Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

UAA - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Emory 1,569.6644 1,574.4507 1,572.0558 61.28 72.38 0.346
2nd Washington-St. Louis 1,554.1731 1,573.6627 1,563.8876 60.53 72.82 0.329
3rd Chicago 1,479.8413 1,486.8278 1,483.3304 56.45 67.32 0.224
4th CWRU 1,458.3568 1,472.7590 1,465.5402 57.96 65.89 0.226
5th Carnegie Mellon 1,436.7498 1,449.1018 1,442.9126 56.64 63.06 0.197
6th Rochester (NY) 1,324.5789 1,336.1354 1,330.3446 51.10 56.91 0.064
7th NYU 1,302.5874 1,331.0352 1,316.7345 50.66 58.05 0.072
8th Brandeis 1,194.3236 1,227.7266 1,210.9099 45.37 51.09 -0.061

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Emory 0.3743 48.00 10.57 44.83 41.21 3.18 8.59
2nd Washington-St. Louis 0.3585 47.29 11.44 43.33 40.46 2.74 9.60
3rd Chicago 0.3117 41.76 10.59 37.92 46.09 2.54 9.91
4th CWRU 0.2806 38.49 10.43 35.91 52.58 3.13 8.59
5th Carnegie Mellon 0.2722 39.96 12.75 35.89 49.90 3.62 8.31
6th NYU 0.2028 35.17 14.89 32.46 50.84 3.58 9.07
7th Rochester (NY) 0.1852 35.21 16.68 32.58 53.34 3.80 10.77
8th Brandeis 0.0884 29.21 20.38 26.76 56.25 5.01 11.52

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Emory 0.0287 22.31 19.45 20.98 62.90 5.56 5.18
2nd Washington-St. Louis 0.0294 21.41 18.47 19.72 65.20 6.75 3.77
3rd CWRU 0.0546 24.08 18.61 22.53 63.03 5.28 5.22
4th Carnegie Mellon 0.0753 26.11 18.58 24.10 59.02 5.58 6.87
5th Chicago 0.0877 24.86 16.09 23.02 63.21 4.41 5.05
6th Rochester (NY) 0.1214 27.87 15.73 26.20 57.78 4.85 6.30
7th NYU 0.1309 31.34 18.26 28.75 52.52 5.59 8.08
8th Brandeis 0.1497 31.07 16.10 28.68 56.48 3.79 7.42

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,423.2144 1,433.7916 1,430.5319 1,454.2264 1,435.4411
Difference 10.5772 7.3175 31.0119 16.3022

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Emory 133 3,081 1,602 193 212 52.00 16.0 14.5 2,410 895 170 258 62.86 14.2 9.3
Washington-St. Louis 132 3,031 1,506 204 321 49.69 14.9 9.4 2,515 938 127 224 62.70 19.8 11.2
CWRU 114 2,231 1,128 159 154 50.56 14.0 14.5 1,918 806 138 167 57.98 13.9 11.5
Carnegie Mellon 130 2,038 1,031 181 158 50.59 11.3 12.9 1,829 805 207 212 55.99 8.8 8.6
Chicago 124 2,002 911 181 181 45.50 11.1 11.1 1,908 821 154 229 56.97 12.4 8.3
NYU 125 2,544 1,194 207 193 46.93 12.3 13.2 2,556 1,213 249 235 52.54 10.3 10.9
Rochester (NY) 117 1,514 706 241 206 46.63 6.3 7.3 1,587 781 179 231 50.79 8.9 6.9
Brandeis 113 1,963 843 229 256 42.94 8.6 7.7 2,354 1,262 223 270 46.39 10.6 8.7
Conference Average 124 2,301 1,115 199 210 48.11 11.8 11.3 2,135 940 181 228 55.78 12.3 9.4
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the UAA

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

73.05

2015-11-07 Rochester, NY
Emory
Washington-St. Louis
2
3
25
21
25
17
21
25
23
25
7
15
GAME

72.11

2015-10-04 New York, N.Y.
Chicago
Washington-St. Louis
1
3
26
24
23
25
22
25
19
25
GAME

71.09

2015-10-18 Cleveland, Ohio
Chicago
Emory
0
3
24
26
25
27
17
25
GAME

70.98

2015-10-17 Cleveland, Ohio
Carnegie Mellon
Chicago
3
1
25
23
25
22
21
25
25
10
GAME

70.67

2015-10-17 Cleveland, Ohio
Emory
Washington-St. Louis
3
2
23
25
17
25
25
22
25
20
15
8
GAME

68.17

2015-10-18 Cleveland, Ohio
Washington-St. Louis
CWRU
3
1
25
10
19
25
25
15
25
23
GAME

67.59

2015-10-17 Cleveland, Ohio
Chicago
CWRU
0
3
19
25
17
25
22
25
GAME

67.52

2015-11-06 Rochester, NY
Carnegie Mellon
Chicago
2
3
25
20
13
25
19
25
25
21
12
15
GAME

66.96

2015-10-03 New York, NY
CWRU
Emory
0
3
22
25
20
25
17
25
GAME

66.76

2015-11-06 Rochester, NY
CWRU
Washington-St. Louis
0
3
16
25
23
25
18
25

HuskerGeek UAA All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 28.3254
2 23.1392
3 22.4477
4 21.8935
5 20.9565
6 20.0378
7 19.8454
8 18.6498
9 18.5976
10 17.8586

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 18.9832
2 16.3862
3 15.2527
4 12.7979
5 12.1176
6 11.4808
7 11.3290
8 10.3805
9 10.3193
10 10.2091

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 17.2006
2 15.8928
3 15.1045
4 14.5931
5 13.1301
6 12.3518
7 12.1620
8 11.5006
9 9.7185
10 9.5616

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2406
2 0.2319
3 0.2196
4 0.2160
5 0.1908
6 0.1866
7 0.1768
8 0.1705
9 0.1616
10 0.1611

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1472
2 0.1406
3 0.1377
4 0.1321
5 0.1230
6 0.1145
7 0.1120
8 0.1070
9 0.0996
10 0.0975

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1678
2 0.1504
3 0.1445
4 0.1324
5 0.1186
6 0.1181
7 0.1174
8 0.1042
9 0.1042
10 0.1039


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek