Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,789.9969

Football ohio st 12.8582
Ice Hockey providence 7.9735
Men's Soccer smu 11.4406
Women's Soccer north carolina 12.2707
Women's Volleyball baylor 12.1306
Field Hockey north carolina 12.7413

Lone Star - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Angelo St. 1,653.8444 1,628.4780 1,641.1122 59.35 57.21 0.222
2nd Tarleton St. 1,612.4179 1,591.2437 1,601.7958 55.66 55.77 0.152
3rd Tex. A&M-Commerce 1,601.8540 1,580.1042 1,590.9419 49.43 34.68 0.144
4th Ark.-Fort Smith 1,591.8766 1,568.5534 1,580.1720 55.59 57.42 0.158
5th West Tex. A&M 1,581.1248 1,561.0357 1,571.0482 48.74 32.99 0.135
6th St. Edward's 1,567.3981 1,543.9985 1,555.6543 49.29 57.76 0.129
7th Tex. Permian Basin 1,563.2730 1,540.3553 1,551.7719 55.33 52.90 0.112
8th Lubbock Christian 1,521.7866 1,500.2459 1,510.9779 53.34 49.12 0.045
9th Tex. A&M-Kingsville 1,518.1439 1,497.9690 1,508.0228 50.29 51.50 0.066
10th Texas Woman's 1,517.5380 1,496.8995 1,507.1834 51.07 51.80 0.063
11th DBU 1,501.8390 1,481.6822 1,491.7266 52.51 50.92 0.059
12th Texas-Tyler 1,496.5007 1,476.3146 1,486.3734 51.61 50.95 0.044
13th St. Mary's (TX) 1,475.4971 1,453.5548 1,464.4849 45.59 50.72 0.020
14th Western N.M. 1,459.6394 1,436.3966 1,447.9714 49.25 46.28 0.011
15th Cameron 1,438.6845 1,416.5122 1,427.5553 43.31 53.11 -0.030
16th Eastern N.M. 1,422.0073 1,401.0219 1,411.4756 48.02 49.25 -0.018
17th Tex. A&M Int'l 1,394.1550 1,371.3185 1,382.6896 42.86 44.73 -0.075

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Angelo St. 0.3264 43.08 10.44 38.25 40.15 2.60 8.66
2nd Ark.-Fort Smith 0.2946 39.37 9.91 34.56 45.75 3.69 8.25
3rd West Tex. A&M 0.2795 41.34 13.39 39.02 46.25 6.21 9.97
4th Tarleton St. 0.2731 40.00 12.68 37.09 45.96 5.09 7.99
5th St. Edward's 0.2668 38.55 11.88 35.53 49.95 4.81 7.63
6th Tex. A&M-Commerce 0.2530 41.09 15.79 38.35 43.75 7.16 12.31
7th Texas-Tyler 0.2234 37.31 14.97 35.33 46.45 4.87 8.24
8th Tex. Permian Basin 0.2232 34.71 12.39 32.21 51.33 5.06 7.26
9th Texas Woman's 0.2145 35.74 14.29 31.36 49.68 4.31 8.15
10th Tex. A&M-Kingsville 0.2085 34.81 13.96 31.55 50.64 5.43 7.93
11th Western N.M. 0.2050 35.01 14.50 32.44 47.98 5.03 7.39
12th Cameron 0.2021 35.61 15.40 33.35 50.38 5.67 7.34
13th Eastern N.M. 0.2000 34.69 14.69 31.52 50.39 5.31 7.62
14th St. Mary's (TX) 0.1968 35.26 15.58 33.33 51.91 5.49 10.28
15th DBU 0.1886 32.84 13.97 30.16 54.35 5.22 6.61
16th Lubbock Christian 0.1730 32.92 15.62 30.58 52.53 5.51 7.92
17th Tex. A&M Int'l 0.1672 32.94 16.22 30.63 50.89 6.17 8.39

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Angelo St. 0.1047 24.70 14.23 21.71 56.44 4.99 5.40
2nd Tex. A&M-Commerce 0.1090 28.02 17.12 25.84 57.58 6.76 4.45
3rd Tex. Permian Basin 0.1115 28.42 17.27 26.47 54.05 5.74 4.70
4th Tarleton St. 0.1213 28.98 16.85 27.73 55.80 6.30 5.21
5th Lubbock Christian 0.1284 28.56 15.72 26.44 54.29 4.60 5.55
6th DBU 0.1292 29.28 16.35 27.38 56.90 4.70 6.01
7th Ark.-Fort Smith 0.1369 29.90 16.21 28.08 52.45 5.51 5.02
8th St. Edward's 0.1377 29.93 16.15 28.70 54.47 5.91 5.89
9th Tex. A&M-Kingsville 0.1422 29.18 14.96 27.14 54.90 5.76 5.49
10th West Tex. A&M 0.1440 29.24 14.84 27.05 57.77 5.58 2.93
11th Texas Woman's 0.1515 29.80 14.65 26.36 52.69 5.66 5.11
12th St. Mary's (TX) 0.1763 32.73 15.10 31.10 54.28 3.82 5.60
13th Texas-Tyler 0.1799 32.53 14.54 30.04 52.40 5.21 5.05
14th Western N.M. 0.1938 34.04 14.66 30.88 49.88 4.71 6.22
15th Eastern N.M. 0.2179 36.82 15.02 32.17 46.81 5.09 6.59
16th Cameron 0.2322 37.95 14.73 35.03 47.45 5.16 6.68
17th Tex. A&M Int'l 0.2425 37.46 13.22 34.38 47.45 3.54 5.99

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,513.5857 1,513.8103 1,514.9141 1,515.9442 1,514.5636
Difference 0.2246 1.3284 2.3585 1.3039

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Angelo St. 60 1,448 944 100 119 65.19 14.5 12.2 945 432 55 83 54.29 17.2 11.4
St. Edward's 56 1,198 833 84 127 69.53 14.3 9.4 888 484 67 68 45.50 13.3 13.1
Ark.-Fort Smith 63 1,379 751 103 130 54.46 13.4 10.6 1,182 543 65 105 54.06 18.2 11.3
Lubbock Christian 72 1,389 855 97 105 61.56 14.3 13.2 1,219 658 88 105 46.02 13.9 11.6
Tex. Permian Basin 52 1,091 616 72 92 56.46 15.2 11.9 1,008 506 55 79 49.80 18.3 12.8
Tarleton St. 67 1,367 716 85 69 52.38 16.1 19.8 1,245 613 79 111 50.76 15.8 11.2
Eastern N.M. 58 1,242 705 77 92 56.76 16.1 13.5 1,227 675 92 109 44.99 13.3 11.3
Texas-Tyler 59 1,113 584 88 111 52.47 12.6 10.0 1,086 560 76 97 48.44 14.3 11.2
DBU 74 1,575 814 77 98 51.68 20.5 16.1 1,601 830 103 117 48.16 15.5 13.7
Tex. A&M-Kingsville 85 1,698 912 128 122 53.71 13.3 13.9 1,701 926 111 181 45.56 15.3 9.4
Western N.M. 54 1,043 540 70 96 51.77 14.9 10.9 1,149 656 89 83 42.91 12.9 13.8
Cameron 61 1,254 549 74 115 43.78 16.9 10.9 1,403 703 102 134 49.89 13.8 10.5
Texas Woman's 68 1,001 499 91 146 49.85 11.0 6.9 1,177 704 76 114 40.19 15.5 10.3
West Tex. A&M 59 871 610 78 71 70.03 11.2 12.3 1,380 1,160 45 92 15.94 30.7 15.0
Tex. A&M Int'l 47 784 366 57 90 46.68 13.8 8.7 1,077 677 80 55 37.14 13.5 19.6
St. Mary's (TX) 59 949 462 89 92 48.68 10.7 10.3 1,329 895 82 110 32.66 16.2 12.1
Tex. A&M-Commerce 66 917 460 110 108 50.16 8.3 8.5 1,532 1,173 78 106 23.43 19.6 14.5
Conference Average 62 1,195 660 87 105 55.01 13.9 11.7 1,244 717 79 103 42.93 16.3 12.5
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Lone Star

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

89.02

2019-09-21 Canyon, Texas
West Tex. A&M
Lubbock Christian
3
2
17
25
25
14
25
12
23
25
15
13
GAME

84.71

2019-09-20 Canyon, Texas
West Tex. A&M
Angelo St.
1
3
25
22
16
25
20
25
19
25
GAME

79.79

2019-09-28 Austin, Texas
St. Edward's
Eastern N.M.
3
0
25
17
25
18
25
18
GAME

76.09

2019-10-01 Canyon, Texas
West Tex. A&M
Eastern N.M.
3
0
25
17
25
16
25
15
GAME

73.56

2019-09-20
Tarleton St.
St. Edward's
3
1
25
16
25
22
23
25
25
18
GAME

73.38

2019-09-27
Tex. A&M-Kingsville
Tarleton St.
3
2
24
26
11
25
25
21
25
21
15
12
GAME

72.74

2019-10-12
DBU
Tarleton St.
3
2
25
18
13
25
28
26
24
26
15
8
GAME

72.04

2019-10-05
Tarleton St.
Ark.-Fort Smith
1
3
15
25
25
22
21
25
16
25
GAME

71.78

2019-09-28
Lubbock Christian
Tex. Permian Basin
2
3
23
25
25
18
26
24
19
25
12
15
GAME

71.69

2019-10-04
Tex. A&M-Commerce
Angelo St.
1
3
17
25
27
25
13
25
11
25

HuskerGeek Lone Star All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 15.8178
2 15.7321
3 13.5505
4 13.0236
5 12.4809
6 11.9885
7 11.3654
8 11.2911
9 10.6987
10 10.0575

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 8.6471
2 7.7655
3 7.3964
4 7.1936
5 6.8613
6 6.4976
7 6.2401
8 5.8879
9 5.6338
10 5.3267

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 14.2455
2 13.1766
3 11.3335
4 9.6545
5 9.5124
6 7.1755
7 7.1260
8 7.0850
9 7.0401
10 6.9791

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2894
2 0.2622
3 0.2297
4 0.2115
5 0.2054
6 0.2048
7 0.1998
8 0.1960
9 0.1915
10 0.1726

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1441
2 0.1316
3 0.1254
4 0.1211
5 0.1207
6 0.1156
7 0.1144
8 0.1015
9 0.0972
10 0.0960

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.3166
2 0.1889
3 0.1711
4 0.1486
5 0.1408
6 0.1331
7 0.1305
8 0.1250
9 0.1246
10 0.1219


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek