Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

SCIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Claremont-M-S 1,529.1834 1,544.3016 1,536.7239 60.12 67.26 0.263
2nd Chapman 1,483.3904 1,500.6372 1,491.9889 56.39 66.52 0.224
3rd Cal Lutheran 1,482.2432 1,494.1964 1,488.2078 56.85 65.54 0.210
4th La Verne 1,471.8393 1,493.5084 1,482.6342 56.70 64.94 0.195
5th Whittier 1,445.8740 1,468.1957 1,456.9921 54.11 64.53 0.145
6th Redlands 1,389.3415 1,402.5627 1,395.9364 53.31 59.18 0.123
7th Pomona-Pitzer 1,373.4193 1,399.1052 1,386.2027 53.55 59.21 0.111
8th Occidental 1,366.9663 1,382.1048 1,374.5147 50.61 59.26 0.085
9th Caltech 1,241.5139 1,271.5586 1,256.4464 44.66 53.08 -0.026

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Claremont-M-S 0.2986 42.36 12.49 39.82 45.24 3.84 10.55
2nd Chapman 0.2919 41.67 12.48 38.68 44.48 4.61 9.50
3rd La Verne 0.2814 41.20 13.06 38.88 44.85 3.00 10.00
4th Cal Lutheran 0.2692 38.91 12.00 36.43 49.25 2.71 9.36
5th Whittier 0.2540 38.07 12.68 35.40 50.91 4.11 9.75
6th Pomona-Pitzer 0.2168 36.54 14.87 34.68 50.48 3.96 10.38
7th Occidental 0.2128 36.04 14.76 33.28 51.04 3.80 9.00
8th Redlands 0.2121 35.14 13.93 33.10 52.06 3.60 9.72
9th Caltech 0.1640 32.83 16.43 30.75 54.21 4.64 8.93

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Claremont-M-S 0.0356 22.74 19.18 20.77 63.03 6.44 5.37
2nd Cal Lutheran 0.0590 24.80 18.90 23.67 60.42 5.76 5.88
3rd Chapman 0.0683 25.72 18.89 23.95 61.02 6.34 7.02
4th La Verne 0.0867 26.53 17.86 24.85 58.33 4.87 5.54
5th Redlands 0.0894 26.61 17.67 24.79 58.89 5.02 6.08
6th Pomona-Pitzer 0.1056 27.81 17.25 25.44 59.45 4.94 6.59
7th Whittier 0.1092 27.74 16.82 24.62 57.19 4.74 5.38
8th Occidental 0.1283 30.08 17.25 28.14 56.05 3.87 5.41
9th Caltech 0.1903 33.56 14.53 30.58 54.02 3.29 8.06

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,429.9608 1,439.4967 1,441.9947 1,445.1876 1,439.1599
Difference 9.5359 12.0339 15.2268 12.2655

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Chapman 98 2,127 1,060 162 144 49.84 13.1 14.8 1,850 773 160 145 58.22 11.6 12.8
Claremont-M-S 121 2,742 1,374 217 194 50.11 12.6 14.1 2,433 1,044 161 161 57.09 15.1 15.1
La Verne 103 2,342 1,149 183 151 49.06 12.8 15.5 2,137 935 149 158 56.25 14.3 13.5
Cal Lutheran 119 2,666 1,278 184 184 47.94 14.5 14.5 2,511 1,111 180 189 55.76 14.0 13.3
Whittier 107 2,018 942 164 115 46.68 12.3 17.5 1,949 865 153 209 55.62 12.7 9.3
Redlands 95 1,919 923 168 174 48.10 11.4 11.0 1,915 917 152 168 52.12 12.6 11.4
Pomona-Pitzer 110 2,033 958 190 181 47.12 10.7 11.2 2,068 995 192 204 51.89 10.8 10.1
Occidental 75 1,504 655 106 117 43.55 14.2 12.9 1,648 808 112 124 50.97 14.7 13.3
Caltech 73 1,365 548 105 132 40.15 13.0 10.3 1,726 927 161 130 46.29 10.7 13.3
Conference Average 100 2,080 987 164 155 46.95 12.7 13.5 2,026 931 158 165 53.80 12.9 12.5
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SCIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

72.67

2018-10-12 Thousand Oaks, Calif
Cal Lutheran
Claremont-M-S
3
2
31
29
18
25
14
25
25
23
15
10
GAME

72.20

2018-10-04 Claremont, CA
Claremont-M-S
Cal Lutheran
3
1
25
22
25
12
26
28
25
21
GAME

72.16

2018-09-25 Whittier, Calif.
Whittier
Cal Lutheran
1
3
11
25
26
28
30
28
6
25
GAME

71.77

2018-11-01 Claremont, CA
Claremont-M-S
La Verne
3
1
25
19
22
25
25
20
29
27
GAME

71.05

2018-10-20 Thousand Oaks, Calif
Cal Lutheran
Whittier
1
3
29
27
16
25
21
25
20
25
GAME

70.83

2018-10-23 Orange, Calif.
Chapman
Cal Lutheran
2
3
25
23
22
25
25
23
19
25
13
15
GAME

70.42

2018-09-28 Thousand Oaks, Calif
Cal Lutheran
Chapman
1
3
23
25
25
17
18
25
22
25
GAME

70.34

2018-09-18 La Verne, CA
La Verne
Claremont-M-S
2
3
19
25
28
26
21
25
25
15
13
15
GAME

70.20

2018-10-26 Claremont, CA
Claremont-M-S
Whittier
3
1
25
20
26
24
26
28
25
21
GAME

69.85

2018-09-12 Thousand Oaks, Calif
Cal Lutheran
La Verne
2
3
25
18
25
17
23
25
18
25
10
15

HuskerGeek SCIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 28.9047
2 23.1327
3 21.9737
4 21.5491
5 20.3661
6 18.5185
7 17.6380
8 16.8822
9 16.4199
10 16.1894

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 18.1164
2 13.7323
3 12.4996
4 11.5644
5 11.4246
6 11.2135
7 11.0152
8 10.6549
9 10.3906
10 8.8893

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.4925
2 17.9309
3 15.3976
4 13.0143
5 12.3002
6 11.9192
7 11.1119
8 10.7883
9 9.3889
10 9.1694

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2409
2 0.2133
3 0.2047
4 0.2004
5 0.1977
6 0.1938
7 0.1855
8 0.1811
9 0.1747
10 0.1594

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1510
2 0.1333
3 0.1298
4 0.1214
5 0.1039
6 0.1034
7 0.1024
8 0.1006
9 0.0992
10 0.0977

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1741
2 0.1638
3 0.1398
4 0.1387
5 0.1370
6 0.1286
7 0.1186
8 0.1182
9 0.1105
10 0.1092


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek