Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Southeastern - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Florida 1,668.5316 1,663.8133 1,666.1708 52.36 74.32 0.256
2nd Kentucky 1,626.8432 1,623.7934 1,625.3176 50.83 70.22 0.206
3rd Texas A&M 1,621.8345 1,617.9138 1,619.8730 52.75 68.96 0.193
4th Tennessee 1,607.4433 1,598.1268 1,602.7783 50.47 69.59 0.202
5th Arkansas 1,593.5192 1,579.3492 1,586.4184 50.44 67.59 0.174
6th Missouri 1,544.0066 1,522.7427 1,533.3378 47.72 66.76 0.144
7th Auburn 1,530.0056 1,521.1857 1,525.5893 48.09 64.88 0.136
8th Georgia 1,515.2317 1,501.1094 1,508.1540 46.67 63.94 0.093
9th LSU 1,506.8797 1,485.8671 1,496.3365 45.88 63.87 0.097
10th Ole Miss 1,498.7477 1,485.3536 1,492.0356 45.76 63.33 0.080
11th Alabama 1,498.8685 1,481.3537 1,490.0854 45.97 62.45 0.069
12th South Carolina 1,496.4531 1,480.1135 1,488.2609 44.99 64.77 0.081
13th Mississippi St. 1,358.7165 1,313.0978 1,335.7124 40.30 55.41 -0.042

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Florida 0.3520 46.56 11.36 42.51 40.59 4.07 7.03
2nd Kentucky 0.3142 44.50 13.07 41.07 41.68 4.62 7.75
3rd Texas A&M 0.3087 43.81 12.94 40.79 43.08 4.26 6.12
4th Tennessee 0.3085 42.88 12.03 39.74 44.48 5.15 4.59
5th Arkansas 0.3034 43.82 13.48 40.50 42.37 4.90 5.55
6th Missouri 0.3032 41.20 10.87 38.90 46.97 4.11 6.31
7th South Carolina 0.2912 41.97 12.85 39.12 45.27 5.28 4.92
8th Auburn 0.2609 40.11 14.02 37.61 46.39 4.98 5.17
9th Georgia 0.2582 40.36 14.54 37.67 47.04 6.17 5.99
10th Ole Miss 0.2572 39.89 14.18 36.97 47.92 4.32 6.17
11th Alabama 0.2549 39.20 13.71 36.50 47.55 5.38 6.06
12th LSU 0.2414 37.83 13.68 35.44 49.63 4.98 5.12
13th Mississippi St. 0.1803 33.43 15.40 31.58 53.02 6.03 4.39

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Florida 0.0958 28.67 19.10 26.38 54.83 7.99 3.49
2nd Tennessee 0.1063 28.56 17.92 26.61 56.47 8.38 2.44
3rd Kentucky 0.1079 29.19 18.40 27.00 55.12 8.09 3.11
4th Texas A&M 0.1158 29.06 17.48 27.28 55.95 6.46 2.55
5th Auburn 0.1246 29.68 17.22 27.64 55.82 7.08 4.95
6th Arkansas 0.1290 30.69 17.79 28.88 53.79 6.65 4.38
7th LSU 0.1445 30.69 16.23 29.03 54.39 6.78 3.73
8th Missouri 0.1588 33.40 17.52 31.78 51.60 7.88 5.53
9th Georgia 0.1649 33.30 16.81 30.89 51.45 7.54 4.63
10th Ole Miss 0.1767 34.08 16.42 32.17 50.98 6.67 3.98
11th Alabama 0.1861 34.29 15.68 32.47 51.20 5.14 5.45
12th South Carolina 0.2105 35.97 14.91 33.42 49.64 5.49 4.28
13th Mississippi St. 0.2218 35.75 13.57 33.13 52.27 4.62 5.58

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,536.1592 1,542.5624 1,539.4009 1,534.9500 1,538.2681
Difference 6.4032 3.2417 -1.2092 2.8119

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Florida 110 2,591 1,190 157 252 45.93 16.5 10.3 2,116 676 83 221 68.05 25.5 9.6
Texas A&M 115 2,638 1,222 137 171 46.32 19.3 15.4 2,301 853 69 165 62.93 33.3 13.9
Kentucky 123 2,775 1,203 178 286 43.35 15.6 9.7 2,503 921 86 190 63.20 29.1 13.2
Tennessee 119 2,684 1,158 98 259 43.15 27.4 10.4 2,441 906 74 197 62.88 33.0 12.4
Arkansas 123 2,760 1,221 120 191 44.24 23.0 14.5 2,519 965 123 220 61.69 20.5 11.5
Missouri 109 2,420 1,053 133 157 43.51 18.2 15.4 2,223 848 130 187 61.85 17.1 11.9
Alabama 119 2,590 1,117 145 189 43.13 17.9 13.7 2,506 1,019 143 215 59.34 17.5 11.7
South Carolina 110 2,416 1,011 107 185 41.85 22.6 13.1 2,313 914 107 229 60.48 21.6 10.1
Auburn 109 2,359 1,002 104 183 42.48 22.7 12.9 2,296 928 127 198 59.58 18.1 11.6
Georgia 112 2,437 1,000 123 173 41.03 19.8 14.1 2,445 1,015 126 174 58.49 19.4 14.1
Ole Miss 107 2,288 925 126 187 40.43 18.2 12.2 2,336 979 103 179 58.09 22.7 13.1
LSU 107 2,281 884 94 178 38.76 24.3 12.8 2,434 1,035 101 164 57.48 24.1 14.8
Mississippi St. 99 1,874 678 69 105 36.18 27.2 17.8 2,301 1,138 137 177 50.54 16.8 13.0
Conference Average 112 2,470 1,051 122 194 42.33 21.0 13.3 2,364 938 108 194 60.36 23.0 12.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Southeastern

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

81.55

2012-11-04 Gainesville, Fla.
Florida
Tennessee
2
3
25
17
21
25
29
27
23
25
17
19
GAME

78.39

2012-10-21 College Station, TX
Texas A&M
Florida
2
3
25
14
27
25
23
25
23
25
6
15
GAME

77.20

2012-10-26 Knoxville, Tenn.
Tennessee
Kentucky
2
3
25
21
29
27
14
25
22
25
5
15
GAME

76.37

2012-11-16 Knoxville, Tenn.
Tennessee
Auburn
3
2
23
25
25
20
29
31
25
19
15
6
GAME

76.28

2012-10-05 Knoxville, Tenn.
Tennessee
Missouri
3
2
25
12
23
25
27
25
22
25
15
11
GAME

75.68

2012-10-03 Baton Rouge, La.
LSU
Georgia
2
3
29
27
24
26
25
23
23
25
6
15
GAME

75.66

2012-09-14 Fayetteville, Ark.
Arkansas
Florida
2
3
25
23
22
25
22
25
25
19
13
15
GAME

75.54

2012-11-21 Knoxville, Tenn.
Tennessee
Texas A&M
2
3
25
15
22
25
20
25
29
27
9
15
GAME

75.48

2012-09-23 College Station, TX
Texas A&M
Kentucky
2
3
23
25
26
24
18
25
25
20
12
15
GAME

75.23

2012-11-09 Athens, Ga.
Georgia
LSU
1
3
30
28
17
25
26
28
21
25

HuskerGeek Southeastern All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 26.4418
2 25.3678
3 25.0521
4 25.0373
5 24.7985
6 24.6868
7 24.2451
8 23.4067
9 23.3069
10 22.1588

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 18.1473
2 17.0587
3 16.0673
4 15.4566
5 15.4248
6 15.2331
7 15.2109
8 15.0594
9 14.3647
10 14.0711

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.9795
2 17.4748
3 17.4177
4 14.6053
5 14.4709
6 14.3385
7 13.7134
8 13.3427
9 13.2520
10 12.8911

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2426
2 0.2298
3 0.2297
4 0.2188
5 0.2132
6 0.2127
7 0.2100
8 0.2084
9 0.2033
10 0.2007

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1592
2 0.1448
3 0.1439
4 0.1434
5 0.1422
6 0.1418
7 0.1398
8 0.1353
9 0.1342
10 0.1296

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1759
2 0.1636
3 0.1560
4 0.1511
5 0.1340
6 0.1258
7 0.1228
8 0.1213
9 0.1187
10 0.1176


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek