Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Landmark - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Juniata 1,503.5773 1,480.9386 1,492.2150 59.62 69.37 0.275
2nd Susquehanna 1,365.3979 1,375.7584 1,370.5684 51.94 60.40 0.123
3rd Catholic 1,281.1008 1,299.2307 1,290.1339 48.38 55.36 0.048
4th Moravian 1,241.3932 1,272.1427 1,256.6739 49.76 55.28 0.005
5th Scranton 1,238.3107 1,255.7058 1,246.9780 48.20 50.54 0.011
6th Goucher 1,200.5587 1,212.1684 1,206.3496 44.29 50.09 -0.024
7th Merchant Marine 1,074.8762 1,055.5700 1,065.1794 40.64 44.07 -0.147

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Juniata 0.3215 45.42 13.27 41.39 41.26 3.03 11.95
2nd Susquehanna 0.2430 38.19 13.89 34.44 44.51 3.51 10.42
3rd Catholic 0.1842 30.10 11.69 26.73 59.22 4.58 6.94
4th Moravian 0.1759 32.84 15.25 29.92 51.57 4.71 9.81
5th Scranton 0.1602 31.67 15.65 29.46 56.66 4.43 8.86
6th Goucher 0.1450 28.18 13.68 25.84 57.77 4.16 8.93
7th Merchant Marine 0.0712 27.76 20.64 25.18 56.79 5.65 10.54

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Juniata 0.0465 24.23 19.58 22.08 63.70 5.97 4.86
2nd Susquehanna 0.1196 27.61 15.65 25.52 59.61 5.16 5.08
3rd Catholic 0.1364 29.69 16.05 27.65 58.05 6.33 10.33
4th Scranton 0.1489 31.73 16.84 28.11 52.11 5.57 7.80
5th Goucher 0.1690 33.39 16.49 31.13 56.90 3.67 9.69
6th Moravian 0.1710 32.40 15.29 29.61 50.43 5.01 7.92
7th Merchant Marine 0.2178 36.83 15.05 32.77 52.15 5.22 12.21

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,275.4426 1,274.1408 1,264.5953 1,256.6739 1,267.7131
Difference -1.3018 -10.8473 -18.7687 -10.3060

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Juniata 125 2,144 1,091 283 262 50.89 7.6 8.2 1,796 716 139 245 60.13 12.9 7.3
Catholic 132 943 496 181 134 52.60 5.2 7.0 820 364 257 245 55.61 3.2 3.3
Susquehanna 127 1,169 574 274 238 49.10 4.3 4.9 1,091 494 164 216 54.72 6.7 5.1
Merchant Marine 59 639 334 196 166 52.27 3.3 3.8 613 304 118 113 50.41 5.2 5.4
Goucher 108 1,286 618 213 271 48.06 6.0 4.7 1,326 663 228 225 50.00 5.8 5.9
Moravian 128 1,072 471 199 253 43.94 5.4 4.2 1,197 604 230 190 49.54 5.2 6.3
Scranton 127 1,160 534 226 208 46.03 5.1 5.6 1,340 717 245 286 46.49 5.5 4.7
Conference Average 115 1,202 588 225 219 48.98 5.3 5.5 1,169 552 197 217 52.42 6.3 5.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Landmark

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

63.45

2013-11-09 Huntingdon, Pa.
Juniata
Susquehanna
3
1
25
17
25
18
19
25
25
10
GAME

60.78

2013-11-08 Huntingdon, Pa.
Juniata
Scranton
3
1
25
16
25
15
21
25
25
10
GAME

58.87

2013-11-08 Huntingdon, Pa.
Catholic
Susquehanna
0
3
21
25
17
25
16
25
GAME

56.57

2013-09-28 Newport News, Va.
Juniata
Scranton
3
0
25
14
25
10
25
14
GAME

53.93

2013-11-05 Washington, D.C.
Catholic
Goucher
3
0
25
11
25
9
25
16
GAME

53.70

2013-11-05 Scranton, Pa.
Scranton
Moravian
3
1
25
22
25
17
19
25
25
13
GAME

47.93

2013-10-27 Towson, Md.
Goucher
Merchant Marine
3
0
25
10
25
15
25
17

HuskerGeek Landmark All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 14.0382
2 12.8544
3 12.5018
4 11.6796
5 10.8543
6 9.6949
7 8.7387
8 8.6379
9 8.6307
10 8.4178

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 10.6683
2 7.9342
3 6.0444
4 5.7807
5 5.7175
6 5.6525
7 4.8937
8 4.2156
9 3.5893
10 3.4864

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 10.2824
2 8.5658
3 7.0737
4 6.0433
5 6.0272
6 5.9414
7 5.4156
8 5.0389
9 5.0035
10 4.5676

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2359
2 0.1884
3 0.1829
4 0.1777
5 0.1610
6 0.1598
7 0.1587
8 0.1559
9 0.1545
10 0.1409

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1497
2 0.1350
3 0.0912
4 0.0854
5 0.0789
6 0.0785
7 0.0781
8 0.0777
9 0.0748
10 0.0728

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1616
2 0.1405
3 0.1168
4 0.1143
5 0.0972
6 0.0905
7 0.0873
8 0.0863
9 0.0862
10 0.0825


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek