Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,839.6298

Football ohio st 12.7316
Men's Basketball kansas 12.7368
Women's Basketball south carolina 13.4324
Baseball ucla 12.9478
Softball ucla 10.9838
Ice Hockey north dakota 10.7002
Men's Lacrosse syracuse 7.8562
Women's Lacrosse north carolina 10.7252
Men's Soccer georgetown 10.7279
Women's Soccer stanford 13.0262
Men's Volleyball byu 11.1006
Women's Volleyball stanford 11.3000
Field Hockey north carolina 12.2787

Centennial - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Johns Hopkins 1,660.9476 1,620.5499 1,640.6244 64.68 68.20 0.362
2nd Franklin & Marshall 1,473.9796 1,440.0897 1,456.9361 55.89 45.80 0.176
3rd Swarthmore 1,451.0154 1,413.9099 1,432.3425 52.25 59.24 0.128
4th Haverford 1,431.3064 1,400.8151 1,415.9787 55.22 56.57 0.122
5th Dickinson 1,391.4257 1,354.8794 1,373.0309 52.20 53.97 0.086
6th McDaniel 1,394.7627 1,350.7173 1,372.5633 51.50 53.95 0.107
7th Gettysburg 1,384.3718 1,345.9038 1,365.0023 52.46 52.35 0.066
8th Muhlenberg 1,339.9880 1,300.9093 1,320.3041 49.42 55.04 0.023
9th Washington Col. 1,268.2543 1,232.9717 1,250.4886 50.40 50.40 -0.038
10th Ursinus 1,263.7118 1,226.2446 1,244.8373 50.28 45.46 -0.080
11th Bryn Mawr 994.2735 953.3522 973.5979 39.10 34.21 -0.338

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Johns Hopkins 0.3703 45.94 8.91 42.40 42.80 2.64 12.54
2nd Franklin & Marshall 0.2473 37.59 12.86 32.72 48.90 3.29 13.12
3rd McDaniel 0.2368 37.55 13.87 35.13 49.57 3.63 11.04
4th Gettysburg 0.2159 34.43 12.85 31.24 50.63 3.58 9.57
5th Swarthmore 0.2125 32.86 11.61 28.88 55.81 2.95 9.29
6th Dickinson 0.2096 34.90 13.94 31.31 50.97 3.45 9.02
7th Haverford 0.2001 35.38 15.36 32.15 50.52 4.20 11.24
8th Muhlenberg 0.1635 30.76 14.41 28.25 57.47 3.96 10.09
9th Washington Col. 0.1496 31.49 16.53 28.85 55.37 3.95 9.97
10th Ursinus 0.1200 27.60 15.60 25.09 56.56 4.00 9.93
11th Bryn Mawr -0.0739 16.22 23.61 15.11 70.22 4.32 8.07

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Johns Hopkins 0.0079 20.98 20.19 19.89 64.45 6.13 6.65
2nd Franklin & Marshall 0.0716 24.66 17.50 21.80 61.63 4.47 5.85
3rd Haverford 0.0777 26.64 18.86 24.21 59.57 6.65 7.71
4th Swarthmore 0.0850 25.95 17.45 24.21 58.91 5.48 6.96
5th Dickinson 0.1234 29.42 17.09 25.76 54.52 4.67 7.33
6th McDaniel 0.1303 28.84 15.81 26.59 57.73 4.06 6.38
7th Muhlenberg 0.1405 29.78 15.74 27.17 57.03 3.85 7.60
8th Gettysburg 0.1502 29.95 14.92 27.41 55.86 3.21 7.36
9th Washington Col. 0.1874 34.55 15.81 31.78 51.54 5.64 8.87
10th Ursinus 0.1998 33.01 13.03 29.21 53.71 2.06 9.33
11th Bryn Mawr 0.2636 40.17 13.81 36.80 48.89 1.06 17.24

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,349.6096 1,359.0538 1,361.3872 1,369.3759 1,359.8566
Difference 9.4441 11.7776 19.7662 13.6626

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Johns Hopkins 97 2,398 1,486 254 219 61.97 9.4 10.9 1,558 592 117 168 62.00 13.3 9.3
Haverford 113 2,237 1,292 264 230 57.76 8.5 9.7 1,826 862 168 221 52.79 10.9 8.3
Swarthmore 99 2,234 1,212 178 207 54.25 12.6 10.8 1,930 875 159 232 54.66 12.1 8.3
Gettysburg 92 2,019 1,046 172 163 51.81 11.7 12.4 1,957 1,001 153 183 48.85 12.8 10.7
Muhlenberg 91 1,668 817 182 142 48.98 9.2 11.7 1,662 806 147 156 51.50 11.3 10.7
Washington Col. 87 1,554 819 186 173 52.70 8.4 9.0 1,573 826 170 166 47.49 9.3 9.5
McDaniel 103 1,728 870 225 333 50.35 7.7 5.2 1,716 870 154 200 49.30 11.1 8.6
Dickinson 89 973 484 149 172 49.74 6.5 5.7 974 496 142 157 49.08 6.9 6.2
Ursinus 87 1,732 911 170 154 52.60 10.2 11.2 1,890 1,063 185 206 43.76 10.2 9.2
Franklin & Marshall 91 1,677 919 200 243 54.80 8.4 6.9 2,076 1,404 150 166 32.37 13.8 12.5
Bryn Mawr 67 907 408 88 130 44.98 10.3 7.0 1,548 1,032 273 145 33.33 5.7 10.7
Conference Average 92 1,739 933 188 197 52.72 9.3 9.1 1,701 893 165 182 47.74 10.7 9.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Centennial

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

71.08

2019-11-10
Johns Hopkins
Franklin & Marshall
3
0
26
24
25
23
25
20
GAME

68.48

2019-10-30 Gettysburg, Pa.
Gettysburg
Johns Hopkins
0
3
17
25
23
25
11
25
GAME

67.09

2019-10-19
Johns Hopkins
Swarthmore
3
0
25
18
25
22
25
12
GAME

66.74

2019-09-28
Franklin & Marshall
Haverford
3
1
27
25
23
25
25
20
25
18
GAME

66.66

2019-09-28 Westminster, Md
McDaniel
Swarthmore
1
3
22
25
25
20
22
25
37
39
GAME

66.56

2019-10-16
Franklin & Marshall
Gettysburg
3
1
25
23
21
25
25
21
25
22
GAME

65.40

2019-09-20 Swarthmore, PA
Swarthmore
Dickinson
2
3
25
17
25
21
24
26
23
25
11
15
GAME

64.47

2019-11-09 Baltimore, MD
Franklin & Marshall
McDaniel
3
1
25
21
23
25
25
22
25
23
GAME

64.45

2019-10-25
McDaniel
Muhlenberg
3
1
28
26
25
21
21
25
25
19
GAME

64.39

2019-11-02
Johns Hopkins
Franklin & Marshall
3
0
25
15
25
15
25
7

HuskerGeek Centennial All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 23.8995
2 19.2640
3 19.2539
4 17.2939
5 16.6073
6 16.5954
7 14.9220
8 14.6479
9 14.1159
10 13.7865

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 12.0119
2 11.7624
3 10.9858
4 10.7261
5 9.5510
6 9.1692
7 8.6777
8 7.3437
9 7.2897
10 6.6887

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 12.1371
2 12.0450
3 11.6040
4 10.8456
5 10.4924
6 9.8334
7 9.6233
8 9.1394
9 8.8266
10 8.7778

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2516
2 0.2140
3 0.2074
4 0.2048
5 0.1977
6 0.1913
7 0.1880
8 0.1872
9 0.1778
10 0.1765

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1335
2 0.1238
3 0.1169
4 0.1141
5 0.1111
6 0.1092
7 0.0954
8 0.0941
9 0.0891
10 0.0881

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1828
2 0.1673
3 0.1600
4 0.1304
5 0.1278
6 0.1249
7 0.1179
8 0.1171
9 0.1132
10 0.1117


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek