Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SCAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Trinity (TX) 1,522.3256 1,538.1915 1,530.2380 60.11 69.39 0.277
2nd Colorado Col. 1,511.2214 1,530.6249 1,520.8922 59.58 69.25 0.264
3rd Southwestern (TX) 1,506.0803 1,520.8985 1,513.4713 58.28 68.42 0.230
4th Austin 1,397.0927 1,429.8640 1,413.3834 51.86 63.70 0.150
5th Texas Lutheran 1,382.9329 1,416.8983 1,399.8126 54.49 60.87 0.140
6th Dallas 1,294.0520 1,310.5742 1,302.2869 49.16 55.62 0.021
7th Schreiner 1,217.7379 1,259.9747 1,238.6763 46.78 52.76 -0.001
8th Centenary (LA) 1,215.6443 1,247.6939 1,231.5649 44.96 51.12 -0.061

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Trinity (TX) 0.3163 42.60 10.97 39.33 45.97 2.64 10.72
2nd Colorado Col. 0.2912 42.04 12.92 39.29 45.38 3.40 9.69
3rd Southwestern (TX) 0.2886 38.70 9.84 35.78 50.31 2.75 9.85
4th Austin 0.2654 38.03 11.49 35.15 52.56 3.29 8.68
5th Texas Lutheran 0.2201 34.78 12.77 32.35 54.38 3.18 7.59
6th Dallas 0.1556 29.92 14.36 28.57 54.54 4.61 10.13
7th Schreiner 0.1527 31.61 16.34 29.59 55.68 3.03 8.38
8th Centenary (LA) 0.1429 31.67 17.38 29.70 54.69 5.35 10.27

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Colorado Col. 0.0268 22.99 20.31 21.49 61.82 7.11 3.72
2nd Trinity (TX) 0.0395 22.35 18.40 20.25 61.33 5.81 6.25
3rd Southwestern (TX) 0.0583 22.07 16.24 20.47 65.73 4.59 4.21
4th Texas Lutheran 0.0806 24.75 16.69 23.54 62.10 4.57 6.35
5th Austin 0.1150 28.41 16.90 26.57 57.46 6.45 5.79
6th Dallas 0.1351 27.61 14.10 25.19 63.03 2.99 4.82
7th Schreiner 0.1536 30.43 15.07 27.82 57.51 4.30 8.54
8th Centenary (LA) 0.2036 35.12 14.76 32.63 52.68 2.80 7.65

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,393.7907 1,398.0871 1,407.2385 1,406.5980 1,401.4286
Difference 4.2964 13.4479 12.8073 10.1839

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Trinity (TX) 123 2,442 1,250 221 205 51.19 11.0 11.9 2,034 819 181 202 59.74 11.2 10.1
Colorado Col. 114 2,628 1,327 186 172 50.50 14.1 15.3 2,217 887 113 144 59.99 19.6 15.4
Southwestern (TX) 134 2,967 1,433 221 198 48.30 13.4 15.0 2,656 1,095 149 211 58.77 17.8 12.6
Austin 123 2,532 1,190 198 215 47.00 12.8 11.8 2,371 1,021 169 196 56.94 14.0 12.1
Texas Lutheran 112 2,425 1,161 135 129 47.88 18.0 18.8 2,358 1,105 170 187 53.14 13.9 12.6
Dallas 102 2,053 906 178 180 44.13 11.5 11.4 2,288 1,154 121 158 49.56 18.9 14.5
Centenary (LA) 88 1,677 742 176 146 44.25 9.5 11.5 1,973 1,058 158 155 46.38 12.5 12.7
Schreiner 77 1,365 566 93 136 41.47 14.7 10.0 1,674 899 170 142 46.30 9.8 11.8
Conference Average 109 2,261 1,072 176 173 46.84 13.1 13.2 2,196 1,005 154 174 53.85 14.7 12.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SCAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

75.50

2016-10-09 Irving, TX
Dallas
Austin
3
2
25
23
25
21
18
25
32
34
15
13
GAME

73.96

2016-10-23 Kerrville, Texas
Colorado Col.
Southwestern (TX)
3
2
25
20
25
22
22
25
22
25
15
12
GAME

72.56

2016-10-08 Georgetown, Texas
Southwestern (TX)
Trinity (TX)
2
3
18
25
20
25
25
22
25
16
12
15
GAME

71.35

2016-10-22
Colorado Col.
Trinity (TX)
2
3
30
28
25
22
20
25
16
25
12
15
GAME

70.64

2016-09-25 Sherman, Texas
Austin
Southwestern (TX)
1
3
25
17
20
25
20
25
20
25
GAME

70.52

2016-11-04 Shreveport, LA
Colorado Col.
Southwestern (TX)
2
3
22
25
20
25
26
24
25
12
15
17
GAME

70.04

2016-10-08 Irving, TX
Austin
Colorado Col.
0
3
24
26
21
25
24
26
GAME

68.33

2016-09-24 Sherman, TX
Colorado Col.
Trinity (TX)
1
3
21
25
20
25
25
22
21
25
GAME

68.14

2016-11-05 Shreveport, LA
Southwestern (TX)
Trinity (TX)
1
3
25
18
23
25
14
25
20
25
GAME

68.10

2016-09-25 Sherman, Texas
Colorado Col.
Texas Lutheran
3
1
25
15
15
25
25
22
25
15

HuskerGeek SCAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 25.8349
2 24.1830
3 23.9194
4 23.7748
5 21.8493
6 21.4070
7 21.1488
8 20.5317
9 20.1915
10 19.6417

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 13.6056
2 13.5643
3 12.8698
4 11.8732
5 11.8091
6 11.2800
7 11.0026
8 10.6501
9 10.3089
10 10.1233

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 21.5095
2 21.0615
3 18.5837
4 15.3886
5 14.5549
6 14.4963
7 14.0166
8 13.4281
9 12.6028
10 12.1263

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2443
2 0.2307
3 0.2117
4 0.2014
5 0.1946
6 0.1852
7 0.1843
8 0.1781
9 0.1776
10 0.1754

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1170
2 0.1083
3 0.1055
4 0.1055
5 0.1051
6 0.1051
7 0.1048
8 0.1007
9 0.1005
10 0.0982

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2173
2 0.1659
3 0.1608
4 0.1399
5 0.1361
6 0.1352
7 0.1318
8 0.1300
9 0.1126
10 0.1092


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek