Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Horizon - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Northern Ky. 1,662.3468 1,626.3304 1,644.2400 47.32 63.13 0.080
2nd Wright St. 1,655.9109 1,620.3462 1,638.0320 51.06 60.35 0.086
3rd Milwaukee 1,646.1112 1,614.5350 1,630.2466 48.76 60.60 0.061
4th Green Bay 1,639.0111 1,601.5349 1,620.1646 49.22 58.74 0.076
5th UIC 1,598.4693 1,567.3111 1,582.8135 47.37 56.33 0.020
6th Cleveland St. 1,591.9403 1,560.4720 1,576.1276 45.42 57.96 0.027
7th Oakland 1,568.5376 1,533.6436 1,550.9924 46.23 55.43 0.023
8th IUPUI 1,514.4704 1,480.0728 1,497.1728 44.88 51.88 -0.038
9th Youngstown St. 1,457.6691 1,423.8727 1,440.6718 40.97 50.97 -0.096

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Milwaukee 0.2513 38.71 13.57 36.24 45.59 6.41 6.88
2nd Northern Ky. 0.2445 37.42 12.96 34.82 48.91 5.24 7.75
3rd Green Bay 0.2324 37.08 13.84 34.50 48.87 5.18 5.80
4th Wright St. 0.2318 36.21 13.03 33.00 49.24 5.17 6.74
5th Cleveland St. 0.2284 36.16 13.32 34.02 51.93 4.71 6.31
6th Oakland 0.2195 36.66 14.71 34.46 48.90 5.89 5.61
7th UIC 0.2186 36.97 15.11 33.65 46.67 5.48 5.72
8th IUPUI 0.1672 32.90 16.18 30.75 52.84 5.54 7.81
9th Youngstown St. 0.1499 31.54 16.56 29.80 54.03 5.67 7.52

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Wright St. 0.1460 29.93 15.32 28.67 56.39 6.24 5.32
2nd Green Bay 0.1567 31.17 15.50 29.18 54.70 5.81 6.28
3rd Northern Ky. 0.1650 32.36 15.87 29.77 53.28 6.78 4.05
4th Milwaukee 0.1907 33.08 14.01 31.36 53.69 4.35 5.57
5th Oakland 0.1966 34.21 14.55 31.81 52.08 6.25 5.73
6th UIC 0.1981 33.91 14.10 31.04 50.36 6.65 5.15
7th Cleveland St. 0.2016 34.37 14.21 31.98 51.15 6.42 5.68
8th IUPUI 0.2054 35.19 14.65 32.07 50.12 5.89 6.11
9th Youngstown St. 0.2455 37.33 12.78 34.82 50.01 4.63 6.43

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,575.6068 1,585.0785 1,592.0690 1,593.0353 1,586.4474
Difference 9.4717 16.4621 17.4284 14.4541

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Wright St. 111 2,537 1,295 154 237 51.05 16.5 10.7 2,183 911 117 218 58.27 18.7 10.0
Milwaukee 119 2,736 1,332 175 193 48.68 15.6 14.2 2,385 966 123 187 59.50 19.4 12.8
Northern Ky. 126 2,812 1,266 194 242 45.02 14.5 11.6 2,580 1,015 107 206 60.66 24.1 12.5
Green Bay 114 2,546 1,193 126 224 46.86 20.2 11.4 2,410 1,040 150 191 56.85 16.1 12.6
UIC 116 2,515 1,177 132 149 46.80 19.1 16.9 2,458 1,119 126 205 54.48 19.5 12.0
Oakland 108 2,316 1,031 118 201 44.52 19.6 11.5 2,384 1,117 133 188 53.15 17.9 12.7
Cleveland St. 108 2,264 969 121 160 42.80 18.7 14.2 2,341 1,059 132 169 54.76 17.7 13.9
IUPUI 115 2,305 1,011 160 319 43.86 14.4 7.2 2,575 1,291 148 220 49.86 17.4 11.7
Youngstown St. 101 1,954 808 140 190 41.35 14.0 10.3 2,274 1,138 141 208 49.96 16.1 10.9
Conference Average 113 2,443 1,120 147 213 45.66 17.0 12.0 2,399 1,073 131 199 55.27 18.5 12.1
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Horizon

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

81.99

2019-10-04 Fairborn, Ohio
Wright St.
Northern Ky.
3
2
21
25
20
25
25
22
27
25
15
11
GAME

79.73

2019-10-13 Rochester, Mich.
Oakland
Milwaukee
3
2
23
25
25
18
26
24
20
25
15
13
GAME

79.50

2019-11-23
Wright St.
Northern Ky.
1
3
19
25
25
21
25
27
22
25
GAME

79.31

2019-11-23 Dayton, Ohio
Milwaukee
Green Bay
3
1
23
25
25
19
25
20
31
29
GAME

79.07

2019-10-09
Northern Ky.
Oakland
2
3
25
22
26
28
20
25
25
18
13
15
GAME

78.20

2019-11-01 Highland Heights, KY
Northern Ky.
Green Bay
1
3
21
25
19
25
25
23
23
25
GAME

77.67

2019-10-05 Cleveland, Ohio
Cleveland St.
Green Bay
3
2
22
25
17
25
26
24
25
22
15
7
GAME

76.78

2019-10-18 Chicago, Ill.
UIC
Northern Ky.
3
2
16
25
25
20
25
22
27
29
15
9
GAME

76.73

2019-11-16 Milwaukee, Wis.
Milwaukee
Green Bay
3
2
22
25
25
22
25
18
22
25
15
13
GAME

76.59

2019-10-25 Highland Heights, KY
Northern Ky.
Wright St.
1
3
23
25
25
19
22
25
17
25

HuskerGeek Horizon All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 32.1532
2 27.1016
3 26.4465
4 24.9682
5 22.5921
6 22.4142
7 21.7416
8 21.7363
9 20.9836
10 20.5412

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 20.2931
2 15.8390
3 15.1192
4 15.0192
5 12.6191
6 11.3228
7 11.2837
8 10.0941
9 9.5549
10 9.3583

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 21.7163
2 19.5768
3 18.0049
4 15.4306
5 14.5708
6 13.7574
7 13.6845
8 13.0823
9 12.9836
10 12.5437

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2820
2 0.2509
3 0.2320
4 0.2092
5 0.2030
6 0.2013
7 0.1961
8 0.1920
9 0.1864
10 0.1828

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1780
2 0.1400
3 0.1391
4 0.1389
5 0.1179
6 0.1091
7 0.1048
8 0.1034
9 0.0925
10 0.0917

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2011
2 0.1715
3 0.1592
4 0.1552
5 0.1325
6 0.1295
7 0.1207
8 0.1206
9 0.1139
10 0.1124


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek