Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

DII Independent - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Oakland City 1,280.7656 1,323.7128 1,302.0621 37.60 46.55 -0.160
2nd Salem (WV) 1,159.4339 1,165.4801 1,162.4531 31.22 38.59 -0.287
3rd Bluefield St. 741.5623 748.1401 744.8440 17.64 12.91 -0.810

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Oakland City 0.0717 24.47 17.30 21.94 58.76 6.07 6.75
2nd Salem (WV) -0.0131 19.28 20.59 18.28 68.07 5.02 3.63
3rd Bluefield St. -0.2595 8.54 34.50 7.08 81.39 6.50 7.43

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Oakland City 0.2313 37.96 14.83 36.14 46.89 3.27 8.78
2nd Salem (WV) 0.2735 41.39 14.04 39.42 45.53 4.29 11.67
3rd Bluefield St. 0.5504 64.07 9.04 58.26 24.59 0.62 32.64

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,069.7864 1,162.4531 0.0000 0.0000 558.0599
Difference 92.6667 -1,069.7864 -1,069.7864 -682.3020

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Oakland City 22 467 247 57 27 52.89 8.2 17.3 415 193 34 41 53.49 12.2 10.1
Salem (WV) 91 1,549 642 106 117 41.45 14.6 13.2 2,025 1,145 226 200 43.46 9.0 10.1
Bluefield St. 39 276 75 27 55 27.17 10.2 5.0 959 776 305 64 19.08 3.1 15.0
Conference Average 51 764 321 63 66 40.50 11.0 11.9 1,133 705 188 102 38.68 8.1 11.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the DII Independent

HuskerGeek DII Independent All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
D
D

2nd Team

Name Team Role
D
D

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 6.0149
2 5.6738
3 5.1436
4 4.8813
5 3.2650
6 2.6667
7 2.2691
8 1.4085
9 1.3096
10 0.5119

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 2.5852
2 0.4588
3 0.1779
4 -0.0589
5 -0.0735
6 -0.0908
7 -0.2066
8 -0.2487
9 -0.3616
10 -0.5244

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 6.9725
2 6.5485
3 5.2026
4 3.2899
5 3.0871
6 2.2961
7 1.9560
8 1.8103
9 1.4003
10 0.8032

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.0692
2 0.0684
3 0.0610
4 0.0585
5 0.0441
6 0.0366
7 0.0336
8 0.0314
9 0.0183
10 0.0181

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.0323
2 0.0074
3 0.0024
4 -0.0007
5 -0.0023
6 -0.0026
7 -0.0053
8 -0.0070
9 -0.0073
10 -0.0083

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.0799
2 0.0792
3 0.0591
4 0.0417
5 0.0387
6 0.0359
7 0.0292
8 0.0287
9 0.0251
10 0.0209


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek