Nerdly Nebraska.
2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Rnk. | Team | Résumé | Recent | ViPR | Adj SP% | Adj SO% | Adj. Hit Mar. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Colorado Col. | 1,537.8057 | 1,494.0635 | 1,515.7768 | 59.26 | 72.37 | 0.310 |
2nd | Southwestern (TX) | 1,500.3480 | 1,492.8856 | 1,496.6121 | 59.65 | 69.66 | 0.271 |
3rd | Trinity (TX) | 1,493.5749 | 1,460.8151 | 1,477.1042 | 60.60 | 66.47 | 0.279 |
4th | Texas Lutheran | 1,384.6041 | 1,360.9847 | 1,372.7436 | 55.31 | 61.54 | 0.170 |
5th | Austin | 1,375.6986 | 1,362.5575 | 1,369.1123 | 53.40 | 62.93 | 0.161 |
6th | Centenary (LA) | 1,253.3098 | 1,232.3055 | 1,242.7633 | 48.33 | 54.01 | 0.011 |
7th | Dallas | 1,196.0523 | 1,177.1781 | 1,186.5777 | 47.30 | 50.80 | -0.030 |
8th | Schreiner | 1,177.0011 | 1,182.9962 | 1,179.9949 | 45.49 | 51.08 | -0.034 |
ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.
Rnk. | Team | Hit% | Kill% | HE% | AST% | O_DIG% | O_BLK% | ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Colorado Col. | 0.3369 | 45.58 | 11.89 | 42.23 | 42.01 | 3.15 | 9.81 |
2nd | Trinity (TX) | 0.3231 | 43.64 | 11.33 | 39.78 | 44.59 | 3.01 | 11.79 |
3rd | Southwestern (TX) | 0.3070 | 42.08 | 11.38 | 38.63 | 45.54 | 3.16 | 11.10 |
4th | Austin | 0.2575 | 36.45 | 10.70 | 33.85 | 53.07 | 3.08 | 10.33 |
5th | Texas Lutheran | 0.2532 | 38.23 | 12.91 | 36.16 | 48.99 | 2.49 | 8.14 |
6th | Centenary (LA) | 0.1953 | 33.24 | 13.71 | 31.17 | 52.92 | 5.13 | 9.84 |
7th | Schreiner | 0.1493 | 29.85 | 14.92 | 27.87 | 59.34 | 2.61 | 7.88 |
8th | Dallas | 0.1171 | 26.90 | 15.19 | 24.72 | 62.99 | 4.87 | 8.86 |
Rnk. | Team | O_Hit% | O_Kill% | O_HE% | O_AST% | DIG% | BLK% | O_ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Colorado Col. | 0.0266 | 22.85 | 20.19 | 21.68 | 61.99 | 6.05 | 3.42 |
2nd | Southwestern (TX) | 0.0359 | 21.97 | 18.38 | 20.44 | 64.04 | 5.07 | 4.74 |
3rd | Trinity (TX) | 0.0443 | 23.13 | 18.69 | 21.66 | 61.89 | 5.54 | 5.83 |
4th | Texas Lutheran | 0.0837 | 26.21 | 17.84 | 24.52 | 60.33 | 5.09 | 5.77 |
5th | Austin | 0.0967 | 28.04 | 18.38 | 26.30 | 56.76 | 5.57 | 6.09 |
6th | Dallas | 0.1474 | 30.45 | 15.71 | 28.15 | 59.17 | 3.31 | 6.68 |
7th | Schreiner | 0.1837 | 34.83 | 16.46 | 33.14 | 51.97 | 4.18 | 7.77 |
8th | Centenary (LA) | 0.1846 | 34.69 | 16.23 | 32.69 | 52.92 | 2.81 | 9.15 |
Description | Average | Remove First and Last | Remove Top and Bottom 2 | Remove Top and Bottom 3 | Composite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 1,355.0856 | 1,357.4855 | 1,365.4308 | 1,370.9279 | 1,362.2325 |
Difference | 2.3999 | 10.3452 | 15.8423 | 9.5292 |
Offense | Defense | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team | Sets | S | SP | SA | SE | SP% | S/SA | S/SE | OS | SPA | SAA | SEA | SO% | OS/SAA | OS/SEA |
Colorado Col. | 125 | 2,914 | 1,507 | 219 | 231 | 51.72 | 13.3 | 12.6 | 2,279 | 844 | 112 | 195 | 62.97 | 20.3 | 11.7 |
Southwestern (TX) | 123 | 2,856 | 1,515 | 258 | 212 | 53.05 | 11.1 | 13.5 | 2,254 | 883 | 142 | 152 | 60.83 | 15.9 | 14.8 |
Trinity (TX) | 129 | 2,712 | 1,405 | 265 | 215 | 51.81 | 10.2 | 12.6 | 2,348 | 1,022 | 184 | 197 | 56.47 | 12.8 | 11.9 |
Austin | 121 | 2,707 | 1,328 | 233 | 199 | 49.06 | 11.6 | 13.6 | 2,479 | 1,093 | 176 | 171 | 55.91 | 14.1 | 14.5 |
Texas Lutheran | 121 | 2,573 | 1,232 | 150 | 152 | 47.88 | 17.2 | 16.9 | 2,522 | 1,182 | 185 | 189 | 53.13 | 13.6 | 13.3 |
Centenary (LA) | 114 | 2,258 | 1,056 | 192 | 143 | 46.77 | 11.8 | 15.8 | 2,458 | 1,255 | 243 | 189 | 48.94 | 10.1 | 13.0 |
Dallas | 88 | 1,420 | 638 | 134 | 120 | 44.93 | 10.6 | 11.8 | 1,704 | 941 | 143 | 133 | 44.78 | 11.9 | 12.8 |
Schreiner | 77 | 1,234 | 475 | 70 | 102 | 38.49 | 17.6 | 12.1 | 1,712 | 983 | 166 | 144 | 42.58 | 10.3 | 11.9 |
Conference Average | 112 | 2,334 | 1,145 | 190 | 172 | 47.96 | 12.9 | 13.6 | 2,220 | 1,025 | 169 | 171 | 53.20 | 13.6 | 13.0 |
|
|
|
Game Link | EPIC | Game Date | Location | Teams | Sets | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Set 4 | Set 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAME |
73.30 |
2017-10-14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
72.79 |
2017-09-23 | Georgetown, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
72.12 |
2017-10-21 | Shreveport, La. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
71.94 |
2017-11-04 | Kerrville, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
71.10 |
2017-11-03 | Kerrville, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
69.85 |
2017-11-03 | Kerrville, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
68.83 |
2017-09-23 | Georgetown, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
68.24 |
2017-09-22 | Georgetown, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
67.97 |
2017-10-01 | Seguin, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
67.04 |
2017-10-22 | Shreveport, La. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Megan Grimes | Southwestern (TX) |
2 | Lizzy Counts | Colorado Col. |
3 | Katie Ingle | Austin |
4 | Kirby Smith | Trinity (TX) |
5 | Jordan Mullen | Colorado Col. |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Kirby Smith | Trinity (TX) |
2 | Jordan Mullen | Colorado Col. |
3 | Kate Mitchell | Southwestern (TX) |
4 | Brittany Hohlt | Southwestern (TX) |
5 | Aria Dudley | Colorado Col. |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Megan Grimes | Southwestern (TX) |
2 | Lizzy Counts | Colorado Col. |
3 | Katie Ingle | Austin |
4 | Katrina Lieberman | Trinity (TX) |
5 | Kelly Jurden | Texas Lutheran |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Jaci Chambers | Texas Lutheran |
2 | Brandi Campos | Southwestern (TX) |
3 | Anna Gurolnick | Colorado Col. |
4 | Tatiana Ferrari | Austin |
5 | Sarah Mullens | Trinity (TX) |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Megan Grimes | Southwestern (TX) | 24.0967 |
2 | Katie Ingle | Austin | 23.4153 |
3 | Lizzy Counts | Colorado Col. | 21.9293 |
4 | Kirby Smith | Trinity (TX) | 20.9070 |
5 | Desiree Frey | Centenary (LA) | 19.3026 |
6 | Jamison Duck | Southwestern (TX) | 19.0544 |
7 | Jaci Chambers | Texas Lutheran | 18.6607 |
8 | Brandi Campos | Southwestern (TX) | 17.1540 |
9 | Haley Harris | Colorado Col. | 16.1358 |
10 | Tatiana Ferrari | Austin | 16.1108 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lizzy Counts | Colorado Col. | 15.1429 |
2 | Katie Ingle | Austin | 14.6672 |
3 | Megan Grimes | Southwestern (TX) | 13.9390 |
4 | Kate Mitchell | Southwestern (TX) | 11.6279 |
5 | Kirby Smith | Trinity (TX) | 11.4927 |
6 | Katrina Lieberman | Trinity (TX) | 10.4336 |
7 | Jordan Mullen | Colorado Col. | 10.1936 |
8 | Makenzie Griffin | Texas Lutheran | 9.6116 |
9 | Hannah Mikelonis | Texas Lutheran | 8.7384 |
10 | Aria Dudley | Colorado Col. | 8.7278 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brandi Campos | Southwestern (TX) | 17.5351 |
2 | Sarah Mullens | Trinity (TX) | 16.0301 |
3 | Jaci Chambers | Texas Lutheran | 15.8308 |
4 | Tatiana Ferrari | Austin | 13.8436 |
5 | Anna Gurolnick | Colorado Col. | 13.5559 |
6 | Jamison Duck | Southwestern (TX) | 12.7701 |
7 | Marissa Sandoval | Centenary (LA) | 11.6083 |
8 | Desiree Frey | Centenary (LA) | 10.9448 |
9 | Diana Hassink | Dallas | 10.9225 |
10 | Megan Grimes | Southwestern (TX) | 10.1578 |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Katie Ingle | Austin | 0.1968 |
2 | Megan Grimes | Southwestern (TX) | 0.1959 |
3 | Kirby Smith | Trinity (TX) | 0.1884 |
4 | Lizzy Counts | Colorado Col. | 0.1827 |
5 | Desiree Frey | Centenary (LA) | 0.1693 |
6 | Jaci Chambers | Texas Lutheran | 0.1581 |
7 | Jordan Mullen | Colorado Col. | 0.1553 |
8 | Jamison Duck | Southwestern (TX) | 0.1549 |
9 | Diana Hassink | Dallas | 0.1482 |
10 | Haley Harris | Colorado Col. | 0.1467 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lizzy Counts | Colorado Col. | 0.1262 |
2 | Katie Ingle | Austin | 0.1233 |
3 | Megan Grimes | Southwestern (TX) | 0.1133 |
4 | Katrina Lieberman | Trinity (TX) | 0.1043 |
5 | Kirby Smith | Trinity (TX) | 0.1035 |
6 | Jordan Mullen | Colorado Col. | 0.0999 |
7 | Kate Mitchell | Southwestern (TX) | 0.0977 |
8 | Makenzie Griffin | Texas Lutheran | 0.0822 |
9 | Madeline McKay | Trinity (TX) | 0.0818 |
10 | Hannah Mikelonis | Texas Lutheran | 0.0760 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brandi Campos | Southwestern (TX) | 0.1437 |
2 | Diana Hassink | Dallas | 0.1437 |
3 | Sarah Mullens | Trinity (TX) | 0.1370 |
4 | Jaci Chambers | Texas Lutheran | 0.1342 |
5 | Tatiana Ferrari | Austin | 0.1163 |
6 | Anna Gurolnick | Colorado Col. | 0.1149 |
7 | Amanda Gomez | Schreiner | 0.1055 |
8 | Marissa Sandoval | Centenary (LA) | 0.1046 |
9 | Jamison Duck | Southwestern (TX) | 0.1038 |
10 | Desiree Frey | Centenary (LA) | 0.0960 |
Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts. The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams. This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams. The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores. It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams. The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average. If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating. If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings. It was weighing the average down so to speak. The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.
The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game. EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.
All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them. This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.
Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list. Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric. Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.