Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

CCIW - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Ill. Wesleyan 1,538.2904 1,553.4167 1,545.8350 58.30 69.75 0.266
2nd Carthage 1,528.5372 1,549.8810 1,539.1721 59.60 66.40 0.236
3rd Millikin 1,424.2493 1,442.0670 1,433.1305 53.42 63.01 0.147
4th Carroll (WI) 1,422.7391 1,434.3328 1,428.5242 52.42 63.57 0.163
5th Wheaton (IL) 1,413.3563 1,430.3957 1,421.8505 52.75 60.85 0.129
6th North Park 1,410.5992 1,420.9299 1,415.7551 52.15 61.56 0.130
7th Augustana (IL) 1,405.3899 1,425.8382 1,415.5771 52.25 61.89 0.113
8th Elmhurst 1,402.2665 1,414.5564 1,408.3980 50.63 62.26 0.106
9th North Central (IL) 1,285.0373 1,304.2398 1,294.6029 46.93 55.42 0.012

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Ill. Wesleyan 0.3174 42.99 11.25 40.05 45.73 2.70 9.79
2nd Carthage 0.2932 42.06 12.74 38.89 46.15 2.94 10.98
3rd Wheaton (IL) 0.2448 38.03 13.56 34.98 49.19 4.16 9.96
4th North Park 0.2380 37.98 14.18 35.27 48.65 3.90 10.07
5th Millikin 0.2370 40.09 16.39 37.37 43.96 4.14 10.85
6th Carroll (WI) 0.2367 36.83 13.16 33.96 51.70 3.15 9.49
7th Elmhurst 0.2245 37.16 14.71 34.64 50.25 3.43 10.49
8th Augustana (IL) 0.2143 36.17 14.74 34.13 51.20 3.19 9.27
9th North Central (IL) 0.1590 33.60 17.70 31.88 52.84 5.53 9.81

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Ill. Wesleyan 0.0515 22.49 17.34 21.02 62.20 5.47 3.92
2nd Carthage 0.0573 23.75 18.02 22.40 61.78 5.29 4.40
3rd Carroll (WI) 0.0732 25.64 18.31 23.39 57.77 6.02 6.48
4th Millikin 0.0902 25.43 16.41 23.08 60.97 4.15 4.71
5th Augustana (IL) 0.1012 26.70 16.58 25.40 59.60 4.60 4.90
6th North Park 0.1076 27.05 16.29 25.06 60.70 3.92 5.19
7th Wheaton (IL) 0.1161 28.32 16.71 26.04 58.59 4.95 7.10
8th Elmhurst 0.1184 27.63 15.79 25.78 59.13 4.53 3.92
9th North Central (IL) 0.1465 30.60 15.94 27.86 56.72 4.08 6.89

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,433.6495 1,437.4868 1,422.9675 1,422.0433 1,429.0367
Difference 3.8373 -10.6820 -11.6062 -6.1503

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Ill. Wesleyan 119 2,522 1,208 179 190 47.90 14.1 13.3 2,242 907 133 215 59.55 16.9 10.4
Carthage 114 2,593 1,299 205 209 50.10 12.6 12.4 2,295 982 130 166 57.21 17.7 13.8
Carroll (WI) 110 1,836 831 179 284 45.26 10.3 6.5 1,771 769 175 196 56.58 10.1 9.0
North Park 116 2,496 1,154 204 258 46.23 12.2 9.7 2,435 1,084 157 210 55.48 15.5 11.6
Augustana (IL) 121 2,636 1,197 173 187 45.41 15.2 14.1 2,615 1,173 161 252 55.14 16.2 10.4
Wheaton (IL) 111 2,213 1,009 178 196 45.59 12.4 11.3 2,196 996 189 213 54.65 11.6 10.3
Millikin 134 2,796 1,247 236 340 44.60 11.8 8.2 2,857 1,314 180 238 54.01 15.9 12.0
Elmhurst 110 2,107 872 179 217 41.39 11.8 9.7 2,283 1,062 134 233 53.48 17.0 9.8
North Central (IL) 83 1,544 614 118 187 39.77 13.1 8.3 1,890 983 154 173 47.99 12.3 10.9
Conference Average 113 2,305 1,048 183 230 45.14 12.6 10.4 2,287 1,030 157 211 54.90 14.8 10.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the CCIW

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

72.98

2018-10-30 Kenosha, Wis.
Carthage
Ill. Wesleyan
1
3
16
25
25
22
25
27
20
25
GAME

70.21

2018-10-04 Rock Island, Ill.
Augustana (IL)
Elmhurst
3
1
25
22
25
20
17
25
33
31
GAME

69.59

2018-09-29 Kenosha, Wis.
Carthage
Augustana (IL)
3
1
30
28
25
21
21
25
25
7
GAME

68.45

2018-10-24 Elmhurst, Ill.
Elmhurst
North Park
2
3
19
25
25
21
25
21
23
25
12
15
GAME

68.36

2018-10-09 Chicago, Ill.
North Park
Augustana (IL)
2
3
25
14
20
25
25
23
30
32
13
15
GAME

68.08

2018-10-13 Wheaton, Ill.
Wheaton (IL)
Millikin
1
3
25
16
28
30
19
25
21
25
GAME

67.67

2018-10-30 Chicago, Ill.
North Park
Wheaton (IL)
1
3
25
21
23
25
22
25
22
25
GAME

67.47

2018-11-03 Bloomington, Ill.
Ill. Wesleyan
Carthage
3
1
25
17
23
25
25
18
25
23
GAME

67.31

2018-10-12 Rock Island, Ill.
Augustana (IL)
Ill. Wesleyan
1
3
25
21
22
25
14
25
12
25
GAME

66.83

2018-10-05 Kenosha, Wis.
Carthage
Carroll (WI)
3
0
25
14
26
24
28
26

HuskerGeek CCIW All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 29.2132
2 27.5322
3 27.0591
4 26.4252
5 25.0759
6 24.3013
7 19.0930
8 17.6839
9 17.3541
10 17.1765

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.9927
2 16.6945
3 14.8559
4 13.2138
5 12.9781
6 12.9738
7 12.9072
8 12.6487
9 12.2754
10 10.5532

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.7441
2 16.5646
3 16.2389
4 14.1303
5 13.4471
6 13.0779
7 12.6763
8 12.4880
9 12.2938
10 12.2856

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2656
2 0.2415
3 0.2339
4 0.2209
5 0.2200
6 0.2098
7 0.1752
8 0.1681
9 0.1661
10 0.1643

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1464
2 0.1373
3 0.1317
4 0.1303
5 0.1203
6 0.1201
7 0.1150
8 0.1149
9 0.1148
10 0.0966

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1657
2 0.1588
3 0.1506
4 0.1500
5 0.1380
6 0.1253
7 0.1217
8 0.1200
9 0.1190
10 0.1125


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek