Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,839.6298

Football ohio st 12.7316
Men's Basketball kansas 12.7368
Women's Basketball south carolina 13.4324
Baseball ucla 12.9478
Softball ucla 10.9838
Ice Hockey north dakota 10.7002
Men's Lacrosse syracuse 7.8562
Women's Lacrosse north carolina 10.7252
Men's Soccer georgetown 10.7279
Women's Soccer stanford 13.0262
Men's Volleyball byu 11.1006
Women's Volleyball stanford 11.3000
Field Hockey north carolina 12.2787

SCAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Colorado Col. 1,603.6639 1,567.0767 1,585.2647 61.19 62.45 0.302
2nd Trinity (TX) 1,593.7172 1,552.5814 1,573.0149 60.39 62.94 0.270
3rd Southwestern (TX) 1,513.7723 1,474.4856 1,493.9998 56.51 60.41 0.181
4th Texas Lutheran 1,476.9940 1,438.0718 1,457.4030 55.11 57.03 0.140
5th Dallas 1,417.3039 1,374.6985 1,395.8386 49.59 58.05 0.081
6th Austin 1,396.7661 1,359.5457 1,378.0302 50.27 56.23 0.071
7th Schreiner 1,352.6136 1,311.4128 1,331.8539 47.89 54.32 0.010
8th Centenary (LA) 1,352.6830 1,310.1929 1,331.2685 48.01 54.14 0.021

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Colorado Col. 0.3395 46.68 12.74 43.68 39.81 3.25 11.35
2nd Trinity (TX) 0.3245 44.31 11.86 40.58 43.20 2.86 10.21
3rd Southwestern (TX) 0.2589 37.96 12.08 35.31 50.25 3.40 11.47
4th Texas Lutheran 0.2323 34.97 11.75 32.22 52.01 3.33 9.68
5th Dallas 0.2091 34.56 13.65 32.15 52.52 4.02 10.46
6th Austin 0.1891 33.10 14.19 30.04 54.72 3.96 10.36
7th Schreiner 0.1837 31.53 13.15 29.11 55.78 3.19 8.32
8th Centenary (LA) 0.1593 31.08 15.14 28.75 55.62 4.59 8.91

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Colorado Col. 0.0372 22.30 18.58 21.22 64.03 5.73 5.04
2nd Trinity (TX) 0.0549 24.33 18.84 22.84 61.49 6.57 4.61
3rd Southwestern (TX) 0.0775 24.81 17.07 23.74 61.36 4.48 5.79
4th Texas Lutheran 0.0921 25.44 16.23 24.06 59.36 5.20 6.88
5th Austin 0.1177 27.89 16.12 26.17 58.43 4.58 6.65
6th Dallas 0.1280 28.31 15.51 26.75 58.37 4.16 7.13
7th Centenary (LA) 0.1388 29.00 15.12 27.24 59.51 2.94 8.12
8th Schreiner 0.1741 31.88 14.47 30.26 54.10 4.29 6.35

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,443.3342 1,438.3567 1,431.3179 1,426.6208 1,434.9074
Difference -4.9775 -12.0163 -16.7134 -11.2357

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Trinity (TX) 137 3,111 1,689 239 179 54.29 13.0 17.4 2,509 1,088 134 226 56.64 18.7 11.1
Colorado Col. 116 1,761 969 231 290 55.03 7.6 6.1 1,402 635 116 169 54.71 12.1 8.3
Southwestern (TX) 130 2,729 1,395 248 243 51.12 11.0 11.2 2,521 1,158 181 189 54.07 13.9 13.3
Texas Lutheran 133 2,861 1,500 218 203 52.43 13.1 14.1 2,578 1,232 208 218 52.21 12.4 11.8
Dallas 126 2,683 1,230 217 195 45.84 12.4 13.8 2,670 1,230 209 220 53.93 12.8 12.1
Austin 138 2,751 1,310 228 270 47.62 12.1 10.2 2,831 1,378 207 203 51.33 13.7 13.9
Schreiner 109 2,098 990 148 148 47.19 14.2 14.2 2,200 1,073 158 223 51.23 13.9 9.9
Centenary (LA) 125 2,490 1,127 161 135 45.26 15.5 18.4 2,758 1,396 236 229 49.38 11.7 12.0
Conference Average 127 2,561 1,276 211 208 49.85 12.4 13.2 2,434 1,149 181 210 52.94 13.6 11.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SCAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

73.23

2019-10-18 Irving, Texas
Dallas
Southwestern (TX)
1
3
25
27
25
22
26
28
20
25
GAME

73.08

2019-10-26 Sherman, Texas
Dallas
Texas Lutheran
3
2
19
25
25
23
22
25
25
17
15
12
GAME

72.13

2019-10-01 Georgetown, Texas
Southwestern (TX)
Texas Lutheran
3
1
25
15
20
25
28
26
25
22
GAME

71.16

2019-10-06 Kerrville, TX
Trinity (TX)
Southwestern (TX)
3
0
25
23
25
22
27
25
GAME

70.90

2019-09-21 Denver, Colo.
Texas Lutheran
Trinity (TX)
2
3
27
25
22
25
25
23
17
25
10
15
GAME

69.51

2019-11-10 Seguin, TX
Trinity (TX)
Colorado Col.
3
1
22
25
26
24
27
25
25
17
GAME

68.08

2019-10-29 Sherman, Texas
Austin
Dallas
1
3
25
21
25
27
27
29
21
25
GAME

67.84

2019-09-21 Shreveport, La.
Centenary (LA)
Dallas
3
1
20
25
26
24
28
26
25
23
GAME

67.81

2019-09-17 Irving, TX
Dallas
Austin
3
2
21
25
19
25
27
25
25
12
16
14
GAME

67.77

2019-10-27 Sherman, Texas
Southwestern (TX)
Trinity (TX)
1
3
16
25
17
25
25
22
19
25

HuskerGeek SCAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 28.6347
2 25.9921
3 25.8466
4 25.4652
5 24.4496
6 23.7628
7 23.1059
8 22.0223
9 21.7688
10 19.4412

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 13.6425
2 12.8014
3 12.2843
4 11.5063
5 10.9370
6 10.1182
7 10.0882
8 9.6897
9 9.6295
10 9.4046

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 24.0560
2 21.9211
3 19.9132
4 18.6275
5 17.6976
6 16.1686
7 15.6698
8 14.9457
9 13.7078
10 12.9557

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2328
2 0.2119
3 0.2070
4 0.2021
5 0.1984
6 0.1834
7 0.1820
8 0.1814
9 0.1804
10 0.1800

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1109
2 0.1058
3 0.1027
4 0.0951
5 0.0951
6 0.0938
7 0.0934
8 0.0905
9 0.0889
10 0.0861

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1972
2 0.1740
3 0.1592
4 0.1520
5 0.1439
6 0.1412
7 0.1336
8 0.1303
9 0.1152
10 0.1141


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek