Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

RMAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Colorado Mesa 1,658.5143 1,640.6114 1,649.5386 53.15 67.88 0.198
2nd Regis (CO) 1,625.3358 1,623.3589 1,624.3470 53.08 66.93 0.191
3rd Colo. Sch. of Mines 1,614.6917 1,602.3954 1,608.5318 50.34 67.27 0.167
4th MSU Denver 1,608.3861 1,596.5089 1,602.4365 52.39 64.84 0.175
5th Colo. Christian 1,555.6542 1,551.7772 1,553.7145 50.32 61.38 0.109
6th UC-Colo. Springs 1,531.5401 1,528.6285 1,530.0836 46.88 61.53 0.078
7th Adams St. 1,488.1590 1,483.5644 1,485.8599 43.56 61.83 0.046
8th Fort Lewis 1,452.7877 1,453.4827 1,453.1352 44.45 57.29 0.029
9th N.M. Highlands 1,454.3908 1,446.3819 1,450.3808 44.55 55.69 0.003
10th Chadron St. 1,445.9800 1,440.9353 1,443.4554 43.20 56.19 -0.018
11th Colorado St.-Pueblo 1,435.0665 1,431.3473 1,433.2057 41.54 57.12 0.000
12th Black Hills St. 1,428.9890 1,418.7713 1,423.8710 42.55 53.89 -0.020
13th Westminster (UT) 1,424.8733 1,405.7033 1,415.2558 42.92 53.59 -0.017
14th South Dakota Mines 1,391.8116 1,391.1032 1,391.4574 41.01 52.17 -0.039
15th Western St. 1,346.1550 1,345.1926 1,345.6737 38.81 49.65 -0.107

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Colo. Sch. of Mines 0.3131 43.70 12.39 41.40 41.05 5.02 7.75
2nd Regis (CO) 0.3031 42.49 12.18 39.54 44.84 4.05 7.61
3rd Colorado Mesa 0.2675 40.95 14.20 37.96 44.34 5.32 6.62
4th MSU Denver 0.2546 38.71 13.25 36.57 47.01 4.33 6.94
5th UC-Colo. Springs 0.2471 39.09 14.37 36.47 44.16 4.54 6.53
6th Colo. Christian 0.2339 39.22 15.83 36.82 45.27 5.23 8.03
7th Adams St. 0.2196 37.36 15.40 35.29 47.48 5.74 5.54
8th Fort Lewis 0.2111 33.20 12.09 30.48 53.85 4.91 4.34
9th N.M. Highlands 0.1902 32.67 13.65 30.77 55.17 5.07 6.80
10th Chadron St. 0.1882 33.72 14.90 32.29 52.51 5.42 4.76
11th Westminster (UT) 0.1862 31.79 13.17 29.47 53.85 4.47 5.93
12th Colorado St.-Pueblo 0.1856 33.05 14.48 30.79 54.03 4.28 6.45
13th Black Hills St. 0.1621 31.77 15.56 29.46 53.02 5.04 5.13
14th South Dakota Mines 0.1465 28.59 13.94 27.06 59.01 4.25 5.74
15th Western St. 0.1034 28.54 18.20 27.27 56.02 6.26 6.60

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Colorado Mesa 0.0697 25.64 18.67 24.16 59.49 6.82 4.10
2nd MSU Denver 0.0794 25.87 17.92 23.80 61.00 6.15 4.32
3rd Regis (CO) 0.1123 27.62 16.39 25.36 57.21 5.48 4.41
4th Colo. Christian 0.1246 29.49 17.03 27.29 57.57 4.41 5.85
5th Colo. Sch. of Mines 0.1463 30.51 15.88 28.67 56.44 5.57 5.22
6th UC-Colo. Springs 0.1692 32.77 15.85 30.82 52.08 4.68 5.65
7th Adams St. 0.1732 33.93 16.62 32.06 52.13 4.63 4.87
8th Black Hills St. 0.1817 33.73 15.56 31.57 51.50 4.96 6.63
9th Fort Lewis 0.1817 33.72 15.55 31.24 52.17 4.12 4.87
10th South Dakota Mines 0.1859 33.39 14.80 30.91 54.73 4.23 6.59
11th Colorado St.-Pueblo 0.1860 32.52 13.92 30.20 55.47 3.37 6.06
12th N.M. Highlands 0.1874 34.55 15.81 32.25 53.12 3.79 7.15
13th Westminster (UT) 0.2032 34.85 14.53 32.50 51.05 4.36 7.71
14th Chadron St. 0.2062 34.82 14.21 32.92 53.88 3.39 6.83
15th Western St. 0.2105 35.98 14.93 32.67 51.11 4.16 6.96

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,494.0631 1,493.5180 1,490.9027 1,486.2381 1,491.1805
Difference -0.5451 -3.1604 -7.8251 -3.8435

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Colorado Mesa 116 2,687 1,297 153 155 48.27 17.6 17.3 2,266 851 98 189 62.45 23.1 12.0
Regis (CO) 117 2,679 1,267 174 238 47.29 15.4 11.3 2,352 920 109 184 60.88 21.6 12.8
Colo. Sch. of Mines 118 2,674 1,203 176 218 44.99 15.2 12.3 2,425 926 132 187 61.81 18.4 13.0
MSU Denver 110 2,518 1,187 152 220 47.14 16.6 11.4 2,258 913 104 159 59.57 21.7 14.2
Colo. Christian 113 2,421 1,091 173 215 45.06 14.0 11.3 2,371 1,041 147 162 56.09 16.1 14.6
UC-Colo. Springs 102 2,178 922 124 184 42.33 17.6 11.8 2,220 960 127 144 56.76 17.5 15.4
Adams St. 101 2,194 893 107 187 40.70 20.5 11.7 2,218 924 105 153 58.34 21.1 14.5
N.M. Highlands 99 2,089 882 127 165 42.22 16.4 12.7 2,222 1,036 155 165 53.38 14.3 13.5
Fort Lewis 84 1,741 718 67 125 41.24 26.0 13.9 1,874 856 94 130 54.32 19.9 14.4
Westminster (UT) 97 2,052 938 110 133 45.71 18.7 15.4 2,247 1,133 175 180 49.58 12.8 12.5
Chadron St. 103 2,122 872 87 86 41.09 24.4 24.7 2,314 1,081 167 214 53.28 13.9 10.8
Colorado St.-Pueblo 100 2,036 788 117 216 38.70 17.4 9.4 2,283 1,053 142 202 53.88 16.1 11.3
Black Hills St. 94 1,873 769 89 125 41.06 21.0 15.0 2,126 1,043 142 148 50.94 15.0 14.4
South Dakota Mines 93 1,825 717 96 171 39.29 19.0 10.7 2,201 1,113 144 158 49.43 15.3 13.9
Western St. 75 1,361 508 84 177 37.33 16.2 7.7 1,913 1,114 134 178 41.77 14.3 10.7
Conference Average 101 2,163 937 122 174 42.83 18.4 13.1 2,219 998 132 170 54.83 17.4 13.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the RMAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

79.36

 2018-09-28 Grand Junction, CO
Colorado Mesa
Regis (CO)
3
2
25
20
20
25
28
26
25
27
15
12
GAME

79.19

 2018-10-27 Golden, Colo.
Colo. Sch. of Mines
Colorado Mesa
2
3
18
25
28
26
25
23
23
25
6
15
GAME

76.28

 2018-09-15 Denver, Colo.
MSU Denver
Regis (CO)
2
3
25
15
22
25
27
25
17
25
10
15
GAME

75.89

 2018-09-14 Denver, Colo.
MSU Denver
Colo. Christian
3
1
25
22
29
31
25
22
25
22
GAME

75.45

 2018-11-09 Golden, Colo.
Colo. Sch. of Mines
MSU Denver
2
3
25
17
26
24
31
33
15
25
12
15
GAME

74.81

 2018-10-12 Golden, Colo.
Colo. Sch. of Mines
Colo. Christian
1
3
25
22
22
25
19
25
26
28
GAME

74.26

 2018-11-02 Lakewood, CO
Colo. Christian
Regis (CO)
2
3
25
19
22
25
21
25
25
21
7
15
GAME

74.08

 2018-10-13 Golden, Colo.
Colo. Sch. of Mines
Regis (CO)
3
1
25
23
25
19
23
25
25
13
GAME

73.74

 2018-10-23 Denver, Colo.
Regis (CO)
MSU Denver
3
0
25
15
25
21
29
27
GAME

73.71

 2018-09-28 Durango, Colo.
Fort Lewis
N.M. Highlands
3
2
26
24
26
24
21
25
18
25
16
14

HuskerGeek RMAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
Taylor Duryea MSU Denver A
Kasie Gilfert Colorado Mesa A
Nikki Kennedy Regis (CO) A
Abby Tiesman Colo. Sch. of Mines A
Tiffany Matchet N.M. Highlands D
Taylor Woods Colorado Mesa D
Drew Stokes Colo. Sch. of Mines S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
Alyssa Brinton UC-Colo. Springs A
Taylor Hicken Colo. Sch. of Mines A
Camille Smith Colorado Mesa A
Dana Thomson South Dakota Mines A
Cammi Baumann Western St. D
Santaisha Sturges MSU Denver D
Silvia Basso Regis (CO) S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1 Tiffany Matchet N.M. Highlands
2 Kasie Gilfert Colorado Mesa
3 Drew Stokes Colo. Sch. of Mines
4 Silvia Basso Regis (CO)
5 Abby Tiesman Colo. Sch. of Mines

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1 Kasie Gilfert Colorado Mesa
2 Abby Tiesman Colo. Sch. of Mines
3 Taylor Duryea MSU Denver
4 Nikki Kennedy Regis (CO)
5 Alyssa Brinton UC-Colo. Springs

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1 Drew Stokes Colo. Sch. of Mines
2 Silvia Basso Regis (CO)
3 Kylee Wurster Colo. Christian
4 Rachel Ringler Adams St.
5 Madison Webb Chadron St.

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1 Taylor Woods Colorado Mesa
2 Cammi Baumann Western St.
3 Elle Duis Colo. Sch. of Mines
4 Ashton Burditt Chadron St.
5 Lyric Hebert MSU Denver

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 Drew Stokes Colo. Sch. of Mines 22.5847
2 Kylee Wurster Colo. Christian 22.3923
3 Tiffany Matchet N.M. Highlands 22.3606
4 Silvia Basso Regis (CO) 21.7328
5 Abby Tiesman Colo. Sch. of Mines 21.0229
6 Madison Webb Chadron St. 20.9762
7 Santaisha Sturges MSU Denver 20.8818
8 Rachel Ringler Adams St. 20.3697
9 Taylor Duryea MSU Denver 19.6343
10 Kasie Gilfert Colorado Mesa 19.3837

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 Kasie Gilfert Colorado Mesa 16.7791
2 Drew Stokes Colo. Sch. of Mines 16.7379
3 Abby Tiesman Colo. Sch. of Mines 15.1931
4 Kylee Wurster Colo. Christian 14.9998
5 Silvia Basso Regis (CO) 14.2157
6 Nikki Kennedy Regis (CO) 13.0738
7 Raelynn Edge UC-Colo. Springs 12.7309
8 Rachel Ringler Adams St. 12.0851
9 Madison Webb Chadron St. 11.9404
10 Laurel Lech Black Hills St. 10.8804

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 Ashton Burditt Chadron St. 18.2760
2 Page Heller Colorado St.-Pueblo 17.2054
3 Taylor Woods Colorado Mesa 16.6503
4 Elle Duis Colo. Sch. of Mines 16.6058
5 Cammi Baumann Western St. 15.9042
6 Mariela Gonzalez Colo. Christian 15.5163
7 Kristina Schell Regis (CO) 15.3911
8 Tana Dahlberg South Dakota Mines 13.9302
9 Lyric Hebert MSU Denver 13.5616
10 Mackenzie Swanson Adams St. 12.9713

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 Tiffany Matchet N.M. Highlands 0.2379
2 Haley Christiansen Fort Lewis 0.2108
3 Rachel Ringler Adams St. 0.2037
4 Madison Webb Chadron St. 0.2037
5 Laurel Lech Black Hills St. 0.2023
6 Kylee Wurster Colo. Christian 0.1982
7 Drew Stokes Colo. Sch. of Mines 0.1930
8 Santaisha Sturges MSU Denver 0.1898
9 Silvia Basso Regis (CO) 0.1874
10 Ashton Burditt Chadron St. 0.1851

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 Kasie Gilfert Colorado Mesa 0.1446
2 Drew Stokes Colo. Sch. of Mines 0.1431
3 Kylee Wurster Colo. Christian 0.1327
4 Abby Tiesman Colo. Sch. of Mines 0.1288
5 Raelynn Edge UC-Colo. Springs 0.1248
6 Silvia Basso Regis (CO) 0.1225
7 Rachel Ringler Adams St. 0.1209
8 Madison Webb Chadron St. 0.1159
9 Laurel Lech Black Hills St. 0.1157
10 Nikki Kennedy Regis (CO) 0.1117

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 Ashton Burditt Chadron St. 0.1774
2 Page Heller Colorado St.-Pueblo 0.1721
3 Tana Dahlberg South Dakota Mines 0.1531
4 Taylor Woods Colorado Mesa 0.1435
5 Elle Duis Colo. Sch. of Mines 0.1407
6 Lyric Hebert MSU Denver 0.1398
7 Mariela Gonzalez Colo. Christian 0.1373
8 Megan Graefe Fort Lewis 0.1355
9 Tiffany Matchet N.M. Highlands 0.1319
10 Kristina Schell Regis (CO) 0.1315

Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
Rankings
Media
Nebraska
HuskerGeek 2024
HuskerGeek