Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

NJAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Stockton 1,400.7298 1,418.4520 1,409.5630 51.50 62.03 0.121
2nd Kean 1,363.5143 1,390.5744 1,376.9778 49.13 60.25 0.124
3rd Montclair St. 1,320.3206 1,353.2412 1,336.6796 49.48 56.13 0.072
4th Rowan 1,257.4541 1,290.2863 1,273.7645 46.73 52.97 -0.007
5th Wm. Paterson 1,249.9468 1,281.5893 1,265.6691 45.92 51.81 -0.028
6th Ramapo 1,193.3971 1,228.2499 1,210.6981 43.10 49.10 -0.089
7th Rutgers-Camden 1,170.7276 1,201.5739 1,186.0505 40.07 49.45 -0.114
8th Rutgers-Newark 1,147.4557 1,157.7969 1,152.6147 40.37 46.08 -0.138
9th New Jersey City 1,051.8242 1,084.0198 1,067.8007 34.95 42.00 -0.239

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Stockton 0.2498 38.60 13.62 34.82 48.13 4.26 8.34
2nd Kean 0.2452 38.21 13.69 35.75 48.64 3.50 9.51
3rd Montclair St. 0.2086 34.83 13.97 32.22 51.07 3.59 7.87
4th Wm. Paterson 0.1910 30.55 11.45 28.27 58.41 3.94 4.20
5th Rowan 0.1431 30.03 15.72 28.50 57.41 4.36 10.31
6th Rutgers-Camden 0.1218 30.20 18.02 28.07 53.84 5.60 9.09
7th Ramapo 0.1149 26.75 15.26 24.84 62.72 3.33 7.99
8th Rutgers-Newark 0.0737 25.09 17.72 23.20 62.34 4.22 9.56
9th New Jersey City 0.0105 23.38 22.34 22.07 61.68 4.92 8.31

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Kean 0.1216 29.23 17.07 27.55 54.83 5.04 7.41
2nd Stockton 0.1290 30.05 17.15 27.96 57.59 5.81 5.90
3rd Montclair St. 0.1365 30.93 17.27 28.99 54.10 4.72 7.59
4th Rowan 0.1501 31.37 16.36 29.11 55.84 4.21 9.80
5th Ramapo 0.2038 34.25 13.87 32.49 54.53 3.40 9.49
6th Rutgers-Newark 0.2119 36.43 15.25 33.67 51.13 2.99 9.28
7th Wm. Paterson 0.2186 35.61 13.75 33.66 51.78 3.44 9.77
8th Rutgers-Camden 0.2362 36.91 13.30 33.72 50.34 2.73 9.18
9th New Jersey City 0.2495 38.84 13.89 35.25 49.11 2.42 11.82

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,253.3131 1,257.4935 1,254.5723 1,250.0439 1,253.8557
Difference 4.1804 1.2592 -3.2692 0.7235

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Wm. Paterson 89 2,029 1,170 184 50 57.66 11.0 40.6 1,531 653 141 160 57.35 10.9 9.6
Stockton 120 2,114 1,029 224 176 48.68 9.4 12.0 1,863 766 162 208 58.88 11.5 9.0
Montclair St. 110 2,283 1,146 191 220 50.20 12.0 10.4 2,085 932 177 213 55.30 11.8 9.8
Kean 117 2,566 1,217 232 299 47.43 11.1 8.6 2,402 1,044 187 195 56.54 12.8 12.3
Rowan 123 2,182 1,077 290 213 49.36 7.5 10.2 2,096 988 254 263 52.86 8.3 8.0
Rutgers-Newark 100 2,131 1,075 288 268 50.45 7.4 8.0 2,062 1,003 174 202 51.36 11.9 10.2
Rutgers-Camden 98 1,994 924 221 171 46.34 9.0 11.7 2,073 1,006 199 176 51.47 10.4 11.8
Ramapo 102 2,112 988 187 162 46.78 11.3 13.0 2,253 1,142 221 191 49.31 10.2 11.8
New Jersey City 103 2,069 961 265 271 46.45 7.8 7.6 2,258 1,158 244 249 48.72 9.3 9.1
Conference Average 107 2,164 1,065 231 203 49.26 9.6 13.6 2,069 966 195 206 53.53 10.8 10.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the NJAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

65.17

2018-09-11 Glassboro, NJ
Rowan
Stockton
1
3
24
26
25
23
17
25
28
30
GAME

63.54

2018-09-20 Glassboro, NJ
Rowan
Wm. Paterson
2
3
16
25
25
19
25
15
23
25
14
16
GAME

63.54

2018-10-23 Galloway, NJ
Stockton
Kean
3
2
25
12
22
25
25
17
22
25
15
10
GAME

62.89

2018-10-23 Mahwah, NJ
Ramapo
Wm. Paterson
1
3
20
25
25
22
21
25
21
25
GAME

61.63

2018-11-01 Galloway, NJ
Stockton
Montclair St.
1
3
25
18
18
25
20
25
22
25
GAME

61.53

2018-09-18 Wayne, N.J.
Wm. Paterson
Kean
0
3
17
25
23
25
24
26
GAME

60.45

2018-10-09 Galloway, NJ
Stockton
Montclair St.
3
1
21
25
25
14
27
25
25
14
GAME

60.31

2018-09-11 Union, N.J.
Kean
Montclair St.
3
1
25
21
25
12
15
25
25
22
GAME

59.80

2018-09-25 Montclair, NJ
Montclair St.
Rowan
1
3
17
25
25
22
21
25
23
25
GAME

58.97

2018-11-01 Glassboro, NJ
Rowan
Kean
0
3
15
25
19
25
22
25

HuskerGeek NJAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 16.3307
2 16.1791
3 15.6905
4 15.6493
5 15.5092
6 15.1536
7 14.7753
8 14.0380
9 14.0338
10 14.0106

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 11.6447
2 11.5895
3 10.5272
4 9.9230
5 9.5644
6 9.1942
7 8.8658
8 8.4883
9 8.1303
10 7.8177

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 14.1963
2 12.8938
3 11.9076
4 11.6457
5 11.2201
6 11.0346
7 9.8587
8 9.6102
9 8.9495
10 8.0448

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1944
2 0.1804
3 0.1803
4 0.1703
5 0.1629
6 0.1562
7 0.1463
8 0.1449
9 0.1440
10 0.1423

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1348
2 0.1252
3 0.1154
4 0.1139
5 0.1032
6 0.0989
7 0.0968
8 0.0857
9 0.0813
10 0.0778

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1464
2 0.1329
3 0.1280
4 0.1264
5 0.1252
6 0.1122
7 0.1033
8 0.1029
9 0.0996
10 0.0975


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek