Nerdly Nebraska.

2018-2019 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,750.6919
BPR D1 NCAAWBB Oregon 0.7989

Football alabama 12.7060
Men's Basketball duke 13.5781
Women's Basketball uconn 13.6085
Ice Hockey st cloud st 9.6944
Men's Soccer palm beach atl 11.0787
Women's Soccer usc 12.7838
Women's Volleyball stanford 13.0484
Field Hockey north carolina 12.5324

Landmark - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Juniata 1,558.4797 1,555.8806 1,557.1796 60.05 68.59 0.305
2nd Susquehanna 1,443.3282 1,451.4087 1,447.3628 53.85 63.12 0.161
3rd Scranton 1,371.8491 1,391.9499 1,381.8629 48.54 61.61 0.099
4th Elizabethtown 1,346.7504 1,372.8878 1,359.7563 51.00 57.66 0.075
5th Catholic 1,338.2283 1,354.8883 1,346.5326 48.18 58.70 0.040
6th Moravian 1,265.6615 1,287.9224 1,276.7434 46.52 53.40 0.006
7th Goucher 1,171.5954 1,214.5060 1,192.8578 41.84 50.97 -0.076

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Juniata 0.3128 45.09 13.82 42.15 41.08 2.80 9.99
2nd Susquehanna 0.2450 37.72 13.22 33.86 48.63 3.25 9.45
3rd Scranton 0.2121 36.20 14.99 33.65 50.83 3.63 10.26
4th Elizabethtown 0.2097 34.97 14.00 32.49 51.57 4.20 10.34
5th Catholic 0.1846 32.53 14.08 30.33 54.43 4.92 7.50
6th Moravian 0.1777 33.08 15.31 32.04 53.67 4.90 10.81
7th Goucher 0.1255 29.25 16.70 27.50 57.36 4.14 9.99

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Juniata 0.0075 21.81 21.07 20.00 63.12 7.45 5.85
2nd Susquehanna 0.0841 24.89 16.48 22.97 59.50 4.85 4.77
3rd Scranton 0.1132 28.32 16.99 26.60 56.75 4.05 7.25
4th Elizabethtown 0.1344 30.68 17.24 28.89 55.91 4.83 6.75
5th Catholic 0.1449 30.64 16.15 29.22 58.49 3.43 6.08
6th Moravian 0.1712 32.38 15.26 29.60 52.60 3.71 8.75
7th Goucher 0.2014 34.61 14.47 31.81 53.99 3.14 8.13

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,366.0422 1,362.4516 1,362.7173 1,359.7563 1,362.7418
Difference -3.5906 -3.3249 -6.2859 -4.4005

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Juniata 112 2,489 1,268 202 262 50.94 12.3 9.5 2,104 849 168 208 59.65 12.5 10.1
Susquehanna 136 2,756 1,311 222 280 47.57 12.4 9.8 2,590 1,127 175 230 56.49 14.8 11.3
Elizabethtown 126 2,753 1,349 259 234 49.00 10.6 11.8 2,641 1,216 213 264 53.96 12.4 10.0
Catholic 123 2,498 1,173 175 145 46.96 14.3 17.2 2,384 1,057 179 228 55.66 13.3 10.5
Scranton 133 2,758 1,226 264 326 44.45 10.4 8.5 2,694 1,168 233 276 56.64 11.6 9.8
Goucher 102 1,844 859 249 302 46.58 7.4 6.1 1,893 916 194 217 51.61 9.8 8.7
Moravian 111 1,593 741 258 257 46.52 6.2 6.2 1,666 821 217 241 50.72 7.7 6.9
Conference Average 120 2,384 1,132 233 258 47.43 10.5 9.9 2,282 1,022 197 238 54.96 11.7 9.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Landmark

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

67.95

2018-10-27 Washington, D.C.
Catholic
Scranton
3
2
24
26
21
25
25
22
25
22
17
15
GAME

65.53

2018-10-27 Bethlehem, Pa.
Moravian
Elizabethtown
1
3
25
23
23
25
20
25
21
25
GAME

65.14

2018-09-29 Selinsgrove, Pa.
Susquehanna
Juniata
0
3
27
29
11
25
19
25
GAME

64.37

2018-10-16 Elizabethtown, Pa.
Elizabethtown
Juniata
1
3
16
25
22
25
25
23
11
25
GAME

64.18

2018-10-27 Washington, D.C.
Juniata
Scranton
3
0
28
26
25
21
25
18
GAME

63.77

2018-10-27 Washington, D.C.
Catholic
Juniata
0
3
16
25
20
25
22
25
GAME

63.65

2018-09-29 Selinsgrove, Pa.
Susquehanna
Catholic
3
0
25
20
25
20
26
24
GAME

63.35

2018-11-03 Huntingdon, Pa.
Juniata
Susquehanna
3
0
25
14
25
18
25
16
GAME

63.33

2018-10-10 Selinsgrove, Pa.
Susquehanna
Scranton
3
2
20
25
25
18
26
24
18
25
15
9
GAME

62.21

2018-10-27 Bethlehem, Pa.
Elizabethtown
Susquehanna
0
3
19
25
21
25
19
25

HuskerGeek Landmark All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 22.4423
2 20.8037
3 20.5552
4 19.4419
5 18.8593
6 17.7425
7 17.6079
8 17.5245
9 17.1828
10 16.4640

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 13.8081
2 13.7686
3 12.5890
4 11.6880
5 11.5465
6 10.6199
7 10.4742
8 10.0364
9 9.4123
10 8.9942

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.0677
2 16.1293
3 15.2458
4 13.8717
5 12.2090
6 11.2366
7 10.9426
8 10.8156
9 10.2690
10 10.0702

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1952
2 0.1926
3 0.1786
4 0.1757
5 0.1706
6 0.1630
7 0.1614
8 0.1607
9 0.1602
10 0.1546

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1197
2 0.1166
3 0.1151
4 0.1141
5 0.1141
6 0.0985
7 0.0958
8 0.0939
9 0.0908
10 0.0907

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1581
2 0.1446
3 0.1309
4 0.1270
5 0.1144
6 0.1022
7 0.1017
8 0.0987
9 0.0904
10 0.0887


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek