Nerdly Nebraska.

2018-2019 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,750.6919
BPR D1 NCAAWBB Baylor 0.7877

Football clemson 12.6021
Men's Basketball duke 12.9757
Women's Basketball baylor 13.5441
Baseball vanderbilt 10.1606
Softball oklahoma 13.3516
Ice Hockey st cloud st 10.4909
Men's Lacrosse penn st 7.8422
Women's Lacrosse maryland 11.2186
Men's Soccer palm beach atl 10.6001
Women's Soccer usc 12.7949
Men's Volleyball hawaii 9.4513
Women's Volleyball stanford 12.9947
Field Hockey north carolina 12.5324

MIAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Calvin 1,571.3423 1,578.3816 1,574.8580 59.16 71.40 0.307
2nd Hope 1,529.3436 1,537.5769 1,533.4547 59.51 66.21 0.237
3rd Alma 1,433.4469 1,443.0043 1,438.2177 53.17 62.73 0.128
4th Albion 1,406.4621 1,429.3995 1,417.8844 52.07 61.48 0.129
5th Trine 1,363.9610 1,387.9068 1,375.8818 51.01 58.80 0.099
6th St. Mary's (IN) 1,358.6817 1,383.3007 1,370.9359 48.15 60.47 0.050
7th Adrian 1,304.0637 1,328.1697 1,316.0615 49.61 54.63 0.014
8th Olivet 1,300.4085 1,329.3274 1,314.7885 46.55 55.06 0.027
9th Kalamazoo 1,266.3734 1,290.9710 1,278.6130 45.53 54.28 0.007

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Calvin 0.3396 44.98 11.02 41.63 43.53 3.06 10.93
2nd Hope 0.2980 42.21 12.40 39.23 44.65 3.14 11.85
3rd Alma 0.2362 36.29 12.67 33.20 52.57 3.77 9.32
4th Albion 0.2322 35.55 12.33 33.16 52.86 3.38 8.29
5th St. Mary's (IN) 0.2069 34.22 13.53 32.42 53.28 4.74 7.62
6th Trine 0.1909 34.35 15.25 32.14 52.81 3.84 9.79
7th Olivet 0.1869 33.37 14.68 31.17 53.13 4.79 9.01
8th Kalamazoo 0.1863 34.64 16.01 31.76 54.98 4.18 8.63
9th Adrian 0.1213 28.58 16.44 26.04 59.36 3.97 8.23

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Calvin 0.0329 24.23 20.94 22.75 60.11 7.61 4.69
2nd Hope 0.0607 24.49 18.42 23.34 61.22 6.15 5.32
3rd Trine 0.0919 26.44 17.26 24.79 57.88 5.56 8.47
4th Albion 0.1033 27.26 16.93 25.84 60.52 4.48 5.66
5th Adrian 0.1078 27.35 16.56 25.26 59.81 4.02 7.10
6th Alma 0.1084 27.51 16.67 26.15 60.79 5.24 4.84
7th St. Mary's (IN) 0.1573 29.75 14.02 27.81 60.17 2.97 5.97
8th Olivet 0.1602 32.43 16.41 30.20 54.67 4.11 6.99
9th Kalamazoo 0.1795 33.66 15.71 30.87 54.49 3.58 8.78

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,402.2995 1,395.3178 1,383.7963 1,388.2341 1,392.4119
Difference -6.9817 -18.5032 -14.0655 -13.1835

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Calvin 129 2,998 1,471 239 294 49.07 12.5 10.2 2,532 975 152 207 61.49 16.7 12.2
Hope 124 2,679 1,350 248 232 50.39 10.8 11.5 2,355 1,005 156 158 57.33 15.1 14.9
Alma 97 1,934 952 179 152 49.22 10.8 12.7 1,728 737 113 170 57.35 15.3 10.2
Albion 99 2,182 1,021 146 175 46.79 14.9 12.5 2,101 937 148 174 55.40 14.2 12.1
St. Mary's (IN) 103 2,226 980 134 111 44.03 16.6 20.1 2,257 1,011 160 229 55.21 14.1 9.9
Trine 86 1,701 778 145 156 45.74 11.7 10.9 1,739 812 175 162 53.31 9.9 10.7
Adrian 88 1,747 809 121 132 46.31 14.4 13.2 1,854 923 164 169 50.22 11.3 11.0
Olivet 100 1,765 776 171 181 43.97 10.3 9.8 1,895 923 158 158 51.29 12.0 12.0
Kalamazoo 105 1,888 775 134 174 41.05 14.1 10.9 2,235 1,139 231 222 49.04 9.7 10.1
Conference Average 103 2,124 990 169 179 46.28 12.9 12.4 2,077 940 162 183 54.51 13.1 11.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the MIAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

72.07

2018-09-22 Grand Rapids, Mich.
Calvin
Hope
3
2
25
16
25
23
19
25
23
25
15
7
GAME

71.62

2018-10-24 Albion, Mich.
Albion
Trine
3
1
28
26
25
21
24
26
31
29
GAME

71.16

2018-09-08 Holland, MI
Hope
Albion
3
1
29
27
25
20
18
25
25
13
GAME

70.06

2018-10-16 Holland, MI
Hope
St. Mary's (IN)
3
1
22
25
26
24
27
25
25
15
GAME

69.38

2018-10-10 Adrian, Mich.
Adrian
Alma
1
3
15
25
28
26
16
25
25
27
GAME

69.36

2018-11-02 Grand Rapids, Mich.
Hope
Alma
3
0
25
20
27
25
25
12
GAME

69.32

2018-10-10 Notre Dame, Ind.
St. Mary's (IN)
Calvin
2
3
18
25
25
23
16
25
25
23
8
15
GAME

69.30

2018-09-08 Grand Rapids, MI
Alma
Trine
3
1
25
27
26
24
25
21
25
22
GAME

67.60

2018-10-02 Angola, Ind.
Trine
Calvin
1
3
25
21
19
25
17
25
19
25
GAME

67.31

2018-10-26 Holland, Mich.
Hope
Calvin
0
3
19
25
23
25
19
25

HuskerGeek MIAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 33.3993
2 32.9840
3 26.9284
4 19.0169
5 18.9907
6 18.9034
7 18.4746
8 17.7958
9 17.2782
10 17.2075

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 22.5099
2 19.2965
3 12.3142
4 11.7939
5 11.7698
6 11.2999
7 10.9305
8 10.7247
9 9.8651
10 9.8520

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.6026
2 16.2036
3 15.7955
4 14.5486
5 13.6876
6 13.5597
7 11.6212
8 10.8894
9 10.7722
10 10.6260

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2651
2 0.2614
3 0.2557
4 0.2255
5 0.2119
6 0.2001
7 0.1846
8 0.1835
9 0.1796
10 0.1745

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1786
2 0.1496
3 0.1271
4 0.1143
5 0.1095
6 0.1090
7 0.1041
8 0.1034
9 0.1017
10 0.1009

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1806
2 0.1573
3 0.1470
4 0.1374
5 0.1350
6 0.1314
7 0.1263
8 0.1254
9 0.1244
10 0.1176


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek