Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,839.6298

Football ohio st 12.7316
Men's Basketball kansas 12.7368
Women's Basketball south carolina 13.4324
Baseball ucla 12.9478
Softball ucla 10.9838
Ice Hockey north dakota 10.7002
Men's Lacrosse syracuse 7.8562
Women's Lacrosse north carolina 10.7252
Men's Soccer georgetown 10.7279
Women's Soccer stanford 13.0262
Men's Volleyball byu 11.1006
Women's Volleyball stanford 11.3000
Field Hockey north carolina 12.2787

GLVC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Rockhurst 1,708.1636 1,669.9820 1,688.9649 59.68 61.33 0.229
2nd Lewis 1,665.1513 1,629.9905 1,647.4771 58.50 59.54 0.207
3rd Mo.-St. Louis 1,628.2846 1,595.7115 1,611.9157 55.61 60.09 0.161
4th Bellarmine 1,606.3799 1,565.8518 1,585.9864 53.83 61.50 0.119
5th Ill. Springfield 1,602.2776 1,568.0178 1,585.0551 57.08 55.58 0.142
6th UIndy 1,601.7835 1,565.4530 1,583.5140 52.14 60.51 0.125
7th Missouri S&T 1,569.6836 1,535.0254 1,552.2578 54.84 44.20 0.094
8th Drury 1,569.2535 1,534.5768 1,551.8183 53.95 55.89 0.093
9th Quincy 1,552.9066 1,515.1133 1,533.8935 50.76 55.78 0.068
10th Southern Ind. 1,528.6574 1,494.3159 1,511.3891 55.46 56.33 0.070
11th McKendree 1,519.6080 1,485.1910 1,502.3010 47.63 56.98 0.068
12th Truman 1,516.2792 1,479.2639 1,497.6572 52.36 53.92 0.063
13th Lindenwood (MO) 1,500.4323 1,472.1673 1,486.2326 49.37 53.23 0.059
14th William Jewell 1,500.4268 1,468.8727 1,484.5659 50.02 54.90 0.042
15th Maryville (MO) 1,413.0155 1,377.8601 1,395.3271 49.34 47.56 -0.058
16th Southwest Baptist 1,381.6045 1,351.7966 1,366.6193 45.91 47.06 -0.091

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Rockhurst 0.3199 42.54 10.55 39.20 44.53 4.07 7.53
2nd Mo.-St. Louis 0.2983 41.45 11.62 37.54 42.80 4.83 7.05
3rd UIndy 0.2820 41.57 13.37 38.65 44.05 5.84 6.20
4th Lewis 0.2768 39.44 11.76 36.20 47.48 2.86 7.87
5th Bellarmine 0.2576 40.17 14.41 37.89 45.08 4.81 6.01
6th Ill. Springfield 0.2517 38.50 13.32 34.78 48.87 4.33 6.97
7th Quincy 0.2383 37.19 13.36 33.81 47.45 5.40 6.14
8th McKendree 0.2354 38.01 14.47 34.92 48.08 4.79 6.85
9th Missouri S&T 0.2287 37.50 14.63 34.24 47.38 5.78 8.50
10th Lindenwood (MO) 0.2236 38.58 16.22 35.79 46.01 5.60 7.48
11th William Jewell 0.2213 35.79 13.66 33.01 51.67 3.85 4.95
12th Drury 0.2209 36.55 14.46 33.40 47.32 5.29 5.90
13th Southern Ind. 0.2129 35.33 14.04 32.54 50.05 4.63 7.14
14th Truman 0.2013 32.94 12.82 29.77 52.04 4.00 5.93
15th Maryville (MO) 0.1633 32.03 15.71 29.53 53.78 5.20 7.00
16th Southwest Baptist 0.1528 33.66 18.37 31.30 50.24 5.54 6.69

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Lewis 0.0695 23.74 16.79 21.90 61.28 6.20 5.43
2nd Rockhurst 0.0907 26.60 17.52 25.04 58.26 6.32 4.53
3rd Ill. Springfield 0.1095 27.90 16.95 25.88 56.56 6.87 4.99
4th Drury 0.1282 29.10 16.28 26.88 54.68 6.41 5.26
5th Missouri S&T 0.1343 28.88 15.45 26.90 56.19 6.05 4.60
6th Mo.-St. Louis 0.1377 28.59 14.83 26.27 55.59 5.37 5.30
7th Bellarmine 0.1383 29.22 15.40 27.47 58.45 4.34 5.26
8th Truman 0.1383 28.46 14.63 25.67 55.88 4.29 5.93
9th Southern Ind. 0.1434 30.62 16.28 28.85 53.56 6.77 6.83
10th UIndy 0.1565 31.03 15.38 28.42 54.16 4.96 5.15
11th Lindenwood (MO) 0.1645 31.89 15.44 29.79 53.76 5.83 6.84
12th McKendree 0.1676 32.56 15.80 29.99 51.50 6.37 4.77
13th Quincy 0.1701 31.66 14.65 28.91 52.82 4.73 5.36
14th William Jewell 0.1790 34.06 16.16 32.44 50.25 6.02 5.33
15th Maryville (MO) 0.2210 36.21 14.11 34.46 51.01 4.56 6.74
16th Southwest Baptist 0.2440 39.10 14.69 36.66 46.20 4.76 8.09

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,536.5609 1,537.8136 1,540.5489 1,539.0105 1,538.4835
Difference 1.2527 3.9880 2.4496 2.5634

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Rockhurst 128 3,013 1,688 173 171 56.02 17.4 17.6 2,432 1,094 106 171 55.02 22.9 14.2
Bellarmine 109 2,604 1,358 124 167 52.15 21.0 15.6 2,161 929 109 205 57.01 19.8 10.5
Lewis 125 2,892 1,594 187 251 55.12 15.5 11.5 2,437 1,140 131 216 53.22 18.6 11.3
Mo.-St. Louis 113 2,504 1,335 146 169 53.32 17.2 14.8 2,147 975 110 166 54.59 19.5 12.9
Southern Ind. 116 2,654 1,473 159 253 55.50 16.7 10.5 2,355 1,144 155 228 51.42 15.2 10.3
Ill. Springfield 116 2,506 1,354 145 162 54.03 17.3 15.5 2,349 1,186 117 190 49.51 20.1 12.4
UIndy 115 2,360 1,148 116 165 48.64 20.3 14.3 2,277 1,045 121 210 54.11 18.8 10.8
Drury 130 2,653 1,335 115 147 50.32 23.1 18.0 2,565 1,265 135 243 50.68 19.0 10.6
Truman 113 2,411 1,206 119 196 50.02 20.3 12.3 2,469 1,241 140 188 49.74 17.6 13.1
Quincy 117 2,411 1,180 118 147 48.94 20.4 16.4 2,450 1,215 131 180 50.41 18.7 13.6
Lindenwood (MO) 100 2,133 1,045 146 224 48.99 14.6 9.5 2,141 1,089 142 173 49.14 15.1 12.4
William Jewell 118 2,288 1,092 87 162 47.73 26.3 14.1 2,425 1,215 139 219 49.90 17.4 11.1
McKendree 107 2,333 1,065 132 219 45.65 17.7 10.7 2,368 1,139 111 197 51.90 21.3 12.0
Maryville (MO) 107 2,108 1,061 151 209 50.33 14.0 10.1 2,391 1,351 152 210 43.50 15.7 11.4
Missouri S&T 124 2,207 1,195 199 262 54.15 11.1 8.4 2,466 1,501 124 193 39.13 19.9 12.8
Southwest Baptist 102 1,959 888 111 145 45.33 17.6 13.5 2,400 1,350 188 216 43.75 12.8 11.1
Conference Average 115 2,440 1,251 139 191 51.02 18.1 13.3 2,365 1,180 132 200 50.19 18.3 11.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the GLVC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

80.07

2019-10-05 St. Louis, Mo.
Mo.-St. Louis
Rockhurst
2
3
25
23
20
25
25
17
22
25
17
19
GAME

78.58

2019-11-15
Lewis
Rockhurst
3
2
20
25
24
26
25
23
25
18
15
10
GAME

76.88

2019-11-01
Southern Ind.
Lewis
3
1
33
31
16
25
25
20
25
23
GAME

75.44

2019-10-26
Ill. Springfield
Mo.-St. Louis
2
3
19
25
20
25
25
19
25
19
13
15
GAME

74.97

2019-11-22 East Peoria, IL
Lewis
Ill. Springfield
3
1
25
9
25
17
19
25
29
27
GAME

74.96

2019-11-02 St. Louis, Mo.
Mo.-St. Louis
Bellarmine
3
1
25
22
23
25
25
21
25
17
GAME

74.71

2019-10-04
Missouri S&T
Ill. Springfield
1
3
25
21
20
25
23
25
24
26
GAME

74.35

2019-11-01 Quincy, IL
Quincy
Rockhurst
0
3
18
25
28
30
21
25
GAME

74.23

2019-11-08
Rockhurst
UIndy
3
0
25
14
25
22
27
25
GAME

74.14

2019-10-11
UIndy
Lewis
3
2
26
24
25
23
22
25
20
25
15
9

HuskerGeek GLVC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S
S
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 26.8966
2 25.6850
3 24.8552
4 23.8468
5 22.9899
6 22.4954
7 21.8960
8 21.7901
9 21.4885
10 20.9868

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 18.9265
2 17.0265
3 15.2373
4 14.5482
5 14.1344
6 13.6499
7 13.0812
8 12.8816
9 12.6283
10 12.3171

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.8934
2 18.3862
3 17.2067
4 17.1502
5 16.5437
6 15.4736
7 15.4713
8 15.0519
9 14.0126
10 13.6596

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2468
2 0.2219
3 0.2109
4 0.2066
5 0.2007
6 0.1955
7 0.1943
8 0.1863
9 0.1850
10 0.1823

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1736
2 0.1347
3 0.1339
4 0.1338
5 0.1330
6 0.1309
7 0.1239
8 0.1186
9 0.1182
10 0.1168

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1766
2 0.1718
3 0.1561
4 0.1420
5 0.1419
6 0.1399
7 0.1369
8 0.1340
9 0.1298
10 0.1251


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek