Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Sunshine State - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Tampa 1,676.1034 1,653.1322 1,664.5782 53.49 68.79 0.225
2nd Barry 1,667.7737 1,644.5348 1,656.1135 55.67 66.47 0.221
3rd Palm Beach Atl. 1,624.3525 1,610.6081 1,617.4657 50.59 67.17 0.169
4th Fla. Southern 1,598.6428 1,584.8852 1,591.7491 51.70 63.39 0.163
5th Saint Leo 1,586.9914 1,575.1927 1,581.0810 49.79 64.27 0.146
6th Embry-Riddle (FL) 1,561.2605 1,552.3338 1,556.7907 50.14 61.97 0.110
7th Lynn 1,559.5546 1,551.1131 1,555.3281 50.76 61.08 0.109
8th Eckerd 1,545.8739 1,538.8272 1,542.3465 49.23 60.76 0.074
9th Florida Tech 1,453.0167 1,451.1816 1,452.0989 43.98 57.09 0.017
10th Nova Southeastern 1,450.0514 1,441.2830 1,445.6605 43.74 57.18 -0.003
11th Rollins 1,377.2710 1,369.3819 1,373.3208 42.82 51.12 -0.062

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Tampa 0.3188 43.78 11.90 41.26 44.59 3.47 5.95
2nd Barry 0.3016 41.43 11.27 38.70 46.32 3.52 7.57
3rd Fla. Southern 0.2835 38.94 10.59 36.57 49.64 3.49 6.86
4th Saint Leo 0.2715 40.24 13.09 37.74 45.99 4.73 6.64
5th Palm Beach Atl. 0.2579 39.26 13.47 36.12 46.82 4.21 7.48
6th Embry-Riddle (FL) 0.2455 36.90 12.35 34.69 52.57 4.29 6.84
7th Lynn 0.2369 37.40 13.70 35.18 48.79 5.13 7.04
8th Eckerd 0.2351 38.29 14.78 35.35 49.52 3.93 9.25
9th Florida Tech 0.1890 33.36 14.47 31.35 53.58 4.51 6.66
10th Nova Southeastern 0.1735 32.75 15.40 30.66 54.74 5.13 7.49
11th Rollins 0.1446 30.37 15.90 28.36 57.38 4.06 7.51

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Barry 0.0805 25.91 17.86 24.32 59.04 7.19 4.94
2nd Palm Beach Atl. 0.0886 27.06 18.21 25.15 56.63 7.53 3.84
3rd Tampa 0.0942 27.14 17.72 25.14 58.44 6.58 4.66
4th Fla. Southern 0.1203 28.64 16.61 26.80 58.13 5.64 5.71
5th Saint Leo 0.1257 29.43 16.86 27.72 57.32 6.26 4.56
6th Lynn 0.1280 28.72 15.92 26.53 57.78 5.87 4.55
7th Embry-Riddle (FL) 0.1351 29.76 16.24 28.42 56.69 5.68 6.42
8th Eckerd 0.1611 30.70 14.59 28.76 56.75 5.16 4.81
9th Florida Tech 0.1716 31.78 14.62 29.54 55.28 5.21 6.11
10th Nova Southeastern 0.1765 32.36 14.71 30.47 55.44 4.51 5.14
11th Rollins 0.2063 36.75 16.12 33.84 48.59 5.89 6.88

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,548.7757 1,555.4038 1,556.6943 1,565.4591 1,556.5832
Difference 6.6281 7.9186 16.6834 10.4100

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Barry 119 2,824 1,455 184 200 51.52 15.3 14.1 2,275 873 123 172 61.63 18.5 13.2
Tampa 138 3,252 1,565 156 262 48.12 20.8 12.4 2,727 1,011 147 236 62.93 18.6 11.6
Palm Beach Atl. 129 3,051 1,385 191 254 45.40 16.0 12.0 2,744 1,057 123 201 61.48 22.3 13.7
Embry-Riddle (FL) 109 2,437 1,207 143 131 49.53 17.0 18.6 2,203 950 164 175 56.88 13.4 12.6
Lynn 112 2,463 1,155 153 154 46.89 16.1 16.0 2,330 1,024 124 182 56.05 18.8 12.8
Saint Leo 118 2,610 1,158 144 218 44.37 18.1 12.0 2,499 1,048 134 183 58.06 18.6 13.7
Fla. Southern 124 2,712 1,250 159 223 46.09 17.1 12.2 2,653 1,182 170 184 55.45 15.6 14.4
Eckerd 111 2,456 1,108 204 235 45.11 12.0 10.5 2,417 1,070 126 179 55.73 19.2 13.5
Nova Southeastern 104 2,094 867 136 172 41.40 15.4 12.2 2,339 1,126 136 185 51.86 17.2 12.6
Florida Tech 107 2,131 868 124 203 40.73 17.2 10.5 2,467 1,237 163 201 49.86 15.1 12.3
Rollins 98 1,798 697 118 168 38.77 15.2 10.7 2,343 1,264 175 203 46.05 13.4 11.5
Conference Average 115 2,530 1,156 156 202 45.27 16.4 12.8 2,454 1,077 144 191 56.00 17.3 12.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Sunshine State

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

80.30

2018-09-29 Miami Shores, FL
Barry
Tampa
2
3
17
25
25
20
24
26
26
24
11
15
GAME

79.31

2018-11-10 St. Petersburg, Fla.
Eckerd
Palm Beach Atl.
2
3
25
18
23
25
25
27
25
20
15
17
GAME

78.96

2018-10-13 Saint Leo, Fla.
Saint Leo
Barry
2
3
25
23
19
25
25
22
23
25
12
15
GAME

78.32

2018-11-02 Tampa, Fla.
Tampa
Barry
1
3
27
25
23
25
22
25
20
25
GAME

77.80

2018-11-03 West Palm Beach, Fla
Palm Beach Atl.
Fla. Southern
3
1
20
25
25
21
26
24
25
22
GAME

77.38

2018-11-17 West Palm Beach, Fla
Palm Beach Atl.
Tampa
1
3
28
26
21
25
21
25
27
29
GAME

76.98

2018-10-23 Miami Shores, FL
Barry
Palm Beach Atl.
2
3
25
21
22
25
25
19
24
26
11
15
GAME

76.88

2018-11-16 West Palm Beach, FL
Barry
Tampa
1
3
25
15
22
25
19
25
21
25
GAME

76.75

2018-09-04 Lakeland, Fla.
Fla. Southern
Eckerd
3
2
25
27
27
25
23
25
26
24
15
9
GAME

76.65

2018-09-07 St. Petersburg, Fla.
Eckerd
Saint Leo
2
3
25
23
25
22
23
25
20
25
12
15

HuskerGeek Sunshine State All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 34.9340
2 33.9908
3 27.7241
4 26.8031
5 26.7729
6 26.0084
7 25.5210
8 23.7172
9 23.5635
10 23.4770

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 20.8079
2 18.2581
3 16.9793
4 16.5035
5 16.1383
6 15.8558
7 15.4390
8 13.6649
9 13.3042
10 13.2846

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.5212
2 20.3134
3 19.7663
4 18.0336
5 17.9629
6 17.0496
7 15.7327
8 15.5695
9 14.4145
10 14.2144

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2911
2 0.2656
3 0.2390
4 0.2163
5 0.2149
6 0.2137
7 0.2104
8 0.2041
9 0.2009
10 0.1987

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1734
2 0.1426
3 0.1379
4 0.1364
5 0.1308
6 0.1259
7 0.1230
8 0.1220
9 0.1213
10 0.1199

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2012
2 0.1797
3 0.1575
4 0.1542
5 0.1536
6 0.1485
7 0.1328
8 0.1307
9 0.1232
10 0.1229


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek