Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Return to 2020 Overview

Division 3 - Division Overview

ViPR Division 3 Top 25

Rnk. Team Conference Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj Hit Mar.
1st Johns Hopkins Centennial 1,660.9476 1,620.5499 1,640.6244 64.68 68.20 0.362
2nd Calvin Michigan Intercol. Ath. Assn. 1,630.3422 1,595.7225 1,612.9395 63.42 65.56 0.336
3rd Carthage CCIW 1,632.7347 1,592.0322 1,612.2550 63.27 65.67 0.304
4th Colorado Col. SCAC 1,603.6639 1,567.0767 1,585.2647 61.19 62.45 0.302
5th Chicago UAA 1,595.4864 1,558.3250 1,576.7962 60.25 67.25 0.283
6th Trinity (TX) SCAC 1,593.7172 1,552.5814 1,573.0149 60.39 62.94 0.270
7th Muskingum OAC 1,590.2749 1,550.3618 1,570.1916 60.12 65.67 0.258
8th Claremont-M-S SCIAC 1,581.8549 1,549.7871 1,565.7389 61.52 65.58 0.282
9th Emory UAA 1,583.3285 1,547.7439 1,565.4351 61.39 69.98 0.284
10th Transylvania HCAC 1,575.6896 1,542.8341 1,559.1753 61.70 62.70 0.261
11th Hope Michigan Intercol. Ath. Assn. 1,574.1682 1,540.1773 1,557.0800 57.96 67.09 0.249
12th Tufts NESCAC 1,574.5017 1,538.3226 1,556.3070 60.40 66.99 0.301
13th Wis.-Stevens Point WIAC 1,572.7328 1,535.7932 1,554.1532 59.80 62.18 0.244
14th Saint Benedict MIAC 1,567.0041 1,535.2146 1,551.0279 61.83 62.11 0.269
15th Ohio Northern OAC 1,569.7569 1,528.6116 1,549.0476 59.05 65.57 0.237
16th St. Thomas (MN) MIAC 1,566.7539 1,529.9424 1,548.2387 60.77 60.64 0.215
17th Augsburg MIAC 1,562.4186 1,533.7272 1,548.0064 59.41 62.40 0.266
18th Berry SAA 1,562.6496 1,527.0758 1,544.7603 57.38 67.16 0.256
19th Wesleyan (CT) NESCAC 1,562.0402 1,527.0395 1,544.4407 59.85 67.13 0.248
20th Susquehanna Landmark 1,558.6548 1,518.9815 1,538.6903 58.41 65.11 0.243
21st Juniata Landmark 1,554.1881 1,516.4593 1,535.2078 58.11 64.62 0.239
22nd Northwestern-St. Paul UMAC 1,555.8405 1,514.2680 1,534.9135 57.64 60.06 0.213
23rd Birmingham-So. SAA 1,549.0725 1,510.1262 1,529.4754 60.14 63.14 0.220
24th Wittenberg NCAC 1,548.9155 1,509.5145 1,529.0881 58.13 61.79 0.197
25th Mary Hardin-Baylor ASC 1,547.9725 1,509.9649 1,528.8506 62.76 58.21 0.236

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division 3 Adjusted Top 10 Offenses

Rnk. Team Conference Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Calvin Michigan Intercol. Ath. Assn. 0.3705 47.96 10.90 44.24 39.41 3.25 13.11
2nd Johns Hopkins Centennial 0.3703 45.94 8.91 42.40 42.80 2.64 12.54
3rd Tufts NESCAC 0.3570 46.96 11.26 43.72 40.80 2.94 8.84
4th Colorado Col. SCAC 0.3395 46.68 12.74 43.68 39.81 3.25 11.35
5th Emory UAA 0.3362 46.31 12.69 42.58 39.82 3.30 10.02
6th Carthage CCIW 0.3353 42.89 9.36 39.28 43.89 2.15 11.10
7th Saint Benedict MIAC 0.3250 42.36 9.86 38.13 45.78 2.09 9.31
8th Trinity (TX) SCAC 0.3245 44.31 11.86 40.58 43.20 2.86 10.21
9th Claremont-M-S SCIAC 0.3140 43.36 11.95 40.49 42.65 3.74 10.50
10th Chicago UAA 0.3098 41.46 10.48 37.85 46.39 2.92 11.13

ViPR Division 3 Adjusted Top 10 Defenses

Rnk. Team Conference O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Johns Hopkins Centennial 0.0079 20.98 20.19 19.89 64.45 6.13 6.65
2nd Berry SAA 0.0258 22.12 19.53 20.65 63.83 6.51 5.03
3rd Chicago UAA 0.0272 20.23 17.52 19.43 65.63 5.69 5.41
4th Carthage CCIW 0.0308 21.32 18.24 20.29 63.43 6.22 4.04
5th Claremont-M-S SCIAC 0.0321 21.16 17.95 19.75 64.33 6.58 6.26
6th Birmingham-So. SAA 0.0340 23.57 20.17 22.20 61.60 7.60 5.50
7th Calvin Michigan Intercol. Ath. Assn. 0.0342 22.81 19.38 21.89 62.21 7.01 5.80
8th Colorado Col. SCAC 0.0372 22.30 18.58 21.22 64.03 5.73 5.04
9th Wesleyan (CT) NESCAC 0.0395 21.50 17.55 20.38 63.68 4.32 7.33
10th Transylvania HCAC 0.0436 22.76 18.40 21.02 62.34 5.20 6.10

Conference Rankings

Rank Conference Average RM-1 RM-2 RM-3 Composite
1st WIAC 1,493.9793 1,493.2711 1,491.4366 1,484.1510 1,490.7095
2nd UAA 1,470.3093 1,474.9816 1,486.9240 1,489.0417 1,480.3142
3rd MIAC 1,450.4691 1,462.4845 1,468.4390 1,463.4835 1,461.2190
4th OAC 1,432.4530 1,447.7075 1,459.4134 1,466.0498 1,451.4059
5th SCAC 1,443.3342 1,438.3567 1,431.3179 1,426.6208 1,434.9074
6th SCIAC 1,425.4746 1,427.9836 1,430.6549 1,435.7540 1,429.9668
7th SAA 1,424.8094 1,426.7067 1,417.4675 1,428.6890 1,424.4181
8th CCIW 1,427.6336 1,418.1252 1,416.8939 1,423.1664 1,421.4548
9th American Rivers 1,412.0192 1,410.6596 1,410.3236 1,413.8494 1,411.7130
10th Michigan Intercol. Ath. Assn. 1,424.2851 1,410.6634 1,394.4570 1,396.6736 1,406.5198
- - Complete Division Rankings - -

Division 3 Point Percentage Leaders

Offense
Team Conference S SP SP%
Hollins ODAC 1,883 1,222 64.90
Baruch CUNYAC 1,916 1,224 63.88
Va. Wesleyan ODAC 2,800 1,782 63.64
Old Westbury Skyline 1,315 821 62.43
Notre Dame (MD) CSAC 1,935 1,202 62.12
Johns Hopkins Centennial 2,398 1,486 61.97
Plymouth St. Little East 2,934 1,818 61.96
Wilson CSAC 1,396 859 61.53
Manhattanville Skyline 2,205 1,352 61.32
Westminster (PA) PAC 2,430 1,489 61.28
Defense
Team Conference OS SPA SO%
Babson NEWMAC 1,953 699 64.21
Emory UAA 1,816 690 62.00
Johns Hopkins Centennial 1,558 592 62.00
Tufts NESCAC 1,498 581 61.22
Wesleyan (CT) NESCAC 1,344 531 60.49
Endicott CCC 2,003 806 59.76
Claremont-M-S SCIAC 1,821 739 59.42
Berry SAA 1,207 493 59.16
Wentworth CCC 1,935 792 59.07
Benedictine (IL) NACC 1,782 737 58.64

The Best Games in Division 3

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

83.78

2019-10-04 Notre Dame, Ind.
St. Mary's (IN)
Kalamazoo
3
2
26
24
21
25
19
25
25
18
15
9
GAME

83.43

2019-08-30 Winona, Minn.
Saint Mary's (MN)
Wis.-Superior
3
2
25
21
25
9
22
25
21
25
15
6
GAME

82.67

2019-09-18 Winona, Minn.
Saint Mary's (MN)
Hamline
1
3
20
25
25
23
23
25
21
25
GAME

82.43

2019-11-01
Wis.-Whitewater
Wis.-Stevens Point
2
3
28
30
25
23
25
23
25
27
12
15
GAME

82.11

2019-10-05 Greenville, Pa.
Wash. & Jeff.
Saint Vincent
3
2
24
26
25
22
25
22
22
25
15
11
GAME

82.08

2019-09-18 Chicago, IL
Chicago
Calvin
3
1
28
26
28
26
25
27
27
25
GAME

80.39

2019-10-18 Middletown, Conn.
Wesleyan (CT)
Juniata
3
2
26
28
25
23
26
28
25
20
16
14
GAME

79.75

2019-10-19 Winona, Minn.
Saint Mary's (MN)
St. Olaf
3
1
21
25
25
13
25
17
25
18
GAME

79.63

2019-11-02 Atlanta, GA
Wash. & Lee
Birmingham-So.
2
3
17
25
25
23
15
25
26
24
15
17
GAME

79.29

2019-10-19
Wis.-Stevens Point
Wis.-Eau Claire
1
3
35
37
21
25
26
24
20
25

HuskerGeek All-Americans

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S
S
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
S
S

3rd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
S
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 40.0833
2 32.6660
3 28.6347
4 28.6215
5 27.1549
6 27.0392
7 26.7114
8 25.9921
9 25.8466
10 25.8192

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 22.7646
2 19.5970
3 18.2609
4 17.9623
5 17.2454
6 17.0295
7 16.9762
8 16.0970
9 16.0250
10 15.4074

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 25.2847
2 24.0560
3 21.9211
4 21.7378
5 21.6317
6 21.1687
7 20.8617
8 20.5979
9 19.9132
10 19.5907

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.3106
2 0.3083
3 0.2886
4 0.2788
5 0.2688
6 0.2636
7 0.2626
8 0.2580
9 0.2564
10 0.2520

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.2333
2 0.1872
3 0.1778
4 0.1751
5 0.1712
6 0.1675
7 0.1618
8 0.1614
9 0.1602
10 0.1568

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2841
2 0.2752
3 0.2482
4 0.2374
5 0.2061
6 0.2058
7 0.2053
8 0.2036
9 0.1996
10 0.1979


The Best Division Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the division which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-America Teams – All America teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate HuskerGeek All-American Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly, Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek