Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

NJAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Stockton 1,490.8697 1,455.7634 1,473.2120 54.77 61.35 0.155
2nd Kean 1,412.0498 1,373.4880 1,392.6355 51.66 59.21 0.109
3rd Rowan 1,389.2580 1,349.3979 1,369.1829 53.18 53.53 0.048
4th Montclair St. 1,383.5704 1,350.5404 1,366.9556 51.81 57.20 0.059
5th Ramapo 1,297.7039 1,266.7819 1,282.1497 47.95 52.50 -0.033
6th Rutgers-Camden 1,265.8618 1,229.8219 1,247.7117 46.87 48.86 -0.098
7th Wm. Paterson 1,238.4376 1,202.3520 1,220.2614 44.64 48.58 -0.092
8th Rutgers-Newark 1,230.8963 1,198.1079 1,214.3914 47.48 48.56 -0.106
9th New Jersey City 1,113.1496 1,075.1339 1,093.9766 43.32 37.13 -0.226

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Stockton 0.2643 39.15 12.72 36.08 48.59 3.68 10.32
2nd Kean 0.2235 36.46 14.10 33.57 50.59 2.78 8.79
3rd Montclair St. 0.2079 33.95 13.16 31.26 53.09 3.41 10.01
4th Rowan 0.1877 33.11 14.35 31.34 54.59 4.19 9.76
5th Ramapo 0.1415 27.60 13.46 26.15 62.07 2.97 9.81
6th Wm. Paterson 0.1371 27.64 13.92 26.03 60.47 4.04 5.36
7th Rutgers-Newark 0.1256 27.94 15.38 25.83 59.94 3.87 9.04
8th Rutgers-Camden 0.1122 27.39 16.17 24.77 57.53 4.62 8.80
9th New Jersey City 0.0325 22.42 19.16 20.44 65.29 4.43 7.87

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Stockton 0.1097 27.97 17.00 25.54 57.20 5.43 5.97
2nd Kean 0.1150 27.54 16.03 25.50 57.24 5.49 7.78
3rd Rowan 0.1394 28.87 14.93 26.51 58.08 3.64 9.26
4th Montclair St. 0.1493 31.14 16.22 28.51 51.40 4.58 7.56
5th Ramapo 0.1743 30.96 13.53 29.61 57.52 2.94 7.07
6th Rutgers-Camden 0.2098 34.72 13.73 32.14 51.26 2.35 8.72
7th Wm. Paterson 0.2290 36.32 13.42 33.96 51.74 1.78 11.58
8th Rutgers-Newark 0.2315 36.51 13.36 33.74 51.30 2.23 11.48
9th New Jersey City 0.2580 39.03 13.23 35.66 48.64 2.94 13.48

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,295.6085 1,299.0412 1,297.2523 1,298.9390 1,297.7103
Difference 3.4326 1.6437 3.3305 2.8023

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Ramapo 72 1,550 947 204 131 61.10 7.6 11.8 1,142 519 78 117 54.55 14.6 9.8
Montclair St. 109 2,024 1,147 244 161 56.67 8.3 12.6 1,608 714 167 187 55.60 9.6 8.6
Stockton 128 2,491 1,363 251 247 54.72 9.9 10.1 2,004 857 151 240 57.24 13.3 8.4
Rutgers-Newark 96 1,884 1,109 246 185 58.86 7.7 10.2 1,573 761 205 206 51.62 7.7 7.6
Kean 122 2,476 1,262 235 254 50.97 10.5 9.7 2,203 963 199 222 56.29 11.1 9.9
Wm. Paterson 75 1,586 863 139 61 54.41 11.4 26.0 1,388 696 152 156 49.86 9.1 8.9
Rowan 120 2,158 1,125 227 184 52.13 9.5 11.7 2,103 1,058 225 216 49.69 9.3 9.7
Rutgers-Camden 93 2,005 1,053 207 162 52.52 9.7 12.4 1,938 990 157 165 48.92 12.3 11.7
New Jersey City 85 1,596 845 183 161 52.95 8.7 9.9 1,771 1,052 221 223 40.60 8.0 7.9
Conference Average 100 1,974 1,079 215 172 54.93 9.3 12.7 1,748 846 173 192 51.60 10.6 9.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the NJAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

66.34

2019-10-01 Glassboro, NJ
Rowan
Montclair St.
3
1
25
23
25
22
20
25
25
22
GAME

65.04

2019-11-09
Stockton
Rowan
3
1
25
27
25
22
25
13
25
19
GAME

64.61

2019-10-29 Union, N.J.
Kean
Stockton
3
2
23
25
23
25
25
16
25
16
15
13
GAME

64.34

2019-10-15 Montclair, NJ
Montclair St.
Stockton
1
3
20
25
25
14
20
25
18
25
GAME

64.30

2019-09-24 Glassboro, NJ
Rowan
Ramapo
3
2
26
28
25
17
25
20
17
25
15
9
GAME

63.47

2019-10-08 Union, N.J.
Kean
Rowan
0
3
22
25
25
27
17
25
GAME

61.48

2019-09-26 Mahwah, NJ
Ramapo
Rutgers-Newark
3
2
25
23
25
21
23
25
17
25
15
8
GAME

61.22

2019-10-15 Mahwah, NJ
Ramapo
Kean
1
3
15
25
22
25
25
19
20
25
GAME

61.12

2019-09-17
Stockton
Rowan
3
0
25
16
25
16
25
19
GAME

59.77

2019-09-26 Montclair, NJ
Montclair St.
Rutgers-Camden
3
1
25
22
24
26
25
12
25
22

HuskerGeek NJAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 24.9355
2 19.1564
3 18.6733
4 17.3846
5 17.2659
6 15.9015
7 14.9922
8 14.6472
9 14.5421
10 13.9950

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 16.9762
2 11.9403
3 11.3209
4 11.2513
5 11.0218
6 10.9473
7 10.6266
8 10.5149
9 9.3273
10 8.7465

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 14.6339
2 13.7092
3 13.4805
4 13.0053
5 11.0351
6 10.7667
7 10.6279
8 10.2525
9 9.0781
10 8.3620

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2352
2 0.2336
3 0.1998
4 0.1934
5 0.1796
6 0.1786
7 0.1753
8 0.1744
9 0.1744
10 0.1686

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1602
2 0.1422
3 0.1381
4 0.1372
5 0.1196
6 0.1082
7 0.1042
8 0.1011
9 0.1001
10 0.0995

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1709
2 0.1632
3 0.1548
4 0.1456
5 0.1404
6 0.1343
7 0.1244
8 0.1158
9 0.1115
10 0.1045


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek