Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

WIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Wis.-Whitewater 1,536.6773 1,560.4884 1,548.5371 59.68 69.98 0.294
2nd Wis.-Stevens Point 1,524.7480 1,551.3564 1,537.9947 56.21 66.23 0.276
3rd Wis.-La Crosse 1,514.0675 1,531.9548 1,522.9849 58.16 70.50 0.271
4th Wis.-Oshkosh 1,492.6891 1,518.5425 1,505.5603 55.80 65.29 0.241
5th Wis.-Eau Claire 1,476.4162 1,482.5780 1,479.4939 58.58 67.34 0.228
6th Wis.-Stout 1,414.2503 1,422.9666 1,418.6018 53.99 64.37 0.147
7th Wis.-River Falls 1,353.6645 1,373.8973 1,363.7434 48.67 58.77 0.114
8th Wis.-Platteville 1,343.9734 1,382.1324 1,362.9193 50.91 58.93 0.105

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Wis.-La Crosse 0.3167 44.51 12.84 41.42 42.68 3.94 10.43
2nd Wis.-Eau Claire 0.3039 42.13 11.74 38.90 45.53 3.78 10.35
3rd Wis.-Whitewater 0.2993 42.99 13.06 39.70 45.12 2.64 10.52
4th Wis.-Oshkosh 0.2923 41.32 12.09 38.22 46.40 3.46 7.28
5th Wis.-Stevens Point 0.2872 41.23 12.51 38.97 46.79 2.95 9.75
6th Wis.-Stout 0.2321 36.86 13.65 32.57 49.12 4.00 8.69
7th Wis.-River Falls 0.2235 36.92 14.57 33.28 50.61 4.39 9.75
8th Wis.-Platteville 0.2190 36.86 14.95 33.93 51.13 2.73 9.28

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Wis.-Whitewater 0.0056 20.20 19.64 19.19 64.14 7.22 4.18
2nd Wis.-Stevens Point 0.0111 19.85 18.75 18.85 67.37 6.25 5.50
3rd Wis.-La Crosse 0.0457 23.29 18.72 21.61 61.91 6.41 4.05
4th Wis.-Oshkosh 0.0514 24.52 19.38 22.17 61.92 8.40 5.62
5th Wis.-Eau Claire 0.0755 25.15 17.60 23.33 57.66 6.00 3.92
6th Wis.-Stout 0.0850 25.48 16.99 23.65 59.63 4.98 6.40
7th Wis.-River Falls 0.1100 27.97 16.97 24.50 57.42 5.81 6.22
8th Wis.-Platteville 0.1140 28.42 17.02 26.41 55.28 6.16 5.24

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,467.4794 1,471.3965 1,481.6602 1,492.5271 1,478.2658
Difference 3.9171 14.1808 25.0477 14.3818

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Wis.-Whitewater 133 2,047 998 214 298 48.75 9.6 6.9 1,769 701 144 236 60.37 12.3 7.5
Wis.-La Crosse 108 1,633 760 195 260 46.54 8.4 6.3 1,476 592 129 194 59.89 11.4 7.6
Wis.-Eau Claire 119 1,561 739 198 231 47.34 7.9 6.8 1,453 623 146 176 57.12 10.0 8.3
Wis.-Stout 107 1,720 804 141 153 46.74 12.2 11.2 1,621 693 161 194 57.25 10.1 8.4
Wis.-Oshkosh 132 1,483 673 181 254 45.38 8.2 5.8 1,442 631 175 208 56.24 8.2 6.9
Wis.-River Falls 101 1,126 509 168 211 45.20 6.7 5.3 1,140 526 134 150 53.86 8.5 7.6
Wis.-Platteville 112 1,672 717 149 189 42.88 11.2 8.8 1,842 897 173 241 51.30 10.6 7.6
Conference Average 116 1,606 743 178 228 46.12 9.2 7.3 1,535 666 152 200 56.58 10.2 7.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the WIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

72.60

2016-10-05 La Crosse, Wis.
Wis.-La Crosse
Wis.-Oshkosh
3
1
25
22
25
19
28
30
25
15
GAME

69.34

2016-10-19 Menomonie, Wis.
Wis.-Stout
Wis.-Eau Claire
3
2
22
25
25
22
25
23
17
25
15
12
GAME

67.81

2016-11-03 La Crosse, Wis.
Wis.-La Crosse
Wis.-Oshkosh
3
1
25
17
21
25
26
24
25
18
GAME

67.49

2016-10-22 La Crosse, Wis.
Wis.-La Crosse
Wis.-Stout
3
1
22
25
28
26
25
20
25
21
GAME

66.87

2016-10-29 Menomonie, Wis.
Wis.-Stout
Wis.-Oshkosh
1
3
25
22
20
25
20
25
15
25
GAME

66.64

2016-11-05 Whitewater, Wis.
Wis.-Whitewater
Wis.-La Crosse
3
1
25
21
17
25
25
22
25
23
GAME

66.49

2016-10-28
Wis.-Eau Claire
Wis.-Whitewater
0
3
12
25
20
25
16
25
GAME

66.38

2016-10-07 Whitewater, Wis.
Wis.-Whitewater
Wis.-Stout
3
0
25
19
25
23
25
18
GAME

65.71

2016-10-08
Wis.-Platteville
Wis.-Stout
2
3
26
24
23
25
17
25
27
25
9
15
GAME

65.43

2016-09-21
Wis.-Eau Claire
Wis.-La Crosse
3
0
26
24
25
17
25
23

HuskerGeek WIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 15.6194
2 15.4470
3 15.0950
4 15.0798
5 14.7641
6 14.7332
7 14.3401
8 13.1714
9 12.5691
10 12.2584

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 10.6281
2 10.0206
3 9.3806
4 9.0327
5 8.6835
6 8.4984
7 7.7695
8 7.7381
9 7.4281
10 7.0143

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 13.9377
2 9.3778
3 8.9578
4 8.4246
5 8.1913
6 8.0734
7 8.0731
8 8.0098
9 7.7599
10 7.3150

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2206
2 0.2154
3 0.2105
4 0.1969
5 0.1882
6 0.1876
7 0.1820
8 0.1776
9 0.1727
10 0.1680

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1432
2 0.1307
3 0.1290
4 0.1250
5 0.1234
6 0.1199
7 0.1158
8 0.1105
9 0.1002
10 0.0867

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1560
2 0.1499
3 0.1359
4 0.1153
5 0.1109
6 0.1106
7 0.1068
8 0.1063
9 0.0997
10 0.0992


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek