Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

AAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st Cincinnati 1,715.7610 1,680.2135 1,697.8943 50.98 63.92 0.128
2nd UCF 1,711.2595 1,677.6334 1,694.3630 51.45 63.78 0.149
3rd SMU 1,639.7671 1,607.2579 1,623.4311 50.68 58.83 0.079
4th Tulane 1,633.7477 1,604.1347 1,618.8735 49.11 59.57 0.068
5th Tulsa 1,598.8635 1,564.5387 1,581.6080 49.89 53.37 0.026
6th Houston 1,591.0086 1,559.1179 1,574.9826 48.25 56.06 0.011
7th Wichita St. 1,582.0722 1,545.4612 1,563.6595 46.22 55.98 0.012
8th Temple 1,564.0727 1,539.1993 1,551.5861 45.66 56.90 0.015
9th Memphis 1,566.0516 1,528.1741 1,546.9969 46.86 53.50 -0.010
10th East Carolina 1,561.1069 1,526.0521 1,543.4800 43.28 55.96 0.005
11th UConn 1,548.9058 1,512.1005 1,530.3925 43.87 55.80 -0.003
12th South Fla. 1,524.3798 1,495.2738 1,509.7567 46.49 52.18 -0.021

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st Cincinnati 0.3308 46.37 13.29 43.08 39.14 5.60 8.82
2nd UCF 0.3081 41.25 10.44 38.50 46.47 4.17 6.00
3rd SMU 0.2519 39.04 13.85 36.46 45.62 6.37 5.46
4th East Carolina 0.2350 36.10 12.61 33.00 50.04 4.41 5.04
5th Tulane 0.2196 36.75 14.79 33.88 48.44 5.65 7.31
6th Wichita St. 0.2166 35.99 14.33 33.67 50.67 5.19 5.90
7th Temple 0.2166 35.38 13.72 33.15 50.42 4.93 5.38
8th Memphis 0.2126 36.91 15.66 33.82 49.13 6.32 6.70
9th South Fla. 0.2099 35.97 14.98 33.89 51.30 5.10 6.42
10th Houston 0.2045 33.60 13.15 30.89 51.54 5.10 6.56
11th Tulsa 0.2001 34.79 14.78 31.85 50.37 5.72 5.86
12th UConn 0.1933 34.63 15.30 32.50 51.23 5.13 5.65

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st Tulane 0.1515 32.24 17.09 30.09 52.61 7.41 6.81
2nd UCF 0.1589 32.35 16.46 30.46 52.61 8.38 3.42
3rd SMU 0.1730 32.42 15.12 30.55 54.78 6.11 6.03
4th Tulsa 0.1737 32.66 15.30 30.26 52.72 6.50 5.58
5th Houston 0.1935 34.86 15.50 32.89 49.84 6.06 5.03
6th UConn 0.1965 35.48 15.83 33.44 49.61 6.08 6.17
7th Temple 0.2015 35.46 15.31 33.48 50.63 5.22 6.12
8th Cincinnati 0.2027 33.85 13.58 31.84 52.70 5.11 4.09
9th Wichita St. 0.2050 36.45 15.95 33.57 50.29 6.32 5.05
10th Memphis 0.2229 36.33 14.04 33.80 50.52 5.27 5.44
11th East Carolina 0.2302 36.85 13.84 34.47 48.51 5.49 6.52
12th South Fla. 0.2304 37.25 14.21 34.88 47.35 5.67 7.11

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,586.4187 1,582.9373 1,575.5772 1,572.9511 1,579.4711
Difference -3.4814 -10.8415 -13.4676 -9.2635

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
Cincinnati 125 2,573 1,234 208 251 47.96 12.4 10.3 2,216 872 93 218 60.65 23.8 10.2
UCF 117 2,663 1,267 140 201 47.58 19.0 13.2 2,297 916 85 218 60.12 27.0 10.5
Tulane 128 2,739 1,309 181 229 47.79 15.1 12.0 2,508 1,072 168 247 57.26 14.9 10.2
SMU 106 2,404 1,169 107 159 48.63 22.5 15.1 2,242 987 130 167 55.98 17.2 13.4
East Carolina 119 2,575 1,169 135 212 45.40 19.1 12.1 2,545 1,135 154 213 55.40 16.5 11.9
Memphis 110 2,358 1,136 158 244 48.18 14.9 9.7 2,336 1,115 116 217 52.27 20.1 10.8
Houston 142 2,920 1,370 177 262 46.92 16.5 11.1 2,985 1,390 152 258 53.43 19.6 11.6
Temple 95 2,070 916 101 152 44.25 20.5 13.6 2,077 925 118 178 55.47 17.6 11.7
Tulsa 132 2,735 1,320 145 232 48.26 18.9 11.8 2,765 1,371 164 255 50.42 16.9 10.8
UConn 104 2,124 932 104 175 43.88 20.4 12.1 2,247 1,033 133 171 54.03 16.9 13.1
Wichita St. 105 2,149 934 106 174 43.46 20.3 12.4 2,342 1,130 119 231 51.75 19.7 10.1
South Fla. 113 2,194 977 128 190 44.53 17.1 11.5 2,421 1,220 169 210 49.61 14.3 11.5
Conference Average 116 2,459 1,144 141 207 46.40 18.1 12.1 2,415 1,097 133 215 54.70 18.7 11.3
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the AAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

81.52

2019-11-08
Wichita St.
SMU
1
3
23
25
28
26
18
25
29
31
GAME

79.57

2019-11-24 Orlando, FL
Cincinnati
UCF
2
3
25
21
16
25
24
26
26
24
10
15
GAME

77.49

2019-10-13
Tulsa
Houston
1
3
26
28
23
25
25
22
23
25
GAME

77.12

2019-10-13
Wichita St.
Tulane
2
3
27
25
25
22
17
25
25
27
11
15
GAME

76.79

2019-10-20 New Orleans, La.
Tulane
East Carolina
2
3
25
14
25
23
17
25
27
29
8
15
GAME

76.49

2019-11-10
UCF
Cincinnati
1
3
22
25
25
23
14
25
21
25
GAME

76.25

2019-11-03
SMU
UCF
1
3
24
26
25
20
21
25
19
25
GAME

75.84

2019-10-04
SMU
Tulsa
3
2
18
25
25
13
25
22
23
25
17
15
GAME

75.46

2019-10-04
Cincinnati
UCF
3
0
25
19
26
24
25
20
GAME

75.35

2019-11-03 New Orleans, La.
Tulane
Tulsa
3
2
23
25
25
20
25
23
23
25
15
13

HuskerGeek AAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 37.6331
2 30.8183
3 27.5685
4 26.6213
5 26.4743
6 23.3401
7 22.3998
8 20.7455
9 20.4660
10 19.8469

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 28.1643
2 19.5307
3 15.8663
4 15.7789
5 15.1694
6 14.1695
7 13.2604
8 11.7154
9 11.3590
10 10.9864

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 24.9149
2 21.9564
3 18.5314
4 18.2194
5 16.4337
6 14.3861
7 14.3033
8 13.7470
9 13.2038
10 12.0713

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.3390
2 0.2703
3 0.2498
4 0.2317
5 0.2164
6 0.1995
7 0.1965
8 0.1819
9 0.1804
10 0.1802

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.2537
2 0.1713
3 0.1489
4 0.1367
5 0.1337
6 0.1333
7 0.1275
8 0.1121
9 0.1057
10 0.1033

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.2026
2 0.1748
3 0.1639
4 0.1531
5 0.1447
6 0.1381
7 0.1337
8 0.1296
9 0.1223
10 0.1183


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek