Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

Big Ten - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Wisconsin 1,709.0783 1,713.6709 1,711.3731 60.53 66.23 0.332
2nd Nebraska 1,672.3184 1,681.1325 1,676.7196 58.81 64.10 0.299
3rd Penn St. 1,622.3018 1,626.2824 1,624.2909 55.49 62.19 0.216
4th Purdue 1,613.6131 1,615.9200 1,614.7661 55.24 60.62 0.206
5th Minnesota 1,603.9551 1,609.5449 1,606.7476 57.04 60.18 0.211
6th Indiana 1,589.7755 1,596.1116 1,592.9404 55.18 58.57 0.162
7th Ohio St. 1,543.3679 1,551.1898 1,547.2739 55.40 55.83 0.148
8th Northwestern 1,542.7694 1,547.9113 1,545.3382 52.98 56.60 0.130
9th Michigan St. 1,525.8431 1,531.8845 1,528.8608 52.30 55.78 0.125
10th Illinois 1,517.3377 1,518.6135 1,517.9755 52.73 54.63 0.111
11th Maryland 1,488.5985 1,496.4444 1,492.5163 50.63 55.17 0.086
12th Michigan 1,484.1051 1,486.0426 1,485.0735 52.20 52.13 0.063
13th Rutgers 1,468.0742 1,474.0549 1,471.0615 50.13 53.32 0.060
14th Iowa 1,427.8473 1,436.2805 1,432.0577 50.90 51.40 0.037

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Wisconsin 0.3921 47.66 8.45 44.19 41.14 2.62 8.06
2nd Nebraska 0.3520 48.01 12.82 44.02 37.26 4.81 6.27
3rd Purdue 0.3340 44.24 10.84 40.34 43.18 4.13 5.92
4th Penn St. 0.3213 45.14 13.01 41.28 41.60 4.69 6.31
5th Minnesota 0.3065 41.80 11.15 38.36 46.10 4.86 7.98
6th Ohio St. 0.2928 42.61 13.33 38.56 44.14 5.56 7.71
7th Indiana 0.2921 42.30 13.09 38.40 42.41 4.81 8.17
8th Northwestern 0.2903 41.70 12.67 37.94 43.93 4.32 6.79
9th Michigan St. 0.2646 41.81 15.35 37.98 41.87 6.24 7.33
10th Illinois 0.2604 39.85 13.81 35.75 46.12 4.93 7.94
11th Rutgers 0.2517 38.95 13.78 36.21 45.88 5.82 5.80
12th Maryland 0.2470 39.89 15.20 36.20 45.60 5.93 6.91
13th Iowa 0.2376 36.18 12.42 33.11 50.85 5.05 7.48
14th Michigan 0.2351 38.72 15.21 35.40 44.71 6.12 9.56

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Nebraska 0.0527 25.58 20.30 24.34 55.72 9.14 3.60
2nd Wisconsin 0.0600 26.09 20.09 24.99 56.00 9.96 4.89
3rd Minnesota 0.0960 28.64 19.05 27.68 54.98 8.44 7.27
4th Penn St. 0.1048 29.63 19.15 28.26 53.19 9.37 3.45
5th Purdue 0.1277 30.65 17.89 28.76 52.63 8.20 4.66
6th Indiana 0.1306 31.29 18.23 29.80 53.44 8.37 4.76
7th Michigan St. 0.1393 31.12 17.19 28.36 52.86 6.91 6.64
8th Ohio St. 0.1448 31.08 16.60 28.77 53.78 6.19 6.68
9th Illinois 0.1496 31.92 16.96 29.12 50.29 7.74 6.53
10th Northwestern 0.1599 32.74 16.74 30.38 51.79 7.00 5.84
11th Maryland 0.1608 33.56 17.49 31.75 49.55 8.26 7.01
12th Michigan 0.1717 32.57 15.39 30.19 52.81 6.31 6.69
13th Rutgers 0.1919 35.53 16.34 33.41 49.07 6.64 5.72
14th Iowa 0.2008 35.52 15.44 32.07 48.92 6.02 7.48

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,560.4996 1,558.6304 1,555.5783 1,555.8023 1,557.6277
Difference -1.8693 -4.9213 -4.6973 -3.8293

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Wisconsin 119 2,808 1,493 184 270 53.17 15.3 10.4 2,248 895 126 227 60.19 17.8 9.9
Nebraska 121 2,861 1,477 143 309 51.63 20.0 9.3 2,343 980 104 325 58.17 22.5 7.2
Penn St. 120 2,720 1,344 141 253 49.41 19.3 10.8 2,433 1,053 100 278 56.72 24.3 8.8
Indiana 122 2,806 1,434 215 286 51.11 13.1 9.8 2,475 1,128 127 268 54.42 19.5 9.2
Minnesota 113 2,503 1,256 169 244 50.18 14.8 10.3 2,386 1,093 186 243 54.19 12.8 9.8
Purdue 125 2,815 1,350 132 227 47.96 21.3 12.4 2,661 1,207 142 266 54.64 18.7 10.0
Michigan St. 116 2,532 1,228 163 319 48.50 15.5 7.9 2,485 1,201 173 280 51.67 14.4 8.9
Northwestern 113 2,450 1,180 149 210 48.16 16.4 11.7 2,394 1,153 153 248 51.84 15.6 9.7
Maryland 114 2,422 1,153 160 251 47.61 15.1 9.6 2,436 1,183 181 270 51.44 13.5 9.0
Ohio St. 108 2,340 1,141 150 220 48.76 15.6 10.6 2,415 1,206 180 239 50.06 13.4 10.1
Illinois 115 2,428 1,164 176 269 47.94 13.8 9.0 2,512 1,247 171 216 50.36 14.7 11.6
Rutgers 115 2,400 1,142 136 240 47.58 17.6 10.0 2,496 1,242 154 276 50.24 16.2 9.0
Iowa 111 2,267 1,073 162 206 47.33 14.0 11.0 2,556 1,338 203 199 47.65 12.6 12.8
Michigan 102 2,087 968 176 268 46.38 11.9 7.8 2,328 1,232 169 240 47.08 13.8 9.7
Conference Average 115 2,531 1,243 161 255 48.98 16.0 10.0 2,441 1,154 155 255 52.76 16.4 9.7
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

HuskerGeek Big Ten All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 30.6764
2 28.2282
3 25.6902
4 25.1091
5 25.0167
6 25.0138
7 24.9378
8 24.7967
9 24.3681
10 23.6364

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 20.8674
2 17.8952
3 16.8275
4 16.2770
5 16.2081
6 15.9220
7 15.6576
8 14.7451
9 14.5250
10 14.3971

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 19.7322
2 16.7548
3 16.7256
4 15.6622
5 14.0519
6 13.0945
7 12.7348
8 12.7138
9 12.4115
10 11.5704

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2454
2 0.2375
3 0.2338
4 0.2258
5 0.2222
6 0.2177
7 0.2138
8 0.2110
9 0.2067
10 0.2033

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1669
2 0.1476
3 0.1434
4 0.1432
5 0.1371
6 0.1349
7 0.1334
8 0.1297
9 0.1296
10 0.1294

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1579
2 0.1483
3 0.1374
4 0.1371
5 0.1350
6 0.1244
7 0.1190
8 0.1147
9 0.1059
10 0.1042


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek