Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,789.9969

Football ohio st 12.8582
Ice Hockey providence 7.9735
Men's Soccer smu 11.4406
Women's Soccer north carolina 12.2707
Women's Volleyball baylor 12.1306
Field Hockey north carolina 12.7413

CCIW - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Carthage 1,590.6754 1,566.2558 1,578.4184 63.70 63.77 0.290
2nd Millikin 1,462.6958 1,440.5283 1,451.5697 56.58 58.26 0.165
3rd Elmhurst 1,444.9206 1,422.8404 1,433.8380 54.83 59.92 0.153
4th Carroll (WI) 1,410.2415 1,394.3493 1,402.2729 51.99 58.62 0.153
5th Wheaton (IL) 1,398.0644 1,376.2308 1,387.1046 53.53 57.80 0.099
6th Ill. Wesleyan 1,386.4135 1,358.7892 1,372.5318 54.45 52.80 0.075
7th Augustana (IL) 1,374.5667 1,349.2696 1,361.8594 52.47 55.13 0.074
8th North Park 1,342.3161 1,321.6737 1,331.9549 49.21 55.60 0.050
9th North Central (IL) 1,319.0199 1,299.4630 1,309.2049 49.30 54.38 0.044

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Carthage 0.3374 42.73 8.98 39.14 42.98 2.32 10.97
2nd Millikin 0.2490 39.86 14.96 35.69 45.58 3.26 12.39
3rd Carroll (WI) 0.2423 35.66 11.43 32.60 54.77 3.66 10.69
4th Elmhurst 0.2393 36.79 12.85 33.43 49.50 2.37 9.50
5th Wheaton (IL) 0.1961 34.80 15.19 32.67 51.88 3.84 12.21
6th Ill. Wesleyan 0.1925 35.74 16.48 32.47 50.42 3.72 9.91
7th North Park 0.1917 34.87 15.69 31.90 50.20 4.09 12.49
8th North Central (IL) 0.1864 33.73 15.08 31.38 54.50 3.95 10.14
9th Augustana (IL) 0.1723 34.05 16.82 31.52 51.01 3.40 12.65

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Carthage 0.0475 21.98 17.23 20.63 62.02 5.98 4.08
2nd Millikin 0.0843 26.03 17.60 23.44 59.35 5.64 6.92
3rd Elmhurst 0.0863 25.43 16.81 23.70 61.83 4.51 4.70
4th Carroll (WI) 0.0895 28.21 19.26 26.42 55.63 6.42 7.97
5th Wheaton (IL) 0.0972 27.29 17.57 25.47 59.09 5.31 6.68
6th Augustana (IL) 0.0984 26.77 16.93 24.70 57.92 4.80 9.24
7th Ill. Wesleyan 0.1178 28.18 16.40 26.76 58.68 5.53 7.13
8th North Park 0.1420 29.69 15.50 26.62 57.56 4.25 6.54
9th North Central (IL) 0.1424 29.48 15.24 26.83 57.80 3.85 8.44

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,403.1950 1,391.5902 1,391.5214 1,387.3031 1,393.4024
Difference -11.6048 -11.6736 -15.8919 -13.0567

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Carthage 68 1,615 941 135 137 58.27 12.0 11.8 1,220 527 63 106 56.80 19.4 11.5
Wheaton (IL) 77 1,682 882 162 173 52.44 10.4 9.7 1,569 742 120 180 52.71 13.1 8.7
Augustana (IL) 77 1,406 753 137 144 53.56 10.3 9.8 1,281 634 149 145 50.51 8.6 8.8
North Park 73 1,593 814 162 195 51.10 9.8 8.2 1,572 787 119 143 49.94 13.2 11.0
Millikin 68 1,503 745 140 210 49.57 10.7 7.2 1,469 722 116 141 50.85 12.7 10.4
Elmhurst 85 1,668 795 114 159 47.66 14.6 10.5 1,691 814 108 171 51.86 15.7 9.9
Carroll (WI) 83 1,246 577 147 193 46.31 8.5 6.5 1,336 658 161 174 50.75 8.3 7.7
North Central (IL) 83 1,509 665 117 145 44.07 12.9 10.4 1,728 889 181 150 48.55 9.5 11.5
Ill. Wesleyan 71 1,260 574 89 118 45.56 14.2 10.7 1,499 840 131 147 43.96 11.4 10.2
Conference Average 76 1,498 750 134 164 49.84 11.5 9.4 1,485 735 128 151 50.66 12.4 10.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the CCIW

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

66.89

2019-10-09
Carthage
Elmhurst
3
0
25
17
25
23
25
14
GAME

66.37

2019-10-12
Carroll (WI)
Carthage
1
3
15
25
17
25
25
20
15
25
GAME

66.12

2019-09-18 Waukesha, Wis.
Carroll (WI)
Millikin
2
3
22
25
25
21
25
23
14
25
8
15
GAME

64.89

2019-10-08
Millikin
Wheaton (IL)
3
1
25
15
26
24
23
25
25
22
GAME

64.28

2019-10-11 Elmhurst, Ill.
Elmhurst
Wheaton (IL)
3
0
25
19
25
22
25
17
GAME

63.84

2019-10-02
Carroll (WI)
Ill. Wesleyan
3
1
21
25
25
14
25
23
25
20
GAME

63.60

2019-09-25
Carthage
Wheaton (IL)
3
0
25
9
25
19
25
12
GAME

63.27

2019-10-05
Carthage
North Park
3
0
25
13
25
18
25
18
GAME

61.72

2019-10-01 Elmhurst, Ill.
Elmhurst
Augustana (IL)
3
1
22
25
25
16
25
22
25
19
GAME

61.65

2019-09-18
Ill. Wesleyan
Carthage
0
3
13
25
11
25
10
25

HuskerGeek CCIW All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 13.8286
2 13.4100
3 12.2531
4 12.1460
5 12.0127
6 11.4308
7 10.5813
8 10.2652
9 10.2124
10 9.7613

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 9.3110
2 7.6202
3 6.8069
4 6.3413
5 6.2695
6 5.9801
7 5.5822
8 5.5289
9 4.9365
10 4.8578

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 11.6217
2 9.2709
3 9.2558
4 8.5228
5 8.4196
6 8.1163
7 7.9594
8 7.5957
9 7.3255
10 6.9927

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2127
2 0.1972
3 0.1891
4 0.1848
5 0.1750
6 0.1713
7 0.1676
8 0.1577
9 0.1551
10 0.1542

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1432
2 0.1121
3 0.1100
4 0.0976
5 0.0920
6 0.0825
7 0.0821
8 0.0777
9 0.0749
10 0.0736

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1714
2 0.1660
3 0.1656
4 0.1550
5 0.1276
6 0.1204
7 0.1185
8 0.1127
9 0.1122
10 0.1107


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek