Nerdly Nebraska.

2019-2020 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,839.6298

Football ohio st 12.7316
Men's Basketball kansas 12.7368
Women's Basketball south carolina 13.4324
Baseball ucla 12.9478
Softball ucla 10.9838
Ice Hockey north dakota 10.7002
Men's Lacrosse syracuse 7.8562
Women's Lacrosse north carolina 10.7252
Men's Soccer georgetown 10.7279
Women's Soccer stanford 13.0262
Men's Volleyball byu 11.1006
Women's Volleyball stanford 11.3000
Field Hockey north carolina 12.2787

SEC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Kentucky 1,796.0585 1,760.2935 1,778.0861 55.80 67.91 0.252
2nd Florida 1,764.7337 1,725.5642 1,745.0391 52.36 68.69 0.222
3rd Texas A&M 1,746.7391 1,709.9900 1,728.2668 26.20 17.63 0.171
4th Missouri 1,744.7438 1,710.4860 1,727.5300 51.65 67.69 0.205
5th Tennessee 1,695.2058 1,660.1117 1,677.5669 47.72 60.34 0.141
6th South Carolina 1,685.6701 1,648.3142 1,666.8875 48.35 63.73 0.147
7th Georgia 1,674.8218 1,640.3019 1,657.4720 49.95 60.26 0.102
8th Ole Miss 1,658.9805 1,627.6946 1,643.2631 48.75 60.51 0.085
9th LSU 1,662.2995 1,623.5716 1,642.8214 48.32 60.69 0.117
10th Arkansas 1,588.3393 1,550.7854 1,569.4500 44.88 58.87 0.026
11th Alabama 1,581.8809 1,550.5766 1,566.1506 48.57 55.07 0.032
12th Mississippi St. 1,576.0903 1,538.5536 1,557.2088 46.34 52.67 0.000
13th Auburn 1,560.7017 1,525.2790 1,542.8887 47.32 52.00 0.019

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Missouri 0.3562 48.79 13.17 44.34 37.82 5.39 8.07
2nd Florida 0.3464 45.87 11.23 42.46 43.39 3.57 7.32
3rd Kentucky 0.3413 45.04 10.91 41.52 42.04 4.79 6.52
4th South Carolina 0.3160 43.15 11.55 39.52 43.79 4.73 6.61
5th Tennessee 0.3061 42.58 11.98 38.69 43.35 4.79 6.65
6th Texas A&M 0.3026 45.08 14.83 40.95 39.70 10.41 19.88
7th Georgia 0.2721 42.58 15.37 39.87 43.39 6.75 7.69
8th LSU 0.2696 40.43 13.47 36.92 46.30 4.05 5.86
9th Alabama 0.2475 37.79 13.04 35.03 46.85 5.38 5.75
10th Ole Miss 0.2435 37.53 13.17 34.61 49.90 5.24 5.73
11th Arkansas 0.2187 38.39 16.52 35.92 46.42 6.33 7.32
12th Auburn 0.1998 35.00 15.02 32.26 50.33 5.04 5.72
13th Mississippi St. 0.1970 34.95 15.24 32.34 51.70 4.37 5.67

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Kentucky 0.0895 27.39 18.44 25.45 55.26 8.07 4.31
2nd Florida 0.1242 29.77 17.34 28.14 53.36 8.32 5.25
3rd Texas A&M 0.1315 30.82 17.67 28.51 52.37 7.50 1.97
4th Missouri 0.1508 32.02 16.94 29.25 52.75 7.55 6.26
5th LSU 0.1527 32.24 16.97 29.68 50.37 7.59 5.28
6th Ole Miss 0.1586 31.99 16.14 30.08 52.28 6.46 5.30
7th Tennessee 0.1652 31.60 15.08 28.70 52.27 6.72 4.63
8th South Carolina 0.1693 33.30 16.38 31.46 49.62 7.62 6.79
9th Georgia 0.1705 31.99 14.95 30.33 54.71 5.81 5.96
10th Auburn 0.1807 33.53 15.45 30.18 50.10 5.82 5.39
11th Arkansas 0.1925 35.55 16.30 33.26 49.04 6.64 7.57
12th Mississippi St. 0.1968 35.45 15.77 32.32 48.64 6.02 6.29
13th Alabama 0.2156 36.16 14.60 33.65 48.31 7.38 6.23

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,654.0485 1,652.8778 1,653.2676 1,654.9987 1,653.7982
Difference -1.1707 -0.7809 0.9502 -0.3338

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Missouri 111 2,539 1,398 189 273 55.06 13.4 9.3 1,902 688 132 203 63.83 14.4 9.4
Florida 117 2,570 1,387 169 245 53.97 15.2 10.5 1,909 675 118 239 64.64 16.2 8.0
Kentucky 114 2,534 1,375 150 248 54.26 16.9 10.2 1,929 724 104 167 62.47 18.5 11.6
South Carolina 114 2,502 1,258 136 264 50.28 18.4 9.5 2,141 851 171 263 60.25 12.5 8.1
Ole Miss 117 2,597 1,347 117 187 51.87 22.2 13.9 2,258 969 129 248 57.09 17.5 9.1
LSU 104 2,196 1,066 112 224 48.54 19.6 9.8 2,017 873 115 202 56.72 17.5 10.0
Alabama 105 2,370 1,252 121 198 52.83 19.6 12.0 2,201 1,048 139 236 52.39 15.8 9.3
Georgia 117 2,537 1,215 170 267 47.89 14.9 9.5 2,368 1,035 148 222 56.29 16.0 10.7
Arkansas 113 2,360 1,095 151 253 46.40 15.6 9.3 2,296 1,006 173 213 56.19 13.3 10.8
Mississippi St. 114 2,407 1,213 124 165 50.40 19.4 14.6 2,346 1,126 162 241 52.00 14.5 9.7
Tennessee 113 2,382 1,076 131 233 45.17 18.2 10.2 2,277 987 123 202 56.65 18.5 11.3
Auburn 106 2,075 986 115 186 47.52 18.0 11.2 2,171 1,113 123 223 48.73 17.7 9.7
Texas A&M 120 833 171 176 248 20.53 4.7 3.4 3,908 3,695 97 273 5.45 40.3 14.3
Conference Average 113 2,300 1,141 143 230 48.05 16.6 10.3 2,286 1,138 133 226 53.28 17.9 10.2
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the SEC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

94.21

2019-11-24 College Station, TX
Texas A&M
Ole Miss
3
1
25
21
23
25
26
24
25
20
GAME

85.77

2019-10-13 College Station, TX
Texas A&M
Florida
2
3
23
25
23
25
25
14
25
15
12
15
GAME

84.80

2019-11-17 Gainesville, Fla
Florida
Kentucky
2
3
21
25
25
15
25
23
24
26
12
15
GAME

83.66

2019-10-27 College Station, TX
Texas A&M
Georgia
3
0
25
16
25
20
25
21
GAME

83.38

2019-09-24 College Station, TX
Texas A&M
Alabama
3
1
25
20
25
19
23
25
25
19
GAME

81.98

2019-11-22 College Station, TX
Texas A&M
Mississippi St.
3
0
25
19
25
14
25
22
GAME

80.65

2019-10-30 Columbia, MO
Missouri
Florida
2
3
22
25
25
17
27
29
25
20
12
15
GAME

80.27

2019-11-03
Texas A&M
Missouri
3
1
25
21
25
21
16
25
25
22
GAME

79.78

2019-10-11 Lexington, Ky.
Kentucky
Georgia
2
3
23
25
23
25
25
20
25
15
12
15
GAME

79.41

2019-10-27 Oxford, Miss.
Ole Miss
Kentucky
1
3
23
25
25
22
17
25
23
25

HuskerGeek SEC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S
S
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S
S
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 27.8137
2 27.8066
3 24.5692
4 22.7615
5 22.4429
6 22.1770
7 21.4735
8 20.5341
9 20.2843
10 19.7362

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 17.5314
2 17.0383
3 15.5751
4 15.1681
5 14.5339
6 14.2930
7 13.6602
8 13.4839
9 13.1231
10 12.9304

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 18.1859
2 17.6383
3 14.4787
4 14.1722
5 13.8915
6 13.7058
7 13.3671
8 13.3506
9 12.5246
10 11.6733

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2599
2 0.2599
3 0.2347
4 0.2318
5 0.2314
6 0.2263
7 0.2105
8 0.1954
9 0.1935
10 0.1919

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1638
2 0.1592
3 0.1564
4 0.1483
5 0.1474
6 0.1469
7 0.1376
8 0.1339
9 0.1280
10 0.1262

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1684
2 0.1648
3 0.1434
4 0.1347
5 0.1323
6 0.1312
7 0.1311
8 0.1309
9 0.1281
10 0.1167


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek