Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,839.6298
BPR D1 NCAAWBB Baylor 0.8231

Football ohio st 12.6975
Men's Basketball kansas 13.0297
Women's Basketball baylor 13.4405
Ice Hockey minnesota st 10.2720
Men's Soccer georgetown 10.7279
Women's Soccer stanford 13.0262
Men's Volleyball byu 10.0755
Women's Volleyball stanford 11.3000
Field Hockey north carolina 12.2787

Great Northwest - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Western Wash. 1,686.8619 1,647.0816 1,666.8531 57.89 66.66 0.222
2nd Alas. Anchorage 1,632.4452 1,594.3618 1,613.2911 57.41 65.71 0.178
3rd Central Wash. 1,628.0229 1,592.1776 1,610.0005 58.51 57.69 0.132
4th Simon Fraser 1,583.4696 1,553.6411 1,568.4844 56.46 62.33 0.142
5th Alas. Fairbanks 1,576.4761 1,537.0146 1,556.6203 54.02 60.77 0.115
6th Concordia Portland 1,533.1341 1,497.2795 1,515.1007 52.38 58.88 0.056
7th Northwest Nazarene 1,514.0750 1,477.4638 1,495.6574 53.38 56.12 0.036
8th Seattle Pacific 1,509.6907 1,472.1156 1,490.7848 51.92 57.18 0.046
9th Mont. St. Billings 1,471.7659 1,437.2515 1,454.4063 50.69 56.85 0.020
10th Western Ore. 1,434.3837 1,399.6475 1,416.9092 48.38 55.57 -0.007
11th Saint Martin's 1,393.0788 1,354.7317 1,373.7715 33.36 22.36 -0.077

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Western Wash. 0.3114 42.18 11.04 39.55 46.65 3.79 7.09
2nd Alas. Anchorage 0.2836 39.66 11.30 36.78 49.66 3.41 9.66
3rd Simon Fraser 0.2501 38.17 13.17 36.00 47.72 4.69 8.10
4th Central Wash. 0.2445 37.61 13.16 34.97 47.65 5.31 7.11
5th Alas. Fairbanks 0.2338 37.84 14.46 35.39 46.13 4.32 8.42
6th Northwest Nazarene 0.2212 34.63 12.51 32.13 52.61 4.37 8.67
7th Mont. St. Billings 0.2172 34.67 12.95 32.68 51.74 4.42 7.75
8th Concordia Portland 0.2140 34.16 12.76 31.65 52.40 4.81 7.57
9th Seattle Pacific 0.2086 35.87 15.01 33.33 50.94 5.01 8.40
10th Western Ore. 0.2004 35.45 15.41 33.37 50.77 4.76 7.90
11th Saint Martin's 0.1518 31.17 15.99 28.70 53.58 8.26 15.53

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Western Wash. 0.0893 27.15 18.22 25.48 57.16 8.75 5.84
2nd Alas. Anchorage 0.1051 28.92 18.40 27.17 55.80 7.43 7.31
3rd Simon Fraser 0.1080 26.58 15.77 25.18 60.76 4.76 6.13
4th Central Wash. 0.1122 26.88 15.66 25.01 58.64 5.73 4.37
5th Alas. Fairbanks 0.1188 29.37 17.49 27.96 53.56 6.81 5.82
6th Concordia Portland 0.1576 30.68 14.92 28.96 55.55 5.34 6.65
7th Seattle Pacific 0.1625 32.05 15.80 30.04 53.82 5.86 8.06
8th Northwest Nazarene 0.1850 31.99 13.49 29.53 55.37 3.93 6.86
9th Mont. St. Billings 0.1971 35.07 15.36 32.80 50.41 5.79 9.45
10th Western Ore. 0.2076 36.29 15.53 33.32 49.28 5.92 10.51
11th Saint Martin's 0.2284 36.10 13.27 33.21 50.81 4.04 6.16

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,523.8072 1,524.5839 1,527.2935 1,525.3295 1,525.2535
Difference 0.7767 3.4863 1.5223 1.9284

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Western Wash. 110 2,659 1,466 176 205 55.13 15.1 13.0 2,049 811 126 167 60.42 16.3 12.3
Alas. Anchorage 118 2,716 1,473 249 290 54.23 10.9 9.4 2,217 921 181 243 58.46 12.2 9.1
Simon Fraser 106 2,307 1,205 177 222 52.23 13.0 10.4 2,087 933 148 158 55.30 14.1 13.2
Alas. Fairbanks 110 2,322 1,218 188 221 52.46 12.4 10.5 2,059 934 141 185 54.64 14.6 11.1
Central Wash. 112 2,441 1,342 164 123 54.98 14.9 19.8 2,122 1,035 113 186 51.23 18.8 11.4
Concordia Portland 105 2,355 1,231 170 127 52.27 13.9 18.5 2,157 1,024 162 187 52.53 13.3 11.5
Seattle Pacific 112 2,327 1,222 196 179 52.51 11.9 13.0 2,235 1,103 208 183 50.65 10.7 12.2
Northwest Nazarene 108 2,327 1,200 194 136 51.57 12.0 17.1 2,298 1,141 179 172 50.35 12.8 13.4
Mont. St. Billings 106 2,209 1,112 164 185 50.34 13.5 11.9 2,185 1,079 233 206 50.62 9.4 10.6
Western Ore. 93 1,845 933 144 242 50.57 12.8 7.6 1,918 979 228 184 48.96 8.4 10.4
Saint Martin's 100 678 209 117 133 30.83 5.8 5.1 3,146 2,928 224 216 6.93 14.0 14.6
Conference Average 107 2,199 1,146 176 188 50.65 12.4 12.4 2,225 1,172 177 190 49.10 13.2 11.8
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Great Northwest

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

79.87

2019-11-14 Bellingham, WA
Western Wash.
Alas. Anchorage
2
3
25
23
25
22
23
25
25
27
14
16
GAME

79.09

2019-10-17 Anchorage, Alaska
Alas. Anchorage
Simon Fraser
2
3
25
23
25
14
23
25
23
25
11
15
GAME

79.08

2019-09-21 Lacey, WA
Saint Martin's
Alas. Anchorage
1
3
12
25
19
25
25
23
20
25
GAME

78.40

2019-09-19 Burnaby, BC
Simon Fraser
Central Wash.
2
3
20
25
25
17
31
29
11
25
10
15
GAME

77.24

2019-10-26 Lacey, WA
Saint Martin's
Northwest Nazarene
1
3
16
25
23
25
25
13
10
25
GAME

77.05

2019-10-26 Seattle, Wash.
Seattle Pacific
Central Wash.
3
2
20
25
24
26
25
21
25
22
18
16
GAME

75.11

2019-11-14 Portland, Ore.
Concordia Portland
Central Wash.
3
2
25
18
15
25
21
25
25
23
15
12
GAME

74.89

2019-10-19 Anchorage, Alaska
Alas. Anchorage
Western Wash.
3
1
25
19
19
25
25
20
26
24
GAME

74.78

2019-10-31
Central Wash.
Alas. Fairbanks
3
2
25
23
22
25
25
19
19
25
15
12
GAME

74.65

2019-11-09 Seattle, Wash.
Seattle Pacific
Simon Fraser
2
3
25
23
27
29
23
25
26
24
11
15

HuskerGeek Great Northwest All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 26.9182
2 26.4622
3 26.3718
4 25.9221
5 25.7484
6 24.4183
7 24.3314
8 21.9652
9 21.2929
10 21.0499

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.5044
2 15.4887
3 15.1686
4 14.8054
5 14.7919
6 14.4904
7 14.1450
8 13.7881
9 13.6527
10 13.2139

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.9595
2 18.5111
3 15.8996
4 14.9072
5 14.5549
6 13.8477
7 13.5818
8 13.1548
9 12.9696
10 12.5837

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2592
2 0.2496
3 0.2447
4 0.2442
5 0.2385
6 0.2282
7 0.2265
8 0.2239
9 0.2197
10 0.2076

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1557
2 0.1517
3 0.1450
4 0.1449
5 0.1448
6 0.1287
7 0.1286
8 0.1283
9 0.1277
10 0.1189

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1848
2 0.1815
3 0.1710
4 0.1590
5 0.1420
6 0.1372
7 0.1323
8 0.1277
9 0.1221
10 0.1201


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek