Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Southeastern - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Florida 1,759.5142 1,678.3272 1,718.4413 50.47 74.12 0.262
2nd Missouri 1,722.1973 1,658.3155 1,689.9546 50.25 69.83 0.194
3rd Kentucky 1,717.6895 1,642.0857 1,679.4623 51.23 68.49 0.207
4th Texas A&M 1,706.7100 1,622.2042 1,663.9207 51.59 66.28 0.195
5th Tennessee 1,639.1314 1,563.9866 1,601.1183 45.94 64.42 0.137
6th Ole Miss 1,635.6461 1,565.4709 1,600.1738 46.74 63.51 0.098
7th Auburn 1,623.3456 1,565.2676 1,594.0422 44.66 63.55 0.079
8th Alabama 1,622.7649 1,546.5667 1,584.2077 45.44 62.81 0.087
9th Mississippi St. 1,605.2681 1,524.5156 1,564.3709 44.85 61.27 0.050
10th South Carolina 1,585.9636 1,508.7055 1,546.8523 44.65 60.86 0.075
11th Arkansas 1,578.7276 1,509.3047 1,543.6260 42.22 61.86 0.058
12th LSU 1,573.7091 1,496.4411 1,534.5889 43.05 60.11 0.040
13th Georgia 1,556.8490 1,479.1775 1,517.5164 42.31 59.75 0.018

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Florida 0.3782 48.23 10.41 45.69 41.03 3.95 5.84
2nd Missouri 0.3250 44.43 11.93 40.53 44.07 4.06 6.48
3rd Kentucky 0.3111 43.81 12.70 40.27 41.78 4.78 6.18
4th Texas A&M 0.3083 44.72 13.89 41.42 40.73 5.29 5.04
5th Tennessee 0.2879 42.50 13.71 39.56 42.78 6.12 5.81
6th South Carolina 0.2725 40.81 13.56 37.65 46.68 4.44 5.48
7th Alabama 0.2615 40.94 14.78 37.55 45.43 4.90 5.94
8th Ole Miss 0.2524 40.01 14.77 37.05 46.08 5.38 5.75
9th Auburn 0.2450 38.73 14.23 36.13 46.90 5.03 6.93
10th Mississippi St. 0.2443 40.81 16.38 37.96 44.71 6.05 6.37
11th Arkansas 0.2367 38.60 14.93 36.23 46.35 5.55 5.42
12th Georgia 0.2339 38.20 14.82 35.54 48.73 5.58 6.36
13th LSU 0.2238 36.64 14.26 33.84 49.89 4.91 5.63

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Kentucky 0.1038 29.37 18.99 27.74 54.96 8.79 3.24
2nd Texas A&M 0.1130 30.07 18.76 28.70 52.03 8.43 5.28
3rd Florida 0.1161 30.19 18.58 28.83 53.08 8.39 2.96
4th Missouri 0.1306 31.21 18.15 29.20 53.12 8.26 4.29
5th Tennessee 0.1506 32.26 17.20 30.30 52.00 7.13 5.05
6th Ole Miss 0.1548 32.04 16.56 30.07 53.92 6.15 4.22
7th Auburn 0.1658 32.43 15.86 30.40 54.97 5.59 4.07
8th Alabama 0.1741 33.78 16.37 31.47 52.25 6.16 5.06
9th Arkansas 0.1791 34.49 16.58 32.66 50.46 7.25 4.78
10th LSU 0.1840 34.27 15.88 31.52 51.85 6.21 4.55
11th Mississippi St. 0.1938 36.21 16.82 34.44 49.39 7.21 4.84
12th South Carolina 0.1974 36.46 16.72 33.91 48.57 7.14 6.32
13th Georgia 0.2155 37.30 15.75 34.87 48.09 6.26 5.90

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,602.9442 1,600.2107 1,597.5304 1,593.5265 1,598.5530
Difference -2.7336 -5.4138 -9.4177 -5.8550

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Florida 105 2,485 1,157 128 195 46.56 19.4 12.7 1,961 596 64 190 69.61 30.6 10.3
Missouri 122 2,830 1,261 157 213 44.56 18.0 13.3 2,462 873 115 279 64.54 21.4 8.8
Kentucky 106 2,476 1,110 128 233 44.83 19.3 10.6 2,202 821 83 169 62.72 26.5 13.0
Texas A&M 108 2,441 1,110 98 154 45.47 24.9 15.9 2,216 864 125 172 61.01 17.7 12.9
Tennessee 109 2,521 1,073 135 296 42.56 18.7 8.5 2,379 934 121 206 60.74 19.7 11.5
Ole Miss 125 2,714 1,165 132 222 42.93 20.6 12.2 2,583 1,038 113 230 59.81 22.9 11.2
Alabama 125 2,686 1,134 139 257 42.22 19.3 10.5 2,627 1,061 139 261 59.61 18.9 10.1
South Carolina 106 2,351 1,002 122 198 42.62 19.3 11.9 2,322 972 149 224 58.14 15.6 10.4
Mississippi St. 126 2,735 1,135 160 266 41.50 17.1 10.3 2,741 1,140 138 248 58.41 19.9 11.1
Auburn 123 2,643 1,067 173 336 40.37 15.3 7.9 2,654 1,082 121 239 59.23 21.9 11.1
Georgia 112 2,438 1,001 150 245 41.06 16.3 10.0 2,481 1,051 148 223 57.64 16.8 11.1
LSU 108 2,248 863 112 233 38.39 20.1 9.6 2,456 1,086 116 210 55.78 21.2 11.7
Arkansas 110 2,333 854 104 258 36.61 22.4 9.0 2,582 1,115 137 260 56.82 18.8 9.9
Conference Average 114 2,531 1,072 134 239 42.28 19.3 11.0 2,436 972 121 224 60.31 20.9 11.0
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Southeastern

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

78.22

2016-10-26 College Station, TX
Texas A&M
Missouri
3
1
22
25
25
22
25
20
25
23
GAME

77.89

2016-11-04 Auburn, Ala.
Auburn
Kentucky
2
3
25
23
25
22
24
26
28
30
12
15
GAME

77.88

2016-10-16 College Station, TX
Texas A&M
Florida
1
3
25
27
25
21
23
25
16
25
GAME

77.83

2016-10-23 Columbia, Mo.
Missouri
Kentucky
3
2
25
21
28
26
16
25
22
25
15
12
GAME

77.31

2016-11-20 Lexington, Ky.
Kentucky
Texas A&M
3
1
25
18
23
25
25
21
28
26
GAME

76.53

2016-11-20 Columbia, Mo.
Missouri
Florida
3
2
25
18
23
25
25
15
21
25
15
10
GAME

76.39

2016-10-02 Gainesville, Fla.
Florida
Tennessee
3
1
25
21
19
25
25
22
25
20
GAME

76.36

2016-09-30 Starkville, Miss.
Mississippi St.
Auburn
3
1
22
25
29
27
25
20
26
24
GAME

75.79

2016-11-13 Oxford, MS
Ole Miss
Kentucky
1
3
28
26
16
25
22
25
15
25
GAME

75.16

2016-11-23 College Station, TX
Texas A&M
LSU
3
1
25
17
25
27
25
18
25
22

HuskerGeek Southeastern All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 30.6421
2 28.9883
3 26.2425
4 26.1819
5 23.9112
6 23.3011
7 23.0983
8 22.2550
9 20.4426
10 20.2430

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 19.9489
2 17.7863
3 17.1069
4 16.1545
5 16.0534
6 13.8980
7 13.3990
8 13.1284
9 13.0963
10 13.0480

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.6436
2 16.1613
3 14.5159
4 13.4540
5 13.0534
6 13.0197
7 12.9641
8 12.8558
9 12.7466
10 12.3606

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2554
2 0.2416
3 0.2179
4 0.2099
5 0.2095
6 0.2080
7 0.2024
8 0.1985
9 0.1960
10 0.1875

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1662
2 0.1524
3 0.1482
4 0.1433
5 0.1376
6 0.1369
7 0.1288
8 0.1279
9 0.1126
10 0.1118

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1720
2 0.1525
3 0.1320
4 0.1214
5 0.1200
6 0.1162
7 0.1140
8 0.1112
9 0.1103
10 0.1103


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek