Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SCAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Colorado Col. 1,537.8057 1,494.0635 1,515.7768 59.26 72.37 0.310
2nd Southwestern (TX) 1,500.3480 1,492.8856 1,496.6121 59.65 69.66 0.271
3rd Trinity (TX) 1,493.5749 1,460.8151 1,477.1042 60.60 66.47 0.279
4th Texas Lutheran 1,384.6041 1,360.9847 1,372.7436 55.31 61.54 0.170
5th Austin 1,375.6986 1,362.5575 1,369.1123 53.40 62.93 0.161
6th Centenary (LA) 1,253.3098 1,232.3055 1,242.7633 48.33 54.01 0.011
7th Dallas 1,196.0523 1,177.1781 1,186.5777 47.30 50.80 -0.030
8th Schreiner 1,177.0011 1,182.9962 1,179.9949 45.49 51.08 -0.034

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Colorado Col. 0.3369 45.58 11.89 42.23 42.01 3.15 9.81
2nd Trinity (TX) 0.3231 43.64 11.33 39.78 44.59 3.01 11.79
3rd Southwestern (TX) 0.3070 42.08 11.38 38.63 45.54 3.16 11.10
4th Austin 0.2575 36.45 10.70 33.85 53.07 3.08 10.33
5th Texas Lutheran 0.2532 38.23 12.91 36.16 48.99 2.49 8.14
6th Centenary (LA) 0.1953 33.24 13.71 31.17 52.92 5.13 9.84
7th Schreiner 0.1493 29.85 14.92 27.87 59.34 2.61 7.88
8th Dallas 0.1171 26.90 15.19 24.72 62.99 4.87 8.86

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Colorado Col. 0.0266 22.85 20.19 21.68 61.99 6.05 3.42
2nd Southwestern (TX) 0.0359 21.97 18.38 20.44 64.04 5.07 4.74
3rd Trinity (TX) 0.0443 23.13 18.69 21.66 61.89 5.54 5.83
4th Texas Lutheran 0.0837 26.21 17.84 24.52 60.33 5.09 5.77
5th Austin 0.0967 28.04 18.38 26.30 56.76 5.57 6.09
6th Dallas 0.1474 30.45 15.71 28.15 59.17 3.31 6.68
7th Schreiner 0.1837 34.83 16.46 33.14 51.97 4.18 7.77
8th Centenary (LA) 0.1846 34.69 16.23 32.69 52.92 2.81 9.15

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,355.0856 1,357.4855 1,365.4308 1,370.9279 1,362.2325
Difference 2.3999 10.3452 15.8423 9.5292

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Colorado Col. 125 2,914 1,507 219 231 51.72 13.3 12.6 2,279 844 112 195 62.97 20.3 11.7
Southwestern (TX) 123 2,856 1,515 258 212 53.05 11.1 13.5 2,254 883 142 152 60.83 15.9 14.8
Trinity (TX) 129 2,712 1,405 265 215 51.81 10.2 12.6 2,348 1,022 184 197 56.47 12.8 11.9
Austin 121 2,707 1,328 233 199 49.06 11.6 13.6 2,479 1,093 176 171 55.91 14.1 14.5
Texas Lutheran 121 2,573 1,232 150 152 47.88 17.2 16.9 2,522 1,182 185 189 53.13 13.6 13.3
Centenary (LA) 114 2,258 1,056 192 143 46.77 11.8 15.8 2,458 1,255 243 189 48.94 10.1 13.0
Dallas 88 1,420 638 134 120 44.93 10.6 11.8 1,704 941 143 133 44.78 11.9 12.8
Schreiner 77 1,234 475 70 102 38.49 17.6 12.1 1,712 983 166 144 42.58 10.3 11.9
Conference Average 112 2,334 1,145 190 172 47.96 12.9 13.6 2,220 1,025 169 171 53.20 13.6 13.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SCAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

73.30

2017-10-14
Trinity (TX)
Southwestern (TX)
2
3
25
22
16
25
17
25
31
29
14
16
GAME

72.79

2017-09-23 Georgetown, Texas
Southwestern (TX)
Texas Lutheran
3
2
22
25
25
19
21
25
25
23
15
10
GAME

72.12

2017-10-21 Shreveport, La.
Colorado Col.
Southwestern (TX)
3
2
25
22
25
21
17
25
22
25
15
10
GAME

71.94

2017-11-04 Kerrville, Texas
Colorado Col.
Trinity (TX)
3
2
22
25
18
25
25
19
25
23
15
13
GAME

71.10

2017-11-03 Kerrville, Texas
Southwestern (TX)
Trinity (TX)
2
3
23
25
25
17
25
19
23
25
12
15
GAME

69.85

2017-11-03 Kerrville, Texas
Colorado Col.
Texas Lutheran
3
2
25
19
25
23
19
25
25
27
15
8
GAME

68.83

2017-09-23 Georgetown, Texas
Texas Lutheran
Trinity (TX)
1
3
14
25
20
25
25
17
24
26
GAME

68.24

2017-09-22 Georgetown, Texas
Southwestern (TX)
Trinity (TX)
1
3
22
25
24
26
25
19
16
25
GAME

67.97

2017-10-01 Seguin, Texas
Colorado Col.
Southwestern (TX)
3
2
25
22
22
25
11
25
25
17
15
13
GAME

67.04

2017-10-22 Shreveport, La.
Centenary (LA)
Texas Lutheran
2
3
25
23
18
25
21
25
26
24
9
15

HuskerGeek SCAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 24.0967
2 23.4153
3 21.9293
4 20.9070
5 19.3026
6 19.0544
7 18.6607
8 17.1540
9 16.1358
10 16.1108

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 15.1429
2 14.6672
3 13.9390
4 11.6279
5 11.4927
6 10.4336
7 10.1936
8 9.6116
9 8.7384
10 8.7278

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.5351
2 16.0301
3 15.8308
4 13.8436
5 13.5559
6 12.7701
7 11.6083
8 10.9448
9 10.9225
10 10.1578

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.1968
2 0.1959
3 0.1884
4 0.1827
5 0.1693
6 0.1581
7 0.1553
8 0.1549
9 0.1482
10 0.1467

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1262
2 0.1233
3 0.1133
4 0.1043
5 0.1035
6 0.0999
7 0.0977
8 0.0822
9 0.0818
10 0.0760

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1437
2 0.1437
3 0.1370
4 0.1342
5 0.1163
6 0.1149
7 0.1055
8 0.1046
9 0.1038
10 0.0960


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek