Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,789.9969

Football ohio st 12.8582
Ice Hockey providence 7.9735
Men's Soccer smu 11.4406
Women's Soccer north carolina 12.2707
Women's Volleyball baylor 12.1306
Field Hockey north carolina 12.7413

Centennial - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Johns Hopkins 1,634.2036 1,607.4431 1,620.7681 63.55 71.61 0.352
2nd Franklin & Marshall 1,472.0333 1,451.4617 1,461.7113 58.04 49.82 0.186
3rd Haverford 1,428.2616 1,408.3845 1,418.2882 56.52 56.37 0.135
4th Swarthmore 1,416.0051 1,396.0641 1,405.9992 50.68 59.51 0.122
5th Dickinson 1,386.6557 1,360.8203 1,373.6773 51.31 52.70 0.088
6th Gettysburg 1,337.8022 1,318.5399 1,328.1362 51.86 52.28 0.053
7th McDaniel 1,327.2625 1,303.2741 1,315.2136 51.02 52.83 0.090
8th Muhlenberg 1,323.1610 1,299.2967 1,311.1746 50.43 54.47 0.028
9th Washington Col. 1,242.8646 1,222.1802 1,232.4791 46.77 48.06 -0.046
10th Ursinus 1,235.7601 1,215.1079 1,225.3905 51.58 44.40 -0.083
11th Bryn Mawr 982.8583 953.5137 968.0748 41.93 33.10 -0.329

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Johns Hopkins 0.3711 45.59 8.48 42.34 43.78 1.84 12.44
2nd Franklin & Marshall 0.2435 37.61 13.26 32.49 48.37 3.14 12.82
3rd McDaniel 0.2324 37.13 13.89 34.84 50.81 4.00 9.85
4th Dickinson 0.2109 35.27 14.18 32.34 53.07 3.63 9.78
5th Haverford 0.2060 35.34 14.74 31.96 51.51 4.30 11.24
6th Gettysburg 0.2045 33.96 13.51 31.16 50.84 3.51 9.17
7th Swarthmore 0.2013 32.01 11.89 28.27 56.00 2.97 10.43
8th Muhlenberg 0.1637 30.74 14.37 27.96 57.55 3.90 9.25
9th Washington Col. 0.1433 31.04 16.71 28.26 54.20 3.96 10.10
10th Ursinus 0.1152 27.26 15.74 24.51 56.02 4.16 10.66
11th Bryn Mawr -0.0763 15.86 23.50 14.50 70.77 4.02 9.40

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Johns Hopkins 0.0188 21.86 19.98 20.72 63.54 6.40 5.81
2nd Franklin & Marshall 0.0570 23.57 17.87 20.60 62.42 3.91 4.61
3rd Haverford 0.0708 26.07 18.99 23.77 61.21 6.87 7.61
4th Swarthmore 0.0788 25.04 17.16 23.09 59.67 5.19 6.80
5th Dickinson 0.1230 29.34 17.04 26.13 54.52 4.70 7.47
6th Muhlenberg 0.1361 30.04 16.43 27.04 55.36 4.32 8.15
7th McDaniel 0.1426 29.24 14.98 26.71 57.93 3.61 6.41
8th Gettysburg 0.1511 30.32 15.21 28.11 55.52 3.13 7.95
9th Washington Col. 0.1891 35.16 16.25 32.01 51.41 6.19 8.82
10th Ursinus 0.1981 33.35 13.54 29.03 52.50 1.97 9.79
11th Bryn Mawr 0.2529 40.00 14.71 36.14 47.79 1.21 17.85

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,332.8103 1,341.3411 1,340.7097 1,346.8402 1,340.4253
Difference 8.5308 7.8995 14.0299 10.1534

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Johns Hopkins 66 1,641 999 175 147 60.88 9.4 11.2 1,037 355 67 121 65.77 15.5 8.6
Haverford 84 1,673 1,003 199 163 59.95 8.4 10.3 1,323 637 114 153 51.85 11.6 8.6
Swarthmore 68 1,634 886 129 148 54.22 12.7 11.0 1,383 618 109 162 55.32 12.7 8.5
Gettysburg 76 1,677 867 140 136 51.70 12.0 12.3 1,605 811 130 152 49.47 12.3 10.6
McDaniel 70 1,109 567 149 241 51.13 7.4 4.6 1,094 551 103 135 49.63 10.6 8.1
Muhlenberg 70 1,206 601 132 109 49.83 9.1 11.1 1,215 606 118 122 50.12 10.3 10.0
Ursinus 69 1,367 738 141 125 53.99 9.7 10.9 1,493 850 153 169 43.07 9.8 8.8
Washington Col. 64 1,081 537 146 127 49.68 7.4 8.5 1,185 643 120 119 45.74 9.9 10.0
Dickinson 61 586 269 91 111 45.90 6.4 5.3 640 338 106 103 47.19 6.0 6.2
Franklin & Marshall 64 1,195 681 136 168 56.99 8.8 7.1 1,395 915 88 108 34.41 15.9 12.9
Bryn Mawr 44 580 266 61 85 45.86 9.5 6.8 996 671 186 90 32.63 5.4 11.1
Conference Average 67 1,250 674 136 142 52.74 9.2 9.0 1,215 636 118 130 47.74 10.9 9.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Centennial

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

66.87

2019-09-28
Franklin & Marshall
Haverford
3
1
27
25
23
25
25
20
25
18
GAME

64.98

2019-09-28 Westminster, Md
McDaniel
Swarthmore
1
3
22
25
25
20
22
25
37
39
GAME

64.89

2019-09-20 Swarthmore, PA
Swarthmore
Dickinson
2
3
25
17
25
21
24
26
23
25
11
15
GAME

63.77

2019-10-05 Haverford, Pa.
Haverford
Johns Hopkins
0
3
17
25
12
25
14
25
GAME

62.69

2019-10-12
Gettysburg
Haverford
1
3
25
22
11
25
19
25
21
25
GAME

62.52

2019-10-10
Franklin & Marshall
McDaniel
3
1
25
13
25
27
25
16
25
7
GAME

61.17

2019-09-25
McDaniel
Gettysburg
3
1
25
18
22
25
25
19
26
22
GAME

61.05

2019-10-10
Johns Hopkins
Dickinson
3
0
25
11
25
22
25
11
GAME

60.81

2019-10-05 Swarthmore, PA
Swarthmore
Franklin & Marshall
1
3
25
18
23
25
15
25
26
28
GAME

60.78

2019-10-12
Johns Hopkins
Muhlenberg
3
0
25
8
25
17
25
13

HuskerGeek Centennial All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 17.7409
2 13.2029
3 12.9399
4 12.8119
5 12.3739
6 12.2216
7 10.7026
8 9.7347
9 9.5981
10 9.5643

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 8.3909
2 7.9684
3 7.5006
4 6.6871
5 6.5365
6 6.2926
7 5.5600
8 5.4475
9 4.9986
10 4.9755

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 11.3577
2 9.3500
3 9.0287
4 8.7951
5 8.5075
6 7.3087
7 6.8347
8 6.4173
9 6.2635
10 6.0029

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2609
2 0.2105
3 0.2054
4 0.2037
5 0.2034
6 0.2000
7 0.1993
8 0.1820
9 0.1714
10 0.1702

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1265
2 0.1234
3 0.1191
4 0.1115
5 0.1038
6 0.1015
7 0.1012
8 0.1009
9 0.0943
10 0.0923

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1816
2 0.1670
3 0.1466
4 0.1375
5 0.1333
6 0.1328
7 0.1310
8 0.1289
9 0.1201
10 0.1139


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek