Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Sunshine State - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 2
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Tampa 1,658.2906 1,619.7098 1,638.8867 57.14 64.15 0.177
2nd Saint Leo 1,630.4884 1,595.5023 1,612.9005 55.53 61.20 0.164
3rd Barry 1,628.4418 1,593.8874 1,611.0720 54.31 62.59 0.169
4th Lynn 1,630.5615 1,587.6687 1,608.9722 55.44 58.17 0.169
5th Embry-Riddle (FL) 1,591.6079 1,556.1846 1,573.7966 53.90 60.52 0.099
6th Nova Southeastern 1,585.0949 1,542.1044 1,563.4519 49.33 63.01 0.126
7th Eckerd 1,574.8542 1,539.7444 1,557.2003 55.53 56.26 0.104
8th Palm Beach Atl. 1,556.6278 1,524.7990 1,540.6312 53.35 55.85 0.100
9th Fla. Southern 1,486.0779 1,448.8441 1,467.3429 52.60 52.46 0.023
10th Rollins 1,469.0620 1,431.1429 1,449.9785 49.76 52.44 0.019
11th Florida Tech 1,450.4340 1,413.3508 1,431.7723 48.41 51.41 0.003

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Tampa 0.3061 42.65 12.05 39.78 44.16 3.11 7.39
2nd Saint Leo 0.2961 41.84 12.22 38.84 44.47 4.31 7.87
3rd Lynn 0.2899 41.06 12.07 37.49 43.05 4.23 6.57
4th Barry 0.2727 39.02 11.75 35.49 48.26 3.55 6.54
5th Palm Beach Atl. 0.2484 39.55 14.71 36.95 46.75 5.72 8.46
6th Nova Southeastern 0.2478 39.42 14.64 36.67 47.32 5.63 8.41
7th Eckerd 0.2447 38.86 14.38 36.12 46.19 4.32 9.33
8th Embry-Riddle (FL) 0.2406 37.35 13.29 34.81 48.86 4.35 7.51
9th Fla. Southern 0.2070 35.15 14.45 32.36 52.95 4.66 8.09
10th Rollins 0.2037 35.79 15.42 32.09 50.15 4.70 7.00
11th Florida Tech 0.1656 29.20 12.64 27.04 58.44 2.99 6.29

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Barry 0.1035 27.14 16.78 24.82 56.44 7.00 5.76
2nd Lynn 0.1210 26.81 14.71 24.09 58.84 5.73 4.97
3rd Nova Southeastern 0.1222 29.50 17.27 27.59 55.60 6.90 6.41
4th Tampa 0.1291 29.39 16.48 27.19 56.21 5.46 6.08
5th Saint Leo 0.1319 29.62 16.43 27.75 56.50 6.27 6.32
6th Eckerd 0.1409 29.76 15.67 27.61 55.25 6.07 5.41
7th Embry-Riddle (FL) 0.1413 29.92 15.78 28.42 55.97 5.97 5.48
8th Palm Beach Atl. 0.1484 31.00 16.16 29.67 54.59 5.16 6.03
9th Florida Tech 0.1626 29.42 13.16 27.77 58.34 3.81 6.40
10th Fla. Southern 0.1844 32.75 14.31 30.19 53.20 5.41 7.00
11th Rollins 0.1847 34.60 16.12 31.45 50.66 6.06 7.45

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,550.5459 1,553.9273 1,560.3524 1,568.8104 1,558.4090
Difference 3.3814 9.8065 18.2645 10.4842

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Tampa 124 2,909 1,528 173 240 52.53 16.8 12.1 2,426 1,016 156 233 58.12 15.6 10.4
Saint Leo 133 2,992 1,585 204 238 52.98 14.7 12.6 2,636 1,174 176 220 55.46 15.0 12.0
Barry 133 3,005 1,514 158 186 50.38 19.0 16.2 2,698 1,187 165 214 56.00 16.4 12.6
Lynn 119 2,644 1,382 154 219 52.27 17.2 12.1 2,290 1,074 123 205 53.10 18.6 11.2
Nova Southeastern 121 2,656 1,237 200 273 46.57 13.3 9.7 2,542 1,072 166 171 57.83 15.3 14.9
Embry-Riddle (FL) 110 2,251 1,105 155 115 49.09 14.5 19.6 2,132 955 127 183 55.21 16.8 11.7
Eckerd 119 2,641 1,369 223 204 51.84 11.8 12.9 2,470 1,206 135 180 51.17 18.3 13.7
Palm Beach Atl. 119 2,604 1,277 193 227 49.04 13.5 11.5 2,578 1,283 158 221 50.23 16.3 11.7
Rollins 116 2,392 1,129 148 218 47.20 16.2 11.0 2,659 1,384 203 205 47.95 13.1 13.0
Fla. Southern 109 2,128 1,018 160 223 47.84 13.3 9.5 2,382 1,265 185 200 46.89 12.9 11.9
Florida Tech 102 1,994 874 105 156 43.83 19.0 12.8 2,387 1,299 156 183 45.58 15.3 13.0
Conference Average 119 2,565 1,274 170 209 49.41 15.4 12.7 2,473 1,174 159 201 52.50 15.8 12.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the Sunshine State

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

79.62

2019-12-06 Boca Raton, FL
Tampa
Barry
2
3
18
25
18
25
25
23
25
19
19
21
GAME

78.46

2019-12-07 Boca Raton, FL
Barry
Saint Leo
2
3
27
25
22
25
29
27
19
25
10
15
GAME

78.44

2019-11-02 Tampa, Fla.
Tampa
Barry
3
2
24
26
21
25
27
25
27
25
20
18
GAME

78.27

2019-10-22
Saint Leo
Tampa
2
3
27
25
25
19
25
27
15
25
6
15
GAME

77.41

2019-11-08
Lynn
Tampa
3
1
25
18
25
22
25
27
25
23
GAME

77.28

2019-11-05 Daytona Beach, Fla.
Embry-Riddle (FL)
Rollins
3
1
31
29
26
28
25
15
25
8
GAME

77.18

2019-09-27 Miami Shores, FL
Barry
Tampa
3
2
25
11
22
25
25
20
28
30
15
13
GAME

76.93

2019-11-05
Eckerd
Saint Leo
1
3
22
25
25
27
29
27
17
25
GAME

76.07

2019-10-26
Eckerd
Barry
3
2
27
29
25
16
25
20
22
25
15
13
GAME

75.73

2019-10-22 Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.
Nova Southeastern
Barry
3
1
25
23
20
25
27
25
25
22

HuskerGeek Sunshine State All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 28.3508
2 26.5385
3 26.2304
4 24.9397
5 24.1849
6 23.8977
7 23.4006
8 22.4476
9 21.0869
10 20.5952

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 17.7221
2 14.8537
3 14.8453
4 14.7365
5 14.1996
6 14.0626
7 13.7124
8 12.7332
9 12.5959
10 12.4665

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.7131
2 19.8028
3 16.8729
4 16.0148
5 15.7182
6 15.1611
7 15.1308
8 13.8789
9 13.6411
10 13.5055

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2509
2 0.2301
3 0.2230
4 0.2134
5 0.2109
6 0.2060
7 0.2050
8 0.1995
9 0.1905
10 0.1872

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1489
2 0.1406
3 0.1390
4 0.1314
5 0.1203
6 0.1203
7 0.1188
8 0.1179
9 0.1105
10 0.1103

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1980
2 0.1657
3 0.1654
4 0.1644
5 0.1321
6 0.1301
7 0.1274
8 0.1271
9 0.1271
10 0.1196


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek