Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,839.6298

Football ohio st 12.7316
Men's Basketball kansas 12.7368
Women's Basketball south carolina 13.4324
Baseball ucla 12.9478
Softball ucla 10.9864
Ice Hockey north dakota 10.7002
Men's Lacrosse syracuse 7.8562
Women's Lacrosse north carolina 10.7252
Men's Soccer georgetown 10.7279
Women's Soccer stanford 13.0262
Men's Volleyball byu 11.1006
Women's Volleyball stanford 11.3000
Field Hockey north carolina 12.2787

CCIW - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Carthage 1,632.7347 1,592.0322 1,612.2550 63.27 65.67 0.304
2nd Millikin 1,503.8542 1,465.6653 1,484.6370 57.45 58.65 0.178
3rd Elmhurst 1,451.6552 1,418.8051 1,435.1362 53.68 60.83 0.141
4th Ill. Wesleyan 1,454.6110 1,409.7022 1,431.9806 57.40 54.32 0.124
5th Carroll (WI) 1,439.1317 1,407.2353 1,423.0941 53.08 59.61 0.153
6th Wheaton (IL) 1,432.6203 1,396.4597 1,414.4245 54.28 58.23 0.099
7th Augustana (IL) 1,398.7541 1,361.1701 1,379.8341 52.45 56.68 0.086
8th North Park 1,376.0812 1,339.7021 1,357.7698 48.56 57.36 0.062
9th North Central (IL) 1,324.1352 1,295.1676 1,309.5713 49.18 54.88 0.034

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Carthage 0.3353 42.89 9.36 39.28 43.89 2.15 11.10
2nd Millikin 0.2565 40.50 14.85 36.36 45.31 3.67 12.04
3rd Elmhurst 0.2448 37.02 12.54 33.78 49.28 2.36 10.04
4th Carroll (WI) 0.2433 35.75 11.42 33.02 54.50 3.37 10.75
5th Ill. Wesleyan 0.2177 37.14 15.37 33.97 49.01 3.65 9.76
6th Wheaton (IL) 0.2002 34.59 14.57 32.37 52.27 3.77 12.00
7th North Park 0.1989 35.33 15.44 31.75 50.95 4.08 11.96
8th North Central (IL) 0.1880 34.07 15.27 31.79 53.71 3.90 9.92
9th Augustana (IL) 0.1851 34.55 16.04 31.93 51.51 2.98 11.81

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Carthage 0.0308 21.32 18.24 20.29 63.43 6.22 4.04
2nd Millikin 0.0782 24.92 17.10 22.77 61.31 5.44 6.63
3rd Carroll (WI) 0.0905 27.85 18.80 26.12 56.62 6.54 7.46
4th Ill. Wesleyan 0.0938 26.72 17.35 25.22 59.28 5.91 6.55
5th Augustana (IL) 0.0992 26.56 16.64 24.88 59.35 4.55 8.03
6th Wheaton (IL) 0.1011 27.84 17.73 26.03 58.63 5.51 5.74
7th Elmhurst 0.1037 26.32 15.95 24.77 61.27 4.31 4.93
8th North Park 0.1370 29.02 15.33 25.82 58.79 4.30 6.36
9th North Central (IL) 0.1541 30.01 14.60 27.52 57.47 3.77 8.58

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,427.6336 1,418.1252 1,416.8939 1,423.1664 1,421.4548
Difference -9.5084 -10.7397 -4.4672 -8.2385

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Carthage 103 2,353 1,325 196 194 56.31 12.0 12.1 1,832 783 102 138 57.26 18.0 13.3
Wheaton (IL) 108 2,320 1,211 232 228 52.20 10.0 10.2 2,161 1,012 154 214 53.17 14.0 10.1
Augustana (IL) 119 2,162 1,101 201 224 50.93 10.8 9.7 2,114 1,056 212 212 50.05 10.0 10.0
Millikin 120 2,550 1,284 234 336 50.35 10.9 7.6 2,458 1,216 199 260 50.53 12.4 9.5
North Park 108 2,303 1,104 214 284 47.94 10.8 8.1 2,344 1,144 165 216 51.20 14.2 10.9
Elmhurst 123 2,343 1,087 179 216 46.39 13.1 10.8 2,390 1,136 160 224 52.47 14.9 10.7
Carroll (WI) 111 1,846 869 190 255 47.08 9.7 7.2 1,926 929 204 230 51.77 9.4 8.4
North Central (IL) 104 1,959 911 141 167 46.50 13.9 11.7 2,151 1,104 225 196 48.68 9.6 11.0
Ill. Wesleyan 110 2,131 1,043 136 179 48.94 15.7 11.9 2,318 1,263 181 220 45.51 12.8 10.5
Conference Average 112 2,219 1,104 191 231 49.63 11.9 9.9 2,188 1,071 178 212 51.18 12.8 10.5
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the CCIW

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

68.89

2019-10-30 Elmhurst, Ill.
Elmhurst
Ill. Wesleyan
2
3
20
25
25
13
19
25
27
25
11
15
GAME

68.67

2019-10-30
Carthage
Millikin
3
0
25
22
25
18
25
18
GAME

67.82

2019-11-09
Carthage
Millikin
3
2
21
25
25
10
22
25
25
11
15
12
GAME

67.59

2019-10-09
Carthage
Elmhurst
3
0
25
17
25
23
25
14
GAME

67.47

2019-10-12
Carroll (WI)
Carthage
1
3
15
25
17
25
25
20
15
25
GAME

67.45

2019-10-16 Elmhurst, Ill.
Elmhurst
Millikin
1
3
23
25
25
18
12
25
22
25
GAME

67.20

2019-09-18 Waukesha, Wis.
Carroll (WI)
Millikin
2
3
22
25
25
21
25
23
14
25
8
15
GAME

66.10

2019-10-08
Millikin
Wheaton (IL)
3
1
25
15
26
24
23
25
25
22
GAME

65.97

2019-10-22
Ill. Wesleyan
Wheaton (IL)
3
1
21
25
25
21
25
23
25
22
GAME

65.45

2019-10-02
Carroll (WI)
Ill. Wesleyan
3
1
21
25
25
14
25
23
25
20

HuskerGeek CCIW All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S
S
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 24.9118
2 19.9019
3 19.3208
4 18.2099
5 17.5529
6 16.2630
7 15.9879
8 15.5489
9 15.3438
10 15.2911

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.4074
2 13.2008
3 11.8066
4 10.2206
5 9.8382
6 9.3354
7 8.6725
8 8.5568
9 7.2300
10 7.0336

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.6827
2 14.6276
3 14.6131
4 14.4986
5 11.9220
6 11.8683
7 11.7372
8 11.6796
9 11.3952
10 10.5194

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2185
2 0.2052
3 0.2033
4 0.1992
5 0.1839
6 0.1719
7 0.1683
8 0.1672
9 0.1562
10 0.1499

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1361
2 0.1352
3 0.1158
4 0.1058
5 0.1054
6 0.0906
7 0.0826
8 0.0757
9 0.0745
10 0.0705

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1828
2 0.1786
3 0.1706
4 0.1454
5 0.1392
6 0.1210
7 0.1156
8 0.1152
9 0.1145
10 0.1130


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek