Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

CCIW - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Elmhurst 1,561.7852 1,551.8450 1,556.8072 63.58 73.26 0.334
2nd Millikin 1,449.8062 1,455.8632 1,452.8316 57.54 65.54 0.240
3rd Wheaton (IL) 1,447.2399 1,443.0322 1,445.1345 56.20 67.01 0.203
4th Carthage 1,438.5500 1,433.4557 1,436.0006 57.37 67.88 0.207
5th Augustana (IL) 1,360.4871 1,358.3919 1,359.4391 53.78 59.64 0.130
6th North Central (IL) 1,340.7148 1,360.5763 1,350.6090 52.97 57.50 0.070
7th Ill. Wesleyan 1,318.5578 1,305.5500 1,312.0378 49.08 59.49 0.075
8th North Park 1,265.0556 1,286.2408 1,275.6042 48.59 56.69 0.041

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Elmhurst 0.3621 47.73 11.52 43.26 41.30 2.25 9.85
2nd Millikin 0.3360 46.21 12.61 42.04 45.95 3.43 12.29
3rd Wheaton (IL) 0.2907 43.07 14.00 39.98 45.49 3.40 9.25
4th Carthage 0.2778 40.78 12.99 36.99 51.99 2.78 11.06
5th Ill. Wesleyan 0.2314 37.79 14.64 35.39 47.68 3.57 7.78
6th Augustana (IL) 0.2197 33.98 12.01 32.28 52.24 3.93 11.07
7th North Park 0.1906 36.16 17.11 33.44 47.99 5.66 9.86
8th North Central (IL) 0.1789 35.88 17.98 32.50 52.54 4.48 8.76

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Elmhurst 0.0277 20.82 18.05 19.51 63.01 7.50 1.46
2nd Carthage 0.0705 24.40 17.35 23.07 61.53 6.44 5.60
3rd Wheaton (IL) 0.0877 26.95 18.18 25.10 56.35 6.34 4.95
4th Augustana (IL) 0.0897 24.89 15.92 21.79 61.92 5.01 5.92
5th Millikin 0.0960 25.48 15.88 23.33 62.80 6.63 5.65
6th North Central (IL) 0.1088 28.69 17.81 26.98 58.11 5.84 6.62
7th North Park 0.1496 30.75 15.80 28.26 59.80 3.89 7.87
8th Ill. Wesleyan 0.1566 30.78 15.12 28.60 54.50 4.53 5.96

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,398.5580 1,392.6754 1,397.7958 1,397.7198 1,396.6873
Difference -5.8826 -0.7622 -0.8382 -2.4943

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Elmhurst 140 2,482 1,265 218 223 50.97 11.4 11.1 2,062 804 95 190 61.01 21.7 10.9
Wheaton (IL) 126 2,197 1,070 199 166 48.70 11.0 13.2 1,938 805 160 228 58.46 12.1 8.5
Carthage 133 1,622 760 243 230 46.86 6.7 7.1 1,518 649 214 258 57.25 7.1 5.9
Augustana (IL) 103 698 342 204 246 49.00 3.4 2.8 659 305 128 195 53.72 5.1 3.4
Millikin 134 971 433 235 260 44.59 4.1 3.7 987 458 177 193 53.60 5.6 5.1
North Central (IL) 110 1,489 692 165 179 46.47 9.0 8.3 1,574 783 163 235 50.25 9.7 6.7
North Park 116 1,264 547 170 303 43.28 7.4 4.2 1,404 694 216 218 50.57 6.5 6.4
Ill. Wesleyan 110 634 256 156 179 40.38 4.1 3.5 746 372 154 173 50.13 4.8 4.3
Conference Average 122 1,420 671 199 223 46.28 7.1 6.8 1,361 609 163 211 54.37 9.1 6.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the CCIW

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

71.75

2013-11-08 Elmhurst, Ill.
Carthage
Millikin
2
3
19
25
27
25
25
21
23
25
15
17
GAME

70.78

2013-11-05 Elmhurst, Ill.
Elmhurst
Millikin
3
1
27
25
20
25
25
21
25
22
GAME

66.52

2013-10-01 Wheaton, Ill.
Wheaton (IL)
Millikin
2
3
25
23
10
25
25
17
18
25
13
15
GAME

66.43

2013-11-09 Elmhurst, Ill.
Elmhurst
Millikin
3
1
25
19
25
11
21
25
25
18
GAME

66.08

2013-11-08 Elmhurst, Ill.
Elmhurst
Wheaton (IL)
3
0
25
19
25
14
25
22
GAME

65.36

2013-10-02 Elmhurst, Ill.
Elmhurst
Carthage
3
1
16
25
25
23
25
13
25
9
GAME

63.71

2013-10-15 Wheaton, Ill.
Wheaton (IL)
Elmhurst
0
3
20
25
14
25
19
25
GAME

63.10

2013-09-24 Naperville, Ill.
North Central (IL)
Elmhurst
0
3
16
25
22
25
18
25
GAME

63.03

2013-11-05 Kenosha, Wis.
Carthage
Wheaton (IL)
3
0
25
22
25
23
25
17
GAME

62.26

2013-11-06 Bloomington, Ill.
Ill. Wesleyan
North Central (IL)
3
1
26
24
20
25
25
17
29
27

HuskerGeek CCIW All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 19.5737
2 15.9815
3 15.7021
4 14.7110
5 13.9331
6 13.4033
7 13.2891
8 11.8805
9 11.7406
10 11.6352

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 11.2526
2 10.4090
3 10.0356
4 9.4697
5 8.4522
6 7.9470
7 6.8621
8 6.6212
9 6.2968
10 5.7804

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 12.1588
2 12.0332
3 10.3003
4 9.9125
5 9.5381
6 8.0345
7 7.6482
8 6.7085
9 5.3990
10 5.1194

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2609
2 0.2151
3 0.1841
4 0.1812
5 0.1777
6 0.1742
7 0.1594
8 0.1489
9 0.1482
10 0.1480

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1541
2 0.1471
3 0.1274
4 0.1184
5 0.1082
6 0.0964
7 0.0940
8 0.0929
9 0.0909
10 0.0887

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1437
2 0.1411
3 0.1307
4 0.1138
5 0.1114
6 0.1015
7 0.0950
8 0.0932
9 0.0883
10 0.0880


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek