Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

OAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Ohio Northern 1,530.8262 1,542.0818 1,536.4437 57.80 69.17 0.230
2nd Baldwin Wallace 1,500.5512 1,521.0495 1,510.7656 57.74 66.31 0.227
3rd Heidelberg 1,490.8155 1,505.3829 1,498.0815 54.82 66.62 0.208
4th Muskingum 1,484.7781 1,492.9920 1,488.8794 55.19 65.85 0.178
5th Otterbein 1,475.3597 1,489.9733 1,482.6485 53.98 67.19 0.199
6th Mount Union 1,446.6216 1,462.9492 1,454.7625 56.97 61.58 0.175
7th John Carroll 1,366.4588 1,390.9691 1,378.6595 49.83 59.65 0.082
8th Marietta 1,292.4698 1,303.5007 1,297.9735 50.03 50.99 0.002
9th Wilmington (OH) 1,193.5717 1,217.2278 1,205.3417 44.96 46.84 -0.093
10th Capital 1,170.2609 1,222.9622 1,196.3213 42.43 49.15 -0.108

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Ohio Northern 0.3016 40.13 9.97 37.39 47.08 3.81 9.01
2nd Baldwin Wallace 0.2996 41.38 11.42 38.58 47.34 3.90 9.03
3rd Otterbein 0.2943 42.31 12.88 40.04 42.97 3.77 10.35
4th Heidelberg 0.2755 38.37 10.82 36.10 50.74 3.22 9.67
5th Muskingum 0.2588 37.63 11.75 33.59 48.35 3.25 7.71
6th Mount Union 0.2495 39.71 14.76 36.92 45.93 4.85 9.34
7th John Carroll 0.2290 37.16 14.26 34.65 49.40 4.22 10.94
8th Marietta 0.1510 31.74 16.64 28.96 53.83 3.98 10.84
9th Capital 0.1052 30.42 19.90 28.03 56.09 5.32 9.84
10th Wilmington (OH) 0.0980 27.72 17.92 25.11 61.88 3.28 8.84

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Heidelberg 0.0673 24.51 17.78 23.45 61.58 4.73 5.45
2nd Ohio Northern 0.0716 24.18 17.01 22.98 64.84 3.95 4.50
3rd Baldwin Wallace 0.0730 24.82 17.52 22.87 62.39 4.80 5.07
4th Mount Union 0.0749 26.25 18.76 24.65 60.19 6.26 4.70
5th Muskingum 0.0805 24.46 16.41 22.25 62.48 5.07 4.32
6th Otterbein 0.0949 26.30 16.80 24.94 60.17 4.31 5.46
7th John Carroll 0.1471 30.02 15.31 28.06 58.99 3.90 5.52
8th Marietta 0.1490 31.89 16.99 29.84 54.38 5.85 9.47
9th Wilmington (OH) 0.1909 33.84 14.75 31.51 53.30 3.73 9.39
10th Capital 0.2127 36.11 14.84 33.13 52.07 4.11 8.04

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,404.9877 1,414.6390 1,433.5008 1,451.2375 1,426.0913
Difference 9.6513 28.5131 46.2497 28.1380

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Baldwin Wallace 103 2,070 1,123 191 162 54.25 10.8 12.8 1,598 618 109 157 61.33 14.7 10.2
Mount Union 87 2,025 1,087 162 85 53.68 12.5 23.8 1,697 739 98 136 56.45 17.3 12.5
Ohio Northern 112 2,377 1,177 170 111 49.52 14.0 21.4 2,029 814 129 185 59.88 15.7 11.0
Muskingum 113 2,333 1,131 146 139 48.48 16.0 16.8 2,098 873 122 196 58.39 17.2 10.7
Heidelberg 111 2,327 1,108 179 200 47.62 13.0 11.6 2,112 875 149 182 58.57 14.2 11.6
Otterbein 100 2,249 1,044 176 220 46.42 12.8 10.2 2,057 845 132 160 58.92 15.6 12.9
John Carroll 100 2,154 1,004 206 163 46.61 10.5 13.2 2,106 957 131 161 54.56 16.1 13.1
Marietta 95 1,721 812 170 126 47.18 10.1 13.7 1,957 1,055 216 176 46.09 9.1 11.1
Wilmington (OH) 53 911 385 67 60 42.26 13.6 15.2 1,233 718 127 91 41.77 9.7 13.5
Capital 84 1,317 509 119 149 38.65 11.1 8.8 1,763 988 174 149 43.96 10.1 11.8
Conference Average 96 1,948 938 159 142 47.47 12.4 14.8 1,865 848 139 159 53.99 14.0 11.8
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the OAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

80.88

2018-10-27
Muskingum
Heidelberg
3
2
29
27
25
23
24
26
22
25
15
13
GAME

73.99

2018-11-03 Ada, Ohio
Ohio Northern
Muskingum
3
1
25
16
25
27
25
21
25
16
GAME

73.69

2018-10-27 Alliance, Ohio
Mount Union
Ohio Northern
2
3
25
23
21
25
21
25
27
25
12
15
GAME

73.30

2018-10-16 Ada, Ohio
Ohio Northern
Heidelberg
3
2
15
25
25
17
25
23
21
25
15
12
GAME

72.24

2018-11-01 Westerville, Ohio
Otterbein
Muskingum
2
3
25
23
20
25
19
25
25
12
14
16
GAME

72.23

2018-11-01 Ada, Ohio
Ohio Northern
Baldwin Wallace
3
1
21
25
25
20
25
20
25
22
GAME

71.45

2018-10-06 Westerville, Ohio
Otterbein
Baldwin Wallace
3
1
19
25
27
25
25
23
25
23
GAME

71.31

2018-10-13 Tiffin, Ohio
Heidelberg
Otterbein
2
3
20
25
24
26
25
23
25
16
10
15
GAME

71.01

2018-10-30 Berea, Ohio
Baldwin Wallace
Heidelberg
3
2
22
25
22
25
25
20
25
21
15
12
GAME

70.70

2018-10-23 Alliance, Ohio
Mount Union
Baldwin Wallace
3
1
25
23
21
25
25
18
25
21

HuskerGeek OAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 25.1925
2 20.5080
3 20.3964
4 19.9079
5 18.6804
6 18.5400
7 18.1276
8 17.6320
9 17.4334
10 17.1574

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 14.8298
2 12.7568
3 12.3416
4 12.0282
5 11.7278
6 11.2394
7 10.9562
8 10.0140
9 9.3403
10 8.9669

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.1168
2 17.0200
3 16.1734
4 15.3013
5 14.7638
6 13.3502
7 13.1643
8 12.5712
9 12.0302
10 11.0698

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2446
2 0.2081
3 0.2076
4 0.2060
5 0.2011
6 0.1991
7 0.1939
8 0.1816
9 0.1813
10 0.1795

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1483
2 0.1417
3 0.1259
4 0.1249
5 0.1168
6 0.1139
7 0.1085
8 0.1067
9 0.1043
10 0.0994

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1874
2 0.1737
3 0.1702
4 0.1617
5 0.1485
6 0.1471
7 0.1349
8 0.1323
9 0.1278
10 0.1118


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek