Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,789.9969

Football ohio st 12.8582
Ice Hockey providence 7.9735
Men's Soccer smu 11.4406
Women's Soccer north carolina 12.2707
Women's Volleyball baylor 12.1306
Field Hockey north carolina 12.7413

SCIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Claremont-M-S 1,574.5491 1,553.5299 1,564.0042 61.41 66.26 0.291
2nd Chapman 1,535.8196 1,508.6139 1,522.1560 62.12 58.54 0.236
3rd Cal Lutheran 1,490.1471 1,464.9384 1,477.4890 55.23 62.43 0.194
4th La Verne 1,477.7968 1,451.6770 1,464.6787 56.07 59.62 0.167
5th Pomona-Pitzer 1,434.4432 1,411.3147 1,422.8319 51.93 60.05 0.147
6th Whittier 1,420.6079 1,396.7518 1,408.6293 52.72 58.37 0.115
7th Redlands 1,343.7428 1,319.3390 1,331.4850 47.78 55.28 0.044
8th Caltech 1,308.8120 1,285.6359 1,297.1722 45.68 54.50 0.045
9th Occidental 1,278.0557 1,258.6870 1,268.3344 46.43 51.70 -0.013

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Claremont-M-S 0.3194 43.27 11.34 40.27 43.42 3.45 10.97
2nd Chapman 0.2788 39.84 11.96 37.16 44.77 4.07 9.21
3rd Cal Lutheran 0.2694 40.01 13.07 36.64 47.44 3.31 11.05
4th La Verne 0.2513 38.33 13.21 35.43 46.21 3.29 11.29
5th Pomona-Pitzer 0.2344 38.41 14.97 35.75 47.00 3.28 8.09
6th Whittier 0.2176 35.09 13.33 32.47 51.04 3.85 9.39
7th Caltech 0.2109 35.71 14.62 32.77 50.30 3.08 8.87
8th Redlands 0.1687 33.10 16.23 30.72 55.50 3.77 12.41
9th Occidental 0.1618 31.74 15.57 28.77 55.12 3.57 11.39

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Claremont-M-S 0.0280 21.04 18.24 19.59 64.56 6.37 6.00
2nd Chapman 0.0426 21.30 17.04 20.04 64.89 5.40 8.38
3rd Cal Lutheran 0.0756 25.66 18.10 23.77 58.31 5.94 6.84
4th La Verne 0.0847 24.07 15.60 22.62 63.94 3.85 5.87
5th Pomona-Pitzer 0.0870 26.22 17.52 24.43 59.26 5.03 6.41
6th Whittier 0.1027 25.99 15.72 24.38 62.64 4.00 5.15
7th Redlands 0.1247 27.29 14.82 25.65 62.21 3.82 8.15
8th Caltech 0.1657 30.46 13.89 28.84 58.36 4.52 8.58
9th Occidental 0.1744 32.65 15.22 30.19 53.63 4.15 7.82

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,417.4201 1,417.7774 1,421.0228 1,432.0467 1,422.0667
Difference 0.3574 3.6027 14.6266 6.1956

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Claremont-M-S 66 1,557 832 128 111 53.44 12.2 14.0 1,255 503 90 111 59.92 13.9 11.3
Chapman 61 1,330 736 100 78 55.34 13.3 17.1 1,135 534 109 120 52.95 10.4 9.5
Cal Lutheran 72 1,583 746 129 139 47.13 12.3 11.4 1,508 668 119 152 55.70 12.7 9.9
La Verne 68 1,548 751 134 113 48.51 11.6 13.7 1,483 685 102 129 53.81 14.5 11.5
Pomona-Pitzer 69 1,461 665 88 127 45.52 16.6 11.5 1,443 651 107 117 54.89 13.5 12.3
Whittier 75 1,535 722 119 90 47.04 12.9 17.1 1,546 732 95 124 52.65 16.3 12.5
Redlands 62 1,001 423 129 151 42.26 7.8 6.6 1,120 552 127 110 50.71 8.8 10.2
Caltech 30 612 258 43 54 42.16 14.2 11.3 699 349 66 54 50.07 10.6 12.9
Occidental 59 1,103 457 111 119 41.43 9.9 9.3 1,298 666 121 126 48.69 10.7 10.3
Conference Average 62 1,303 621 109 109 46.98 12.3 12.4 1,276 593 104 116 53.27 12.4 11.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SCIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

73.16

2019-10-01 Whittier, Calif.
Whittier
La Verne
2
3
20
25
25
20
25
22
25
27
17
19
GAME

72.31

2019-10-01
Chapman
Claremont-M-S
3
2
14
25
25
27
25
14
25
17
15
10
GAME

69.53

2019-09-24 Claremont, CA
Claremont-M-S
La Verne
3
1
25
11
26
28
25
20
25
18
GAME

69.51

2019-09-20 Claremont, CA
Pomona-Pitzer
Cal Lutheran
2
3
22
25
28
26
25
23
11
25
14
16
GAME

69.04

2019-09-27 Thousand Oaks, CA
Cal Lutheran
Claremont-M-S
1
3
20
25
21
25
25
18
25
27
GAME

68.78

2019-10-08 Whittier, Calif.
Whittier
Chapman
1
3
21
25
24
26
25
23
23
25
GAME

68.31

2019-10-05
Chapman
Cal Lutheran
3
2
19
25
21
25
25
20
25
16
15
11
GAME

67.63

2019-10-11 Claremont, CA
Pomona-Pitzer
Claremont-M-S
0
3
20
25
23
25
19
25
GAME

67.47

2019-09-28 La Verne, CA
La Verne
Cal Lutheran
3
1
20
25
25
21
25
22
25
22
GAME

65.70

2019-10-04 La Verne, CA
La Verne
Chapman
0
3
21
25
17
25
20
25

HuskerGeek SCIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 15.4341
2 13.6841
3 13.1532
4 12.9367
5 12.7510
6 12.0553
7 11.9815
8 11.6664
9 11.3685
10 11.0286

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 9.4120
2 8.0200
3 7.3017
4 6.6484
5 6.3917
6 6.3803
7 6.1655
8 5.7372
9 5.5458
10 5.4604

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 12.1538
2 11.1510
3 10.8115
4 10.4326
5 9.6239
6 9.2445
7 8.3720
8 7.4335
9 6.9628
10 6.0222

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2359
2 0.2270
3 0.2175
4 0.1993
5 0.1990
6 0.1960
7 0.1958
8 0.1900
9 0.1895
10 0.1875

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1384
2 0.1383
3 0.1304
4 0.1106
5 0.1100
6 0.1031
7 0.0970
8 0.0946
9 0.0907
10 0.0882

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2048
2 0.1863
3 0.1787
4 0.1663
5 0.1594
6 0.1593
7 0.1534
8 0.1517
9 0.1213
10 0.1079


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek