Nerdly Nebraska.

2023-2024 HuskerGeek Ratings Leaders

Sport School Rating
ViPR D1 Volleyball Wisconsin 1,711.3731

AAC - Conference Overview

Conference Division: Division 1
Rnk. Team Résumé Recent ViPR Adj SP% Adj SO% Adj. Hit Mar.
1st UCF 1,583.7439 1,587.2957 1,585.5188 56.62 59.89 0.174
2nd Houston 1,499.2054 1,503.9546 1,501.5781 52.14 56.42 0.070
3rd Cincinnati 1,486.4352 1,494.0834 1,490.2544 51.36 54.79 0.040
4th SMU 1,476.8491 1,482.8501 1,479.8465 49.30 55.79 0.057
5th Wichita St. 1,467.4062 1,473.9957 1,470.6973 52.15 51.31 0.062
6th Tulane 1,436.9863 1,442.9957 1,439.9879 49.65 54.06 0.032
7th Tulsa 1,408.3990 1,415.1080 1,411.7495 49.38 51.56 -0.002
8th Memphis 1,396.3047 1,406.9928 1,401.6386 49.43 49.73 -0.035
9th East Carolina 1,387.8682 1,390.5378 1,389.2023 50.02 50.63 -0.013
10th South Fla. 1,374.8288 1,380.9629 1,377.8925 47.79 47.12 -0.052
11th Temple 1,333.7538 1,342.2878 1,338.0140 47.01 47.83 -0.059

ViPR Adjusted Offenses and Defenses are adjusted to expected values against an average team in the same division.

ViPR Division Adjusted Offenses

Rnk. Team Hit% Kill% HE% AST% O_DIG% O_BLK% ACE%
1st UCF 0.3094 42.54 11.60 39.35 44.91 3.89 8.29
2nd SMU 0.2625 39.07 12.82 35.16 48.46 4.79 5.05
3rd Tulane 0.2444 37.99 13.55 34.18 46.07 5.49 6.34
4th Wichita St. 0.2362 37.85 14.24 34.91 48.99 4.84 6.42
5th Houston 0.2350 36.54 13.04 32.66 47.24 5.18 7.62
6th Cincinnati 0.2303 38.80 15.77 36.19 43.84 5.90 7.63
7th Tulsa 0.2063 33.21 12.58 30.94 53.21 5.25 5.63
8th East Carolina 0.1992 33.40 13.48 30.27 54.57 5.63 5.93
9th Temple 0.1874 34.12 15.38 31.63 51.45 5.95 5.56
10th Memphis 0.1797 34.08 16.10 31.42 51.12 5.13 5.49
11th South Fla. 0.1701 34.10 17.09 30.84 50.14 6.47 7.49

ViPR Division Adjusted Defenses

Rnk. Team O_Hit% O_Kill% O_HE% O_AST% DIG% BLK% O_ACE%
1st UCF 0.1357 31.92 18.35 30.00 52.08 8.80 5.61
2nd Houston 0.1648 32.08 15.60 29.76 52.49 6.49 5.19
3rd Wichita St. 0.1742 33.41 15.98 30.08 52.31 6.04 5.96
4th Cincinnati 0.1900 33.68 14.68 30.96 53.54 5.30 4.61
5th SMU 0.2051 35.32 14.82 33.00 51.97 6.46 5.36
6th Tulsa 0.2084 34.69 13.85 31.92 50.57 5.02 5.67
7th Tulane 0.2122 36.34 15.12 32.43 46.58 6.09 6.23
8th East Carolina 0.2127 37.75 16.48 35.02 46.22 5.47 6.46
9th Memphis 0.2148 36.38 14.90 34.02 50.26 5.95 5.19
10th South Fla. 0.2217 37.26 15.09 33.80 48.09 6.79 7.11
11th Temple 0.2469 39.58 14.89 36.29 44.26 5.68 5.50

Conference Strength

Description Average Remove First and Last Remove Top and Bottom 2 Remove Top and Bottom 3 Composite
Scores 1,444.2164 1,440.3164 1,440.4824 1,440.7840 1,441.4498
Difference -3.9000 -3.7340 -3.4324 -3.6888

Point Totals

Offense Defense
Team Sets S SP SA SE SP% S/SA S/SE OS SPA SAA SEA SO% OS/SAA OS/SEA
UCF 125 2,700 1,438 217 251 53.26 12.4 10.8 2,277 985 147 193 56.74 15.5 11.8
Houston 123 2,699 1,389 214 260 51.46 12.6 10.4 2,454 1,111 142 257 54.73 17.3 9.5
Tulane 121 2,598 1,295 163 255 49.85 15.9 10.2 2,533 1,202 165 209 52.55 15.4 12.1
Cincinnati 113 2,384 1,182 177 206 49.58 13.5 11.6 2,232 1,059 118 223 52.55 18.9 10.0
Wichita St. 117 2,451 1,245 145 220 50.80 16.9 11.1 2,366 1,199 152 242 49.32 15.6 9.8
SMU 114 2,221 1,045 110 186 47.05 20.2 11.9 2,196 1,032 146 212 53.01 15.0 10.4
East Carolina 104 2,174 1,092 124 177 50.23 17.5 12.3 2,296 1,160 159 214 49.48 14.4 10.7
Tulsa 117 2,315 1,121 136 195 48.42 17.0 11.9 2,465 1,232 163 233 50.02 15.1 10.6
Memphis 119 2,358 1,158 132 172 49.11 17.9 13.7 2,462 1,263 135 214 48.70 18.2 11.5
Temple 118 2,225 1,050 135 169 47.19 16.5 13.2 2,506 1,334 147 196 46.77 17.0 12.8
South Fla. 117 2,264 1,075 174 258 47.48 13.0 8.8 2,501 1,368 186 236 45.30 13.4 10.6
Conference Average 117 2,399 1,190 157 214 49.49 15.8 11.4 2,390 1,177 151 221 50.83 16.0 10.9
  • Sets - Team Sets Played
  • S - Serves
  • SP - Service Points
  • SA - Service Aces
  • SE - Service Errors
  • SP% - Service Point Percentage
  • S/SA - Serves Per Service Ace
  • S/SE - Serves Per Service Error
  • OS - Opponent Serves
  • SPA - Service Points Allowed
  • SAA - Service Aces Allowed
  • SEA - Service Errors Against
  • SO% - Team Sideout Percentage
  • OS/SAA - Serves Per Ace Allowed
  • OS/SEA - Serves Per Error Against

The Best Games in the AAC

Game Link EPIC Game Date Location Teams Sets Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 Set 4 Set 5
GAME

74.26

2021-10-22
East Carolina
Tulane
2
3
21
25
23
25
27
25
25
17
6
15
GAME

72.77

2021-10-03
Cincinnati
SMU
3
1
25
23
25
23
24
26
26
24
GAME

72.55

2021-10-08
UCF
Houston
2
3
25
18
23
25
20
25
25
22
12
15
GAME

72.04

2021-11-21
SMU
Houston
3
1
27
25
25
17
17
25
25
23
GAME

71.68

2021-11-26
Tulsa
SMU
1
3
18
25
27
25
26
28
24
26
GAME

71.49

2021-11-21
East Carolina
Wichita St.
1
3
31
29
22
25
33
35
21
25
GAME

71.24

2021-11-05
Cincinnati
UCF
2
3
25
22
25
23
15
25
13
25
11
15
GAME

71.06

2021-11-05
Wichita St.
Houston
2
3
29
27
25
27
18
25
25
17
13
15
GAME

70.85

2021-11-03
Memphis
SMU
3
1
22
25
25
20
25
22
30
28
GAME

69.99

2021-11-26
Houston
UCF
2
3
25
18
25
23
19
25
8
25
8
15

HuskerGeek AAC All-Conference

1st Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
S
S

2nd Team

Name Team Role
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
S

Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Attacker of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Setter of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

Defensive Player of the Year

Rank Name Team
1
2
3
4
5

WPA

Rk. Name Team WPA
1 28.6466
2 25.4758
3 23.9786
4 23.4025
5 22.8214
6 22.3656
7 21.8107
8 20.5904
9 20.1487
10 20.0123

Offensive WPA

Rk. Name Team OWPA
1 17.4854
2 16.6329
3 16.3086
4 15.3393
5 15.0772
6 12.0659
7 11.7705
8 11.7668
9 11.3858
10 11.1869

Defensive WPA

Rk. Name Team DWPA
1 20.6695
2 16.7761
3 16.1603
4 14.5709
5 14.4033
6 13.5960
7 13.2350
8 12.1543
9 12.0137
10 11.7744

WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team WPA/S
1 0.2448
2 0.2235
3 0.2200
4 0.2173
5 0.2149
6 0.2085
7 0.2077
8 0.2000
9 0.1937
10 0.1895

Offensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team OWPA/S
1 0.1665
2 0.1496
3 0.1422
4 0.1323
5 0.1311
6 0.1257
7 0.1241
8 0.1178
9 0.1132
10 0.1131

Defensive WPA Per Set

Rk. Name Team DWPA/S
1 0.1752
2 0.1553
3 0.1483
4 0.1455
5 0.1350
6 0.1301
7 0.1260
8 0.1247
9 0.1154
10 0.1107


Explanations

Conference Strength – The Conference Strength table has two parts.  The first row is a list of averages of the scores for a selection of teams in the conference ranging from all of them under the heading “Average” to an average of teams in the conference if we remove the top and bottom three teams.  This is designed to check if a conference is propped up by its elite teams of held down by its weakest teams.  The Composite score on the far right is an average of those scores.  It is a weighted score where the middle teams have a higher value than the edge teams.  The second row containing difference is simply a measure of how different removing the edge teams makes the conference from its initial average.  If the numbers are positive, then removing the edge teams increases the conferences rating.  If a value grows from the value before it, then the team removed at the bottom of the ratings was rated farther outside of the mean than the team removed at the top of the ratings.  It was weighing the average down so to speak.  The Composite difference at the far right is simply an average of the differences.

The Best Conference Games – A short list of the best games played between two members of the conference which is calculated using the EPIC score of each game.  EPIC score is essentially very simple amounting to adding the teams combined ViPR Rating and the total Win Probability Added scored by each team.

All-Conference Teams – All-conference teams are calculated using Win Probability Added per Set Played and the quality of the team that the player plays on. Team quality is included because better teams tend to have better players and more of them.  This often means that players on better teams have fewer opportunities than standouts on lesser teams.

Awards Lists – Each awards list uses the same formula that is used to calculate All-Conference Teams, and decides based on the focus of the list.  Player of the Year has no limitation on how the player score is added up. While Attacker of the Year must have a higher attack score than any other metric.  Similarly Setter and Defensive Player must acquire most of their score through those metrics.

HuskerGeek
HuskerGeek