Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,789.9969

Football ohio st 12.8582
Ice Hockey providence 7.9735
Men's Soccer smu 11.4406
Women's Soccer north carolina 12.2707
Women's Volleyball baylor 12.1306
Field Hockey north carolina 12.7413

OAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Muskingum 1,552.7774 1,528.8705 1,540.7776 58.72 66.35 0.253
2nd Mount Union 1,527.3638 1,508.2777 1,517.7907 62.39 60.09 0.237
3rd Ohio Northern 1,521.1135 1,497.5717 1,509.2967 58.40 64.47 0.226
4th Heidelberg 1,519.1740 1,497.3725 1,508.2339 55.66 65.81 0.194
5th Otterbein 1,492.1143 1,476.4708 1,484.2719 56.51 64.79 0.210
6th Baldwin Wallace 1,436.6143 1,412.9893 1,424.7528 52.88 61.81 0.127
7th John Carroll 1,393.4146 1,369.4105 1,381.3604 57.15 54.65 0.092
8th Marietta 1,348.3630 1,326.5517 1,337.4129 52.55 52.27 0.084
9th Capital 1,252.4532 1,229.5998 1,240.9739 47.17 48.48 -0.061
10th Wilmington (OH) 1,189.6092 1,164.7435 1,177.1107 47.97 44.77 -0.074

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Muskingum 0.3101 41.22 10.22 37.18 44.45 2.40 8.79
2nd Mount Union 0.3017 40.89 10.72 37.33 43.47 3.82 11.03
3rd Otterbein 0.2954 42.26 12.71 39.51 42.96 3.85 12.28
4th Ohio Northern 0.2884 38.07 9.23 35.67 49.56 3.56 9.70
5th Heidelberg 0.2866 40.63 11.96 38.21 47.43 3.24 10.14
6th Baldwin Wallace 0.2334 38.60 15.27 34.65 48.54 3.72 11.34
7th Marietta 0.2306 36.03 12.97 33.29 52.21 3.98 9.88
8th John Carroll 0.2149 34.73 13.24 32.00 50.99 3.97 9.47
9th Capital 0.1299 30.90 17.90 29.34 54.43 5.44 9.75
10th Wilmington (OH) 0.0872 26.13 17.40 24.42 63.37 4.07 10.32

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Muskingum 0.0572 23.60 17.88 21.65 60.86 4.86 6.56
2nd Ohio Northern 0.0625 24.54 18.29 23.53 62.36 6.06 4.74
3rd Mount Union 0.0649 23.77 17.28 22.06 60.79 5.75 6.64
4th Otterbein 0.0858 25.54 16.96 23.53 60.73 5.06 4.46
5th Heidelberg 0.0924 26.76 17.51 25.16 58.42 5.14 4.92
6th Baldwin Wallace 0.1060 27.70 17.10 24.70 58.02 3.87 6.75
7th John Carroll 0.1230 28.61 16.31 26.49 55.53 3.35 6.19
8th Marietta 0.1465 30.83 16.18 28.16 54.09 4.35 8.77
9th Wilmington (OH) 0.1616 31.57 15.40 29.54 59.59 3.53 11.26
10th Capital 0.1907 33.65 14.57 31.01 53.72 2.95 9.67

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,412.1982 1,425.5117 1,440.8881 1,449.6547 1,432.0632
Difference 13.3135 28.6899 37.4566 26.4867

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Muskingum 70 1,557 875 103 102 56.20 15.1 15.3 1,190 494 93 120 58.49 12.8 9.9
Mount Union 75 1,480 874 152 101 59.05 9.7 14.7 1,221 595 104 115 51.27 11.7 10.6
Otterbein 72 1,599 819 166 218 51.22 9.6 7.3 1,323 551 86 137 58.35 15.4 9.7
Heidelberg 81 1,634 817 135 123 50.00 12.1 13.3 1,400 577 91 160 58.79 15.4 8.8
Ohio Northern 88 1,938 1,018 142 113 52.53 13.6 17.2 1,682 736 96 148 56.24 17.5 11.4
John Carroll 83 1,894 1,084 158 165 57.23 12.0 11.5 1,651 813 116 159 50.76 14.2 10.4
Baldwin Wallace 75 1,360 677 160 189 49.78 8.5 7.2 1,235 552 103 152 55.30 12.0 8.1
Marietta 79 1,554 788 134 156 50.71 11.6 10.0 1,597 830 165 159 48.03 9.7 10.0
Capital 70 1,006 480 126 94 47.71 8.0 10.7 1,142 620 153 139 45.71 7.5 8.2
Wilmington (OH) 54 820 359 89 121 43.78 9.2 6.8 1,138 689 143 103 39.46 8.0 11.0
Conference Average 75 1,484 779 137 138 51.82 11.0 11.4 1,358 646 115 139 52.24 12.4 9.8
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the OAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

74.68

2019-09-24 Ada, Ohio
Ohio Northern
Muskingum
3
2
25
20
11
25
28
30
25
19
15
9
GAME

70.06

2019-10-04
Otterbein
Mount Union
2
3
17
25
16
25
29
27
25
17
8
15
GAME

68.41

2019-10-05
Marietta
Ohio Northern
1
3
18
25
25
21
15
25
14
25
GAME

68.41

2019-10-04 Marietta, Ohio
Marietta
Ohio Northern
1
3
18
25
25
21
15
25
14
25
GAME

67.85

2019-10-08 Ada, Ohio
Ohio Northern
Baldwin Wallace
3
1
25
17
25
27
25
20
25
11
GAME

66.06

2019-10-12 Berea, Ohio
Baldwin Wallace
Otterbein
1
3
24
26
18
25
25
21
18
25
GAME

64.88

2019-10-05
Muskingum
John Carroll
3
0
25
16
25
20
25
18
GAME

64.32

2019-10-08
Mount Union
John Carroll
3
1
25
20
18
25
26
24
25
20
GAME

62.16

2019-10-09 Westerville, Ohio
Otterbein
Marietta
3
0
25
18
25
17
25
22
GAME

61.36

2019-10-08
Otterbein
Marietta
3
0
25
18
25
17
25
22

HuskerGeek OAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 16.3254
2 15.5147
3 14.4687
4 13.1618
5 12.8081
6 12.5332
7 12.4117
8 12.1878
9 11.7055
10 11.1095

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 9.1562
2 7.7217
3 7.6317
4 7.4359
5 7.1426
6 7.1059
7 6.7622
8 6.7013
9 6.6771
10 6.6694

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 15.0385
2 11.6461
3 10.1521
4 9.6483
5 9.1701
6 9.0819
7 8.5744
8 8.1981
9 7.9088
10 7.6190

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2372
2 0.2067
3 0.1958
4 0.1845
5 0.1825
6 0.1819
7 0.1800
8 0.1773
9 0.1732
10 0.1731

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1403
2 0.1388
3 0.1237
4 0.1165
5 0.1095
6 0.1075
7 0.1031
8 0.1024
9 0.1016
10 0.1014

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1769
2 0.1664
3 0.1542
4 0.1514
5 0.1454
6 0.1429
7 0.1410
8 0.1322
9 0.1249
10 0.1223


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek