Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Heartland - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Ark.-Fort Smith 1,548.9159 1,544.6254 1,546.7692 48.36 62.62 0.100
2nd Lubbock Christian 1,546.3863 1,538.2369 1,542.3063 48.68 61.99 0.094
3rd St. Edward's 1,537.6436 1,519.3378 1,528.4633 48.71 59.67 0.083
4th St. Mary's (TX) 1,487.7310 1,476.2883 1,481.9986 45.46 58.09 0.041
5th DBU 1,481.6283 1,472.6634 1,477.1391 46.54 57.02 0.040
6th Tex. A&M Int'l 1,352.4637 1,347.1620 1,349.8103 39.73 50.20 -0.099
7th Newman 1,344.7490 1,337.3783 1,341.0586 37.87 50.68 -0.109

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Lubbock Christian 0.2328 36.54 13.26 34.87 51.28 4.32 6.36
2nd Ark.-Fort Smith 0.2295 34.57 11.62 31.63 53.71 4.12 5.76
3rd St. Mary's (TX) 0.2014 34.86 14.73 33.36 50.74 4.88 6.26
4th St. Edward's 0.2008 32.66 12.59 30.59 55.32 4.45 5.61
5th DBU 0.1938 33.05 13.66 30.47 53.03 4.87 5.05
6th Tex. A&M Int'l 0.1315 30.23 17.08 29.01 55.79 4.78 6.22
7th Newman 0.1203 29.41 17.38 27.66 55.89 4.80 6.54

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st St. Edward's 0.1177 28.39 16.63 26.64 56.72 5.63 5.30
2nd Ark.-Fort Smith 0.1291 29.22 16.31 27.08 56.34 4.73 4.61
3rd Lubbock Christian 0.1389 30.00 16.11 28.63 54.90 5.05 5.27
4th DBU 0.1540 31.20 15.80 29.03 54.81 5.39 7.66
5th St. Mary's (TX) 0.1601 31.65 15.65 29.69 55.49 4.99 6.35
6th Newman 0.2289 36.70 13.81 33.84 50.95 3.14 8.63
7th Tex. A&M Int'l 0.2306 37.40 14.35 35.35 50.08 4.29 8.56

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,466.7922 1,475.9435 1,495.8670 1,481.9986 1,480.1503
Difference 9.1513 29.0748 15.2064 17.8108

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Lubbock Christian 109 2,471 1,157 154 174 46.82 16.0 14.2 2,258 927 114 143 58.95 19.8 15.8
Ark.-Fort Smith 116 2,592 1,183 137 163 45.64 18.9 15.9 2,421 1,004 115 164 58.53 21.1 14.8
St. Edward's 120 2,653 1,235 138 151 46.55 19.2 17.6 2,507 1,081 131 153 56.88 19.1 16.4
DBU 103 2,187 974 104 127 44.54 21.0 17.2 2,248 1,033 172 186 54.05 13.1 12.1
St. Mary's (TX) 96 2,060 894 123 135 43.40 16.7 15.3 2,140 970 132 141 54.67 16.2 15.2
Tex. A&M Int'l 94 1,825 721 114 145 39.51 16.0 12.6 2,214 1,133 187 174 48.83 11.8 12.7
Newman 86 1,558 560 96 122 35.94 16.2 12.8 2,021 1,060 170 161 47.55 11.9 12.6
Conference Average 103 2,192 961 124 145 43.20 17.7 15.1 2,258 1,030 146 160 54.21 16.1 14.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Heartland

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.31

2018-09-29 Austin, Texas
St. Edward's
Ark.-Fort Smith
2
3
24
26
23
25
25
20
25
22
10
15
GAME

74.27

2018-09-14 Carrollton, TX
St. Edward's
St. Mary's (TX)
3
2
28
30
25
19
25
21
22
25
15
11
GAME

73.28

2018-10-11 Fort Smith, Ark.
Ark.-Fort Smith
Lubbock Christian
0
3
21
25
20
25
26
28
GAME

73.06

2018-10-27 Lubbock, Texas
Lubbock Christian
St. Mary's (TX)
3
1
26
24
18
25
28
26
25
19
GAME

72.86

2018-11-09 Lubbock, Texas
Lubbock Christian
St. Edward's
2
3
22
25
25
13
21
25
25
14
11
15
GAME

72.16

2018-10-06 Lubbock, Texas
Lubbock Christian
St. Edward's
3
0
31
29
25
23
25
22
GAME

71.19

2018-11-01 Dallas, TX
DBU
St. Mary's (TX)
1
3
23
25
25
19
20
25
22
25
GAME

70.97

2018-09-14 Carrollton, TX
Tex. A&M Int'l
DBU
2
3
19
25
27
25
21
25
29
27
12
15
GAME

70.50

2018-09-27 San Antonio, Texas
St. Mary's (TX)
Lubbock Christian
0
3
19
25
22
25
27
29
GAME

70.33

2018-10-06 Fort Smith, Ark.
Ark.-Fort Smith
St. Mary's (TX)
1
3
31
33
12
25
25
18
21
25

HuskerGeek Heartland All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 24.7315
2 24.2332
3 23.9945
4 22.4218
5 21.6823
6 21.4713
7 18.2587
8 18.2386
9 17.8446
10 15.4040

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 14.7336
2 13.8779
3 13.3226
4 12.1492
5 9.8043
6 9.6126
7 8.2105
8 7.7521
9 7.7115
10 7.6877

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.4532
2 20.2878
3 16.8737
4 14.3819
5 13.6569
6 12.0840
7 11.8507
8 11.2606
9 9.9980
10 9.2584

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2524
2 0.2223
3 0.2085
4 0.2076
5 0.2068
6 0.1789
7 0.1675
8 0.1593
9 0.1591
10 0.1572

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1503
2 0.1285
3 0.1148
4 0.1115
5 0.0899
6 0.0829
7 0.0820
8 0.0813
9 0.0740
10 0.0732

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1951
2 0.1704
3 0.1626
4 0.1507
5 0.1261
6 0.1240
7 0.1185
8 0.1109
9 0.1020
10 0.1019


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek