Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Pac-12 - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Washington 1,830.7723 1,775.9248 1,803.1400 54.96 75.69 0.302
2nd Stanford 1,816.9571 1,760.3686 1,788.4390 54.45 75.56 0.319
3rd Oregon 1,754.3080 1,691.6391 1,722.6886 51.74 71.17 0.232
4th Arizona 1,745.4457 1,689.3819 1,717.1850 51.53 69.36 0.202
5th UCLA 1,743.3948 1,689.0555 1,716.0101 50.62 70.77 0.211
6th Southern California 1,733.8311 1,679.6805 1,706.5410 50.42 69.66 0.200
7th Colorado 1,722.1012 1,672.2750 1,697.0052 51.04 67.75 0.203
8th Oregon St. 1,724.2737 1,669.8143 1,696.8255 50.99 67.14 0.181
9th Utah 1,716.0501 1,671.9570 1,693.8601 49.39 68.81 0.195
10th Arizona St. 1,706.9257 1,652.8902 1,679.6907 49.57 68.23 0.188
11th Washington St. 1,687.2296 1,636.3579 1,661.5991 47.70 66.32 0.138
12th California 1,660.8771 1,610.8029 1,635.6484 43.86 67.33 0.111

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Stanford 0.3961 47.64 8.03 44.01 42.90 2.98 5.99
2nd Washington 0.3891 47.59 8.67 43.79 42.46 2.91 7.66
3rd UCLA 0.3416 47.96 13.80 44.72 36.04 6.32 6.04
4th Oregon 0.3379 45.45 11.66 42.05 41.52 5.16 5.86
5th Southern California 0.3310 42.52 9.41 38.76 47.90 3.62 7.64
6th Colorado 0.3222 45.26 13.04 41.49 40.86 5.28 6.44
7th Utah 0.3125 43.79 12.54 40.16 42.61 3.83 5.47
8th Oregon St. 0.3056 39.39 8.83 36.28 50.20 2.94 6.80
9th Arizona 0.2961 40.38 10.77 37.49 48.44 3.17 5.05
10th Arizona St. 0.2898 40.69 11.71 37.49 46.36 5.70 5.83
11th California 0.2825 41.59 13.34 39.31 45.12 4.90 4.49
12th Washington St. 0.2677 40.27 13.50 37.05 47.02 4.57 5.64

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Stanford 0.0766 27.20 19.54 25.80 55.85 8.17 3.43
2nd Washington 0.0876 29.42 20.66 28.07 53.19 9.43 3.03
3rd Arizona 0.0944 27.53 18.09 26.53 58.23 7.40 2.66
4th Arizona St. 0.1023 29.68 19.46 28.66 54.19 8.18 4.70
5th Oregon 0.1060 28.37 17.77 27.00 55.42 6.84 3.57
6th Utah 0.1176 30.70 18.94 29.32 52.65 8.28 4.32
7th Colorado 0.1188 30.99 19.11 29.51 52.02 8.31 4.09
8th Oregon St. 0.1241 30.29 17.88 29.14 55.14 7.46 4.25
9th Washington St. 0.1297 31.80 18.83 30.17 52.27 7.97 3.62
10th UCLA 0.1304 30.91 17.88 29.38 53.98 7.18 3.94
11th Southern California 0.1310 30.38 17.29 29.37 54.66 6.97 2.83
12th California 0.1713 34.69 17.55 33.20 49.27 6.74 3.68

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,709.8861 1,707.9844 1,703.7258 1,704.5712 1,706.5419
Difference -1.9016 -6.1603 -5.3149 -4.4589

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Washington 118 2,801 1,304 182 250 46.56 15.4 11.2 2,257 725 81 223 67.88 27.9 10.1
Stanford 128 3,012 1,337 138 207 44.39 21.8 14.6 2,572 857 111 186 66.68 23.2 13.8
Arizona 119 2,741 1,206 114 214 44.00 24.0 12.8 2,504 949 81 224 62.10 30.9 11.2
Oregon 120 2,763 1,177 127 179 42.60 21.8 15.4 2,536 937 110 201 63.05 23.1 12.6
UCLA 118 2,676 1,114 126 212 41.63 21.2 12.6 2,531 952 121 184 62.39 20.9 13.8
Colorado 132 2,973 1,264 157 302 42.52 18.9 9.8 2,855 1,138 133 223 60.14 21.5 12.8
Utah 123 2,733 1,121 113 230 41.02 24.2 11.9 2,651 1,025 131 203 61.34 20.2 13.1
Southern California 120 2,681 1,097 170 270 40.92 15.8 9.9 2,585 1,006 88 217 61.08 29.4 11.9
Arizona St. 137 3,003 1,237 141 298 41.19 21.3 10.1 2,944 1,163 159 267 60.50 18.5 11.0
Oregon St. 132 2,910 1,231 161 205 42.30 18.1 14.2 2,859 1,171 141 223 59.04 20.3 12.8
Washington St. 122 2,623 1,025 125 213 39.08 21.0 12.3 2,706 1,123 115 211 58.50 23.5 12.8
California 114 2,424 878 83 127 36.22 29.2 19.1 2,560 1,025 115 210 59.96 22.3 12.2
Conference Average 124 2,778 1,166 136 226 41.87 21.1 12.8 2,630 1,006 116 214 61.89 23.5 12.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Pac-12

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

86.24

2014-11-15 Tempe, Ariz.
Arizona St.
Oregon
2
3
25
21
30
32
24
26
26
24
13
15
GAME

84.82

2014-11-13 Boulder, Colo.
Colorado
Washington
3
2
27
25
26
24
17
25
23
25
15
11
GAME

83.71

2014-11-15 Salt Lake City, Utah
Utah
Washington
3
2
25
19
23
25
20
25
27
25
15
13
GAME

83.07

2014-11-22 Pullman, Wash.
Washington St.
Arizona
2
3
22
25
25
21
23
25
31
29
8
15
GAME

82.61

2014-10-10 Tucson, Ariz.
Arizona
Stanford
1
3
23
25
26
24
20
25
20
25
GAME

82.27

2014-11-16 Tucson, Ariz
Arizona
Oregon St.
3
1
25
19
21
25
25
23
25
23
GAME

81.81

2014-11-07 Stanford, Calif.
Stanford
Arizona
3
2
25
20
23
25
25
16
22
25
15
9
GAME

81.25

2014-10-26 Stanford, Calif.
Stanford
Southern California
3
1
23
25
25
22
25
20
25
19
GAME

81.11

2014-10-24 Stanford, Calif.
Stanford
UCLA
3
1
25
20
30
28
20
25
27
25
GAME

80.96

2014-11-23 Eugene, Ore.
Oregon
Southern California
3
1
25
23
23
25
25
13
25
22

HuskerGeek Pac-12 All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 36.7925
2 34.6348
3 33.4011
4 30.9615
5 30.9474
6 30.3092
7 30.2981
8 29.9595
9 29.8147
10 29.1170

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 23.3698
2 21.7120
3 21.3044
4 20.1771
5 20.1412
6 19.9667
7 19.1853
8 17.6589
9 16.0008
10 15.8591

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.5147
2 19.0793
3 18.2061
4 17.7797
5 17.4561
6 17.1162
7 16.5342
8 15.2930
9 14.9814
10 14.7673

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2807
2 0.2727
3 0.2686
4 0.2628
5 0.2593
6 0.2591
7 0.2516
8 0.2419
9 0.2367
10 0.2288

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1853
2 0.1710
3 0.1707
4 0.1706
5 0.1637
6 0.1612
7 0.1576
8 0.1401
9 0.1369
10 0.1333

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1659
2 0.1494
3 0.1478
4 0.1422
5 0.1378
6 0.1314
7 0.1297
8 0.1295
9 0.1285
10 0.1274


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek