Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SCAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Trinity (TX) 1,486.3917 1,473.9725 1,480.1691 59.47 68.18 0.280
2nd Colorado Col. 1,484.1301 1,474.8424 1,479.4790 60.06 68.54 0.268
3rd Southwestern (TX) 1,474.0957 1,466.0893 1,470.0871 59.09 67.83 0.246
4th Texas Lutheran 1,415.1411 1,403.3522 1,409.2343 57.06 63.77 0.184
5th Dallas 1,352.3048 1,356.3959 1,354.3488 55.71 59.94 0.142
6th Austin 1,297.9163 1,300.4440 1,299.1795 49.52 58.84 0.107
7th Schreiner 1,152.9795 1,183.3763 1,168.0791 48.34 50.13 -0.027
8th Centenary (LA) 1,099.5566 1,124.5001 1,111.9584 42.92 48.09 -0.072

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Trinity (TX) 0.3155 41.54 9.99 38.39 47.82 3.11 9.67
2nd Colorado Col. 0.2970 41.09 11.39 38.29 46.41 2.93 10.33
3rd Southwestern (TX) 0.2739 37.42 10.03 34.38 52.00 2.83 8.31
4th Texas Lutheran 0.2396 36.55 12.59 33.84 51.27 3.09 8.61
5th Dallas 0.2144 34.94 13.50 32.19 51.48 3.28 10.74
6th Austin 0.2106 35.38 14.32 32.81 51.79 2.92 7.32
7th Schreiner 0.1357 29.29 15.72 27.06 55.34 3.44 7.92
8th Centenary (LA) 0.1229 30.35 18.07 28.21 53.68 5.65 8.70

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Southwestern (TX) 0.0277 20.60 17.83 19.18 66.51 4.46 3.88
2nd Colorado Col. 0.0294 22.09 19.15 20.90 64.22 5.88 4.81
3rd Trinity (TX) 0.0360 23.07 19.47 21.61 62.44 6.76 5.67
4th Texas Lutheran 0.0556 22.66 17.10 21.15 64.65 4.50 5.81
5th Dallas 0.0723 24.03 16.81 22.52 65.19 4.59 6.68
6th Austin 0.1032 29.78 19.47 27.53 54.98 7.35 6.81
7th Schreiner 0.1626 31.62 15.36 27.73 55.20 4.25 10.58
8th Centenary (LA) 0.1946 34.90 15.44 31.84 53.51 3.16 11.03

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,346.5669 1,363.4013 1,383.2124 1,381.7916 1,368.7431
Difference 16.8344 36.6455 35.2247 29.5682

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Colorado Col. 131 3,034 1,560 242 246 51.42 12.5 12.3 2,536 1,037 145 161 59.11 17.5 15.8
Trinity (TX) 143 3,062 1,534 224 226 50.10 13.7 13.5 2,647 1,097 186 204 58.56 14.2 13.0
Southwestern (TX) 120 2,714 1,357 163 145 50.00 16.7 18.7 2,369 998 110 165 57.87 21.5 14.4
Texas Lutheran 115 2,518 1,267 165 112 50.32 15.3 22.5 2,292 1,017 150 177 55.63 15.3 12.9
Dallas 101 1,817 880 189 116 48.43 9.6 15.7 1,846 900 153 115 51.25 12.1 16.1
Austin 108 2,242 1,019 140 134 45.45 16.0 16.7 2,325 1,118 173 154 51.91 13.4 15.1
Schreiner 89 1,024 431 101 126 42.09 10.1 8.1 1,369 794 231 156 42.00 5.9 8.8
Centenary (LA) 77 1,121 427 86 126 38.09 13.0 8.9 1,631 965 203 127 40.83 8.0 12.8
Conference Average 111 2,192 1,059 164 154 46.99 13.4 14.6 2,127 991 169 157 52.15 13.5 13.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SCAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

72.42

2014-10-10
Trinity (TX)
Southwestern (TX)
3
1
27
25
25
20
27
29
25
22
GAME

70.94

2014-10-26 Seguin, TX
Colorado Col.
Southwestern (TX)
2
3
25
17
25
21
24
26
23
25
16
18
GAME

70.51

2014-09-27 Shreveport, La.
Dallas
Southwestern (TX)
1
3
25
22
13
25
26
28
20
25
GAME

70.48

2014-09-19 Georgetown, Texas
Southwestern (TX)
Trinity (TX)
2
3
25
17
25
27
19
25
25
14
12
15
GAME

70.43

2014-11-07 Sherman, Texas
Colorado Col.
Southwestern (TX)
2
3
25
23
23
25
19
25
25
20
10
15
GAME

69.52

2014-10-26 Seguin, Texas
Texas Lutheran
Dallas
2
3
25
22
19
25
25
23
20
25
11
15
GAME

69.10

2014-09-27 Shreveport, La.
Colorado Col.
Trinity (TX)
3
2
22
25
25
15
21
25
25
20
16
14
GAME

68.16

2014-09-20 Georgetown, Texas
Southwestern (TX)
Texas Lutheran
3
1
17
25
25
19
25
16
30
28
GAME

67.10

2014-10-25 Seguin, Texas
Texas Lutheran
Colorado Col.
1
3
19
25
25
20
21
25
23
25
GAME

67.02

2014-11-08 Sherman, Texas
Southwestern (TX)
Trinity (TX)
0
3
23
25
20
25
20
25

HuskerGeek SCAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 32.9032
2 27.9290
3 27.0161
4 22.6907
5 21.0045
6 19.6626
7 19.4819
8 17.6804
9 16.1381
10 15.8534

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 17.0119
2 14.4741
3 13.1190
4 9.8022
5 9.7075
6 8.8722
7 8.6762
8 8.6068
9 7.9001
10 7.8080

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.7647
2 20.5110
3 18.4093
4 16.6718
5 15.8912
6 14.6910
7 13.5204
8 13.4549
9 12.8229
10 12.5980

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2653
2 0.2251
3 0.2165
4 0.1846
5 0.1826
6 0.1818
7 0.1732
8 0.1707
9 0.1610
10 0.1539

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1372
2 0.1122
3 0.1041
4 0.1020
5 0.0880
6 0.0867
7 0.0830
8 0.0744
9 0.0724
10 0.0717

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1806
2 0.1750
3 0.1566
4 0.1534
5 0.1426
6 0.1425
7 0.1302
8 0.1282
9 0.1124
10 0.1117


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek