Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,839.6298
BPR D1 NCAAWBB Baylor 0.8231

Football ohio st 12.6975
Men's Basketball kansas 13.0297
Women's Basketball baylor 13.4405
Ice Hockey minnesota st 10.2720
Men's Soccer georgetown 10.7279
Women's Soccer stanford 13.0262
Men's Volleyball byu 10.0755
Women's Volleyball stanford 11.3000
Field Hockey north carolina 12.2787

Mid-America Intercollegiate - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Neb.-Kearney 1,742.0825 1,708.8167 1,725.3694 57.85 70.39 0.253
2nd Washburn 1,706.3176 1,668.1292 1,687.1154 58.83 61.23 0.216
3rd Central Mo. 1,655.9476 1,622.9912 1,639.3866 58.57 63.81 0.191
4th Northwest Mo. St. 1,615.2669 1,585.5745 1,600.3518 55.87 63.96 0.171
5th Central Okla. 1,592.4097 1,558.8236 1,575.5272 56.00 57.69 0.129
6th Missouri Western 1,565.4121 1,534.8868 1,550.0743 49.84 57.58 0.113
7th Pittsburg St. 1,542.5758 1,507.6235 1,524.9995 50.38 57.94 0.080
8th Mo. Southern St. 1,518.7539 1,485.2415 1,501.9042 50.06 57.22 0.059
9th Emporia St. 1,482.1590 1,452.9625 1,467.4881 52.67 50.71 0.047
10th Fort Hays St. 1,474.7657 1,438.0522 1,456.2933 51.33 51.04 0.043
11th Newman 1,411.4274 1,374.7276 1,392.9566 49.87 46.40 -0.032

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Neb.-Kearney 0.3070 39.27 8.57 36.63 49.61 3.69 7.31
2nd Central Mo. 0.3016 41.02 10.86 37.98 45.39 4.08 7.87
3rd Washburn 0.2991 42.01 12.11 38.02 42.65 4.95 8.11
4th Northwest Mo. St. 0.2895 39.35 10.39 35.53 46.50 3.89 7.54
5th Central Okla. 0.2502 36.11 11.09 33.12 51.66 3.41 7.08
6th Missouri Western 0.2488 37.02 12.14 34.19 49.09 4.44 5.88
7th Pittsburg St. 0.2269 36.67 13.98 34.24 48.52 5.23 7.18
8th Fort Hays St. 0.2124 36.24 15.00 33.55 48.12 5.12 5.33
9th Emporia St. 0.2090 34.98 14.07 32.42 48.76 5.32 6.80
10th Mo. Southern St. 0.2016 34.37 14.21 31.58 52.76 4.16 6.67
11th Newman 0.1815 32.66 14.51 30.13 53.23 4.26 6.57

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Neb.-Kearney 0.0535 22.66 17.31 21.51 64.05 5.59 3.69
2nd Washburn 0.0828 24.36 16.08 22.26 61.21 5.87 3.64
3rd Central Mo. 0.1108 27.53 16.46 25.89 58.89 5.69 5.86
4th Northwest Mo. St. 0.1181 27.10 15.30 24.58 57.42 5.48 4.60
5th Central Okla. 0.1210 27.87 15.77 26.17 60.26 4.17 4.87
6th Missouri Western 0.1357 29.02 15.45 26.83 56.90 5.02 6.20
7th Mo. Southern St. 0.1425 30.78 16.53 28.86 54.74 5.44 5.69
8th Pittsburg St. 0.1471 30.18 15.47 27.77 55.31 3.92 4.71
9th Emporia St. 0.1621 30.86 14.66 28.32 53.79 4.99 5.89
10th Fort Hays St. 0.1696 31.73 14.77 28.52 53.35 4.53 5.59
11th Newman 0.2136 35.68 14.33 32.17 49.88 4.17 7.18

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,556.4969 1,555.9045 1,551.3902 1,550.5714 1,553.5908
Difference -0.5925 -5.1067 -5.9255 -3.8749

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Neb.-Kearney 121 2,802 1,505 159 180 53.71 17.6 15.6 2,121 774 81 207 63.51 26.2 10.2
Central Mo. 117 2,739 1,488 157 221 54.33 17.4 12.4 2,262 981 127 214 56.63 17.8 10.6
Washburn 102 2,419 1,334 148 197 55.15 16.3 12.3 1,945 868 68 168 55.37 28.6 11.6
Northwest Mo. St. 110 2,340 1,198 136 262 51.20 17.2 8.9 2,450 1,034 96 145 57.80 25.5 16.9
Central Okla. 109 2,442 1,284 134 205 52.58 18.2 11.9 2,259 1,081 108 202 52.15 20.9 11.2
Pittsburg St. 111 2,261 1,067 129 176 47.19 17.5 12.8 2,316 1,125 111 181 51.43 20.9 12.8
Mo. Southern St. 118 2,479 1,158 123 161 46.71 20.2 15.4 2,611 1,268 142 220 51.44 18.4 11.9
Missouri Western 110 2,492 1,131 105 197 45.39 23.7 12.6 2,172 1,057 138 201 51.34 15.7 10.8
Fort Hays St. 102 2,062 982 78 133 47.62 26.4 15.5 2,301 1,257 124 170 45.37 18.6 13.5
Emporia St. 105 1,976 942 96 160 47.67 20.6 12.4 2,274 1,261 131 174 44.55 17.4 13.1
Newman 103 1,857 864 89 202 46.53 20.9 9.2 2,393 1,417 163 205 40.79 14.7 11.7
Conference Average 110 2,352 1,178 123 190 49.82 19.6 12.6 2,282 1,102 117 190 51.85 20.4 12.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Mid-America Intercollegiate

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

82.07

2019-10-05
Northwest Mo. St.
Neb.-Kearney
1
3
20
25
33
31
20
25
20
25
GAME

79.40

2019-10-19
Washburn
Northwest Mo. St.
3
2
25
20
30
32
25
18
23
25
15
7
GAME

77.78

2019-11-16
Central Mo.
Washburn
2
3
28
26
27
25
14
25
18
25
12
15
GAME

77.35

2019-10-18
Washburn
Central Mo.
3
1
25
22
25
27
25
19
25
23
GAME

76.48

2019-11-01 Joplin, Mo.
Mo. Southern St.
Missouri Western
2
3
30
32
20
25
27
25
27
25
12
15
GAME

76.26

2019-10-04
Central Mo.
Neb.-Kearney
2
3
25
18
21
25
22
25
25
15
9
15
GAME

75.71

2019-11-02 Kearney, NE
Neb.-Kearney
Central Mo.
3
0
25
21
25
20
25
11
GAME

75.53

2019-10-11
Northwest Mo. St.
Central Okla.
0
3
21
25
21
25
22
25
GAME

74.94

2019-10-15 Kearney, NE
Neb.-Kearney
Washburn
3
0
25
17
25
23
25
16
GAME

74.65

2019-11-15
Northwest Mo. St.
Washburn
0
3
20
25
15
25
25
27

HuskerGeek Mid-America Intercollegiate All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S
S
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 26.2828
2 25.7672
3 25.0391
4 24.1562
5 24.0914
6 23.9454
7 23.2087
8 23.0411
9 21.6709
10 21.6210

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.5171
2 14.4381
3 13.9225
4 13.2273
5 13.0934
6 12.8544
7 11.8704
8 11.8348
9 11.4902
10 11.4189

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 22.9371
2 20.9490
3 17.8015
4 15.8402
5 15.8045
6 15.7213
7 13.5813
8 12.7581
9 12.6290
10 12.6106

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2395
2 0.2368
3 0.2347
4 0.2184
5 0.2149
6 0.2125
7 0.2122
8 0.2114
9 0.2079
10 0.2053

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1475
2 0.1365
3 0.1309
4 0.1297
5 0.1260
6 0.1224
7 0.1105
8 0.1084
9 0.1057
10 0.1057

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2104
2 0.2034
3 0.1589
4 0.1541
5 0.1342
6 0.1339
7 0.1331
8 0.1276
9 0.1261
10 0.1192


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek