Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SCIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Cal Lutheran 1,564.8397 1,555.9014 1,560.3642 61.22 73.02 0.327
2nd Claremont-M-S 1,496.6533 1,488.2889 1,492.4652 59.41 70.04 0.252
3rd Pomona-Pitzer 1,455.4406 1,457.6560 1,456.5479 58.26 67.27 0.228
4th Chapman 1,456.9408 1,449.3286 1,453.1297 58.06 66.09 0.219
5th Occidental 1,453.6490 1,449.7803 1,451.7134 60.12 64.23 0.206
6th Whittier 1,412.2404 1,414.8548 1,413.5470 54.35 64.50 0.189
7th La Verne 1,394.8044 1,396.9016 1,395.8526 55.74 63.83 0.170
8th Redlands 1,356.0390 1,355.8697 1,355.9543 52.85 60.67 0.143
9th Caltech 1,101.2989 1,088.9429 1,095.1035 40.77 44.88 -0.122

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Cal Lutheran 0.3592 47.30 11.38 43.09 41.50 2.63 9.00
2nd Claremont-M-S 0.3158 43.79 12.21 40.91 42.03 4.82 10.92
3rd Chapman 0.2998 42.29 12.31 38.99 45.99 4.37 9.19
4th Pomona-Pitzer 0.2909 41.11 12.02 37.85 46.40 3.23 8.46
5th Occidental 0.2738 39.67 12.29 35.57 46.98 3.14 11.28
6th Whittier 0.2572 38.68 12.96 35.28 42.99 3.14 10.87
7th La Verne 0.2498 40.59 15.62 37.58 47.88 4.96 8.97
8th Redlands 0.2434 37.24 12.90 34.39 51.78 4.00 8.53
9th Caltech 0.1240 31.47 19.07 29.06 58.13 4.18 8.42

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Cal Lutheran 0.0324 21.65 18.41 19.88 63.90 6.62 3.43
2nd Pomona-Pitzer 0.0631 24.72 18.42 22.20 58.93 6.17 4.44
3rd Claremont-M-S 0.0636 22.60 16.23 20.89 64.89 4.85 3.63
4th Occidental 0.0675 22.80 16.05 19.82 57.98 4.91 6.26
5th Whittier 0.0679 23.22 16.43 21.91 62.37 5.45 3.60
6th La Verne 0.0799 25.47 17.48 23.37 59.75 5.66 5.19
7th Chapman 0.0805 25.41 17.36 23.32 63.18 4.34 5.47
8th Redlands 0.1006 26.82 16.76 24.81 58.63 5.27 6.72
9th Caltech 0.2458 39.24 14.67 35.31 47.21 3.97 12.01

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,408.2975 1,431.3157 1,434.1581 1,439.4634 1,428.3087
Difference 23.0182 25.8606 31.1658 26.6815

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Cal Lutheran 130 1,449 721 231 265 49.76 6.3 5.5 1,222 476 121 176 61.05 10.1 6.9
Claremont-M-S 113 1,482 728 206 194 49.12 7.2 7.6 1,294 528 110 172 59.20 11.8 7.5
Pomona-Pitzer 112 2,028 1,010 149 116 49.80 13.6 17.5 1,787 755 135 186 57.75 13.2 9.6
Chapman 117 1,813 890 155 121 49.09 11.7 15.0 1,672 738 164 174 55.86 10.2 9.6
Occidental 99 1,382 699 175 130 50.58 7.9 10.6 1,274 591 153 164 53.61 8.3 7.8
Whittier 105 1,219 568 187 188 46.60 6.5 6.5 1,192 541 118 131 54.61 10.1 9.1
La Verne 115 1,361 616 155 180 45.26 8.8 7.6 1,405 665 181 181 52.67 7.8 7.8
Redlands 99 1,547 670 114 162 43.31 13.6 9.5 1,731 870 173 177 49.74 10.0 9.8
Caltech 54 655 237 55 98 36.18 11.9 6.7 1,127 730 182 90 35.23 6.2 12.5
Conference Average 105 1,437 682 159 162 46.63 9.7 9.6 1,412 655 149 161 53.30 9.7 9.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SCIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

72.36

2013-09-20 Orange, CA
Chapman
Claremont-M-S
3
2
25
21
23
25
18
25
25
23
15
7
GAME

72.36

2013-10-26 Claremont, CA
Pomona-Pitzer
Claremont-M-S
3
1
20
25
26
24
25
13
35
33
GAME

71.35

2013-10-29 Orange, CA
Chapman
Cal Lutheran
2
3
13
25
25
17
26
24
21
25
5
15
GAME

70.62

2013-10-04 Los Angeles, CA
Occidental
Claremont-M-S
1
3
23
25
25
12
29
31
24
26
GAME

70.48

2013-10-25 Claremont, CA
Claremont-M-S
Cal Lutheran
2
3
21
25
19
25
25
15
25
23
13
15
GAME

70.40

2013-09-28 Claremont, CA
Pomona-Pitzer
Occidental
2
3
23
25
26
24
25
20
23
25
11
15
GAME

69.34

2013-10-19 Claremont, CA
Pomona-Pitzer
Cal Lutheran
1
3
25
21
27
29
14
25
23
25
GAME

69.09

2013-11-02 Orange, CA
Chapman
Occidental
2
3
23
25
25
21
23
25
25
14
8
15
GAME

68.82

2013-10-15 Claremont, CA
Pomona-Pitzer
La Verne
3
1
25
23
27
29
25
22
25
18
GAME

68.27

2013-09-20 Whittier, Calif.
Whittier
Cal Lutheran
1
3
25
23
23
25
8
25
23
25

HuskerGeek SCIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 20.8559
2 15.1239
3 15.0846
4 15.0576
5 14.9505
6 13.7878
7 13.3572
8 12.8564
9 12.7639
10 12.6713

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 13.4469
2 12.5590
3 10.1247
4 8.5170
5 8.2162
6 7.9961
7 7.5658
8 7.3671
9 6.7703
10 6.4027

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 13.1884
2 12.2459
3 10.2103
4 8.0288
5 7.5531
6 7.4826
7 7.4090
8 7.2540
9 7.1455
10 6.9980

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.3419
2 0.2514
3 0.2401
4 0.2224
5 0.2074
6 0.1993
7 0.1954
8 0.1855
9 0.1846
10 0.1836

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.2204
2 0.1675
3 0.1369
4 0.1352
5 0.1269
6 0.1235
7 0.1208
8 0.1201
9 0.1159
10 0.1110

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2127
2 0.1702
3 0.1475
4 0.1218
5 0.1215
6 0.1214
7 0.1181
8 0.1145
9 0.1115
10 0.1093


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek