Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

NWC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Pacific Lutheran 1,510.6100 1,536.1043 1,523.3038 58.74 67.48 0.252
2nd Whitworth 1,477.3357 1,493.9091 1,485.5993 55.44 65.82 0.208
3rd Pacific (OR) 1,461.7194 1,475.8685 1,468.7769 56.19 64.16 0.208
4th George Fox 1,413.7095 1,429.6101 1,421.6376 53.39 60.56 0.140
5th Puget Sound 1,410.9635 1,423.0825 1,417.0100 53.57 59.91 0.141
6th Lewis & Clark 1,386.3383 1,404.7497 1,395.5136 53.94 59.29 0.148
7th Whitman 1,382.8339 1,395.8656 1,389.3345 52.99 58.75 0.118
8th Willamette 1,364.6434 1,380.8760 1,372.7357 48.88 61.28 0.097
9th Linfield 1,277.6939 1,291.0659 1,284.3625 48.31 53.07 0.033

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Pacific (OR) 0.2774 40.24 12.50 37.34 46.06 4.35 10.87
2nd Whitworth 0.2760 41.31 13.72 38.36 45.07 3.82 10.89
3rd Pacific Lutheran 0.2755 37.97 10.42 34.28 51.99 3.00 11.49
4th Puget Sound 0.2381 37.28 13.47 32.90 50.51 3.36 12.64
5th Whitman 0.2336 35.24 11.88 32.46 52.01 4.04 10.78
6th George Fox 0.2233 36.93 14.60 34.58 49.97 2.54 9.60
7th Lewis & Clark 0.2201 36.13 14.12 33.38 50.77 3.50 8.91
8th Willamette 0.2159 34.02 12.43 31.78 53.93 3.67 9.82
9th Linfield 0.1734 32.01 14.67 30.16 56.94 3.37 8.88

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Pacific Lutheran 0.0238 23.68 21.31 22.50 58.50 7.87 5.16
2nd Whitworth 0.0677 25.51 18.73 24.01 60.68 5.20 5.98
3rd Pacific (OR) 0.0690 24.95 18.05 22.72 62.18 4.71 5.71
4th Lewis & Clark 0.0725 26.11 18.86 25.01 58.75 5.49 6.67
5th George Fox 0.0832 25.70 17.38 24.66 61.45 5.22 5.58
6th Puget Sound 0.0968 27.07 17.39 25.33 57.68 5.65 6.84
7th Whitman 0.1152 28.97 17.45 26.61 56.48 6.16 6.77
8th Willamette 0.1186 29.38 17.52 27.76 56.49 4.65 5.22
9th Linfield 0.1407 30.64 16.57 28.88 55.85 4.79 7.88

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,417.5860 1,421.5154 1,418.4545 1,411.3871 1,417.2357
Difference 3.9294 0.8685 -6.1989 -0.4670

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Pacific Lutheran 81 1,884 982 174 138 52.12 10.8 13.7 1,538 621 107 130 59.62 14.4 11.8
Whitworth 90 2,093 1,028 178 199 49.12 11.8 10.5 1,859 769 145 170 58.63 12.8 10.9
Pacific (OR) 84 1,898 961 171 172 50.63 11.1 11.0 1,671 721 124 127 56.85 13.5 13.2
Lewis & Clark 87 1,866 911 130 135 48.82 14.4 13.8 1,828 867 156 130 52.57 11.7 14.1
Willamette 89 1,931 917 159 157 47.49 12.1 12.3 1,915 890 134 160 53.53 14.3 12.0
George Fox 89 1,911 908 144 164 47.51 13.3 11.7 1,878 874 141 162 53.46 13.3 11.6
Whitman 91 1,695 801 168 124 47.26 10.1 13.7 1,730 839 165 138 51.50 10.5 12.5
Puget Sound 88 1,658 775 191 167 46.74 8.7 9.9 1,692 816 159 176 51.77 10.6 9.6
Linfield 83 1,607 707 120 169 44.00 13.4 9.5 1,886 1,002 174 164 46.87 10.8 11.5
Conference Average 87 1,838 888 159 158 48.19 11.7 11.8 1,777 822 145 151 53.87 12.4 11.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the NWC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

71.66

2018-10-19 Tacoma, Wash.
Puget Sound
Lewis & Clark
2
3
19
25
28
26
21
25
25
20
12
15
GAME

70.59

2018-09-14 Tacoma, Wash.
Pacific Lutheran
Pacific (OR)
3
2
26
24
23
25
25
16
17
25
15
11
GAME

69.80

2018-10-27 Tacoma, Wash.
Puget Sound
Whitman
3
1
25
22
29
27
26
28
25
21
GAME

68.63

2018-10-12 Forest Grove, Ore.
Pacific (OR)
Pacific Lutheran
3
1
25
23
16
25
27
25
25
18
GAME

68.55

2018-10-31 Walla Walla, Wash.
Whitman
Whitworth
3
2
25
23
25
16
17
25
22
25
15
10
GAME

68.23

2018-10-27 Tacoma, Wash.
Pacific Lutheran
Whitworth
3
1
20
25
25
20
25
18
25
16
GAME

67.96

2018-09-22 Newberg, Ore.
George Fox
Whitman
2
3
25
16
25
23
25
27
21
25
6
15
GAME

67.91

2018-09-29 Walla Walla, Wash.
Whitman
Puget Sound
1
3
18
25
17
25
25
23
20
25
GAME

67.87

2018-09-15 Walla Walla, Wash.
Whitman
Willamette
2
3
19
25
23
25
25
23
25
21
10
15
GAME

67.77

2018-11-02 Newberg, Ore.
George Fox
Pacific Lutheran
1
3
23
25
24
26
25
18
15
25

HuskerGeek NWC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 20.6531
2 18.7712
3 18.1160
4 16.5452
5 14.1104
6 14.0401
7 14.0124
8 13.4126
9 12.8068
10 12.7748

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 12.7892
2 12.2997
3 8.2239
4 7.8429
5 7.4028
6 7.2112
7 6.9621
8 6.9594
9 6.7484
10 6.5233

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 13.1191
2 11.6103
3 11.4079
4 11.1693
5 10.4527
6 10.2825
7 10.0066
8 9.8921
9 9.7968
10 8.8010

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2295
2 0.2264
3 0.2086
4 0.1924
5 0.1752
6 0.1733
7 0.1680
8 0.1656
9 0.1617
10 0.1601

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1421
2 0.1367
3 0.1028
4 0.0968
5 0.0890
6 0.0881
7 0.0815
8 0.0792
9 0.0785
10 0.0782

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1562
2 0.1492
3 0.1396
4 0.1382
5 0.1374
6 0.1275
7 0.1254
8 0.1251
9 0.1237
10 0.1139


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek