Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,839.6298
BPR D1 NCAAWBB Baylor 0.8231

Football ohio st 12.6975
Men's Basketball kansas 13.0297
Women's Basketball baylor 13.4405
Ice Hockey minnesota st 10.2720
Men's Soccer georgetown 10.7279
Women's Soccer stanford 13.0262
Men's Volleyball byu 10.0755
Women's Volleyball stanford 11.3000
Field Hockey north carolina 12.2787

SCIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Claremont-M-S 1,581.8549 1,549.7871 1,565.7389 61.52 65.58 0.282
2nd Chapman 1,540.9831 1,504.2894 1,522.5257 63.03 57.90 0.216
3rd Cal Lutheran 1,505.8755 1,468.0932 1,486.8644 55.75 62.36 0.185
4th La Verne 1,473.9451 1,439.1954 1,456.4666 55.66 59.61 0.151
5th Whittier 1,456.2963 1,417.0806 1,436.5547 54.12 59.12 0.125
6th Pomona-Pitzer 1,430.4652 1,398.2004 1,414.2408 51.72 59.54 0.119
7th Redlands 1,378.9524 1,339.6287 1,359.1483 48.75 57.25 0.056
8th Caltech 1,338.0374 1,302.3735 1,320.0850 46.48 55.96 0.053
9th Occidental 1,283.6077 1,251.8846 1,267.6469 46.05 51.61 -0.018

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Claremont-M-S 0.3140 43.36 11.95 40.49 42.65 3.74 10.50
2nd Chapman 0.2785 39.74 11.89 36.89 45.29 3.85 9.77
3rd Cal Lutheran 0.2676 39.97 13.21 36.72 47.59 3.12 10.81
4th La Verne 0.2394 37.05 13.10 34.32 47.32 3.57 10.24
5th Pomona-Pitzer 0.2215 37.26 15.11 34.52 48.00 3.61 8.89
6th Whittier 0.2159 35.36 13.77 32.55 50.45 3.88 9.08
7th Caltech 0.2103 35.69 14.65 33.27 49.84 3.58 9.02
8th Redlands 0.1854 34.55 16.01 31.87 53.73 3.77 12.17
9th Occidental 0.1618 31.80 15.62 28.98 54.22 3.72 11.12

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Claremont-M-S 0.0321 21.16 17.95 19.75 64.33 6.58 6.26
2nd Chapman 0.0622 22.38 16.16 20.90 64.72 4.97 7.62
3rd Cal Lutheran 0.0824 26.26 18.03 24.35 58.22 6.00 6.65
4th La Verne 0.0881 23.98 15.16 22.35 63.45 4.11 5.59
5th Whittier 0.0909 24.72 15.64 23.16 63.12 4.47 5.19
6th Pomona-Pitzer 0.1023 27.06 16.83 25.31 58.42 5.01 6.36
7th Redlands 0.1296 27.60 14.64 25.73 61.66 3.80 7.00
8th Caltech 0.1572 29.54 13.82 27.73 58.91 4.26 7.22
9th Occidental 0.1800 32.94 14.93 30.52 53.22 4.03 8.28

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,425.4746 1,427.9836 1,430.6549 1,435.7540 1,429.9668
Difference 2.5090 5.1804 10.2794 5.9896

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Claremont-M-S 104 2,267 1,221 185 168 53.86 12.3 13.5 1,821 739 140 168 59.42 13.0 10.8
Chapman 94 2,088 1,170 159 102 56.03 13.1 20.5 1,783 853 155 177 52.16 11.5 10.1
Cal Lutheran 106 2,330 1,123 187 184 48.20 12.5 12.7 2,197 988 165 202 55.03 13.3 10.9
La Verne 106 2,242 1,081 172 174 48.22 13.0 12.9 2,182 1,019 145 179 53.30 15.0 12.2
Whittier 104 2,185 1,045 152 125 47.83 14.4 17.5 2,162 1,014 134 169 53.10 16.1 12.8
Pomona-Pitzer 100 2,105 945 135 175 44.89 15.6 12.0 2,134 980 156 172 54.08 13.7 12.4
Redlands 94 1,677 719 190 230 42.87 8.8 7.3 1,823 877 166 161 51.89 11.0 11.3
Caltech 60 1,215 500 82 114 41.15 14.8 10.7 1,396 691 113 106 50.50 12.4 13.2
Occidental 85 1,562 624 143 167 39.95 10.9 9.4 1,923 1,011 180 166 47.43 10.7 11.6
Conference Average 95 1,963 936 156 160 47.00 12.8 12.9 1,936 908 150 167 52.99 13.0 11.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SCIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

73.56

2019-10-01 Whittier, Calif.
Whittier
La Verne
2
3
20
25
25
20
25
22
25
27
17
19
GAME

72.36

2019-10-01
Chapman
Claremont-M-S
3
2
14
25
25
27
25
14
25
17
15
10
GAME

72.02

2019-10-18 Whittier, Calif.
Whittier
Claremont-M-S
1
3
13
25
29
27
25
27
17
25
GAME

71.62

2019-11-07
Chapman
Cal Lutheran
3
2
20
25
25
23
18
25
25
14
15
9
GAME

70.77

2019-10-15 Claremont, CA
Claremont-M-S
Cal Lutheran
3
2
25
22
25
15
18
25
26
28
15
8
GAME

70.05

2019-10-26 Claremont, CA
Pomona-Pitzer
La Verne
3
2
25
22
18
25
21
25
25
12
19
17
GAME

69.90

2019-11-02 La Verne, CA
La Verne
Claremont-M-S
2
3
25
22
25
22
20
25
17
25
10
15
GAME

69.76

2019-10-15 Claremont, CA
Pomona-Pitzer
Caltech
2
3
25
23
22
25
25
20
22
25
9
15
GAME

69.53

2019-09-20 Claremont, CA
Pomona-Pitzer
Cal Lutheran
2
3
22
25
28
26
25
23
11
25
14
16
GAME

69.40

2019-09-24 Claremont, CA
Claremont-M-S
La Verne
3
1
25
11
26
28
25
20
25
18

HuskerGeek SCIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 22.3181
2 20.7944
3 19.6975
4 18.7414
5 18.2821
6 17.5473
7 17.3718
8 17.3243
9 16.8553
10 16.3121

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 12.4101
2 11.7517
3 11.5844
4 10.6652
5 9.6263
6 9.3683
7 9.1432
8 8.5058
9 8.1691
10 7.8487

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.9094
2 15.4301
3 14.6279
4 14.4171
5 14.2181
6 14.0055
7 13.3763
8 11.3619
9 9.9081
10 9.1242

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2453
2 0.2059
3 0.2052
4 0.2009
5 0.1968
6 0.1966
7 0.1904
8 0.1856
9 0.1847
10 0.1793

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1364
2 0.1207
3 0.1172
4 0.1164
5 0.1134
6 0.1051
7 0.0946
8 0.0926
9 0.0891
10 0.0864

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1894
2 0.1819
3 0.1773
4 0.1607
5 0.1559
6 0.1545
7 0.1518
8 0.1517
9 0.1311
10 0.1192


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek