hills 1,545.9879 1,535.9929 1,540.9823 48.08 61.39 0.087
12th Sonoma St. 1,498.2011 1,486.8405 1,492.5100 47.37 57.98 0.034
13th Humboldt St. 1,418.7839 1,414.0550 1,416.4175 45.29 51.00 -0.033

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Cal St. San B'dino 0.3382 44.67 10.85 41.73 42.59 4.11 8.46
2nd Cal Poly Pomona 0.3113 42.31 11.18 39.07 43.82 4.26 7.20
3rd Cal St. East Bay 0.2931 39.72 10.41 36.74 48.00 3.46 7.22
4th Cal St. L.A. 0.2843 43.46 15.03 40.79 42.68 4.81 8.80
5th Stanislaus St. 0.2827 40.95 12.68 37.88 44.61 4.85 6.77
6th San Fran. St. 0.2790 38.94 11.05 36.39 48.59 3.86 8.82
7th Chico St. 0.2687 40.96 14.09 38.49 44.45 5.59 8.92
8th UC San Diego 0.2613 39.33 13.19 36.21 48.25 4.66 7.04
9th Cal St. San Marcos 0.2570 38.42 12.72 35.26 46.40 4.44 7.45
10th Cal St. Dom. Hills 0.2428 37.33 13.05 34.50 47.19 4.10 8.77
11th Cal St. Monterey Bay 0.2415 37.29 13.14 34.69 48.25 4.55 9.51
12th Sonoma St. 0.2236 38.40 16.04 36.02 44.76 6.87 7.99
13th Humboldt St. 0.1452 30.43 15.91 28.36 53.74 5.53 7.84

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Cal St. San B'dino 0.0724 25.42 18.18 24.12 59.58 6.37 4.57
2nd Cal St. L.A. 0.0796 25.61 17.64 23.96 60.87 5.63 2.21
3rd Cal Poly Pomona 0.0844 24.77 16.33 23.30 61.47 5.26 4.52
4th UC San Diego 0.1052 28.05 17.53 26.16 57.36 6.71 5.42
5th Cal St. San Marcos 0.1072 27.69 16.97 26.11 55.98 6.38 5.64
6th Cal St. Monterey Bay 0.1221 28.64 16.43 26.46 56.62 4.99 4.81
7th San Fran. St. 0.1276 29.69 16.92 27.88 57.58 5.97 6.12
8th Cal St. East Bay 0.1283 30.59 17.77 29.59 56.81 6.02 4.26
9th Chico St. 0.1319 30.71 17.52 28.80 55.82 5.36 6.60
10th Stanislaus St. 0.1537 31.69 16.32 29.69 55.06 4.72 5.20
11th Cal St. Dom. Hills 0.1560 31.61 16.01 29.83 53.81 5.10 5.27
12th Humboldt St. 0.1782 33.85 16.02 31.44 53.82 5.03 6.03
13th Sonoma St. 0.1895 33.74 14.79 30.70 53.07 4.10 5.44

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,580.4498 1,583.8999 1,585.5594 1,582.9235 1,583.2082
Difference 3.4501 5.1096 2.4737 3.6778

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Cal St. San B'dino 110 2,539 1,258 178 175 49.55 14.3 14.5 2,078 752 124 176 63.81 16.8 11.8
Cal Poly Pomona 103 2,404 1,109 144 174 46.13 16.7 13.8 2,093 773 120 175 63.07 17.4 12.0
Cal St. L.A. 80 1,830 852 143 239 46.56 12.8 7.7 1,608 614 56 128 61.82 28.7 12.6
Chico St. 97 2,087 981 167 160 47.01 12.5 13.0 1,969 867 151 167 55.97 13.0 11.8
Stanislaus St. 95 2,098 926 127 134 44.14 16.5 15.7 2,042 854 135 196 58.18 15.1 10.4
Cal St. East Bay 106 2,374 1,008 141 161 42.46 16.8 14.7 2,299 924 130 174 59.81 17.7 13.2
Cal St. Monterey Bay 94 2,083 943 175 188 45.27 11.9 11.1 2,045 899 126 154 56.04 16.2 13.3
San Fran. St. 91 1,955 864 165 243 44.19 11.8 8.0 1,909 819 144 161 57.10 13.3 11.9
Cal St. San Marcos 99 2,135 973 128 127 45.57 16.7 16.8 2,119 949 146 141 55.22 14.5 15.0
UC San Diego 88 1,951 848 112 118 43.47 17.4 16.5 1,937 835 131 171 56.89 14.8 11.3
Cal St. Dom. Hills 86 1,840 769 141 164 41.79 13.0 11.2 1,936 880 127 182 54.55 15.2 10.6
Sonoma St. 94 1,929 808 136 171 41.89 14.2 11.3 2,131 1,029 141 158 51.71 15.1 13.5
Humboldt St. 81 1,497 605 108 145 40.41 13.9 10.3 1,889 1,027 137 154 45.63 13.8 12.3
Conference Average 94 2,056 919 143 169 44.50 14.5 12.7 2,004 863 128 164 56.91 16.3 12.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the CCAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

80.47

2018-10-05 La Jolla, CA
UC San Diego
Cal St. San B'dino
2
3
21
25
28
26
20
25
28
26
13
15
GAME

79.10

2018-10-12 Seaside, CA
Cal St. Monterey Bay
San Fran. St.
3
2
27
29
25
22
25
27
25
21
15
11
GAME

77.31

2018-10-26 Hayward, CA
Cal St. East Bay
Cal St. Monterey Bay
3
2
25
18
25
23
22
25
23
25
15
2
GAME

76.92

2018-11-10 Turlock, Calif.
Cal Poly Pomona
Cal St. San B'dino
1
3
25
18
23
25
23
25
19
25
GAME

76.59

2018-10-12 Chico, Calif.
Chico St.
Cal St. San Marcos
2
3
27
25
20
25
23
25
25
19
12
15
GAME

76.13

2018-11-09 Turlock, Calif.
Cal Poly Pomona
Cal St. East Bay
3
0
25
15
28
26
25
23
GAME

76.10

2018-11-03 Carson, CA
Cal St. Dom. Hills
Cal St. San Marcos
2
3
22
25
26
24
23
25
26
24
8
15
GAME

75.91

2018-09-22 San Bernardino, CA
Cal St. San B'dino
UC San Diego
3
1
25
23
24
26
25
20
25
20
GAME

75.82

2018-09-25 Seaside, CA
Cal St. Monterey Bay
Sonoma St.
3
2
25
27
19
25
25
22
25
23
15
10
GAME

75.74

2018-09-21 Pomona, CA
Cal Poly Pomona
UC San Diego
3
2
23
25
25
22
22
25
25
22
15
5

HuskerGeek CCAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 29.3818
2 29.1569
3 27.9826
4 25.9224
5 22.4057
6 21.8709
7 21.6733
8 20.6635
9 20.5612
10 20.1375

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 20.4041
2 16.2507
3 16.1793
4 14.2140
5 13.4088
6 12.1056
7 11.2854
8 11.1188
9 11.0933
10 10.3075

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 29.2293
2 19.2836
3 15.9451
4 12.9132
5 12.8115
6 12.6712
7 12.5280
8 12.3058
9 11.1062
10 10.7521

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2825
2 0.2423
3 0.2198
4 0.2134
5 0.2104
6 0.2056
7 0.2036
8 0.1900
9 0.1868
10 0.1819

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1962
2 0.1578
3 0.1512
4 0.1421
5 0.1412
6 0.1297
7 0.1288
8 0.1277
9 0.1180
10 0.1104

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1563
2 0.1366
3 0.1345
4 0.1333
5 0.1315
6 0.1271
7 0.1262
8 0.1194
9 0.1184
10 0.1161


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek