Nerdly Nebraska.
2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Sport | School | Rating |
---|---|---|
ViPR D1 Volleyball | Wisconsin | 1,711.3731 |
Rnk. | Team | Résumé | Recent | ViPR | Adj SP% | Adj SO% | Adj. Hit Mar. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Florida | 1,668.5316 | 1,663.8133 | 1,666.1708 | 52.36 | 74.32 | 0.256 |
2nd | Kentucky | 1,626.8432 | 1,623.7934 | 1,625.3176 | 50.83 | 70.22 | 0.206 |
3rd | Texas A&M | 1,621.8345 | 1,617.9138 | 1,619.8730 | 52.75 | 68.96 | 0.193 |
4th | Tennessee | 1,607.4433 | 1,598.1268 | 1,602.7783 | 50.47 | 69.59 | 0.202 |
5th | Arkansas | 1,593.5192 | 1,579.3492 | 1,586.4184 | 50.44 | 67.59 | 0.174 |
6th | Missouri | 1,544.0066 | 1,522.7427 | 1,533.3378 | 47.72 | 66.76 | 0.144 |
7th | Auburn | 1,530.0056 | 1,521.1857 | 1,525.5893 | 48.09 | 64.88 | 0.136 |
8th | Georgia | 1,515.2317 | 1,501.1094 | 1,508.1540 | 46.67 | 63.94 | 0.093 |
9th | LSU | 1,506.8797 | 1,485.8671 | 1,496.3365 | 45.88 | 63.87 | 0.097 |
10th | Ole Miss | 1,498.7477 | 1,485.3536 | 1,492.0356 | 45.76 | 63.33 | 0.080 |
11th | Alabama | 1,498.8685 | 1,481.3537 | 1,490.0854 | 45.97 | 62.45 | 0.069 |
12th | South Carolina | 1,496.4531 | 1,480.1135 | 1,488.2609 | 44.99 | 64.77 | 0.081 |
13th | Mississippi St. | 1,358.7165 | 1,313.0978 | 1,335.7124 | 40.30 | 55.41 | -0.042 |
ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.
Rnk. | Team | Hit% | Kill% | HE% | AST% | O_DIG% | O_BLK% | ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Florida | 0.3520 | 46.56 | 11.36 | 42.51 | 40.59 | 4.07 | 7.03 |
2nd | Kentucky | 0.3142 | 44.50 | 13.07 | 41.07 | 41.68 | 4.62 | 7.75 |
3rd | Texas A&M | 0.3087 | 43.81 | 12.94 | 40.79 | 43.08 | 4.26 | 6.12 |
4th | Tennessee | 0.3085 | 42.88 | 12.03 | 39.74 | 44.48 | 5.15 | 4.59 |
5th | Arkansas | 0.3034 | 43.82 | 13.48 | 40.50 | 42.37 | 4.90 | 5.55 |
6th | Missouri | 0.3032 | 41.20 | 10.87 | 38.90 | 46.97 | 4.11 | 6.31 |
7th | South Carolina | 0.2912 | 41.97 | 12.85 | 39.12 | 45.27 | 5.28 | 4.92 |
8th | Auburn | 0.2609 | 40.11 | 14.02 | 37.61 | 46.39 | 4.98 | 5.17 |
9th | Georgia | 0.2582 | 40.36 | 14.54 | 37.67 | 47.04 | 6.17 | 5.99 |
10th | Ole Miss | 0.2572 | 39.89 | 14.18 | 36.97 | 47.92 | 4.32 | 6.17 |
11th | Alabama | 0.2549 | 39.20 | 13.71 | 36.50 | 47.55 | 5.38 | 6.06 |
12th | LSU | 0.2414 | 37.83 | 13.68 | 35.44 | 49.63 | 4.98 | 5.12 |
13th | Mississippi St. | 0.1803 | 33.43 | 15.40 | 31.58 | 53.02 | 6.03 | 4.39 |
Rnk. | Team | O_Hit% | O_Kill% | O_HE% | O_AST% | DIG% | BLK% | O_ACE% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st | Florida | 0.0958 | 28.67 | 19.10 | 26.38 | 54.83 | 7.99 | 3.49 |
2nd | Tennessee | 0.1063 | 28.56 | 17.92 | 26.61 | 56.47 | 8.38 | 2.44 |
3rd | Kentucky | 0.1079 | 29.19 | 18.40 | 27.00 | 55.12 | 8.09 | 3.11 |
4th | Texas A&M | 0.1158 | 29.06 | 17.48 | 27.28 | 55.95 | 6.46 | 2.55 |
5th | Auburn | 0.1246 | 29.68 | 17.22 | 27.64 | 55.82 | 7.08 | 4.95 |
6th | Arkansas | 0.1290 | 30.69 | 17.79 | 28.88 | 53.79 | 6.65 | 4.38 |
7th | LSU | 0.1445 | 30.69 | 16.23 | 29.03 | 54.39 | 6.78 | 3.73 |
8th | Missouri | 0.1588 | 33.40 | 17.52 | 31.78 | 51.60 | 7.88 | 5.53 |
9th | Georgia | 0.1649 | 33.30 | 16.81 | 30.89 | 51.45 | 7.54 | 4.63 |
10th | Ole Miss | 0.1767 | 34.08 | 16.42 | 32.17 | 50.98 | 6.67 | 3.98 |
11th | Alabama | 0.1861 | 34.29 | 15.68 | 32.47 | 51.20 | 5.14 | 5.45 |
12th | South Carolina | 0.2105 | 35.97 | 14.91 | 33.42 | 49.64 | 5.49 | 4.28 |
13th | Mississippi St. | 0.2218 | 35.75 | 13.57 | 33.13 | 52.27 | 4.62 | 5.58 |
Description | Average | Remove First and Last | Remove Top and Bottom 2 | Remove Top and Bottom 3 | Composite |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scores | 1,536.1592 | 1,542.5624 | 1,539.4009 | 1,534.9500 | 1,538.2681 |
Difference | 6.4032 | 3.2417 | -1.2092 | 2.8119 |
Offense | Defense | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team | Sets | S | SP | SA | SE | SP% | S/SA | S/SE | OS | SPA | SAA | SEA | SO% | OS/SAA | OS/SEA |
Florida | 110 | 2,591 | 1,190 | 157 | 252 | 45.93 | 16.5 | 10.3 | 2,116 | 676 | 83 | 221 | 68.05 | 25.5 | 9.6 |
Texas A&M | 115 | 2,638 | 1,222 | 137 | 171 | 46.32 | 19.3 | 15.4 | 2,301 | 853 | 69 | 165 | 62.93 | 33.3 | 13.9 |
Kentucky | 123 | 2,775 | 1,203 | 178 | 286 | 43.35 | 15.6 | 9.7 | 2,503 | 921 | 86 | 190 | 63.20 | 29.1 | 13.2 |
Tennessee | 119 | 2,684 | 1,158 | 98 | 259 | 43.15 | 27.4 | 10.4 | 2,441 | 906 | 74 | 197 | 62.88 | 33.0 | 12.4 |
Arkansas | 123 | 2,760 | 1,221 | 120 | 191 | 44.24 | 23.0 | 14.5 | 2,519 | 965 | 123 | 220 | 61.69 | 20.5 | 11.5 |
Missouri | 109 | 2,420 | 1,053 | 133 | 157 | 43.51 | 18.2 | 15.4 | 2,223 | 848 | 130 | 187 | 61.85 | 17.1 | 11.9 |
Alabama | 119 | 2,590 | 1,117 | 145 | 189 | 43.13 | 17.9 | 13.7 | 2,506 | 1,019 | 143 | 215 | 59.34 | 17.5 | 11.7 |
South Carolina | 110 | 2,416 | 1,011 | 107 | 185 | 41.85 | 22.6 | 13.1 | 2,313 | 914 | 107 | 229 | 60.48 | 21.6 | 10.1 |
Auburn | 109 | 2,359 | 1,002 | 104 | 183 | 42.48 | 22.7 | 12.9 | 2,296 | 928 | 127 | 198 | 59.58 | 18.1 | 11.6 |
Georgia | 112 | 2,437 | 1,000 | 123 | 173 | 41.03 | 19.8 | 14.1 | 2,445 | 1,015 | 126 | 174 | 58.49 | 19.4 | 14.1 |
Ole Miss | 107 | 2,288 | 925 | 126 | 187 | 40.43 | 18.2 | 12.2 | 2,336 | 979 | 103 | 179 | 58.09 | 22.7 | 13.1 |
LSU | 107 | 2,281 | 884 | 94 | 178 | 38.76 | 24.3 | 12.8 | 2,434 | 1,035 | 101 | 164 | 57.48 | 24.1 | 14.8 |
Mississippi St. | 99 | 1,874 | 678 | 69 | 105 | 36.18 | 27.2 | 17.8 | 2,301 | 1,138 | 137 | 177 | 50.54 | 16.8 | 13.0 |
Conference Average | 112 | 2,470 | 1,051 | 122 | 194 | 42.33 | 21.0 | 13.3 | 2,364 | 938 | 108 | 194 | 60.36 | 23.0 | 12.4 |
|
|
|
Game Link | EPIC | Game Date | Location | Teams | Sets | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Set 4 | Set 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAME |
81.55 |
2012-11-04 | Gainesville, Fla. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
78.39 |
2012-10-21 | College Station, TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
77.20 |
2012-10-26 | Knoxville, Tenn. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
76.37 |
2012-11-16 | Knoxville, Tenn. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
76.28 |
2012-10-05 | Knoxville, Tenn. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
75.68 |
2012-10-03 | Baton Rouge, La. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
75.66 |
2012-09-14 | Fayetteville, Ark. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
75.54 |
2012-11-21 | Knoxville, Tenn. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
75.48 |
2012-09-23 | College Station, TX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAME |
75.23 |
2012-11-09 | Athens, Ga. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name | Team | Role |
---|---|---|
Lisa Henning | Missouri | A |
Chloe Mann | Florida | A |
Lindsey Miller | Texas A&M | A |
Kelsey Robinson | Tennessee | A |
Ellen Mullins | Tennessee | D |
Christine Hartmann | Kentucky | S |
Allie Sawatzky | Texas A&M | S |
Name | Team | Role |
---|---|---|
Leslie Cikra | Tennessee | A |
Jasmine Norton | Arkansas | A |
Ziva Recek | Florida | A |
Tangerine Wiggs | Florida | A |
Meghan Mannari | LSU | D |
Taylor Brauneis | Florida | S |
Molly Kreklow | Missouri | S |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Kelsey Robinson | Tennessee |
2 | Christine Hartmann | Kentucky |
3 | Allie Sawatzky | Texas A&M |
4 | Taylor Brauneis | Florida |
5 | Lisa Henning | Missouri |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Kelsey Robinson | Tennessee |
2 | Lisa Henning | Missouri |
3 | Ziva Recek | Florida |
4 | Chloe Mann | Florida |
5 | Jasmine Norton | Arkansas |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Christine Hartmann | Kentucky |
2 | Allie Sawatzky | Texas A&M |
3 | Taylor Brauneis | Florida |
4 | Molly Kreklow | Missouri |
5 | Mary Pollmiller | Tennessee |
Rank | Name | Team |
---|---|---|
1 | Ellen Mullins | Tennessee |
2 | Meghan Mannari | LSU |
3 | Roxanne McVey | Mississippi St. |
4 | Taylor Unroe | Florida |
5 | Stephanie Klefot | Kentucky |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kelsey Robinson | Tennessee | 26.4418 |
2 | Raymariely Santos | Arkansas | 25.3678 |
3 | Lisa Henning | Missouri | 25.0521 |
4 | Molly Kreklow | Missouri | 25.0373 |
5 | Mary Pollmiller | Tennessee | 24.7985 |
6 | Jasmine Norton | Arkansas | 24.6868 |
7 | Allie Sawatzky | Texas A&M | 24.2451 |
8 | Amanda Philpot | Ole Miss | 23.4067 |
9 | Christine Hartmann | Kentucky | 23.3069 |
10 | Sierra Wilson | Alabama | 22.1588 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Allie Sawatzky | Texas A&M | 18.1473 |
2 | Raymariely Santos | Arkansas | 17.0587 |
3 | Christine Hartmann | Kentucky | 16.0673 |
4 | Lisa Henning | Missouri | 15.4566 |
5 | Mary Pollmiller | Tennessee | 15.4248 |
6 | Molly Kreklow | Missouri | 15.2331 |
7 | Amanda Philpot | Ole Miss | 15.2109 |
8 | Sierra Wilson | Alabama | 15.0594 |
9 | Taylor Brauneis | Florida | 14.3647 |
10 | Chloe Mann | Florida | 14.0711 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ellen Mullins | Tennessee | 17.9795 |
2 | Allison Summers | Georgia | 17.4748 |
3 | Roxanne McVey | Mississippi St. | 17.4177 |
4 | Stephanie Klefot | Kentucky | 14.6053 |
5 | Emily Helm | Arkansas | 14.4709 |
6 | Ashley Veach | Ole Miss | 14.3385 |
7 | Kelsey Robinson | Tennessee | 13.7134 |
8 | Taylor Unroe | Florida | 13.3427 |
9 | Meghan Mannari | LSU | 13.2520 |
10 | Sarah Wroblicky | Auburn | 12.8911 |
Rk. | Name | Team | WPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kelsey Robinson | Tennessee | 0.2426 |
2 | Lisa Henning | Missouri | 0.2298 |
3 | Molly Kreklow | Missouri | 0.2297 |
4 | Amanda Philpot | Ole Miss | 0.2188 |
5 | Raymariely Santos | Arkansas | 0.2132 |
6 | Allie Sawatzky | Texas A&M | 0.2127 |
7 | Christine Hartmann | Kentucky | 0.2100 |
8 | Mary Pollmiller | Tennessee | 0.2084 |
9 | Kayla Fitterer | Alabama | 0.2033 |
10 | Jasmine Norton | Arkansas | 0.2007 |
Rk. | Name | Team | OWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Allie Sawatzky | Texas A&M | 0.1592 |
2 | Christine Hartmann | Kentucky | 0.1448 |
3 | Kayla Fitterer | Alabama | 0.1439 |
4 | Raymariely Santos | Arkansas | 0.1434 |
5 | Amanda Philpot | Ole Miss | 0.1422 |
6 | Lisa Henning | Missouri | 0.1418 |
7 | Molly Kreklow | Missouri | 0.1398 |
8 | Chloe Mann | Florida | 0.1353 |
9 | Taylor Brauneis | Florida | 0.1342 |
10 | Mary Pollmiller | Tennessee | 0.1296 |
Rk. | Name | Team | DWPA/S |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Roxanne McVey | Mississippi St. | 0.1759 |
2 | Meghan Mannari | LSU | 0.1636 |
3 | Allison Summers | Georgia | 0.1560 |
4 | Ellen Mullins | Tennessee | 0.1511 |
5 | Ashley Veach | Ole Miss | 0.1340 |
6 | Kelsey Robinson | Tennessee | 0.1258 |
7 | Sarah Wroblicky | Auburn | 0.1228 |
8 | Taylor Unroe | Florida | 0.1213 |
9 | Stephanie Klefot | Kentucky | 0.1187 |
10 | Emily Helm | Arkansas | 0.1176 |
Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts. The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams. This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams. The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores. It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams. The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average. If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating. If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings. It was weighing the average down so to speak. The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.
The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game. EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.
All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them. This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.
Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list. Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric. Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.