Nerdly Nebraska.

2018-2019 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Stanford 1,750.6919
BPR D1 NCAAWBB Baylor 0.7877

Football clemson 12.6021
Men's Basketball duke 12.9757
Women's Basketball baylor 13.5441
Baseball vanderbilt 10.1606
Softball oklahoma 13.3516
Ice Hockey st cloud st 10.4909
Men's Lacrosse penn st 7.8422
Women's Lacrosse maryland 11.2186
Men's Soccer palm beach atl 10.6001
Women's Soccer usc 12.7949
Men's Volleyball hawaii 9.4513
Women's Volleyball stanford 12.9947
Field Hockey north carolina 12.5324

WIAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 3
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Wis.-Eau Claire 1,559.6724 1,572.2968 1,565.9719 58.17 70.21 0.266
2nd Wis.-Whitewater 1,541.3474 1,554.7519 1,548.0352 59.41 67.53 0.262
3rd Wis.-Stevens Point 1,491.7651 1,507.2976 1,499.5112 54.88 67.25 0.201
4th Wis.-Stout 1,431.9089 1,452.1525 1,441.9952 55.13 61.24 0.151
5th Wis.-Oshkosh 1,433.0223 1,450.7388 1,441.8534 54.07 62.73 0.146
6th Wis.-La Crosse 1,424.9011 1,444.0211 1,434.4292 52.02 64.14 0.161
7th Wis.-River Falls 1,343.3930 1,371.9722 1,357.6074 51.07 57.63 0.090
8th Wis.-Platteville 1,312.1813 1,331.9454 1,322.0264 49.91 54.87 0.041

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Wis.-Eau Claire 0.3270 44.73 12.04 41.90 41.60 3.36 9.82
2nd Wis.-Whitewater 0.2896 41.33 12.37 38.26 46.35 3.31 10.20
3rd Wis.-Stevens Point 0.2799 41.38 13.39 38.27 44.86 3.39 8.18
4th Wis.-La Crosse 0.2301 37.13 14.12 34.59 49.98 2.97 11.44
5th Wis.-Stout 0.2194 37.72 15.78 34.86 48.09 3.90 9.02
6th Wis.-Oshkosh 0.2137 36.37 15.00 33.44 49.81 3.89 9.16
7th Wis.-River Falls 0.1910 33.28 14.18 31.05 54.07 3.75 9.81
8th Wis.-Platteville 0.1567 33.98 18.31 30.66 52.27 4.21 10.53

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Wis.-Whitewater 0.0276 22.21 19.45 21.27 64.16 6.98 3.83
2nd Wis.-Eau Claire 0.0613 23.88 17.76 22.07 60.85 6.09 4.84
3rd Wis.-Oshkosh 0.0680 24.76 17.96 22.90 59.97 6.33 5.94
4th Wis.-Stout 0.0683 22.77 15.94 21.92 64.04 4.70 5.02
5th Wis.-La Crosse 0.0687 23.11 16.24 22.09 66.73 4.51 4.48
6th Wis.-Stevens Point 0.0794 25.67 17.73 24.40 59.23 5.46 4.27
7th Wis.-River Falls 0.1006 26.29 16.23 23.95 61.05 4.88 7.09
8th Wis.-Platteville 0.1155 28.42 16.87 25.46 56.82 4.56 7.21

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,451.4287 1,453.9053 1,454.4473 1,441.9243 1,450.4264
Difference 2.4765 3.0185 -9.5044 -1.3365

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Wis.-Eau Claire 139 3,070 1,499 225 259 48.83 13.6 11.9 2,625 1,020 163 241 61.14 16.1 10.9
Wis.-Whitewater 119 2,309 1,123 200 259 48.64 11.5 8.9 2,101 894 129 198 57.45 16.3 10.6
Wis.-Stevens Point 123 2,662 1,197 135 186 44.97 19.7 14.3 2,566 1,090 152 253 57.52 16.9 10.1
Wis.-Stout 111 2,323 1,089 156 187 46.88 14.9 12.4 2,303 1,068 141 195 53.63 16.3 11.8
Wis.-Oshkosh 108 2,150 977 148 196 45.44 14.5 11.0 2,174 995 176 240 54.23 12.4 9.1
Wis.-River Falls 128 2,649 1,225 220 257 46.24 12.0 10.3 2,738 1,320 232 232 51.79 11.8 11.8
Wis.-La Crosse 100 1,711 734 183 228 42.90 9.3 7.5 1,786 804 120 167 54.98 14.9 10.7
Wis.-Platteville 111 2,091 937 187 256 44.81 11.2 8.2 2,316 1,182 215 232 48.96 10.8 10.0
Conference Average 117 2,371 1,098 182 229 46.09 13.4 10.6 2,326 1,047 166 220 54.96 14.4 10.6
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the WIAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

73.74

2018-11-01 Whitewater, Wis.
Wis.-Whitewater
Wis.-Oshkosh
3
1
26
24
25
22
24
26
25
22
GAME

72.04

2018-11-01
Wis.-Eau Claire
Wis.-Stevens Point
3
1
26
24
14
25
29
27
25
18
GAME

71.77

2018-11-03
Wis.-Eau Claire
Wis.-Whitewater
3
1
25
22
25
20
18
25
28
26
GAME

70.83

2018-10-12 River Falls, WI
Wis.-River Falls
Wis.-Oshkosh
1
3
25
27
26
24
24
26
22
25
GAME

69.87

2018-10-13 Eau Claire, Wis.
Wis.-Eau Claire
Wis.-Stevens Point
3
1
25
23
25
20
21
25
25
22
GAME

69.62

2018-10-24 Menomonie, Wis.
Wis.-Stout
Wis.-Eau Claire
2
3
26
24
25
22
18
25
20
25
11
15
GAME

68.93

2018-10-26 Eau Claire, WI
Wis.-Eau Claire
Wis.-Whitewater
3
1
20
25
25
15
25
17
25
20
GAME

68.70

2018-09-26 Menomonie, Wis.
Wis.-Stout
Wis.-Stevens Point
1
3
21
25
25
20
23
25
24
26
GAME

67.44

2018-10-10 Oshkosh, Wis.
Wis.-Oshkosh
Wis.-Stevens Point
0
3
20
25
23
25
18
25
GAME

65.91

2018-09-19 Stevens Point, Wis.
Wis.-Stevens Point
Wis.-Whitewater
1
3
22
25
25
15
21
25
18
25

HuskerGeek WIAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 35.5088
2 24.4246
3 23.4387
4 23.0677
5 22.0118
6 20.3932
7 19.8713
8 19.0511
9 19.0402
10 18.8032

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 20.1612
2 18.8142
3 16.5048
4 13.5035
5 10.8081
6 10.2670
7 8.9335
8 8.7572
9 8.6241
10 7.6147

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 21.5619
2 19.7310
3 19.1962
4 17.2294
5 16.6946
6 15.4928
7 13.3998
8 12.8007
9 12.6753
10 12.2067

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.3035
2 0.1987
3 0.1893
4 0.1888
5 0.1865
6 0.1817
7 0.1790
8 0.1789
9 0.1774
10 0.1764

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1608
2 0.1539
3 0.1279
4 0.1250
5 0.1020
6 0.0950
7 0.0845
8 0.0840
9 0.0837
10 0.0812

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1920
2 0.1827
3 0.1753
4 0.1596
5 0.1581
6 0.1427
7 0.1295
8 0.1163
9 0.1098
10 0.1056


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek